The failed reform to the administrators responsability regime in Colombia

As a result of Law 222 from 1995, there has been presenting a modernization to the administrators liability regime, this is based on Anglo-Saxon dispositions, characterized by its flexibility and dynamism on regulating trade. Therefore, bill 070/2015 was proposed, which presented different mechanism...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
Repositorio:
Vitela
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/52
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/724
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/52
Palabra clave:
Régimen de responsabilidad de administradores
common law
civil law
trasplante jurídico
business judgement rule
reforma
Administrators liability regime,
common law
civil law
legal transplant
business judgement rule
reform
Rights
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
id Vitela2_04f4c88339fb420404aa830c154c0ecd
oai_identifier_str oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/52
network_acronym_str Vitela2
network_name_str Vitela
repository_id_str
spelling Londoño Restrepo, DanielaRiaño Guerrero, Juan Diego2018-01-022023-10-11T03:54:28Z2023-10-11T03:54:28Zhttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/724https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/52As a result of Law 222 from 1995, there has been presenting a modernization to the administrators liability regime, this is based on Anglo-Saxon dispositions, characterized by its flexibility and dynamism on regulating trade. Therefore, bill 070/2015 was proposed, which presented different mechanisms and concepts that were seeking to advancement the topic, mainly oriented by foreign regulations. Finally, that bill was withdrawn from Congress by of the lack of reception. However due to its necessity the bill at some point can resubmit a reform, which seeks the easing of administrators liability regime and achieve to increase the investment in domestic market.A partir de la expedición de la Ley 222 de 1995 se ha presentado una modernización al régimen de responsabilidad de administradores, basado en disposiciones de naturaleza anglosajona, caracterizadas por su flexibilidad y dinamismo en la regulación del comercio. De acuerdo con lo anterior, se propuso el Proyecto de Ley 070 de 2015, en el que se planteaban diversos mecanismos y conceptos que buscaban el avance del tema, orientado principalmente por la normatividad extranjera. Finalmente, dicho proyecto fue retirado del Congreso por la falta de acogida, sin embargo, queda latente la necesidad de que en algún momento se pueda volver a presentar una reforma que busque la flexibilización del régimen de responsabilidad de administradores y se logre aumentar la inversión en el mercado doméstico.application/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javeriana Calihttps://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/724/610https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2016): Criterio Jurídico; 107 - 1331657-3978Régimen de responsabilidad de administradorescommon lawcivil lawtrasplante jurídicobusiness judgement rulereformaAdministrators liability regime,common lawcivil lawlegal transplantbusiness judgement rulereformThe failed reform to the administrators responsability regime in ColombiaDe la fallida reforma al régimen de responsabilidad de administradores en Colombiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion11522/52oai:vitela.javerianacali.edu.co:11522/522024-06-25 05:12:37.315metadata.onlyhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.coRepositorio Vitelavitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv The failed reform to the administrators responsability regime in Colombia
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv De la fallida reforma al régimen de responsabilidad de administradores en Colombia
title The failed reform to the administrators responsability regime in Colombia
spellingShingle The failed reform to the administrators responsability regime in Colombia
Londoño Restrepo, Daniela
Régimen de responsabilidad de administradores
common law
civil law
trasplante jurídico
business judgement rule
reforma
Administrators liability regime,
common law
civil law
legal transplant
business judgement rule
reform
title_short The failed reform to the administrators responsability regime in Colombia
title_full The failed reform to the administrators responsability regime in Colombia
title_fullStr The failed reform to the administrators responsability regime in Colombia
title_full_unstemmed The failed reform to the administrators responsability regime in Colombia
title_sort The failed reform to the administrators responsability regime in Colombia
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Londoño Restrepo, Daniela
Riaño Guerrero, Juan Diego
author Londoño Restrepo, Daniela
author_facet Londoño Restrepo, Daniela
Riaño Guerrero, Juan Diego
author_role author
author2 Riaño Guerrero, Juan Diego
author2_role author
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Régimen de responsabilidad de administradores
common law
civil law
trasplante jurídico
business judgement rule
reforma
topic Régimen de responsabilidad de administradores
common law
civil law
trasplante jurídico
business judgement rule
reforma
Administrators liability regime,
common law
civil law
legal transplant
business judgement rule
reform
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Administrators liability regime,
common law
civil law
legal transplant
business judgement rule
reform
description As a result of Law 222 from 1995, there has been presenting a modernization to the administrators liability regime, this is based on Anglo-Saxon dispositions, characterized by its flexibility and dynamism on regulating trade. Therefore, bill 070/2015 was proposed, which presented different mechanisms and concepts that were seeking to advancement the topic, mainly oriented by foreign regulations. Finally, that bill was withdrawn from Congress by of the lack of reception. However due to its necessity the bill at some point can resubmit a reform, which seeks the easing of administrators liability regime and achieve to increase the investment in domestic market.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-11T03:54:28Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-11T03:54:28Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/724
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/52
url https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/724
https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/52
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/724/610
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2016): Criterio Jurídico; 107 - 133
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 1657-3978
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Vitela
repository.mail.fl_str_mv vitela.mail@javerianacali.edu.co
_version_ 1812095057993400320

Publicaciones similares