El “iusnaturalismo” de Thomas Hobbes

One of the most controversial issues surrounding the study of Thomas Hobbes has be en his classification as a proponent of either natural law theory or legal positivism. Some authors find in Hobbes the roots of modern legal positivism, while others think he is one of the main figures in the formatio...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2023

Institución:: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali

Repositorio:: Vitela

Idioma:: spa

id	Vitela2_0900f354a5e0f9c4afbab75f0dca0ec0
oai_identifier_str	oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/138
network_acronym_str	Vitela2
network_name_str	Vitela
repository_id_str
spelling	Hernández, Javier Felipe2023-03-232023-10-11T03:55:00Z2023-10-11T03:55:00Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/917https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/138One of the most controversial issues surrounding the study of Thomas Hobbes has be en his classification as a proponent of either natural law theory or legal positivism. Some authors find in Hobbes the roots of modern legal positivism, while others think he is one of the main figures in the formation of the modern theory of natural right s. In this article, the author examines the way in which Hobbes understood and used the concepts of ius naturale and l ex naturalis , and shows the fundamental changes he introduced to these concepts’ previous uses and meanings. Finally, this paper will show that the alleged paradox in which Hobbes fell by using natural law theory to reach a positive law conclusion responds to the fact that he introduced the idea of ius naturale as an unlimited faculty and that he found human reason to be essentially utilitar ian.Uno de los aspectos de Thomas Hobbes que más ha suscitado debates ha sido su clasificación como defensor del iusnaturalismo o del iuspositivismo. Algunos autores ven en la obra del filósofo inglés el germen del iuspositivismo moderno, mientras que otros lo siguen considerando como una de las figuras principales en la edificación de la teoría moderna de los derechos naturales. En el presente trabajo, se hace un estudio del significado y uso que da Hobbes a las nociones de ius naturale y lex naturalis y se presentan los cambios fundamentales que introduce a dichas categorías con respecto a usos y significados anteriores. Dicho estudio permitirá concluir que la supuesta paradoja en que incurre Hobbes al llegar a una conclusión iuspositivista desde los fundamentos del iusnaturalismo obedece a que introdujo la idea de ius naturale como facultad ilimitada y a que da a la razón humana un carácter netamente utilitarista.application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/917/773https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2010): Criterio Jurídico; 35-581657-3978Hobbesderecho naturalderecho positivoparadojaHobbesnatural lawpositive lawparadoxEl “iusnaturalismo” de Thomas Hobbesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion11522/138oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/1382024-06-25 05:12:38.427metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv	El “iusnaturalismo” de Thomas Hobbes
title	El “iusnaturalismo” de Thomas Hobbes
spellingShingle	El “iusnaturalismo” de Thomas Hobbes Hernández, Javier Felipe Hobbes derecho natural derecho positivo paradoja Hobbes natural law positive law paradox
title_short	El “iusnaturalismo” de Thomas Hobbes
title_full	El “iusnaturalismo” de Thomas Hobbes
title_fullStr	El “iusnaturalismo” de Thomas Hobbes
title_full_unstemmed	El “iusnaturalismo” de Thomas Hobbes
title_sort	El “iusnaturalismo” de Thomas Hobbes
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv	Hernández, Javier Felipe
author	Hernández, Javier Felipe
author_facet	Hernández, Javier Felipe
author_role	author
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv	Hobbes derecho natural derecho positivo paradoja
topic	Hobbes derecho natural derecho positivo paradoja Hobbes natural law positive law paradox
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv	Hobbes natural law positive law paradox
description	One of the most controversial issues surrounding the study of Thomas Hobbes has be en his classification as a proponent of either natural law theory or legal positivism. Some authors find in Hobbes the roots of modern legal positivism, while others think he is one of the main figures in the formation of the modern theory of natural right s. In this article, the author examines the way in which Hobbes understood and used the concepts of ius naturale and l ex naturalis , and shows the fundamental changes he introduced to these concepts’ previous uses and meanings. Finally, this paper will show that the alleged paradox in which Hobbes fell by using natural law theory to reach a positive law conclusion responds to the fact that he introduced the idea of ius naturale as an unlimited faculty and that he found human reason to be essentially utilitar ian.
publishDate	2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2023-10-11T03:55:00Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2023-10-11T03:55:00Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2023-03-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/917
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/138
url	https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/917 https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/138
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/917/773
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv	Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv	Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2010): Criterio Jurídico; 35-58
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	1657-3978
institution	Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Vitela
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
_version_	1812095056445702144

El “iusnaturalismo” de Thomas Hobbes

Publicaciones similares