Algunas vicisitudes del régimen societario colombiano derivadas de la interpretación constitucional
Corporate law in Colombia ha s experienced difficulties recen tly because of the way in which the Constitutional Court has led the pr ocess of constitutionalization of private law, thereby affecting legal stability in a way that is inconvenient to the proper functioning of the national legal system....
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
- Repositorio:
- Vitela
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/182
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/963
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/182
- Palabra clave:
- Derecho societario
Derecho privado
tribunal constitucional
precedente judicial
constitucionalización del Derecho privado
acción de tutela
Corporate law
Private law
Constitutional court
Judicial precedent
Constitutionalization of private law
Expedited constitutional action
- Rights
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Summary: | Corporate law in Colombia ha s experienced difficulties recen tly because of the way in which the Constitutional Court has led the pr ocess of constitutionalization of private law, thereby affecting legal stability in a way that is inconvenient to the proper functioning of the national legal system. Two elements especially affect the stability and certainty of the system: first, the lack of meticulousness of many opinions of the Constitutional Court, and, second, the legislative branch’s slow response in light of its duty to counteract judicial pr ecedents that affect the basic investment conditions in a market economy. This article analyzes more than ten rulings of the Constitutional Court, arranging them in two time periods, and in them the aforementioned lack of meticulousness is evident: for example, it is very difficult to determine what the rationale of the opinion is, and a deficient use of the doctrine of stare decisis is clearly made, in which the binding force of previous opinions is not even upheld. |
---|