Decisión judicial y Ethos
The modern theory of argumentation belongs to an intellectual movement which vindicates practical reason and tries to establish the limits of scientific reason. However the subject of rational argumentation has been usually stated by studying the forms of persuasive discourse. This formal approach m...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2011
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
- Repositorio:
- Vitela
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/234
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1017
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/234
- Palabra clave:
- argumentación
formalismo
verdad
justicia y modo de ser
argumentation
formalism
truth
justice and character
- Rights
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
| id |
Vitela2_b22a4750130018cf109acae5dc19f1a1 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/234 |
| network_acronym_str |
Vitela2 |
| network_name_str |
Vitela |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Zamorano Aragón, Luís Eduardo2011-06-032023-10-11T03:55:34Z2023-10-11T03:55:34Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1017https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/234The modern theory of argumentation belongs to an intellectual movement which vindicates practical reason and tries to establish the limits of scientific reason. However the subject of rational argumentation has been usually stated by studying the forms of persuasive discourse. This formal approach misses the concern about truth, and in the case of legal argumentation, the concern about justice. In this sense, it is necessary to reassess the argumentation problem in a way that includes both the dimension of truth and the role of the one who is carrying an argument. From the point of view of the law, this means to regain the question about what is just and the awareness of the importance played by the character of the person which is justifying an interpretation. Specially, it must be taken into account the paradigmatic status of adjudication.La moderna teoría de la argumentación pertenece al movimiento intelectual que revindica la razón práctica y busca trazarle límites a la razón físico-matemática. Sin embargo, el tema de la racionalidad argumentativa se ha planteado usualmente en la perspectiva de las formas del discurso persuasivo. Este enfoque formalista pierde de vista la preocupación por la verdad, y en el caso de la argumentación jurídica, la preocupación por la justicia. En este sentido, se hace necesario replantear el problema de la argumentación para que incluya tanto la dimensión de verdad como el papel que juega quien argumenta. Desde el punto de vista del derecho significa recuperar la pregunta por lo justo y el reconocimiento de la importancia del modo de ser de quien justifica una interpretación. En especial ha de tomarse en cuenta el carácter paradigmático de la decisión judicial.application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1017/870https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 1 Núm. 5 (2005): Criterio Jurídico; 51-631657-3978argumentaciónformalismoverdadjusticia y modo de serargumentationformalismtruthjustice and characterDecisión judicial y Ethosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion11522/234oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/2342024-06-25 05:12:39.567metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co |
| dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Decisión judicial y Ethos |
| title |
Decisión judicial y Ethos |
| spellingShingle |
Decisión judicial y Ethos Zamorano Aragón, Luís Eduardo argumentación formalismo verdad justicia y modo de ser argumentation formalism truth justice and character |
| title_short |
Decisión judicial y Ethos |
| title_full |
Decisión judicial y Ethos |
| title_fullStr |
Decisión judicial y Ethos |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Decisión judicial y Ethos |
| title_sort |
Decisión judicial y Ethos |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Zamorano Aragón, Luís Eduardo |
| author |
Zamorano Aragón, Luís Eduardo |
| author_facet |
Zamorano Aragón, Luís Eduardo |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
argumentación formalismo verdad justicia y modo de ser |
| topic |
argumentación formalismo verdad justicia y modo de ser argumentation formalism truth justice and character |
| dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv |
argumentation formalism truth justice and character |
| description |
The modern theory of argumentation belongs to an intellectual movement which vindicates practical reason and tries to establish the limits of scientific reason. However the subject of rational argumentation has been usually stated by studying the forms of persuasive discourse. This formal approach misses the concern about truth, and in the case of legal argumentation, the concern about justice. In this sense, it is necessary to reassess the argumentation problem in a way that includes both the dimension of truth and the role of the one who is carrying an argument. From the point of view of the law, this means to regain the question about what is just and the awareness of the importance played by the character of the person which is justifying an interpretation. Specially, it must be taken into account the paradigmatic status of adjudication. |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-11T03:55:34Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-11T03:55:34Z |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-06-03 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1017 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/234 |
| url |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1017 https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/234 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1017/870 |
| dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali |
| dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 1 Núm. 5 (2005): Criterio Jurídico; 51-63 |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-3978 |
| institution |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Vitela |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1812095057206968320 |