Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho

T he Dw or k i n - B lu ff : R eha b ilitatio n o f N o n - K n o w led g e as a “N e w ” T heor y o f L a w . This study offers some basic remarks on the principal m ethodolo g ical theses of Ronald Dworkin. However, it does not seek primarily to ‘refute’ him, for this indeed is unnecessary given (...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
Repositorio:
Vitela
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/160
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/941
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/160
Palabra clave:
Metodología del Derecho
mito jurídico básico
ideología jurídica profesional
efecto-Vicente
Methodology of Law
Basic Legal Myth
Professional ideology of lawyers
“Vincent effect
Rights
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
id Vitela2_5e5e0f6a791b37078ce3bfb65f84a230
oai_identifier_str oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/160
network_acronym_str Vitela2
network_name_str Vitela
repository_id_str
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho
title Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho
spellingShingle Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho
P. Haba, Enrique
Metodología del Derecho
mito jurídico básico
ideología jurídica profesional
efecto-Vicente
Methodology of Law
Basic Legal Myth
Professional ideology of lawyers
“Vincent effect
title_short Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho
title_full Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho
title_fullStr Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho
title_full_unstemmed Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho
title_sort Su rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derecho
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv P. Haba, Enrique
author P. Haba, Enrique
author_facet P. Haba, Enrique
author_role author
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Metodología del Derecho
mito jurídico básico
ideología jurídica profesional
efecto-Vicente
topic Metodología del Derecho
mito jurídico básico
ideología jurídica profesional
efecto-Vicente
Methodology of Law
Basic Legal Myth
Professional ideology of lawyers
“Vincent effect
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Methodology of Law
Basic Legal Myth
Professional ideology of lawyers
“Vincent effect
description T he Dw or k i n - B lu ff : R eha b ilitatio n o f N o n - K n o w led g e as a “N e w ” T heor y o f L a w . This study offers some basic remarks on the principal m ethodolo g ical theses of Ronald Dworkin. However, it does not seek primarily to ‘refute’ him, for this indeed is unnecessary given (i) the superficial level at which his reasoning proceeds and (ii) the banal character of his conclusions. Four issues in particular are treated: ( a ) Dworkin adds virtually nothing to the existing corpus of knowledge in Legal Theory; indeed, he operates well below the level of existing knowledge (even in English ! ), essentially ignoring it and disregarding almost all the basic works dealing with the subjects he considers. ( b ) His theses are essentially based on an old commonplace, the B asic L e g al My th : “ O n e Right Answer”; and he stresses that jurists would arrive at such an answer by means of a typical rationalist fantasy, a ‘constructive model’, which derives from the mirage of a perfectly unitary system provided by the national law as a whole (“the principle of unity in law”). ( c ) His basic line of argument amounts to a rehabilitation of a naive realism for legal studies, mainly built upon the ordinary word-naturalism and the faith on a “heaven” of legal ideas (rules, principles, etc.); he commends such an approach as the ultimate method of knowing what law really is (“taking it seriously”). ( d ) It is difficult to see how Dworkin’s international renown could result from the content of his writings: essentially, it must derive, at least outside the Anglo-Saxon world, from the “Vincent effect” (the following of fashion). It is not worthwhile to add yet further observations on those “new” dresses, which have given rise to such meticulous commentaries within Vincent’s Empire; rather we should break the silence over the fact that its Emperor wears no clothes at all ! [Trad.: Prof. Bernard S. Jackson, Liverpool]
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-11T03:55:10Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-11T03:55:10Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/941
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/160
url https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/941
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/160
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/941/796
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2009): Criterio Jurídico; 155-258
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 1657-3978
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Vitela
repository.mail.fl_str_mv vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
_version_ 1812095050437361664
spelling P. Haba, Enrique2023-03-232023-10-11T03:55:10Z2023-10-11T03:55:10Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/941https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/160T he Dw or k i n - B lu ff : R eha b ilitatio n o f N o n - K n o w led g e as a “N e w ” T heor y o f L a w . This study offers some basic remarks on the principal m ethodolo g ical theses of Ronald Dworkin. However, it does not seek primarily to ‘refute’ him, for this indeed is unnecessary given (i) the superficial level at which his reasoning proceeds and (ii) the banal character of his conclusions. Four issues in particular are treated: ( a ) Dworkin adds virtually nothing to the existing corpus of knowledge in Legal Theory; indeed, he operates well below the level of existing knowledge (even in English ! ), essentially ignoring it and disregarding almost all the basic works dealing with the subjects he considers. ( b ) His theses are essentially based on an old commonplace, the B asic L e g al My th : “ O n e Right Answer”; and he stresses that jurists would arrive at such an answer by means of a typical rationalist fantasy, a ‘constructive model’, which derives from the mirage of a perfectly unitary system provided by the national law as a whole (“the principle of unity in law”). ( c ) His basic line of argument amounts to a rehabilitation of a naive realism for legal studies, mainly built upon the ordinary word-naturalism and the faith on a “heaven” of legal ideas (rules, principles, etc.); he commends such an approach as the ultimate method of knowing what law really is (“taking it seriously”). ( d ) It is difficult to see how Dworkin’s international renown could result from the content of his writings: essentially, it must derive, at least outside the Anglo-Saxon world, from the “Vincent effect” (the following of fashion). It is not worthwhile to add yet further observations on those “new” dresses, which have given rise to such meticulous commentaries within Vincent’s Empire; rather we should break the silence over the fact that its Emperor wears no clothes at all ! [Trad.: Prof. Bernard S. Jackson, Liverpool]El presente examen se ocupa del caso-Dworkin, visto el sorprendente eco obtenido por ese autor. Son examinadas sus tesis metodológicas , pero el objetivo central no es abocarse a “refutarlas” (resulta superfluo, dado el carácter bastante trivial de ellas mismas y el superficial nivel de los razonamientos en que las apoya), sino que aquí se trata principalmente de hacer ver cuatro puntos claves:a) Dworkin no agrega prácticamente nada al corpus mismo de conocimientos que han ido conformando la Teoría del Derecho, antes bien se queda muy por debajo de estos; en particular, ignora casi todos los planteamientos fundamentales presentados en numerosos estudios, incluso los de autores muy mencionados internacionalmente, con respecto a las cuestiones epistemológicas esenciales implicadas en las cuestiones básicas de la metodología jurídica. b) Sus ideas están fundamentalmente centradas en torno a una reiteración más del habitual Basic Legal Myth , “ one right answer”; para ello recurre a un típico ensueño racionalista (“constructive model”), montado sobre el espejismo corriente de que las respuestas jurídicas se obtendrían de un sistem a perfectamente unitario proporcionado por el derecho nacional (“the principle of unity in law”). c) Su argumentación propugna un realismo ingenuo —especialmente bajo modos del naturalismo lingüístico— combinado con la fe en un “cielo” normativista, como forma de conocer “en serio” el derecho. d) No se ve cómo la celebridad internacional de Dworkin pudiera ser consecuencia del contenido mismo de sus escritos; semejante éxito obedece esencialmente, al menos fuera del mundo académico anglosajón, al efecto Vicente (sumisión a la moda). No es cuestión, pues, de venir a agregar más observaciones de detalle sobre estas “nuevas” vestimentas, que han provocado tantos y tan meticulosos comentarios en el Imperio Vicente: ¡lo principal es romper el silencio sobre el hecho de que su Emperador se pasea desnudo!application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/941/796https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2009): Criterio Jurídico; 155-2581657-3978Metodología del Derechomito jurídico básicoideología jurídica profesionalefecto-VicenteMethodology of LawBasic Legal MythProfessional ideology of lawyers“Vincent effectSu rehabilitación del no-saber en la actual Teoría del Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion11522/160oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/1602024-06-25 05:12:38.689metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co