El derecho romano de la propiedad en la doctrina civil colombiana

This article shows how legal writers in Colombia have frequently adopted the idea that Roman jurists conceived of three divisions within the right of ownership, called usus, fructus, and abusus. The text then turns to primary sources of Roman Law, and shows that this concept was not theorized by Rom...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
Repositorio:
Vitela
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/224
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1007
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/224
Palabra clave:
Derecho Romano
propiedad
Doctrina Civil Colombiana
“zonas ciegas”
cultura jurídica
Roman law
property
colombian civil doctrine
“blind zones”
juridical culture
Rights
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
id Vitela2_52a0dcfb261fa18d050f555319e1ffd6
oai_identifier_str oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/224
network_acronym_str Vitela2
network_name_str Vitela
repository_id_str
spelling Escobar Córdoba, Federico2023-03-232023-10-11T03:55:31Z2023-10-11T03:55:31Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1007https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/224This article shows how legal writers in Colombia have frequently adopted the idea that Roman jurists conceived of three divisions within the right of ownership, called usus, fructus, and abusus. The text then turns to primary sources of Roman Law, and shows that this concept was not theorized by Roman jurists. The analysis continues with secondary sources of Roman Law, underscoring the fact that Colombian authors commonly describe this triple division as a Roman creation, while foreign legal writers on Roman Law generally do not. The article concludes by suggesting that this is one case of what the author calls “blind spots,” referring to the way in which members of the legal community tend to reproduce certain traditional ideas without seeing their real content or origin.El artículo muestra cómo la doctrina civil colombiana ha acogido recurrentemente la idea de que los romanos dividieron el derecho de propiedad en tres propiedades o atributos: usus, fructus , y abusus . Luego, el texto pasa a los textos primarios romanos, poniendo en evidencia la ausencia de esa tridivisión entre los jurisconsultos. El análisis continúa con los textos secundarios de derecho romano, resaltando la manera en que las obras colombianas con frecuencia le atribuyen al derecho romano la tridivisión, mientras los textos extranjeros normalmente no lo hacen. El artículo concluye proponiendo que este es un caso de lo que el autor llama “zonas ciegas,” la manera en que los miembros de una cultura jurídica reproducen ciertas ideas tradicionales sin ver su contenido u origen reales.application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1007/860https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 1 Núm. 6 (2006): Criterio Jurídico; 311-3261657-3978Derecho RomanopropiedadDoctrina Civil Colombiana“zonas ciegas”cultura jurídicaRoman lawpropertycolombian civil doctrine“blind zones”juridical cultureEl derecho romano de la propiedad en la doctrina civil colombianainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion11522/224oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/2242024-06-25 05:12:39.451metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv El derecho romano de la propiedad en la doctrina civil colombiana
title El derecho romano de la propiedad en la doctrina civil colombiana
spellingShingle El derecho romano de la propiedad en la doctrina civil colombiana
Escobar Córdoba, Federico
Derecho Romano
propiedad
Doctrina Civil Colombiana
“zonas ciegas”
cultura jurídica
Roman law
property
colombian civil doctrine
“blind zones”
juridical culture
title_short El derecho romano de la propiedad en la doctrina civil colombiana
title_full El derecho romano de la propiedad en la doctrina civil colombiana
title_fullStr El derecho romano de la propiedad en la doctrina civil colombiana
title_full_unstemmed El derecho romano de la propiedad en la doctrina civil colombiana
title_sort El derecho romano de la propiedad en la doctrina civil colombiana
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Escobar Córdoba, Federico
author Escobar Córdoba, Federico
author_facet Escobar Córdoba, Federico
author_role author
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Derecho Romano
propiedad
Doctrina Civil Colombiana
“zonas ciegas”
cultura jurídica
topic Derecho Romano
propiedad
Doctrina Civil Colombiana
“zonas ciegas”
cultura jurídica
Roman law
property
colombian civil doctrine
“blind zones”
juridical culture
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Roman law
property
colombian civil doctrine
“blind zones”
juridical culture
description This article shows how legal writers in Colombia have frequently adopted the idea that Roman jurists conceived of three divisions within the right of ownership, called usus, fructus, and abusus. The text then turns to primary sources of Roman Law, and shows that this concept was not theorized by Roman jurists. The analysis continues with secondary sources of Roman Law, underscoring the fact that Colombian authors commonly describe this triple division as a Roman creation, while foreign legal writers on Roman Law generally do not. The article concludes by suggesting that this is one case of what the author calls “blind spots,” referring to the way in which members of the legal community tend to reproduce certain traditional ideas without seeing their real content or origin.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-11T03:55:31Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-11T03:55:31Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1007
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/224
url https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1007
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/224
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1007/860
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 1 Núm. 6 (2006): Criterio Jurídico; 311-326
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 1657-3978
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Vitela
repository.mail.fl_str_mv vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
_version_ 1812095059308314624