Reflections and data on abortion in Colombia
Before 2006 Colombia was discussed in a social, moral and ethical dilemma on the decriminalization of abortion in favor of women and even after approved only jurisprudential three aspects. The country is still biased and voices that support their arguments doctrines argue freedom of women as absolut...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
- Repositorio:
- Vitela
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/65
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/742
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/65
- Palabra clave:
- aborto
embarazo
terapéutico
eugenésico
clasificación
abortion
pregnancy
therapeutic
eugenic
classification
- Rights
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
id |
Vitela2_bd829e59c563fffb9ff198364df3c33a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/65 |
network_acronym_str |
Vitela2 |
network_name_str |
Vitela |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Mier Corpas, Ever David2023-03-222023-10-11T03:54:33Z2023-10-11T03:54:33Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/742https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/65Before 2006 Colombia was discussed in a social, moral and ethical dilemma on the decriminalization of abortion in favor of women and even after approved only jurisprudential three aspects. The country is still biased and voices that support their arguments doctrines argue freedom of women as absolute standard forgetting that the person has rights from the start to be conceived heard. On the other hand, there are those who defend or try to prove that abortion in its three forms is unnecessary, proposing solutions to the problem of various kinds, they can be moral, ethical and even religious alternatives. The purpose of this paper is to show the successes and failures in a very objective manner, the approval of abortion in its three forms established by the Constitutional Court of Colombia, progress and solutions to the problem.Antes del año 2006 Colombia se debatía en un dilema social, moral y ético sobre la despenalización del aborto en pro de la mujer y aun después de aprobada jurisprudencialmente sólo en tres aspectos. El país todavía se encuentra parcializado y se escuchan voces, que sustentan sus argumentos en doctrinas que argumentan la libertad de la mujer como norma absoluta olvidándose que la persona tiene derechos desde que empieza a ser concebida. Por otro lado, hay quienes defienden o intentan demostrar que el aborto en sus tres formas es innecesario, proponiendo soluciones de diversa índole al problema, estas pueden ser alternativas morales, éticas y hasta religiosas. El propósito de este escrito es mostrar los logros y los desaciertos de una manera muy objetiva, en la aprobación del aborto en sus tres formas establecidas por la Corte Constitucional de Colombia, los avances y las soluciones al problema.application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/742/626https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2014): Criterio Jurídico; 65-841657-3978abortoembarazoterapéuticoeugenésicoclasificaciónabortionpregnancytherapeuticeugenicclassificationReflections and data on abortion in ColombiaReflexiones y datos sobreel aborto en Colombiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion11522/65oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/652024-06-25 05:12:37.532metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co |
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Reflections and data on abortion in Colombia |
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Reflexiones y datos sobreel aborto en Colombia |
title |
Reflections and data on abortion in Colombia |
spellingShingle |
Reflections and data on abortion in Colombia Mier Corpas, Ever David aborto embarazo terapéutico eugenésico clasificación abortion pregnancy therapeutic eugenic classification |
title_short |
Reflections and data on abortion in Colombia |
title_full |
Reflections and data on abortion in Colombia |
title_fullStr |
Reflections and data on abortion in Colombia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reflections and data on abortion in Colombia |
title_sort |
Reflections and data on abortion in Colombia |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Mier Corpas, Ever David |
author |
Mier Corpas, Ever David |
author_facet |
Mier Corpas, Ever David |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
aborto embarazo terapéutico eugenésico clasificación |
topic |
aborto embarazo terapéutico eugenésico clasificación abortion pregnancy therapeutic eugenic classification |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv |
abortion pregnancy therapeutic eugenic classification |
description |
Before 2006 Colombia was discussed in a social, moral and ethical dilemma on the decriminalization of abortion in favor of women and even after approved only jurisprudential three aspects. The country is still biased and voices that support their arguments doctrines argue freedom of women as absolute standard forgetting that the person has rights from the start to be conceived heard. On the other hand, there are those who defend or try to prove that abortion in its three forms is unnecessary, proposing solutions to the problem of various kinds, they can be moral, ethical and even religious alternatives. The purpose of this paper is to show the successes and failures in a very objective manner, the approval of abortion in its three forms established by the Constitutional Court of Colombia, progress and solutions to the problem. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-11T03:54:33Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-11T03:54:33Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-22 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/742 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/65 |
url |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/742 https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/65 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/742/626 |
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2014): Criterio Jurídico; 65-84 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-3978 |
institution |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Vitela |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co |
_version_ |
1812095046989643776 |