Imaginarios y marcos valorativos de funcionarios de justicia sobre víctimas de violación sexual en Cali
This paper forms part of a more extensive research project called “From victims to survivors and living persons: integral attention in cases of sexual violation”, developed in Cali, Colombia. The study enquires about the needs of female victims/survivors of sexual violence, and discusses the role of...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2022
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
- Repositorio:
- Vitela
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/384
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/pensamientopsicologico/article/view/112
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/384
- Palabra clave:
- violencia sexual
violencia simbólica
expedientes judiciales
victimización
segunda victimización
Sexual violence
symbolic violence
law files
law proceedings
victimize
second victimization
Violência sexual
violência simbólica
expedientes judiciais
victimización
segunda victimización
- Rights
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Summary: | This paper forms part of a more extensive research project called “From victims to survivors and living persons: integral attention in cases of sexual violation”, developed in Cali, Colombia. The study enquires about the needs of female victims/survivors of sexual violence, and discusses the role of the judicial officials in the process of accusation. The problematization of this situation is aimed at the transformation of services in law enforcement institutions. The paper analyses a series of accusations relating to rape in 25 proceedings from 2000 to 2003, all of them cold cases. Semantic fields, apparently invisible to the official during the reporting process, are exposed. Two conclusions are drawn: first, that stereotypes and prejudices held by judicial officials about the victim affect mediation even before the accuser is given recognition as a victim. Second, that instrumentalization of victims in order to obtain evidence is a dehumanizing procedure, as it may induce self-guilt, shame and a second victimization. |
---|