Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho
T he Dw or k i n - B lu ff : R eha b ilitatio n o f N o n - K n o w led g e as a “N e w ” T heor y o f L a w . This study offers some basic remarks on the principal m ethodolo g ical theses of Ronald Dworkin. However, it does not seek primarily to ‘refute’ him, for this indeed is unnecessary given (...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
- Repositorio:
- Vitela
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/160
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/941
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/160
- Palabra clave:
- Metodología del Derecho
mito jurídico básico
ideología jurídica profesional
efecto-Vicente
Methodology of Law
Basic Legal Myth
Professional ideology of lawyers
“Vincent effect
- Rights
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
id |
Vitela2_5e5e0f6a791b37078ce3bfb65f84a230 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/160 |
network_acronym_str |
Vitela2 |
network_name_str |
Vitela |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho |
title |
Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho |
spellingShingle |
Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho P. Haba, Enrique Metodología del Derecho mito jurídico básico ideología jurídica profesional efecto-Vicente Methodology of Law Basic Legal Myth Professional ideology of lawyers “Vincent effect |
title_short |
Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho |
title_full |
Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho |
title_fullStr |
Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho |
title_full_unstemmed |
Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho |
title_sort |
Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
P. Haba, Enrique |
author |
P. Haba, Enrique |
author_facet |
P. Haba, Enrique |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Metodología del Derecho mito jurídico básico ideología jurídica profesional efecto-Vicente |
topic |
Metodología del Derecho mito jurídico básico ideología jurídica profesional efecto-Vicente Methodology of Law Basic Legal Myth Professional ideology of lawyers “Vincent effect |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Methodology of Law Basic Legal Myth Professional ideology of lawyers “Vincent effect |
description |
T he Dw or k i n - B lu ff : R eha b ilitatio n o f N o n - K n o w led g e as a “N e w ” T heor y o f L a w . This study offers some basic remarks on the principal m ethodolo g ical theses of Ronald Dworkin. However, it does not seek primarily to ‘refute’ him, for this indeed is unnecessary given (i) the superficial level at which his reasoning proceeds and (ii) the banal character of his conclusions. Four issues in particular are treated: ( a ) Dworkin adds virtually nothing to the existing corpus of knowledge in Legal Theory; indeed, he operates well below the level of existing knowledge (even in English ! ), essentially ignoring it and disregarding almost all the basic works dealing with the subjects he considers. ( b ) His theses are essentially based on an old commonplace, the B asic L e g al My th : “ O n e Right Answer”; and he stresses that jurists would arrive at such an answer by means of a typical rationalist fantasy, a ‘constructive model’, which derives from the mirage of a perfectly unitary system provided by the national law as a whole (“the principle of unity in law”). ( c ) His basic line of argument amounts to a rehabilitation of a naive realism for legal studies, mainly built upon the ordinary word-naturalism and the faith on a “heaven” of legal ideas (rules, principles, etc.); he commends such an approach as the ultimate method of knowing what law really is (“taking it seriously”). ( d ) It is difficult to see how Dworkin’s international renown could result from the content of his writings: essentially, it must derive, at least outside the Anglo-Saxon world, from the “Vincent effect” (the following of fashion). It is not worthwhile to add yet further observations on those “new” dresses, which have given rise to such meticulous commentaries within Vincent’s Empire; rather we should break the silence over the fact that its Emperor wears no clothes at all ! [Trad.: Prof. Bernard S. Jackson, Liverpool] |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-11T03:55:10Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-11T03:55:10Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-23 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/941 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/160 |
url |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/941 https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/160 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/941/796 |
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2009): Criterio Jurídico; 155-258 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-3978 |
institution |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Vitela |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co |
_version_ |
1812095050437361664 |
spelling |
P. Haba, Enrique2023-03-232023-10-11T03:55:10Z2023-10-11T03:55:10Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/941https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/160T he Dw or k i n - B lu ff : R eha b ilitatio n o f N o n - K n o w led g e as a “N e w ” T heor y o f L a w . This study offers some basic remarks on the principal m ethodolo g ical theses of Ronald Dworkin. However, it does not seek primarily to ‘refute’ him, for this indeed is unnecessary given (i) the superficial level at which his reasoning proceeds and (ii) the banal character of his conclusions. Four issues in particular are treated: ( a ) Dworkin adds virtually nothing to the existing corpus of knowledge in Legal Theory; indeed, he operates well below the level of existing knowledge (even in English ! ), essentially ignoring it and disregarding almost all the basic works dealing with the subjects he considers. ( b ) His theses are essentially based on an old commonplace, the B asic L e g al My th : “ O n e Right Answer”; and he stresses that jurists would arrive at such an answer by means of a typical rationalist fantasy, a ‘constructive model’, which derives from the mirage of a perfectly unitary system provided by the national law as a whole (“the principle of unity in law”). ( c ) His basic line of argument amounts to a rehabilitation of a naive realism for legal studies, mainly built upon the ordinary word-naturalism and the faith on a “heaven” of legal ideas (rules, principles, etc.); he commends such an approach as the ultimate method of knowing what law really is (“taking it seriously”). ( d ) It is difficult to see how Dworkin’s international renown could result from the content of his writings: essentially, it must derive, at least outside the Anglo-Saxon world, from the “Vincent effect” (the following of fashion). It is not worthwhile to add yet further observations on those “new” dresses, which have given rise to such meticulous commentaries within Vincent’s Empire; rather we should break the silence over the fact that its Emperor wears no clothes at all ! [Trad.: Prof. Bernard S. Jackson, Liverpool]El presente examen se ocupa del caso-Dworkin, visto el sorprendente eco obtenido por ese autor. Son examinadas sus tesis metodológicas , pero el objetivo central no es abocarse a “refutarlas” (resulta superfluo, dado el carácter bastante trivial de ellas mismas y el superficial nivel de los razonamientos en que las apoya), sino que aquí se trata principalmente de hacer ver cuatro puntos claves:a) Dworkin no agrega prácticamente nada al corpus mismo de conocimientos que han ido conformando la Teoría del Derecho, antes bien se queda muy por debajo de estos; en particular, ignora casi todos los planteamientos fundamentales presentados en numerosos estudios, incluso los de autores muy mencionados internacionalmente, con respecto a las cuestiones epistemológicas esenciales implicadas en las cuestiones básicas de la metodología jurídica. b) Sus ideas están fundamentalmente centradas en torno a una reiteración más del habitual Basic Legal Myth , “ one right answer”; para ello recurre a un típico ensueño racionalista (“constructive model”), montado sobre el espejismo corriente de que las respuestas jurídicas se obtendrían de un sistem a perfectamente unitario proporcionado por el derecho nacional (“the principle of unity in law”). c) Su argumentación propugna un realismo ingenuo —especialmente bajo modos del naturalismo lingüístico— combinado con la fe en un “cielo” normativista, como forma de conocer “en serio” el derecho. d) No se ve cómo la celebridad internacional de Dworkin pudiera ser consecuencia del contenido mismo de sus escritos; semejante éxito obedece esencialmente, al menos fuera del mundo académico anglosajón, al efecto Vicente (sumisión a la moda). No es cuestión, pues, de venir a agregar más observaciones de detalle sobre estas “nuevas” vestimentas, que han provocado tantos y tan meticulosos comentarios en el Imperio Vicente: ¡lo principal es romper el silencio sobre el hecho de que su Emperador se pasea desnudo!application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/941/796https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2009): Criterio Jurídico; 155-2581657-3978Metodología del Derechomito jurídico básicoideología jurídica profesionalefecto-VicenteMethodology of LawBasic Legal MythProfessional ideology of lawyers“Vincent effectSu rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion11522/160oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/1602024-06-25 05:12:38.689metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co |