Una defensa pluralista de la investigación jurídica
The main thesis of this article is that the ruling paradigm in research in Colombia is that of empirical sciences, which is why disciplines that take on different kinds of research, like law, must insist that the plural forms of academic research be respected. The argument begins by reconstructing t...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
- Repositorio:
- Vitela
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/171
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/952
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/171
- Palabra clave:
- Ciencia jurídica
ciencias empíricas
investigación
pluralismo
interdisciplinariedad
Legal science
Empirical sciences
Research
Pluralism
Interdisciplinarity
- Rights
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
id |
Vitela2_8ddbbaf8bbc4f2274e7646f06b483a61 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/171 |
network_acronym_str |
Vitela2 |
network_name_str |
Vitela |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Escobar Córdoba, Federico2023-03-232023-10-11T03:55:14Z2023-10-11T03:55:14Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/952https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/171The main thesis of this article is that the ruling paradigm in research in Colombia is that of empirical sciences, which is why disciplines that take on different kinds of research, like law, must insist that the plural forms of academic research be respected. The argument begins by reconstructing the discussion about the scientific character of law, and suggests that many of the hopes to create a “legal science” are unduly reductive. The author then considers the way in which legal research in Colombia is dominated, conc eptually and in practice, by empirical sciences. Afterward, the article highlights the interdisciplinary quality of law, and ends with a few observations that purport to reaffirm, in research, the pluralism of academic pursuits.La tesis de este artículo es que el paradigma dominante en la investigación en Colombia es el de las ciencias empíricas, por lo cual las disciplinas que siguen patrones diferentes, como la jurídica, deben buscar que se respete la pluralidad de formas de investigación. El texto empieza con la discusión sobre el carácter científico del Derecho, y propone que mu chas de las aspiraciones a crear una “ciencia jurídica” son reduccionistas. Luego, el autor pasa a considerar la forma en la cual la investigación jurídica en Colombia está dominada, conceptualmente y en la práctica, por las ciencias empíricas. Después, el artículo acentúa el carácter interdisciplinario del Derecho, y concluye con unas consideraciones que buscan reivindicar, en la investigación, el pluralismo de la academia.application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/952/807https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2008): Criterio Jurídico; 245-2801657-3978Ciencia jurídicaciencias empíricasinvestigaciónpluralismointerdisciplinariedadLegal scienceEmpirical sciencesResearchPluralismInterdisciplinarityUna defensa pluralista de la investigación jurídicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion11522/171oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/1712024-06-25 05:12:38.83metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co |
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Una defensa pluralista de la investigación jurídica |
title |
Una defensa pluralista de la investigación jurídica |
spellingShingle |
Una defensa pluralista de la investigación jurídica Escobar Córdoba, Federico Ciencia jurídica ciencias empíricas investigación pluralismo interdisciplinariedad Legal science Empirical sciences Research Pluralism Interdisciplinarity |
title_short |
Una defensa pluralista de la investigación jurídica |
title_full |
Una defensa pluralista de la investigación jurídica |
title_fullStr |
Una defensa pluralista de la investigación jurídica |
title_full_unstemmed |
Una defensa pluralista de la investigación jurídica |
title_sort |
Una defensa pluralista de la investigación jurídica |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Escobar Córdoba, Federico |
author |
Escobar Córdoba, Federico |
author_facet |
Escobar Córdoba, Federico |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Ciencia jurídica ciencias empíricas investigación pluralismo interdisciplinariedad |
topic |
Ciencia jurídica ciencias empíricas investigación pluralismo interdisciplinariedad Legal science Empirical sciences Research Pluralism Interdisciplinarity |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Legal science Empirical sciences Research Pluralism Interdisciplinarity |
description |
The main thesis of this article is that the ruling paradigm in research in Colombia is that of empirical sciences, which is why disciplines that take on different kinds of research, like law, must insist that the plural forms of academic research be respected. The argument begins by reconstructing the discussion about the scientific character of law, and suggests that many of the hopes to create a “legal science” are unduly reductive. The author then considers the way in which legal research in Colombia is dominated, conc eptually and in practice, by empirical sciences. Afterward, the article highlights the interdisciplinary quality of law, and ends with a few observations that purport to reaffirm, in research, the pluralism of academic pursuits. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-11T03:55:14Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-11T03:55:14Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-23 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/952 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/171 |
url |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/952 https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/171 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/952/807 |
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2008): Criterio Jurídico; 245-280 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-3978 |
institution |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Vitela |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co |
_version_ |
1812095043598548992 |