Sarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and others

After a transitional justice process, different guerrilla groups located in the State of Sarapoa abandoned the fight and merged to the civil life. As part of the peace talks, the government allowed political participation to former members of the guerrilla, through a political party called “Propuest...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2023

Institución:: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali

Repositorio:: Vitela

Idioma:: spa

id	Vitela2_71a649fa780f17daf51ae8c01905c5e5
oai_identifier_str	oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/58
network_acronym_str	Vitela2
network_name_str	Vitela
repository_id_str
spelling	Zapata, Iván DaríoGuillén Ruiz, Laura2023-03-222023-10-11T03:54:31Z2023-10-11T03:54:31Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/732https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/58After a transitional justice process, different guerrilla groups located in the State of Sarapoa abandoned the fight and merged to the civil life. As part of the peace talks, the government allowed political participation to former members of the guerrilla, through a political party called “Propuestas por la Paz”, which elected Aura Bonilla as Congresswoman and Elizabeth Guzmán as the mayor of the capital. Overthrowing and subsequent inability of both women, made by the state ́s General Solicitor, antagonize with the most basic standards on political rights and restricts the cornerstone of the due process of law: the double jeopardy clause. The following lawsuit approaches the problem through the case law of the Inter-American Human Rights Court, taking special care of the institutional design of the State of Sarapoa, and the establishing the international responsibility for it.Tras un proceso de Justicia Transicional, los diferentes actores armados presentes en el Estado de Sarapoa dejaron las armas y se reincorporaron a la vida civil. Como parte de las negociaciones de paz, se permitió la participación política a ex militantes de los grupos guerrilleros, consolidados en el movimiento político “Propuestas por la Paz”, por el cual resultaron elegidas Aura Bonilla, como senadora de la república, y Elizabeth Guzmán, como alcaldesa de la capital. La destitución y posterior inhabilidad de ambas funcionarias, a manos del Procurador General de la Nación, contraría los más básicos estándares en materia de limitación de derechos políticos y vulnera flagrantemente una de las más elementales garantías del debido proceso legal: el non bis in ídem. El presente escrito de demanda aborda el problema a partir del desarrollo jurisprudencial de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, analizando cuidadosamente el diseño institucional del Estado de Sarapoa, y determinando la responsabilidad internacional del mismo.application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/732/616https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2015): Criterio Jurídico; 7-471657-3978Derechos políticossanción disciplinariagarantías procesalesnon bis in ídemcontrol de convencionalidadPolitical rightsdisciplinary actiondue processnon bis in idemconventionality controlSarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and othersCaso Republica de Sarapoa Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzmán y otrosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion11522/58oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/582024-06-25 05:12:37.423metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv	Sarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and others
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv	Caso Republica de Sarapoa Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzmán y otros
title	Sarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and others
spellingShingle	Sarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and others Zapata, Iván Darío Derechos políticos sanción disciplinaria garantías procesales non bis in ídem control de convencionalidad Political rights disciplinary action due process non bis in idem conventionality control
title_short	Sarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and others
title_full	Sarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and others
title_fullStr	Sarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and others
title_full_unstemmed	Sarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and others
title_sort	Sarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and others
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv	Zapata, Iván Darío Guillén Ruiz, Laura
author	Zapata, Iván Darío
author_facet	Zapata, Iván Darío Guillén Ruiz, Laura
author_role	author
author2	Guillén Ruiz, Laura
author2_role	author
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv	Derechos políticos sanción disciplinaria garantías procesales non bis in ídem control de convencionalidad
topic	Derechos políticos sanción disciplinaria garantías procesales non bis in ídem control de convencionalidad Political rights disciplinary action due process non bis in idem conventionality control
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv	Political rights disciplinary action due process non bis in idem conventionality control
description	After a transitional justice process, different guerrilla groups located in the State of Sarapoa abandoned the fight and merged to the civil life. As part of the peace talks, the government allowed political participation to former members of the guerrilla, through a political party called “Propuestas por la Paz”, which elected Aura Bonilla as Congresswoman and Elizabeth Guzmán as the mayor of the capital. Overthrowing and subsequent inability of both women, made by the state ́s General Solicitor, antagonize with the most basic standards on political rights and restricts the cornerstone of the due process of law: the double jeopardy clause. The following lawsuit approaches the problem through the case law of the Inter-American Human Rights Court, taking special care of the institutional design of the State of Sarapoa, and the establishing the international responsibility for it.
publishDate	2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2023-10-11T03:54:31Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2023-10-11T03:54:31Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2023-03-22
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/732
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/58
url	https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/732 https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/58
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/732/616
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv	Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv	Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2015): Criterio Jurídico; 7-47
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	1657-3978
institution	Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Vitela
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
_version_	1812095064047878144

Sarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and others

Publicaciones similares