El uso de documentos y escritos en la audiencia de juicio oral

The coming into effect of the adversarial criminal system in most of Latin America, which occurred during the final years of the previous century and the beginning of the present one, suggests fundamental changes in litigation. One of those changes has to do with the a ppropriate use of documents an...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
Repositorio:
Vitela
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/184
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/965
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/184
Palabra clave:
Oralidad
litigación
sistema acusatorio
juicio oral
impugnación de credibilidad de testigos
escritos para refrescar memoria
escritos de pasada memoria
prueba documental
Orality
Litigation
Adversarial system
Trial hearing
Impeachment on the basis of credibility
Documents and writings to refresh memory
Documents and writings of past recollection
Documentary evidence
Rights
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
id Vitela2_4e0e367b41d5f21529a31787b6ab6927
oai_identifier_str oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/184
network_acronym_str Vitela2
network_name_str Vitela
repository_id_str
spelling Decastro González, Alejandro2023-03-232023-10-11T03:55:18Z2023-10-11T03:55:18Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/965https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/184The coming into effect of the adversarial criminal system in most of Latin America, which occurred during the final years of the previous century and the beginning of the present one, suggests fundamental changes in litigation. One of those changes has to do with the a ppropriate use of documents and writings in the oral trial hearing, an aspect th at was not problematic in the previous mixed-written procedural systems with an inquisitive tendency. The present article approaches that problem and pr oposes the correct use that should be given to documents and writings during the oral trial hearing.La entrada en vigencia del sistema penal acusatorio en buena parte de Latinoamérica, desde finales del siglo pasado y comienzos del presente, plantea cambios fundamentales en la litigación. Uno de esos cambios tiene que ver con el uso adecuado de los documentos y escritos en la audiencia de juicio oral, aspecto que no resultaba problemático en los anteriores sistemas procesales mixtos-escriturales con tendencia inquisitiva. El presente artículo aborda esa problemática y plantea la correcta utilización que se les debe dar a los documentos y escritos en la audiencia de juicio oral.application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/965/820https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2008): Criterio Jurídico; 131-1551657-3978Oralidadlitigaciónsistema acusatoriojuicio oralimpugnación de credibilidad de testigosescritos para refrescar memoriaescritos de pasada memoriaprueba documentalOralityLitigationAdversarial systemTrial hearingImpeachment on the basis of credibilityDocuments and writings to refresh memoryDocuments and writings of past recollectionDocumentary evidenceEl uso de documentos y escritos en la audiencia de juicio oralinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion11522/184oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/1842024-06-25 05:12:38.987metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv El uso de documentos y escritos en la audiencia de juicio oral
title El uso de documentos y escritos en la audiencia de juicio oral
spellingShingle El uso de documentos y escritos en la audiencia de juicio oral
Decastro González, Alejandro
Oralidad
litigación
sistema acusatorio
juicio oral
impugnación de credibilidad de testigos
escritos para refrescar memoria
escritos de pasada memoria
prueba documental
Orality
Litigation
Adversarial system
Trial hearing
Impeachment on the basis of credibility
Documents and writings to refresh memory
Documents and writings of past recollection
Documentary evidence
title_short El uso de documentos y escritos en la audiencia de juicio oral
title_full El uso de documentos y escritos en la audiencia de juicio oral
title_fullStr El uso de documentos y escritos en la audiencia de juicio oral
title_full_unstemmed El uso de documentos y escritos en la audiencia de juicio oral
title_sort El uso de documentos y escritos en la audiencia de juicio oral
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Decastro González, Alejandro
author Decastro González, Alejandro
author_facet Decastro González, Alejandro
author_role author
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Oralidad
litigación
sistema acusatorio
juicio oral
impugnación de credibilidad de testigos
escritos para refrescar memoria
escritos de pasada memoria
prueba documental
topic Oralidad
litigación
sistema acusatorio
juicio oral
impugnación de credibilidad de testigos
escritos para refrescar memoria
escritos de pasada memoria
prueba documental
Orality
Litigation
Adversarial system
Trial hearing
Impeachment on the basis of credibility
Documents and writings to refresh memory
Documents and writings of past recollection
Documentary evidence
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Orality
Litigation
Adversarial system
Trial hearing
Impeachment on the basis of credibility
Documents and writings to refresh memory
Documents and writings of past recollection
Documentary evidence
description The coming into effect of the adversarial criminal system in most of Latin America, which occurred during the final years of the previous century and the beginning of the present one, suggests fundamental changes in litigation. One of those changes has to do with the a ppropriate use of documents and writings in the oral trial hearing, an aspect th at was not problematic in the previous mixed-written procedural systems with an inquisitive tendency. The present article approaches that problem and pr oposes the correct use that should be given to documents and writings during the oral trial hearing.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-11T03:55:18Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-11T03:55:18Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/965
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/184
url https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/965
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/184
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/965/820
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2008): Criterio Jurídico; 131-155
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 1657-3978
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Vitela
repository.mail.fl_str_mv vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
_version_ 1812095056448847872