Errores de tipo en Alemania y en Colombia: comparación de Derecho Penal
The article begins by presenting the difference between a mistake in typification, which involves the elements of a crimeís typification, and a mistake in law, which occurs with regard to the legal prohibition of a certain act. Based on this distinction, the article then turns to mistakes in typific...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
- Repositorio:
- Vitela
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/211
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/992
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/211
- Palabra clave:
- Error de tipo
Error de hecho esencial
Error en persona
Aberratio ictus
Dolus generalis
Mistake in typification
Essential factual mistake
Mistake in the person
Aberratio ictus
Dolus generalis
Aberratio delicti
Mistake and causality
- Rights
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
id |
Vitela2_95c951da321e5b941f6b4d6574bdbd1a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/211 |
network_acronym_str |
Vitela2 |
network_name_str |
Vitela |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bott, Ingo2023-03-232023-10-11T03:55:26Z2023-10-11T03:55:26Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/992https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/211The article begins by presenting the difference between a mistake in typification, which involves the elements of a crimeís typification, and a mistake in law, which occurs with regard to the legal prohibition of a certain act. Based on this distinction, the article then turns to mistakes in typification, showing the effect of excluding the intention to harm while preserving negligence. This section also includes the mistake of privileged typification. Afterward, the authors explain the mistake in the person, and, through a series of examples, they consider possible variants of this kind of mistake. This leads to the study of mistakes in the act, as part of the authorsí goal of analyzing aberratio ictus. When this ìmistakeî becomes associated with the eventual intention to harm, another problem arises, which is also analyzed in the article. After this, the authors examine dolus generalis, which refers to the link of causality, that is, to the way the action that gives rise to the criminal act is developed. Next, the article focuses on aberratio delicti, an event solved according to the rule of the intention to harm. Finally, the authors turn to the agentís mistake in deflecting the development of the path of causality, which leads to the problem of objective imputation. One can conclude that there are similarities between the German and the Colombian criminal law systemsí codification and treatment of mistakes.Se presenta la distinción entre el error de tipo, que versa sobre los elementos del tipo de injusto, y error de derecho, que se da sobre la prohibición jurídica del hecho. Se estudia el error de tipo, señalando la consecuencia de exclusión del dolo, con la subsistencia de la culpa; también se incluye en ello el error sobre el tipo privilegiado. Luego se explica el error en persona, considerando posibles variaciones a través de ejemplos. Esto lleva a considerar el error en el acto, en la meta del autor para analizar el aberratio ictus. Al entrar este “error” en relación con el dolo eventual, surge un problema que también se analiza. Posteriormente se contempla el dolus generalis que se refiere al nexo causal, al desarrollo de la acción que origina la acción. A continuación se ve el aberratio delicti, fenómeno que se resuelve según la norma del dolo. Finalmente, ocupa la atención el error del agente en la desviación del curso causal, llegando al problema de la imputación objetiva. Lo anterior concluye la cercanía en la codificación y tratamiento del error en los sistemas penales de Alemania y Colombia.application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/992/847https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 1 Núm. 7 (2007): Criterio Jurídico; 403-4261657-3978Error de tipoError de hecho esencialError en personaAberratio ictusDolus generalisMistake in typificationEssential factual mistakeMistake in the personAberratio ictusDolus generalisAberratio delictiMistake and causalityErrores de tipo en Alemania y en Colombia: comparación de Derecho Penalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion11522/211oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/2112024-06-25 05:12:39.294metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co |
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Errores de tipo en Alemania y en Colombia: comparación de Derecho Penal |
title |
Errores de tipo en Alemania y en Colombia: comparación de Derecho Penal |
spellingShingle |
Errores de tipo en Alemania y en Colombia: comparación de Derecho Penal Bott, Ingo Error de tipo Error de hecho esencial Error en persona Aberratio ictus Dolus generalis Mistake in typification Essential factual mistake Mistake in the person Aberratio ictus Dolus generalis Aberratio delicti Mistake and causality |
title_short |
Errores de tipo en Alemania y en Colombia: comparación de Derecho Penal |
title_full |
Errores de tipo en Alemania y en Colombia: comparación de Derecho Penal |
title_fullStr |
Errores de tipo en Alemania y en Colombia: comparación de Derecho Penal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Errores de tipo en Alemania y en Colombia: comparación de Derecho Penal |
title_sort |
Errores de tipo en Alemania y en Colombia: comparación de Derecho Penal |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Bott, Ingo |
author |
Bott, Ingo |
author_facet |
Bott, Ingo |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Error de tipo Error de hecho esencial Error en persona Aberratio ictus Dolus generalis |
topic |
Error de tipo Error de hecho esencial Error en persona Aberratio ictus Dolus generalis Mistake in typification Essential factual mistake Mistake in the person Aberratio ictus Dolus generalis Aberratio delicti Mistake and causality |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Mistake in typification Essential factual mistake Mistake in the person Aberratio ictus Dolus generalis Aberratio delicti Mistake and causality |
description |
The article begins by presenting the difference between a mistake in typification, which involves the elements of a crimeís typification, and a mistake in law, which occurs with regard to the legal prohibition of a certain act. Based on this distinction, the article then turns to mistakes in typification, showing the effect of excluding the intention to harm while preserving negligence. This section also includes the mistake of privileged typification. Afterward, the authors explain the mistake in the person, and, through a series of examples, they consider possible variants of this kind of mistake. This leads to the study of mistakes in the act, as part of the authorsí goal of analyzing aberratio ictus. When this ìmistakeî becomes associated with the eventual intention to harm, another problem arises, which is also analyzed in the article. After this, the authors examine dolus generalis, which refers to the link of causality, that is, to the way the action that gives rise to the criminal act is developed. Next, the article focuses on aberratio delicti, an event solved according to the rule of the intention to harm. Finally, the authors turn to the agentís mistake in deflecting the development of the path of causality, which leads to the problem of objective imputation. One can conclude that there are similarities between the German and the Colombian criminal law systemsí codification and treatment of mistakes. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-11T03:55:26Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-11T03:55:26Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-23 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/992 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/211 |
url |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/992 https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/211 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/992/847 |
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 1 Núm. 7 (2007): Criterio Jurídico; 403-426 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-3978 |
institution |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Vitela |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co |
_version_ |
1812095063114645504 |