Colombian class action and social rule of law: A propósito de un estudio de caso

This document shows the result of two and a half years of work of the members of the Observatory of judicial activity of the Group of Public Interest Law –POLITES– attached to the research group IJUD of the Law School of Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali, about the effectiveness of judicial prot...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
Repositorio:
Vitela
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/53
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/727
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/53
Palabra clave:
Estado de Derecho
Estado Constitucional y Democrático de Derecho
Proceso Judicial
Acciones Populares
Rule of Law
Democratic and Constitutional State
Judicial Process
Class Actions
Rights
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Description
Summary:This document shows the result of two and a half years of work of the members of the Observatory of judicial activity of the Group of Public Interest Law –POLITES– attached to the research group IJUD of the Law School of Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali, about the effectiveness of judicial protection of collective rights and interests protected by the Class actions, processed in the period 2004-2013 in the Administrative Tribunal of Valle del Cauca. This work then relates the seven (7) categories of study mentioned below: claimants, defendants, collective rights threatened, terms, covenant compliance, economic incentives and legal decision; for this purpose, the guide question was: Does the legal proceedings of a lawsuit class action meets the constitutional purposes devised by the constituent of effective protection of collective rights? The text is developed in two parts: a theoretical part, where the concept of rule of law and transition to constitutional and democratic state of law is analyzed, through the rule of law; and the second, a practical part, in which the result of field research conducted in the first instance judicial body is reflected.