Frente a las sendas del cognoscitivismo ético-judicial: algunas inquietudes y observaciones críticas a las propuestas de Luis E. Zamorano y Nelson J. Cuchumbé
This article is a critical review of two papers written by professors Luis E. Zamorano and Nelson Cuchumbé, in which those authors vindicate models of ethical and judicial cognitivism. This critique purports to identify some problematic aspects associated with their cognitivist proposals, and also t...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
- Repositorio:
- Vitela
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/159
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/940
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/159
- Palabra clave:
- Cognoscitivismo ético-judicial
metaética
racionalismo de la decisión judicial
relativismo ético
emotivismo ético
heurística ético-judicial
Ethical and judicial cognitivism
Metaethics
Rationality of the judicial opinion
Ethical relativism
Ethical emotionalism
Ethical and judicial heuristics
- Rights
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
| Summary: | This article is a critical review of two papers written by professors Luis E. Zamorano and Nelson Cuchumbé, in which those authors vindicate models of ethical and judicial cognitivism. This critique purports to identify some problematic aspects associated with their cognitivist proposals, and also to ask some metaethical questions based on those problems. |
|---|