El Ejecutivo carece de facultad constitucional para regular el arbitramento y para señalar tarifas al arbitramento independiente

In 2007, the Colombian government regulated, through the Ministry of the Interior, the procedure and fees fo r institutional arbitration through decrees 3626 and 4089 of September and October of that year. These regulations should not extend to independent arbitration, since the exclusive source for...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
Repositorio:
Vitela
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/144
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/924
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/144
Palabra clave:
Cláusula compromisoria
conflicto
derecho laboral
solución alternativa de conflictos
arbitraje
reserva de ley
jurisdicción
derechos fundamentales
Arbitration agreement
conflict
labor law
alternative dispute resolution techniques
arbitration
matters reserved to the law-making powers of the legislature
jurisdiction
fundamental rights
Rights
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Description
Summary:In 2007, the Colombian government regulated, through the Ministry of the Interior, the procedure and fees fo r institutional arbitration through decrees 3626 and 4089 of September and October of that year. These regulations should not extend to independent arbitration, since the exclusive source for that type of arbitration is the will of the parties to a contrac t. This article will refer briefly to three aspects that should be clarified in order to avoid misunderstandings. First, whether the president has a right to regulate arbitration. Secondly, whether Congress can delegate to the executive the power to legisl ate on arbitration through extraordinary powers. Finally, the application of these decrees, as they are presumed legal, to voluntary and independent arbitration