Commentary to the Award Rendered to the Amparo Directo en Revision 992/2014 of the Mexican Supreme Court. No discrimination in job offers

Judgment 992/2014 decided by the First Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice in Mexico on November 12, 2014, about age discrimination in employment. The Court held that three employment calls published by a food service company in a national newspaper were unconstitutional, mentioning a requisite...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
Repositorio:
Vitela
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/54
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/728
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/54
Palabra clave:
Derecho de acceso al empleo
no discriminación laboral
juicio de razonabilidad en el ámbito privado
Right of access to employment
no labor discrimination
trial of reasonableness in the private sector
Rights
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
id Vitela2_617a36f02a4d7131aba4112fea036a63
oai_identifier_str oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/54
network_acronym_str Vitela2
network_name_str Vitela
repository_id_str
spelling Santiago Juárez, Mario2023-03-222023-10-11T03:54:29Z2023-10-11T03:54:29Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/728https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/54Judgment 992/2014 decided by the First Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice in Mexico on November 12, 2014, about age discrimination in employment. The Court held that three employment calls published by a food service company in a national newspaper were unconstitutional, mentioning a requisite for applying for a position to be within a range of age, which is considered unconstitutional by the Court.En el presente artículo se estudia la sentencia Amparo Directo en Revisión 992/2014, dictada por la Primera Sala de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación (Primera Sala o Corte) el 12 de noviembre de 2014, relacionada con el derecho de acceso al empleo y la no discriminación por razones de edad. En ella se estableció la inconstitucionalidad de tres convocatorias de empleo que una empresa restaurantera publicó en un diario de circulación nacional. En éstas se disponía como requisito para solicitar el empleo, entre otros, el de estar dentro de un rango de edad, considerado por la Corte como inconstitucional.application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/728/612https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2015): Criterio Jurídico; 7-291657-3978Derecho de acceso al empleono discriminación laboraljuicio de razonabilidad en el ámbito privadoRight of access to employmentno labor discriminationtrial of reasonableness in the private sectorCommentary to the Award Rendered to the Amparo Directo en Revision 992/2014 of the Mexican Supreme Court. No discrimination in job offersComentario a la Sentencia Recaída al Amparo Directo en Revisión 992/2014 de la Suprema Corte de México. No discriminación en las convocatorias de empleoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion11522/54oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/542024-06-25 05:12:37.352metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Commentary to the Award Rendered to the Amparo Directo en Revision 992/2014 of the Mexican Supreme Court. No discrimination in job offers
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Comentario a la Sentencia Recaída al Amparo Directo en Revisión 992/2014 de la Suprema Corte de México. No discriminación en las convocatorias de empleo
title Commentary to the Award Rendered to the Amparo Directo en Revision 992/2014 of the Mexican Supreme Court. No discrimination in job offers
spellingShingle Commentary to the Award Rendered to the Amparo Directo en Revision 992/2014 of the Mexican Supreme Court. No discrimination in job offers
Santiago Juárez, Mario
Derecho de acceso al empleo
no discriminación laboral
juicio de razonabilidad en el ámbito privado
Right of access to employment
no labor discrimination
trial of reasonableness in the private sector
title_short Commentary to the Award Rendered to the Amparo Directo en Revision 992/2014 of the Mexican Supreme Court. No discrimination in job offers
title_full Commentary to the Award Rendered to the Amparo Directo en Revision 992/2014 of the Mexican Supreme Court. No discrimination in job offers
title_fullStr Commentary to the Award Rendered to the Amparo Directo en Revision 992/2014 of the Mexican Supreme Court. No discrimination in job offers
title_full_unstemmed Commentary to the Award Rendered to the Amparo Directo en Revision 992/2014 of the Mexican Supreme Court. No discrimination in job offers
title_sort Commentary to the Award Rendered to the Amparo Directo en Revision 992/2014 of the Mexican Supreme Court. No discrimination in job offers
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Santiago Juárez, Mario
author Santiago Juárez, Mario
author_facet Santiago Juárez, Mario
author_role author
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Derecho de acceso al empleo
no discriminación laboral
juicio de razonabilidad en el ámbito privado
topic Derecho de acceso al empleo
no discriminación laboral
juicio de razonabilidad en el ámbito privado
Right of access to employment
no labor discrimination
trial of reasonableness in the private sector
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Right of access to employment
no labor discrimination
trial of reasonableness in the private sector
description Judgment 992/2014 decided by the First Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice in Mexico on November 12, 2014, about age discrimination in employment. The Court held that three employment calls published by a food service company in a national newspaper were unconstitutional, mentioning a requisite for applying for a position to be within a range of age, which is considered unconstitutional by the Court.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-11T03:54:29Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-11T03:54:29Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-22
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/728
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/54
url https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/728
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/54
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/728/612
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2015): Criterio Jurídico; 7-29
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 1657-3978
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Vitela
repository.mail.fl_str_mv vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
_version_ 1812095047029489664

Publicaciones similares