Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI)

Incluye figuras, tablas y anexos

Autores:
Ubaque Bernal, Jhoimar De Jesus
Tipo de recurso:
Trabajo de grado de pregrado
Fecha de publicación:
2022
Institución:
Universidad de los Llanos
Repositorio:
Repositorio Digital Universidad de los LLanos
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unillanos.edu.co:001/2849
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/2849
https://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
Degradación de hábitats
Biodiversidad
Árbol ultramétrico
Cuencas biogeograficas
Especies crípticas
MOTU
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos Reservados - Universidad de los Llanos, 2022
id Unillanos2_98f63c1429f0d8dbe43fb5b6b439763f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unillanos.edu.co:001/2849
network_acronym_str Unillanos2
network_name_str Repositorio Digital Universidad de los LLanos
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI)
title Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI)
spellingShingle Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI)
Degradación de hábitats
Biodiversidad
Árbol ultramétrico
Cuencas biogeograficas
Especies crípticas
MOTU
title_short Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI)
title_full Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI)
title_fullStr Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI)
title_full_unstemmed Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI)
title_sort Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI)
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Ubaque Bernal, Jhoimar De Jesus
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv Rodríguez Castro, Karen Giselle
Ramirez Malaver, Jorge Luis
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Ubaque Bernal, Jhoimar De Jesus
dc.subject.armarc.none.fl_str_mv Degradación de hábitats
Biodiversidad
topic Degradación de hábitats
Biodiversidad
Árbol ultramétrico
Cuencas biogeograficas
Especies crípticas
MOTU
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv Árbol ultramétrico
Cuencas biogeograficas
Especies crípticas
MOTU
description Incluye figuras, tablas y anexos
publishDate 2022
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-13T13:28:57Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-13T13:28:57Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Trabajo de grado - Pregrado
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TP
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Ubaque Bernal, Jhoimar de J. (2022). Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI) [Trabajo de grado, Universidad de los Llanos]. Repositorio digital Universidad de los Llanos.
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/2849
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad de los Llanos
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv Repositorio digital Universidad de los Llanos
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv Ubaque Bernal, Jhoimar de J. (2022). Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI) [Trabajo de grado, Universidad de los Llanos]. Repositorio digital Universidad de los Llanos.
Universidad de los Llanos
Repositorio digital Universidad de los Llanos
url https://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/2849
https://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Adnet S, Gismondi R, Antoine P. 2014. Comparisons of Dental Morphology in River Stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae) with New Fossils from the Middle Eocene of Peruvian Amazonia Rekindle Debate on Their Evolution.Naturwissenschaften 101 (1): 33–45.
Albert J, Lovejoy N, Crampton W. 2006. Miocene tectonism and the separation of cis - and trans - Andean rivers basin: evidence from Neotropical fishes. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 21: 1-14.
Albert J, Reis, R. 2011. Historical Biogeography of Neotropical Freshwater Fishes. University of California Press, Los Angeles, California.
Alfonsin M, Bucetto M. 2019. Las especies en peligro de extinción y los mecanismos para la recuperación y conservación de la biodiversidad: un estudio sobre la viabilidad de los mecanismos y las trabas burocráticas. Revista LEX: Universidad Alas Peruanas, 9: 23, 297-324
Altschul S.F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E.W. Lipman, D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol, 215: 403–410.
Angermeier P, Winston M. 1998. Local vs. Regional influences on local diversity in stream fish communities of Virginia. Ecology, 79 (3): 911-927.
Araujo M, Charvet-Almeida M, Pereira H. 2004.Freshwater Stingrays (Potamotrygonidae): Status, Conservation and Management Challenges. Information document AC20: 8, 1-6
Banerjee D, Kumar V, Singha D, Chandra K, Laskar B, Kundu S, Chakraborty R, Chatterjee S. 2015. Identification through DNA barcoding of Tabanidae (Diptera) vectors of surra disease in India. Acta Trop, 150: 52–58
Batista-Morales A, Lasso C, Morales-Betancourt M, Caballero S. 2017. Phylogeography and genetic structure of the species complex of the freshwater stingray, Potamotrygon orbignyi (Castelnau, 1855), among Amazonas and Orinoco rivers. Repositorio Uniandes, 1-56
Beheregaray L, Caccone A. 2007. Cryptic biodiversity in a changing world. Journal of Biology, 6:9
Bermingham, E. Moritz C. 1998. Comparative phylogeography: Concepts and applications. Molecular Ecology, 7: 367-369.
Blaxter M, Mann J, Chapman T, Thomas F, Whitton C, Floyd R Abebe E. 2005. Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci 360: 1935–1943.
Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu C.H, Xie D, Suchard M, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2014. BEAST 2: A software platform for bayesianevolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol, 10(4): e1003537.
Caldas J, Castro-González V, Puentes M, Lasso C, Duarte L, Grijalba-Bendeck M, Gómez F, Navia A, Mejía-Falla P, Bessudo S, Diazgranados M, Zapata-Padilla L (Eds.). 2010. Plan de Acción Nacional para la Conservación y Manejo de Tiburones, Rayas y Quimeras de Colombia (PAN-Tiburones Colombia). Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario, Secretaria Agricultura y Pesca San Andrés Isla, Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, Instituto Alexander Von Humboldt, Universidad del Magdalena, Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Pontifcia Universidad Javeriana, Fundación SQUALUS, Fundación Malpelo y otros EcosistemasMarinos, Conservación Internacional, WWF Colombia. Editorial Produmedios, Bogotá. 60 p.
Cañedo A, Rodríguez-Labrada R, Vázquez-Mojena Y. 2009. Centro Nacional para la Información Biotecnológica de los Estados Unidos: un palacio de la información para la medicina molecular. Revista cubana de los profesionales de la información y la comunicación en salud, 19(4): 19
Carstens B.C, Pelletier T.A, Reid N.M, Satler J.D. 2013. How to fail at species delimitation. Mol Ecol. 22:4369–4383
Carvalho M, Lovejoy N, Rosa R. 2003. Family Potamotrygonidae. 22-29. En: Reis, Feraris R, & Kullander S. Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America. Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 729p.
Carvalho M, Sabaj-Pérez M, Lovejoy R. 2011. Potamotrygon tigrina, a new species of freshwater stingray from the Upper Amazon basin, closely related to Potamotrygon schroederi Fernández-Yépez 1958 (Chondricthyes: Potamotrygonidae). Zootaxa, 2827:1-30
Carvalho M, Paulo J, Silva C, Loboda T, Silva P, Ragno M, Soares M. 2013. Systematics and Evolution of the Highly Diverse and Morphologically Complex Neotropical Freshwater Stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae). Modalidad, Conferencia: 9th Indo-Pacific Fish Conference, en Okinawa, Japan
CBD: Convention on Biological Diversity.2011. [citado 12 de Octubre de 2021]; Disponible en: http://www.cbd.int/
Charvet-Almeida P, Araújo M, Almeida M. 2005 Reproductive aspects of freshwater stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae) in the Brazilian Amazon Basin. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery. Science, 35: 165–171
Cruz V, Vera M, Mendonça F, Pardo B, Martinez P, Oliveira C, Foresti F. 2015. First identification of interspecies hybridization in the freshwater stingrays Potamotrygon motoro and P. falkneri (Myliobatiformes, Potamotrygonidae). Conserv Genet, 16: 241–245
Cruz V, Nobile M, Paim F, Adachi A, Ribeiro G, Ferreira D, Pansonato-Alves J, Charvet P, Oliveira C, Foresti F. 2021. Cytogenetic and molecular characteristics of Potamotrygon motoro and Potamotrygon sp. (Chondrichthyes, Myliobatiformes, Potamotrygonidae) from the Amazon basin: Implications for the taxonomy of the genus. Genetics and molecular biology, 44(2): e20200083.
Darriba D, Taboada L, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods, 9(8): 772.
Dellicour S, Flot J. 2018. The hitchhiker’s guide to single-locus species delimitation. Molecular Ecology Resources, 18(6):1234–1246
Díaz J, Villanova V, Brancolini F, del Pazo F, Posner V, Grimberg A, Arranz A. 2016. First DNA Barcode Reference Library for the Identification of South American Freshwater Fish from the Lower Paraná River. PLoS ONE, 11(7): e0157419.
Drummond A.J, Bouckaert R. 2015. Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis with BEAST. Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press.
Faria V, Rolim L, Vaz L, Furtado-Neto M. 2012. Reevaluation of RAPD Markers Involved in a Case of Stingray Misidentification (Dasyatidae: Dasyatis). Genetics and Molecular Research, 11(4): 3835–45.
Fontenelle J, Marques F, Kolmann M, Lovejoy N. 2021a. Biogeography of the neotropical freshwater stingrays (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygoninae) reveals effects of continent- scale paleogeographic change and drainage evolution. J Biogeogr, 0(0): 1–14
Fontenelle J, Marques F, Kolmann M, Lovejoy N. 2021b. Biogeography of the neotropicalfreshwater stingrays (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygoninae) reveals effects of continent-scale paleogeographic change and drainage evolution. J Biogeogr, 0(0):1–14.
Flot J.F. 2015. Species delimitation’s coming of age. Syst Biol, 64(6):897–899.
Floyd R, Abebe E, Papert A, Blaxter M. 2002. Molecular Barcodes for Soil Nematode Identification. Mol Ecol, 11(4):839-850
Funk D, Omland E. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 34: 397–423
García D, Lasso C, Morales M, Caballero S. 2015: Molecular systematics of the freshwater stingrays (myliobatiformes: potamotrygonidae) of the Amazon, Orinoco, Magdalena, Esequibo, Caribbean, and Maracaibo basins (Colombia – Venezuela): evidence from three mitochondrial genes. Mitochondrial DNA, 1-13
García-Melo J, Oliveira C, Da Costa S, Ochoa-Orrego L, Garcia L, Maldonado Ocampo J .2019. Species delimitation of neotropical Characins (Stevardiinae): Implications for taxonomy of complex groups. PLoS ONE, 14(6): e0216786.
García-Villamil, D. 2012. Molecular systematics of the freshwater stingrays (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygonidae) of the Amazon, Orinoco, Magdalena, Essequibo, Caribe and Maracaibo basins (Colombia- Venezuela): evidence from mitochondrial genes. Tesis de Maestría, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia, Bogotá. 32 pp.
Gonçalves P, Oliveira-Marques A, Matsumoto T, Miyaki C. 2015. DNA barcoding identifies illegal parrot trade. J Hered, 106: 560–564.
Graça W, Pavanelli C, Buckup P. 2008. Two new species of Characidium (Characiformes: Crenuchidae) from Paraguay and Xingu River basins, State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Copeia, 2008:326–332
Hartvig I, Czako M, Kjær ED, Nielsen LR, Theilade I .2015. The Use of DNA Barcoding in Identification and Conservation of Rosewood (Dalbergia spp.). PLoS ONE, 10(9)
Hebert P, Cywinska A, Ball S, de Waard J. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society Lond, 270: 313-321.
Hebert P, Penton E, Burns J, Janzen D, Hallwachs W. 2004a. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the Neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerater. PNAS. 101(41): 12-17
Hebert P, Stoeckle M, Zemlak T, Francis M. 2004b. Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes. PLoS Biol, 2(10):312
Hebert P, Ryan Gregory T.2005. The Promise of DNA Barcoding for Taxonom. Systematic Biology, 54(5): 852–859
Hey J, Waples R, Arnold M, Butlin R, Harrison R. 2003. Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol, 18(11):597–603.
Hoffmann M, Hilton-Taylor C, Angulo A, Böhm M, Brooks. 2010. The Impact of Conservation on the Status of the World s Vertebrates. Science, 2; 330(6010), 1503- 1509.
Hopkins G, Freckleton, R. 2002. Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. Animal Conservation, 5: 245-249.
Hubert N, Renno J. 2006. Historical biogeography of South American freshwater fishes. Journal of Biogeography, 33: 1414-1436.
Jalali K, Ojha R,Venkatesan T. 2015. DNA Barcoding for Identification of Agriculturally Important Insects. En: Chakravarthy K. New Horizons in Insect Science: Towards Sustainable Pest Management, Springer India. Bangalore India, 13-23
Jones M, Ghoorah A, Blaxter M. 2011. JMOTU and taxonerator: turning DNA barcode sequences into annotated operational taxonomic units. PLOS ONE, 6:e19259
Kaur S. 2015. DNA Barcoding and Its Applications. IJERGS, 3 (2): 3.
Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28(12):1647-9.
Kekkonen M, Mutanen M, Kaila L, Nieminen M, Hebert PDN. 2015. Delineating Species with DNA Barcodes: A Case of Taxon Dependent Method Performance in Moths. PLoS One, 10: e0122481.
Kolokotronis S, Leslie M. 2010. Barcoding bushmeat: Molecular identification of Central African and South American harvested vertebrates. Conservation Genetics, 11(4): 1389-1404
Kullander S. 1986. Cichlid Fishes of the Amazon River Drainage of Peru. Swedish Stockholm: Museum of Natural History.
Kuntke F, Jonge N, Hesselsøe M, & Nielsen J. 2020. Stream water quality assessment by metabarcoding of invertebrates. Ecological Indicators, 111: 105982.
Lasso, C. 1985. Las rayas de agua dulce. Natura 77: 6–9
Lasso C, Rosa R, Sanchez-Duarte P, Morales-Betancourt M, Agudelo-Cordoba E. 2013. IX. Rayas de Agua Dulce (Potamotrygonidae) de Suramérica. Parte I.
Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Perú, Brasil, Guyana, Surinam Y Guayana Francesa: Diversidad, Bioecolog+ia, Uso Y Conservación. Serie Editorial Recursos Hidrobiológicos Y Pesqueros Continentales de Colombia. Serie Edit. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Instituto de Investigación de los Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH).
Latrubesse E, Stevaux J, Santos M, Assine M. 2005. Grandes sistemas fluviais: geologia, geomorfologia e paleoidrologia. En Quaternário do Brasil, edited by. Souza C, Suguio K, Oliveira A, Oliveira P. 276–297. Ribeirão Preto: Holos Editora.
Librado P, Rozas J. 2009. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics, 25(11):1451-2.
Lobola T, Carvalho M. 2013. Systematic revisión of the Potamotrygon motoro (Mûller & Henle, 1841) species complex in the Paraná-Paraguay basin, with description of two new ocellated species (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygonidae). Neotropical Ichthyology 11(4): 693-737.
Lohse, K. 2009. Can mtDNA barcodes be used to delimit species? A response to Pons et al (2006). Systematic Biology, 58(4): 439–442.
Lovejoy N, Birminghan E, Martin A. 1998. South American rays came in with the sea. Nature, 396:421-422.
Lundberg J, Marshall L, Guerrero J, Horton B, Malabarba M, Wesselingh F. 1998. The stage for Neotropical fish diversification: A history of tropical South American rivers pp. 13-48. En: Malabarba M, Reis R, Vari R, Lucena Z, Lucena C (Eds. Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Porto Alegre, Brazil, EDIPUCRS. pp 603
Magoga G, Coral S, Fontaneto D, Montagna M. 2018. Barcoding of Chrysomelidae of Euro-Mediterranean area: efficiency and problematic species. Scientific Reports, 8: 13398.
Mason N, Fletcher N, Gill, B, Funk W, Zamudio K. 2020. Coalescent-based species delimitation is sensitive to geographic sampling and isolation by distance. Systematics and Biodiversity, 18(3): 269–280.
Mayr E.1942. Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Meyer C, Paulay G. 2005. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology, 3(12): e422.
Montoya-Burgos J. 2003. Historical biogeography of the catfish genus Hypostomus (Siluriformes: Loricariidae), with implications on the diversification of Neotropical ichthyofauna. Molecular Ecology, 12: 1855-1867.
Nanney, D. 1982. Genes and phenes in Tetrahymena. Bioscience, 32: 783–78
Nielsen R, Wakeley J. 2001. Distinguishing migration from Isolation: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach. Genet, 158(2): 885–896.
Nosil P, Funk D, Ortiz-Barriento D. 2009. Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Molecular ecology, 18(3): 375-402
Olivieri G, Zimmermann E, Randrianambinina B, Rasoloharijaona S, Rakotondravony D, Guschanski K, Radespiel U. 2007.The ever-increasing diversity in mouse lemurs: three new species in north and northwestern Madagascar. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 43(1):309-27.
Pace, N. 1997. A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science 276: 734–740.
Paine M, McDowell J, Graves J. (2007). Specific identification of Western Atlantic Ocean scombrids using mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene region sequences. Bull. Mar. Sci., 80(2): 353-367.
Palacio-López K, Rodriguez-López N. 2007. Phenotypic Plasticity in Lippia alba (Verbenaceae) in Response to Water Availability in Two Light Environments. Acta Biológica Colombiana: 12, 187-198.
Palsbøll P, Martine B, and Fred W. Allendorf. 2007. Identification of Management Units Using Population Genetic Data. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22 (1): 11– 16
Panprommin D, Soontornprasit K, Tuncharoen S, Pithakpol S, Keereelang J. 2019. DNA barcodes for the identification of species diversity in fish from Kwan Phayao, Thailand Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 12(3): 82-389
Pentinsaari M, Hebert P, Mutanen M. 2014. Barcoding beetles: A regional survey of 1872 species reveals high identification success and unusually deep interspecific divergences. PLoS One, 9(9): e108651
Pentinsaari M, Vos R, Mutanen M. 2017. Algorithmic single-locus species delimitation: effects of sampling effort, variation and non monophyly in four methods and 1870 species of beetles. Molecular Ecology Resources, 17(3): 393–404.
Pereira L, Hanner R, Foresti F, Oliveira C. 2013. Can DNA barcoding accurately discriminate megadiverse Neotropical freshwater fish fauna?. BMC Genetics, 14:20.
Pfenninger M, Schwenk K. 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol Biol, 7: 121
Pfenninger M, Schwenk K. 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol Biol, 7: 121
Pfenninger M, Schwenk K. 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol Biol, 7: 121
Porter T, Hajibabaei, M. 2018. Over 2.5 million COI sequences in GenBank and growing. PloS one, 13(9),
Quattrini A, Wu T, Soong K, Jeng M, Benayahu Y,McFadden C. 2019. A next generation approach to species delimitation reveals the role of hybridization in a cryptic species complex of corals. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 19:116
Queiroz K. 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst. Biol, 56(6): 879–886.
Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D. 2014. Tracer v1.6. Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer
Rambaut A. 2019. Figtree v1.4.4. Available from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
Ramirez J.L, Santos C.A, Machado C.B, Oliveira A.K, Garavello J.C, Britski H.A, Galetti P.M. 2020. Molecular phylogeny and species delimitation of the genus Schizodon (Characiformes, Anostomidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol, 153:106959.
Ramirez J.L, Santos C.A, Machado C.B, Oliveira A.K, Garavello J.C, Britski H.A, Galetti P.M. 2020. Molecular phylogeny and species delimitation of the genus Schizodon (Characiformes, Anostomidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol, 153:106959.
Renza-Millán M, Villa-Navarro F, Lasso C, Morales-Betancourt M, Caballero S. 2016. Capítulo 15. Potamotrygon motoro (Müller & Henle 1841) (Myliobatiformes, Potamotrygonidae) en las cuencas del Orinoco y Amazonas (Colombia). P 377-388. En: Lasso C, Rosa R, Morales-Betancourt M, Garrone-Neto D, Carvalho M (Eds). 2016. XV. Rayas de agua dulce (Potamotrygonidae) de Suramérica. Parte II: Colombia, Brasil, Perú, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay y Argentina. Serie Editorial Recursos Hidrobiológicos y Pesqueros Continentales de Colombia. Investigación de los Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH). Bogotá, D. C., Colombia. 435 pp
Renza-Millán M, Lasso C, Morales-Betancourt M, Villa F, Caballero S. 2019. Mitochondrial DNA diversity and population structure of the ocellate freshwater stingray Potamotrygon motoro (Müller & Henle, 1841) (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygonidae) in the Colombian Amazon and Orinoco Basins. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 30(3): 466-473
Rincón, G. 2006. Aspectos Taxonómicos, Alimentação E Reprodução Da Raia de Agua Doce Potamotrygon Orbignyi (Castelnau), (Elasmobranchii: Potamotrygonidae) No Rio Paranã-Tocantins. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho.
Rodrigues M.S, Morelli K, Jansen AM. 2017. Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene as a DNA barcode for discriminating Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and closely related species. Parasites Vectors, 10: 488
Rocha A, Garber N, Garber A, Stuck K. 2005. Structure of the mitochondrial control region and flanking tRNA genes of Mugil cephalus. Hidrobiológica, 15(2): 139-149
Rocha A, Garber N, Garber A, Stuck K. 2005. Structure of the mitochondrial control region and flanking tRNA genes of Mugil cephalus. Hidrobiológica, 15(2): 139-149
Rosa R. 1985. A systematic revision of the South American freshwater stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae). Tesis Doctoral, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, 523 pp.
Rosa R, Charvet-Almeida P, Quijada C. 2010. Biology of the South American potamotrygonid stingrays. pp 24186. En: Carrier J, Musick J, Heithaus R. Sharks and their relatives II. Biodiversity, adaptive physiology and conservation. CRC Press. 639 pp.
Rosenblum E, Sarver B, Brown J, Roches S, Hardwick K Tyler D Hether, EastmanJ, Pennell M, HarmonL. 2012. Goldilocks meets SantaRosalia: an ephemeral speciation model explains patterns of diversification across time scales. Evol. Biol, 39:255–61
Rosser N, Freitas A, Huertas B, Joron, M, Lamas, G, Mérot C, Simpson F, Willmott K, Mallet J, & Dasmahapatra, K.(2019). Cryptic speciation associated with geographic and ecological divergence in two Amazonian Heliconius butterflies. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 186:(1) 233–249
Sanches D, Martins T, Lutz Í, Veneza I, Silva R.D, Araújo F, Muriel-Cunha J, Sampaio I, Garcia M, Sousa L.M, Evangelista-Gomes, G. 2021. Mitochondrial DNA suggests Hybridization in Freshwater Stingrays Potamotrygon (POTAMOTRYGONIDAE: MYLIOBATIFORMES) from the Xingu river, Amazonia and reveals speciation in Paratrygon aireba. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 93(3): e20191325
Schaefer S, Weitzman S, Britski H. 1989. Review of the Neotropical catfish genus Scoloplax (Pisces: Loricarioidea: Scoloplacidae) with comments on reductive characters in phylogenetic analysis. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 141:181–211.
Schlick-Steiner B.C, Steiner F.M, Seifert B, Stauffer C, Christian E, Crozier R.H. 2010. Integrative taxonomy: a multisource approach to exploring biodiversity. Annu Rev Entomol, 55: 421-38
Schoch C.L, Seifert K.A, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, Chen W, Consortium B. 2012. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc NatlAcad Sci USA, 109(16):6241–6246.
Schwentner M, Brian B, Richter S. 2011. An integrative approach to species delineation incorporating different species concepts: a case study of Limnadopsis (Branchiopoda: Spinicaudata), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 104 (3): 575–599,
Silva-Santos R, Ramirez J, Galetti P, Freitas P. 2018. Molecular Evidences of a Hidden Complex Scenario in Leporinus cf. friderici. Front. Genet, 9:47
Sigovini M, Keppel E, Tagliapietra D. 2016. Open Nomenclature in the biodiversity era. Methods in Ecology and EvolutioN, 7(10): 1217-1225
Silva T. 2017. Species descriptions and digital environments: alternatives for accessibility of morphological data. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 61(4): 277– 281
Smith K. 2008. A Brief History of NCBI’s Formation and Growth. In The NCBI Handbook. 2nd edition. Bethesda, United States. National Center for Biotechnology Information.
Song H, Mu X, Wei M, Wang X, Luo J, Hu Y. 2015. Complete mitochondrial genome of the ocellate river stingray (Potamotrygon motoro). Mitochondrial DNA, 26(6): 857-8.
Sukumaran J, Knowles L. 2017. Multispecies coalescent delimits structure notspecies. PNAS, 114(1):1607–12.Tavares ES, Baker AJ. 2008. Single mitochondrial gene barcodes reliably identify sister-species in diverse clades of birds. BMC Evol Biol, 8(1): 81.
Thompson J.D, Higgins D.G, Gibson T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22(22): 4876-4880.
Toffoli D, Hrbek T, Araújo, Góes de M, Pinto de M, Charvet-Almeida P, Pires I. 2008. A test of the utility of DNA barcoding in the radiation of the freshwater stingray genus Potamotrygon (Potamotrygonidae, Myliobatiformes). Genetics and Molecular Biology, 31(1): 324-336
Toffoli D, Hrbek T, Araújo, Góes de M, Pinto de M, Charvet-Almeida P, Pires I. 2008. A test of the utility of DNA barcoding in the radiation of the freshwater stingray genus Potamotrygon (Potamotrygonidae, Myliobatiformes). Genetics and Molecular Biology, 31(1): 324-336
Ward R, Zemlak T, Innes B, Last P, Hebert P. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci, 360:1847–1857
Ward R, Hanner R, Hebert P. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol, 74(2):329–56.
Wesselingh F, Räsänen M, Irion G, Vonhof H, Kaandorp R, Renema W, Pitmann L, Gingras M. 2002. Lake Pebas: A palaeoecological reconstruction of a Miocene, long-lived lake complex in western Amazonia. Cainozoic Research, 1:35– 81.
Wesselingh F, Salo J. 2006. A Miocene perspective on the evolution of the Amazonian biota. Scripta Geologica, 133:439–458.
Wilson E. 2003. The encyclopedia of life. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18(1): 77–80.
Zhang J, Hanner R. 2011. DNA barcoding is a useful tool for the identification of marine fishes from Japan. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 39(1): 31–42.
Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A. 2013. A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics, 29: 2869– 2876.
Zhao Y, Yi Z, Warren A, Song W. 2018. Species delimitation for the molecular taxonomy and ecology of the widely distributed microbial eukaryote genus Euplotes (Alveolata, Ciliophora). Proc Biol Sci, 285(1871):20172159.
Zemlak T, Ward R, Connell A, Holmes B, Hebert P. 2009. DNA barcoding reveals overlooked marine fishes. Mol Ecol Resour, 9(1): 237-42.
Ziesler R; Ardizzone G. 1979. Las aguas continentales de América Latina. FAO, Rome
dc.relation.indexed.spa.fl_str_mv N/A
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos Reservados - Universidad de los Llanos, 2022
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos Reservados - Universidad de los Llanos, 2022
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-ND 4.0)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 44 Páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad de los Llanos
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv Facultad de Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Villavicencio
institution Universidad de los Llanos
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/6ffb3b79-64cb-4223-ad52-45495f85b804/download
https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/c5bdcc0a-53c6-48d5-8303-feb0f4495722/download
https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/fb449b1d-83c8-41ca-97cd-0f5d1ee4bf65/download
https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/b6dd8407-125f-4dc3-aa76-bd008515175b/download
https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/2d687bd4-1296-4e7e-a1ea-4ce24167ec7a/download
https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/a48c046f-90f9-4165-97ea-91602991fa8a/download
https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/cfdd8c0a-7f92-4d45-be3a-803ae67a8c9a/download
https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/eff2c1a5-ce4d-47dc-9037-42505abccb6e/download
https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/0f5d4a08-1ca3-419e-aa56-fbc900857002/download
https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/e0443588-527d-44d5-b716-58289a921c18/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f7c6e382a43d2577a35b71202b6dc0cd
c1ded5da7e7a5e7a7ce8c71a0621893c
b05981a67b776795efa2ca64392a43ed
4814f91d07807c47dd846cd328b86171
b9aad01abf860ae73571db743bb47d72
3af2e4a7f9d9ca9f558506f33355f075
7fd13a833de9d750e80395e7b50c37c7
9a477021f05c35d1bf099ad36907ac33
cf53cfe9a9424161f1fe4b5d67567182
77c82408c586ac306b1b2f2d3db06748
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad de Los Llanos
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@unillanos.edu.co
_version_ 1812104645792759808
spelling Rodríguez Castro, Karen Giselle4039028acec7e5ae7aca15b6732defd2Ramirez Malaver, Jorge Luis50bf4fa1bac0cfcc76da3c747a442546Ubaque Bernal, Jhoimar De Jesus1d83a3926f0e8b66baa1689ec6400d022023-04-13T13:28:57Z2023-04-13T13:28:57Z2022Ubaque Bernal, Jhoimar de J. (2022). Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI) [Trabajo de grado, Universidad de los Llanos]. Repositorio digital Universidad de los Llanos.https://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/2849Universidad de los LlanosRepositorio digital Universidad de los Llanoshttps://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/Incluye figuras, tablas y anexosEl género Potamotrygon incluye 33 especies de rayas de rio, pero la identificación de sus especies ha presentado dificultades debido a la escasez de caracteres puntuales para identificar especies, su sistemática compleja con varios ejemplos de especies cripticas en todo su rango de distribución. Por tal razón la delimitación de especies utilizando características alternativas, como las moleculares, es importante en estos casos. El objetivo de este estudio fue delimitar las especies del género utilizando datos moleculares, comparar los resultados con las especies definidas con datos morfológicos y definir MOTUs (ingles Molecular operational Taxonomic Units) y relacionar su existencia con eventos evolutivos. Con el uso de 255 secuencias del gen citocromo oxidasa I (COI) obtenidas a partir de datos depositados en NCBI y BOLD de distintos autores y de diferentes localidades, realizamos la delimitación de especies de Potamotrygon con los métodos PTP, bPTP y GYMC. Para finalizar, se compararon las MOTUs encontradas con las regiones biogeográficas. Encontramos 84 haplotipos donde especies diferentes compartían un mismo haplotipo. Además, en el árbol ultramétrico se delimitaron por el análisis de GYMC 27 MOTUs, PTP 28MOTUs y bPTP 29 MOTUs. El consenso delimitó 28 MOTUs, que guardan relación con la región biogeográfica y en menor medida, con especies nominales. Ciertos MOTUs encontradas corresponden a las especies nominales de las secuencias trabajadas, sin embargo, algunas presentan inconsistencias. Sugerimos qué esto se debe a especies cripticas, una alta variabilidad morfológica y la existencia de complejos de especies. El número de regiones biogeográficas influencian en el número de MOTUs y algunas MOTUs son de amplia distribución mientras que algunas son propias de una única cuenca. Otro aspecto importante es que la historia evolutiva (biogeográfica) de las cuencas han influido en la alta diversidad de especies del género. Por último, la delimitación de especies utilizando métodos coalescentes con estas secuencias fue eficiente para el género Potamotrygon, los MOTUs obtenidos se ajustan adecuadamente a las regiones biogeográficas y la alta variabilidad de especies es explicada por los eventos evolutivos ocurridos en sus diferentes cuencas.1.Resumen. – 2. Planteamiento Del Problema. – 3. Objetivos. – 4. Objetivo general. -- 5. Objetivos específicos. – 6. Justificación. – 7. Marco Teórico. – 8. Identificación molecular: códigos de barras de ADN y aplicaciones. – 9. Bases de datos genéticas. – 10. Delimitación de especies. – 11. Estudios en peces; género Potamotrygon. Metodología. – 12. Obtención y análisis de secuencias. – 13. Delimitación de especies. – 14. Clasificación biogeográfica. – 15. Resultados. Discusión De Resultados. – 16. Conclusiones. – 17. Bibliografía. – 18. Anexos.PregradoBiólogoBiología44 Páginasapplication/pdfspaUniversidad de los LlanosFacultad de Ciencias Básicas e IngenieríaVillavicencioDerechos Reservados - Universidad de los Llanos, 2022https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-ND 4.0)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI)Trabajo de grado - Pregradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fTexthttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TPhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Adnet S, Gismondi R, Antoine P. 2014. Comparisons of Dental Morphology in River Stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae) with New Fossils from the Middle Eocene of Peruvian Amazonia Rekindle Debate on Their Evolution.Naturwissenschaften 101 (1): 33–45.Albert J, Lovejoy N, Crampton W. 2006. Miocene tectonism and the separation of cis - and trans - Andean rivers basin: evidence from Neotropical fishes. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 21: 1-14.Albert J, Reis, R. 2011. Historical Biogeography of Neotropical Freshwater Fishes. University of California Press, Los Angeles, California.Alfonsin M, Bucetto M. 2019. Las especies en peligro de extinción y los mecanismos para la recuperación y conservación de la biodiversidad: un estudio sobre la viabilidad de los mecanismos y las trabas burocráticas. Revista LEX: Universidad Alas Peruanas, 9: 23, 297-324Altschul S.F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E.W. Lipman, D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol, 215: 403–410.Angermeier P, Winston M. 1998. Local vs. Regional influences on local diversity in stream fish communities of Virginia. Ecology, 79 (3): 911-927.Araujo M, Charvet-Almeida M, Pereira H. 2004.Freshwater Stingrays (Potamotrygonidae): Status, Conservation and Management Challenges. Information document AC20: 8, 1-6Banerjee D, Kumar V, Singha D, Chandra K, Laskar B, Kundu S, Chakraborty R, Chatterjee S. 2015. Identification through DNA barcoding of Tabanidae (Diptera) vectors of surra disease in India. Acta Trop, 150: 52–58Batista-Morales A, Lasso C, Morales-Betancourt M, Caballero S. 2017. Phylogeography and genetic structure of the species complex of the freshwater stingray, Potamotrygon orbignyi (Castelnau, 1855), among Amazonas and Orinoco rivers. Repositorio Uniandes, 1-56Beheregaray L, Caccone A. 2007. Cryptic biodiversity in a changing world. Journal of Biology, 6:9Bermingham, E. Moritz C. 1998. Comparative phylogeography: Concepts and applications. Molecular Ecology, 7: 367-369.Blaxter M, Mann J, Chapman T, Thomas F, Whitton C, Floyd R Abebe E. 2005. Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci 360: 1935–1943.Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu C.H, Xie D, Suchard M, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2014. BEAST 2: A software platform for bayesianevolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol, 10(4): e1003537.Caldas J, Castro-González V, Puentes M, Lasso C, Duarte L, Grijalba-Bendeck M, Gómez F, Navia A, Mejía-Falla P, Bessudo S, Diazgranados M, Zapata-Padilla L (Eds.). 2010. Plan de Acción Nacional para la Conservación y Manejo de Tiburones, Rayas y Quimeras de Colombia (PAN-Tiburones Colombia). Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario, Secretaria Agricultura y Pesca San Andrés Isla, Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, Instituto Alexander Von Humboldt, Universidad del Magdalena, Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Pontifcia Universidad Javeriana, Fundación SQUALUS, Fundación Malpelo y otros EcosistemasMarinos, Conservación Internacional, WWF Colombia. Editorial Produmedios, Bogotá. 60 p.Cañedo A, Rodríguez-Labrada R, Vázquez-Mojena Y. 2009. Centro Nacional para la Información Biotecnológica de los Estados Unidos: un palacio de la información para la medicina molecular. Revista cubana de los profesionales de la información y la comunicación en salud, 19(4): 19Carstens B.C, Pelletier T.A, Reid N.M, Satler J.D. 2013. How to fail at species delimitation. Mol Ecol. 22:4369–4383Carvalho M, Lovejoy N, Rosa R. 2003. Family Potamotrygonidae. 22-29. En: Reis, Feraris R, & Kullander S. Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America. Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 729p.Carvalho M, Sabaj-Pérez M, Lovejoy R. 2011. Potamotrygon tigrina, a new species of freshwater stingray from the Upper Amazon basin, closely related to Potamotrygon schroederi Fernández-Yépez 1958 (Chondricthyes: Potamotrygonidae). Zootaxa, 2827:1-30Carvalho M, Paulo J, Silva C, Loboda T, Silva P, Ragno M, Soares M. 2013. Systematics and Evolution of the Highly Diverse and Morphologically Complex Neotropical Freshwater Stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae). Modalidad, Conferencia: 9th Indo-Pacific Fish Conference, en Okinawa, JapanCBD: Convention on Biological Diversity.2011. [citado 12 de Octubre de 2021]; Disponible en: http://www.cbd.int/Charvet-Almeida P, Araújo M, Almeida M. 2005 Reproductive aspects of freshwater stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae) in the Brazilian Amazon Basin. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery. Science, 35: 165–171Cruz V, Vera M, Mendonça F, Pardo B, Martinez P, Oliveira C, Foresti F. 2015. First identification of interspecies hybridization in the freshwater stingrays Potamotrygon motoro and P. falkneri (Myliobatiformes, Potamotrygonidae). Conserv Genet, 16: 241–245Cruz V, Nobile M, Paim F, Adachi A, Ribeiro G, Ferreira D, Pansonato-Alves J, Charvet P, Oliveira C, Foresti F. 2021. Cytogenetic and molecular characteristics of Potamotrygon motoro and Potamotrygon sp. (Chondrichthyes, Myliobatiformes, Potamotrygonidae) from the Amazon basin: Implications for the taxonomy of the genus. Genetics and molecular biology, 44(2): e20200083.Darriba D, Taboada L, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods, 9(8): 772.Dellicour S, Flot J. 2018. The hitchhiker’s guide to single-locus species delimitation. Molecular Ecology Resources, 18(6):1234–1246Díaz J, Villanova V, Brancolini F, del Pazo F, Posner V, Grimberg A, Arranz A. 2016. First DNA Barcode Reference Library for the Identification of South American Freshwater Fish from the Lower Paraná River. PLoS ONE, 11(7): e0157419.Drummond A.J, Bouckaert R. 2015. Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis with BEAST. Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press.Faria V, Rolim L, Vaz L, Furtado-Neto M. 2012. Reevaluation of RAPD Markers Involved in a Case of Stingray Misidentification (Dasyatidae: Dasyatis). Genetics and Molecular Research, 11(4): 3835–45.Fontenelle J, Marques F, Kolmann M, Lovejoy N. 2021a. Biogeography of the neotropical freshwater stingrays (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygoninae) reveals effects of continent- scale paleogeographic change and drainage evolution. J Biogeogr, 0(0): 1–14Fontenelle J, Marques F, Kolmann M, Lovejoy N. 2021b. Biogeography of the neotropicalfreshwater stingrays (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygoninae) reveals effects of continent-scale paleogeographic change and drainage evolution. J Biogeogr, 0(0):1–14.Flot J.F. 2015. Species delimitation’s coming of age. Syst Biol, 64(6):897–899.Floyd R, Abebe E, Papert A, Blaxter M. 2002. Molecular Barcodes for Soil Nematode Identification. Mol Ecol, 11(4):839-850Funk D, Omland E. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 34: 397–423García D, Lasso C, Morales M, Caballero S. 2015: Molecular systematics of the freshwater stingrays (myliobatiformes: potamotrygonidae) of the Amazon, Orinoco, Magdalena, Esequibo, Caribbean, and Maracaibo basins (Colombia – Venezuela): evidence from three mitochondrial genes. Mitochondrial DNA, 1-13García-Melo J, Oliveira C, Da Costa S, Ochoa-Orrego L, Garcia L, Maldonado Ocampo J .2019. Species delimitation of neotropical Characins (Stevardiinae): Implications for taxonomy of complex groups. PLoS ONE, 14(6): e0216786.García-Villamil, D. 2012. Molecular systematics of the freshwater stingrays (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygonidae) of the Amazon, Orinoco, Magdalena, Essequibo, Caribe and Maracaibo basins (Colombia- Venezuela): evidence from mitochondrial genes. Tesis de Maestría, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia, Bogotá. 32 pp.Gonçalves P, Oliveira-Marques A, Matsumoto T, Miyaki C. 2015. DNA barcoding identifies illegal parrot trade. J Hered, 106: 560–564.Graça W, Pavanelli C, Buckup P. 2008. Two new species of Characidium (Characiformes: Crenuchidae) from Paraguay and Xingu River basins, State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Copeia, 2008:326–332Hartvig I, Czako M, Kjær ED, Nielsen LR, Theilade I .2015. The Use of DNA Barcoding in Identification and Conservation of Rosewood (Dalbergia spp.). PLoS ONE, 10(9)Hebert P, Cywinska A, Ball S, de Waard J. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society Lond, 270: 313-321.Hebert P, Penton E, Burns J, Janzen D, Hallwachs W. 2004a. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the Neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerater. PNAS. 101(41): 12-17Hebert P, Stoeckle M, Zemlak T, Francis M. 2004b. Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes. PLoS Biol, 2(10):312Hebert P, Ryan Gregory T.2005. The Promise of DNA Barcoding for Taxonom. Systematic Biology, 54(5): 852–859Hey J, Waples R, Arnold M, Butlin R, Harrison R. 2003. Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol, 18(11):597–603.Hoffmann M, Hilton-Taylor C, Angulo A, Böhm M, Brooks. 2010. The Impact of Conservation on the Status of the World s Vertebrates. Science, 2; 330(6010), 1503- 1509.Hopkins G, Freckleton, R. 2002. Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. Animal Conservation, 5: 245-249.Hubert N, Renno J. 2006. Historical biogeography of South American freshwater fishes. Journal of Biogeography, 33: 1414-1436.Jalali K, Ojha R,Venkatesan T. 2015. DNA Barcoding for Identification of Agriculturally Important Insects. En: Chakravarthy K. New Horizons in Insect Science: Towards Sustainable Pest Management, Springer India. Bangalore India, 13-23Jones M, Ghoorah A, Blaxter M. 2011. JMOTU and taxonerator: turning DNA barcode sequences into annotated operational taxonomic units. PLOS ONE, 6:e19259Kaur S. 2015. DNA Barcoding and Its Applications. IJERGS, 3 (2): 3.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28(12):1647-9.Kekkonen M, Mutanen M, Kaila L, Nieminen M, Hebert PDN. 2015. Delineating Species with DNA Barcodes: A Case of Taxon Dependent Method Performance in Moths. PLoS One, 10: e0122481.Kolokotronis S, Leslie M. 2010. Barcoding bushmeat: Molecular identification of Central African and South American harvested vertebrates. Conservation Genetics, 11(4): 1389-1404Kullander S. 1986. Cichlid Fishes of the Amazon River Drainage of Peru. Swedish Stockholm: Museum of Natural History.Kuntke F, Jonge N, Hesselsøe M, & Nielsen J. 2020. Stream water quality assessment by metabarcoding of invertebrates. Ecological Indicators, 111: 105982.Lasso, C. 1985. Las rayas de agua dulce. Natura 77: 6–9Lasso C, Rosa R, Sanchez-Duarte P, Morales-Betancourt M, Agudelo-Cordoba E. 2013. IX. Rayas de Agua Dulce (Potamotrygonidae) de Suramérica. Parte I.Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Perú, Brasil, Guyana, Surinam Y Guayana Francesa: Diversidad, Bioecolog+ia, Uso Y Conservación. Serie Editorial Recursos Hidrobiológicos Y Pesqueros Continentales de Colombia. Serie Edit. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Instituto de Investigación de los Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH).Latrubesse E, Stevaux J, Santos M, Assine M. 2005. Grandes sistemas fluviais: geologia, geomorfologia e paleoidrologia. En Quaternário do Brasil, edited by. Souza C, Suguio K, Oliveira A, Oliveira P. 276–297. Ribeirão Preto: Holos Editora.Librado P, Rozas J. 2009. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics, 25(11):1451-2.Lobola T, Carvalho M. 2013. Systematic revisión of the Potamotrygon motoro (Mûller & Henle, 1841) species complex in the Paraná-Paraguay basin, with description of two new ocellated species (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygonidae). Neotropical Ichthyology 11(4): 693-737.Lohse, K. 2009. Can mtDNA barcodes be used to delimit species? A response to Pons et al (2006). Systematic Biology, 58(4): 439–442.Lovejoy N, Birminghan E, Martin A. 1998. South American rays came in with the sea. Nature, 396:421-422.Lundberg J, Marshall L, Guerrero J, Horton B, Malabarba M, Wesselingh F. 1998. The stage for Neotropical fish diversification: A history of tropical South American rivers pp. 13-48. En: Malabarba M, Reis R, Vari R, Lucena Z, Lucena C (Eds. Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Porto Alegre, Brazil, EDIPUCRS. pp 603Magoga G, Coral S, Fontaneto D, Montagna M. 2018. Barcoding of Chrysomelidae of Euro-Mediterranean area: efficiency and problematic species. Scientific Reports, 8: 13398.Mason N, Fletcher N, Gill, B, Funk W, Zamudio K. 2020. Coalescent-based species delimitation is sensitive to geographic sampling and isolation by distance. Systematics and Biodiversity, 18(3): 269–280.Mayr E.1942. Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressMeyer C, Paulay G. 2005. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology, 3(12): e422.Montoya-Burgos J. 2003. Historical biogeography of the catfish genus Hypostomus (Siluriformes: Loricariidae), with implications on the diversification of Neotropical ichthyofauna. Molecular Ecology, 12: 1855-1867.Nanney, D. 1982. Genes and phenes in Tetrahymena. Bioscience, 32: 783–78Nielsen R, Wakeley J. 2001. Distinguishing migration from Isolation: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach. Genet, 158(2): 885–896.Nosil P, Funk D, Ortiz-Barriento D. 2009. Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Molecular ecology, 18(3): 375-402Olivieri G, Zimmermann E, Randrianambinina B, Rasoloharijaona S, Rakotondravony D, Guschanski K, Radespiel U. 2007.The ever-increasing diversity in mouse lemurs: three new species in north and northwestern Madagascar. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 43(1):309-27.Pace, N. 1997. A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science 276: 734–740.Paine M, McDowell J, Graves J. (2007). Specific identification of Western Atlantic Ocean scombrids using mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene region sequences. Bull. Mar. Sci., 80(2): 353-367.Palacio-López K, Rodriguez-López N. 2007. Phenotypic Plasticity in Lippia alba (Verbenaceae) in Response to Water Availability in Two Light Environments. Acta Biológica Colombiana: 12, 187-198.Palsbøll P, Martine B, and Fred W. Allendorf. 2007. Identification of Management Units Using Population Genetic Data. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22 (1): 11– 16Panprommin D, Soontornprasit K, Tuncharoen S, Pithakpol S, Keereelang J. 2019. DNA barcodes for the identification of species diversity in fish from Kwan Phayao, Thailand Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 12(3): 82-389Pentinsaari M, Hebert P, Mutanen M. 2014. Barcoding beetles: A regional survey of 1872 species reveals high identification success and unusually deep interspecific divergences. PLoS One, 9(9): e108651Pentinsaari M, Vos R, Mutanen M. 2017. Algorithmic single-locus species delimitation: effects of sampling effort, variation and non monophyly in four methods and 1870 species of beetles. Molecular Ecology Resources, 17(3): 393–404.Pereira L, Hanner R, Foresti F, Oliveira C. 2013. Can DNA barcoding accurately discriminate megadiverse Neotropical freshwater fish fauna?. BMC Genetics, 14:20.Pfenninger M, Schwenk K. 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol Biol, 7: 121Pfenninger M, Schwenk K. 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol Biol, 7: 121Pfenninger M, Schwenk K. 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol Biol, 7: 121Porter T, Hajibabaei, M. 2018. Over 2.5 million COI sequences in GenBank and growing. PloS one, 13(9),Quattrini A, Wu T, Soong K, Jeng M, Benayahu Y,McFadden C. 2019. A next generation approach to species delimitation reveals the role of hybridization in a cryptic species complex of corals. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 19:116Queiroz K. 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst. Biol, 56(6): 879–886.Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D. 2014. Tracer v1.6. Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/TracerRambaut A. 2019. Figtree v1.4.4. Available from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/Ramirez J.L, Santos C.A, Machado C.B, Oliveira A.K, Garavello J.C, Britski H.A, Galetti P.M. 2020. Molecular phylogeny and species delimitation of the genus Schizodon (Characiformes, Anostomidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol, 153:106959.Ramirez J.L, Santos C.A, Machado C.B, Oliveira A.K, Garavello J.C, Britski H.A, Galetti P.M. 2020. Molecular phylogeny and species delimitation of the genus Schizodon (Characiformes, Anostomidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol, 153:106959.Renza-Millán M, Villa-Navarro F, Lasso C, Morales-Betancourt M, Caballero S. 2016. Capítulo 15. Potamotrygon motoro (Müller & Henle 1841) (Myliobatiformes, Potamotrygonidae) en las cuencas del Orinoco y Amazonas (Colombia). P 377-388. En: Lasso C, Rosa R, Morales-Betancourt M, Garrone-Neto D, Carvalho M (Eds). 2016. XV. Rayas de agua dulce (Potamotrygonidae) de Suramérica. Parte II: Colombia, Brasil, Perú, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay y Argentina. Serie Editorial Recursos Hidrobiológicos y Pesqueros Continentales de Colombia. Investigación de los Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH). Bogotá, D. C., Colombia. 435 ppRenza-Millán M, Lasso C, Morales-Betancourt M, Villa F, Caballero S. 2019. Mitochondrial DNA diversity and population structure of the ocellate freshwater stingray Potamotrygon motoro (Müller & Henle, 1841) (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygonidae) in the Colombian Amazon and Orinoco Basins. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 30(3): 466-473Rincón, G. 2006. Aspectos Taxonómicos, Alimentação E Reprodução Da Raia de Agua Doce Potamotrygon Orbignyi (Castelnau), (Elasmobranchii: Potamotrygonidae) No Rio Paranã-Tocantins. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho.Rodrigues M.S, Morelli K, Jansen AM. 2017. Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene as a DNA barcode for discriminating Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and closely related species. Parasites Vectors, 10: 488Rocha A, Garber N, Garber A, Stuck K. 2005. Structure of the mitochondrial control region and flanking tRNA genes of Mugil cephalus. Hidrobiológica, 15(2): 139-149Rocha A, Garber N, Garber A, Stuck K. 2005. Structure of the mitochondrial control region and flanking tRNA genes of Mugil cephalus. Hidrobiológica, 15(2): 139-149Rosa R. 1985. A systematic revision of the South American freshwater stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae). Tesis Doctoral, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, 523 pp.Rosa R, Charvet-Almeida P, Quijada C. 2010. Biology of the South American potamotrygonid stingrays. pp 24186. En: Carrier J, Musick J, Heithaus R. Sharks and their relatives II. Biodiversity, adaptive physiology and conservation. CRC Press. 639 pp.Rosenblum E, Sarver B, Brown J, Roches S, Hardwick K Tyler D Hether, EastmanJ, Pennell M, HarmonL. 2012. Goldilocks meets SantaRosalia: an ephemeral speciation model explains patterns of diversification across time scales. Evol. Biol, 39:255–61Rosser N, Freitas A, Huertas B, Joron, M, Lamas, G, Mérot C, Simpson F, Willmott K, Mallet J, & Dasmahapatra, K.(2019). Cryptic speciation associated with geographic and ecological divergence in two Amazonian Heliconius butterflies. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 186:(1) 233–249Sanches D, Martins T, Lutz Í, Veneza I, Silva R.D, Araújo F, Muriel-Cunha J, Sampaio I, Garcia M, Sousa L.M, Evangelista-Gomes, G. 2021. Mitochondrial DNA suggests Hybridization in Freshwater Stingrays Potamotrygon (POTAMOTRYGONIDAE: MYLIOBATIFORMES) from the Xingu river, Amazonia and reveals speciation in Paratrygon aireba. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 93(3): e20191325Schaefer S, Weitzman S, Britski H. 1989. Review of the Neotropical catfish genus Scoloplax (Pisces: Loricarioidea: Scoloplacidae) with comments on reductive characters in phylogenetic analysis. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 141:181–211.Schlick-Steiner B.C, Steiner F.M, Seifert B, Stauffer C, Christian E, Crozier R.H. 2010. Integrative taxonomy: a multisource approach to exploring biodiversity. Annu Rev Entomol, 55: 421-38Schoch C.L, Seifert K.A, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, Chen W, Consortium B. 2012. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc NatlAcad Sci USA, 109(16):6241–6246.Schwentner M, Brian B, Richter S. 2011. An integrative approach to species delineation incorporating different species concepts: a case study of Limnadopsis (Branchiopoda: Spinicaudata), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 104 (3): 575–599,Silva-Santos R, Ramirez J, Galetti P, Freitas P. 2018. Molecular Evidences of a Hidden Complex Scenario in Leporinus cf. friderici. Front. Genet, 9:47Sigovini M, Keppel E, Tagliapietra D. 2016. Open Nomenclature in the biodiversity era. Methods in Ecology and EvolutioN, 7(10): 1217-1225Silva T. 2017. Species descriptions and digital environments: alternatives for accessibility of morphological data. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 61(4): 277– 281Smith K. 2008. A Brief History of NCBI’s Formation and Growth. In The NCBI Handbook. 2nd edition. Bethesda, United States. National Center for Biotechnology Information.Song H, Mu X, Wei M, Wang X, Luo J, Hu Y. 2015. Complete mitochondrial genome of the ocellate river stingray (Potamotrygon motoro). Mitochondrial DNA, 26(6): 857-8.Sukumaran J, Knowles L. 2017. Multispecies coalescent delimits structure notspecies. PNAS, 114(1):1607–12.Tavares ES, Baker AJ. 2008. Single mitochondrial gene barcodes reliably identify sister-species in diverse clades of birds. BMC Evol Biol, 8(1): 81.Thompson J.D, Higgins D.G, Gibson T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22(22): 4876-4880.Toffoli D, Hrbek T, Araújo, Góes de M, Pinto de M, Charvet-Almeida P, Pires I. 2008. A test of the utility of DNA barcoding in the radiation of the freshwater stingray genus Potamotrygon (Potamotrygonidae, Myliobatiformes). Genetics and Molecular Biology, 31(1): 324-336Toffoli D, Hrbek T, Araújo, Góes de M, Pinto de M, Charvet-Almeida P, Pires I. 2008. A test of the utility of DNA barcoding in the radiation of the freshwater stingray genus Potamotrygon (Potamotrygonidae, Myliobatiformes). Genetics and Molecular Biology, 31(1): 324-336Ward R, Zemlak T, Innes B, Last P, Hebert P. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci, 360:1847–1857Ward R, Hanner R, Hebert P. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol, 74(2):329–56.Wesselingh F, Räsänen M, Irion G, Vonhof H, Kaandorp R, Renema W, Pitmann L, Gingras M. 2002. Lake Pebas: A palaeoecological reconstruction of a Miocene, long-lived lake complex in western Amazonia. Cainozoic Research, 1:35– 81.Wesselingh F, Salo J. 2006. A Miocene perspective on the evolution of the Amazonian biota. Scripta Geologica, 133:439–458.Wilson E. 2003. The encyclopedia of life. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18(1): 77–80.Zhang J, Hanner R. 2011. DNA barcoding is a useful tool for the identification of marine fishes from Japan. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 39(1): 31–42.Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A. 2013. A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics, 29: 2869– 2876.Zhao Y, Yi Z, Warren A, Song W. 2018. Species delimitation for the molecular taxonomy and ecology of the widely distributed microbial eukaryote genus Euplotes (Alveolata, Ciliophora). Proc Biol Sci, 285(1871):20172159.Zemlak T, Ward R, Connell A, Holmes B, Hebert P. 2009. DNA barcoding reveals overlooked marine fishes. Mol Ecol Resour, 9(1): 237-42.Ziesler R; Ardizzone G. 1979. Las aguas continentales de América Latina. FAO, RomeN/ADegradación de hábitatsBiodiversidadÁrbol ultramétricoCuencas biogeograficasEspecies crípticasMOTUPublicationLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8414https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/6ffb3b79-64cb-4223-ad52-45495f85b804/downloadf7c6e382a43d2577a35b71202b6dc0cdMD54ORIGINALTrabajo de grado.pdfTrabajo de grado.pdf164003231application/pdf1402538https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/c5bdcc0a-53c6-48d5-8303-feb0f4495722/downloadc1ded5da7e7a5e7a7ce8c71a0621893cMD55Autorización.pdfAutorización.pdf164003231application/pdf21263https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/fb449b1d-83c8-41ca-97cd-0f5d1ee4bf65/downloadb05981a67b776795efa2ca64392a43edMD56Nota de aceptación.pdfNota de aceptación.pdf164003231application/pdf543514https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/b6dd8407-125f-4dc3-aa76-bd008515175b/download4814f91d07807c47dd846cd328b86171MD57TEXTTrabajo de grado.pdf.txtTrabajo de grado.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain79997https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/2d687bd4-1296-4e7e-a1ea-4ce24167ec7a/downloadb9aad01abf860ae73571db743bb47d72MD58Autorización.pdf.txtAutorización.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain2256https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/a48c046f-90f9-4165-97ea-91602991fa8a/download3af2e4a7f9d9ca9f558506f33355f075MD510Nota de aceptación.pdf.txtNota de aceptación.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain1910https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/cfdd8c0a-7f92-4d45-be3a-803ae67a8c9a/download7fd13a833de9d750e80395e7b50c37c7MD512THUMBNAILTrabajo de grado.pdf.jpgTrabajo de grado.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg6601https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/eff2c1a5-ce4d-47dc-9037-42505abccb6e/download9a477021f05c35d1bf099ad36907ac33MD59Autorización.pdf.jpgAutorización.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg14614https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/0f5d4a08-1ca3-419e-aa56-fbc900857002/downloadcf53cfe9a9424161f1fe4b5d67567182MD511Nota de aceptación.pdf.jpgNota de aceptación.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg8595https://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org/bitstreams/e0443588-527d-44d5-b716-58289a921c18/download77c82408c586ac306b1b2f2d3db06748MD513001/2849oai:dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.org:001/28492024-04-17 16:39:46.552https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/Derechos Reservados - Universidad de los Llanos, 2022open.accesshttps://dspace7-unillanos.metacatalogo.orgRepositorio Universidad de Los Llanosrepositorio@unillanos.edu.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

Publicaciones similares