Second intention healing with guide sutures in mohs surgery: a reconstructive option.
Objective: To determine the aesthetic outcome of healing by second intention with guide sutures in Mohs surgery according to the concave, flat and convex anatomical areas of the face. Materials and methods: An observational descriptive study of a series of cases was carried out with 30 patients over...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
- Repositorio:
- Vitela
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/503
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/salutemscientiaspiritus/article/view/1083
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/503
- Palabra clave:
- Cicatrización por segunda intención
Sutura guía
Aéreas anatómicas del rostro
Aéreas NEET FAIR NOCH
Second intetion healing
Guide sutures
Anatomical aereas of the face
NEET FAIR NIGHT aereas
- Rights
- License
- Derechos de autor 2023 Salutem Scientia Spiritus
id |
Vitela2_256f9ecec6ff4aaebba311334b15aae8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/503 |
network_acronym_str |
Vitela2 |
network_name_str |
Vitela |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Second intention healing with guide sutures in mohs surgery: a reconstructive option. |
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Cicatrizacion por segunda intención con suturas guía en cirugía de Mohs: Una opción reconstructiva. |
title |
Second intention healing with guide sutures in mohs surgery: a reconstructive option. |
spellingShingle |
Second intention healing with guide sutures in mohs surgery: a reconstructive option. Peña-Muñoz, Erika Andrea Cicatrización por segunda intención Sutura guía Aéreas anatómicas del rostro Aéreas NEET FAIR NOCH Second intetion healing Guide sutures Anatomical aereas of the face NEET FAIR NIGHT aereas |
title_short |
Second intention healing with guide sutures in mohs surgery: a reconstructive option. |
title_full |
Second intention healing with guide sutures in mohs surgery: a reconstructive option. |
title_fullStr |
Second intention healing with guide sutures in mohs surgery: a reconstructive option. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Second intention healing with guide sutures in mohs surgery: a reconstructive option. |
title_sort |
Second intention healing with guide sutures in mohs surgery: a reconstructive option. |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Peña-Muñoz, Erika Andrea Fierro-Abella, Eduardo Victoria-Chaparro, Jairo |
author |
Peña-Muñoz, Erika Andrea |
author_facet |
Peña-Muñoz, Erika Andrea Fierro-Abella, Eduardo Victoria-Chaparro, Jairo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fierro-Abella, Eduardo Victoria-Chaparro, Jairo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Cicatrización por segunda intención Sutura guía Aéreas anatómicas del rostro Aéreas NEET FAIR NOCH |
topic |
Cicatrización por segunda intención Sutura guía Aéreas anatómicas del rostro Aéreas NEET FAIR NOCH Second intetion healing Guide sutures Anatomical aereas of the face NEET FAIR NIGHT aereas |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Second intetion healing Guide sutures Anatomical aereas of the face NEET FAIR NIGHT aereas |
description |
Objective: To determine the aesthetic outcome of healing by second intention with guide sutures in Mohs surgery according to the concave, flat and convex anatomical areas of the face. Materials and methods: An observational descriptive study of a series of cases was carried out with 30 patients over 18 years of age, selected from the Oncoderma Clinic in Cali, post-operative for non-melanoma skin cancer through Mohs surgery, who were left in the process of healing by second intention with guide sutures, and after one year they underwent a control with a photographic record of the actress to which a SCAR evaluation scale was applied to measure the final aesthetic outcome. Results: The SCAR scale had an average score of 5.40 (SD 2.91). For the NEET anatomical area the average score was 4.15 (SD 2.2), followed by NOCH with 7.00 (SD 2.94) and the highest average score was for the FAIR area with 8.50 (SD 2, 07). In these scores there were significant differences between the groups (p = 0.001). Of the 20 scars evaluated in the NEET area, the rating was unacceptable only for 2 (10%) scars that scored 9 each. In contrast, the final score for most of the scars evaluated in the FAIR and NOCH areas was unacceptable; In the analysis of the FAIR area, it was found that the general impression was unacceptable for 5 (83.33%) scars of the 6 that make up this area in total, with a maximum score of 11 for 1 scar. The anatomical area NOCH, made up of 4 scars, had an unacceptable general impression for 3 (75%), of them, with a maximum score of 10 for 1 scar. Conclusions: The aesthetic outcome of second intention healing with guide sutures in Mohs surgery in concave anatomical areas was acceptable, but the results in flat areas of the face were unacceptable, as well as in convex areas. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-11T04:35:13Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-11T04:35:13Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-30 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de investigación original |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/salutemscientiaspiritus/article/view/1083 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/503 |
url |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/salutemscientiaspiritus/article/view/1083 https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/503 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/salutemscientiaspiritus/article/view/1083/934 |
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2023 Salutem Scientia Spiritus https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2023 Salutem Scientia Spiritus https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali |
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Salutem Scientia Spiritus; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2021): Revista Salutem Scientia Spiritus; 14-20 |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Salutem Scientia Spiritus; Vol. 7 Núm. 4 (2021): Revista Salutem Scientia Spiritus; 14-20 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
2463-1426 |
institution |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Vitela |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co |
_version_ |
1812095040635273216 |
spelling |
Peña-Muñoz, Erika AndreaFierro-Abella, EduardoVictoria-Chaparro, Jairo2021-12-302023-10-11T04:35:13Z2023-10-11T04:35:13Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/salutemscientiaspiritus/article/view/1083https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/503Objective: To determine the aesthetic outcome of healing by second intention with guide sutures in Mohs surgery according to the concave, flat and convex anatomical areas of the face. Materials and methods: An observational descriptive study of a series of cases was carried out with 30 patients over 18 years of age, selected from the Oncoderma Clinic in Cali, post-operative for non-melanoma skin cancer through Mohs surgery, who were left in the process of healing by second intention with guide sutures, and after one year they underwent a control with a photographic record of the actress to which a SCAR evaluation scale was applied to measure the final aesthetic outcome. Results: The SCAR scale had an average score of 5.40 (SD 2.91). For the NEET anatomical area the average score was 4.15 (SD 2.2), followed by NOCH with 7.00 (SD 2.94) and the highest average score was for the FAIR area with 8.50 (SD 2, 07). In these scores there were significant differences between the groups (p = 0.001). Of the 20 scars evaluated in the NEET area, the rating was unacceptable only for 2 (10%) scars that scored 9 each. In contrast, the final score for most of the scars evaluated in the FAIR and NOCH areas was unacceptable; In the analysis of the FAIR area, it was found that the general impression was unacceptable for 5 (83.33%) scars of the 6 that make up this area in total, with a maximum score of 11 for 1 scar. The anatomical area NOCH, made up of 4 scars, had an unacceptable general impression for 3 (75%), of them, with a maximum score of 10 for 1 scar. Conclusions: The aesthetic outcome of second intention healing with guide sutures in Mohs surgery in concave anatomical areas was acceptable, but the results in flat areas of the face were unacceptable, as well as in convex areas.Objetivo: Determinar el desenlace estético de la cicatrización por segunda intención con suturas guía en la cirugía de Mohs según las áreas anatómicas cóncavas, planas y convexas del rostro. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo de serie de casos con 30 pacientes mayores de 18 años, seleccionados de la Clínica Oncoderma de Cali, post-operatorios de cáncer de piel no melanoma mediante cirugía de Mohs, que se dejaron en proceso de cicatrización por segunda intención con suturas guía, y posterior a un año se les realizó control con registro fotográfico de la ciactriz a la cual se le aplicó una escala de evaluación SCAR para medir el desenlace estético final. Resultados: La escala SCAR tuvo un puntaje promedio de 5,40 (DE 2,91). Para el área anatómica NEET el puntaje promedio fue 4,15 (DE 2,2), seguido de NOCH con 7,00 (DE 2,94) y el mayor puntaje promedio fue para el área FAIR con 8,50 (DE 2,07). En estos puntajes hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos (p=0,001). De las 20 cicatrices evaluadas en el área NEET, la calificación fue inaceptable solo para 2 (10%) cicatrices que obtuvieron puntaje de 9 cada una. Por el contrario, la calificación final para la mayoría de las cicatrices evaluadas en las áreas FAIR y NOCH fue inaceptable; en el análisis del área FAIR, se encontró que la impresión general fue inaceptable para 5 (83,33%) cicatrices de las 6 que componen en total esta área, con puntaje máximo de 11 para 1 cicatriz. El área anatómica NOCH, constituido por 4 cicatrices, tuvo impresión general inaceptable para 3 (75%), de ellas, con puntaje máximo de 10 para 1 cicatriz. Conclusiones: El desenlace estético de la cicatrización por segunda intención con suturas guía en la cirugía de Mohs en las áreas anatómicas cóncavas fue aceptable, pero los resultados en las áreas planas del rostro fue inaceptable, asi como también en las áreas convexas.application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/salutemscientiaspiritus/article/view/1083/934Derechos de autor 2023 Salutem Scientia Spiritushttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Salutem Scientia Spiritus; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2021): Revista Salutem Scientia Spiritus; 14-20Salutem Scientia Spiritus; Vol. 7 Núm. 4 (2021): Revista Salutem Scientia Spiritus; 14-202463-1426Cicatrización por segunda intenciónSutura guíaAéreas anatómicas del rostroAéreas NEET FAIR NOCHSecond intetion healingGuide suturesAnatomical aereas of the faceNEET FAIR NIGHT aereasSecond intention healing with guide sutures in mohs surgery: a reconstructive option.Cicatrizacion por segunda intención con suturas guía en cirugía de Mohs: Una opción reconstructiva.info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo de investigación original11522/503oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/5032024-06-25 05:12:43.222metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co |