Efecto del enriquecimiento ambiental sobre la ganancia de peso y la relación humano-animal en bovinos en pastoreo
Los bovinos en pastoreo extensivo del trópico bajo sobreviven a limitantes nutricionales, de salud y de bienestar, las cuales desafían constantemente la capacidad humana para brindarles planes de mejoramiento capaces de generar adaptabilidad al contexto productivo, disminuyendo las adversidades de u...
- Autores:
-
Vargas Angel, Gino Odair
Jaramillo-Hernández , Dumar Alexander
Mainau Brunsó, Eva
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2024
- Institución:
- Universidad de los Llanos
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Digital Universidad de los LLanos
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unillanos.edu.co:001/4399
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.22579/22484817.1142
- Palabra clave:
- behavior
cattle
enrichment
extensive production
wellbeing
bienestar
comportamiento
enriquecimiento
ganado vacuno
producción extensiva
bem-estar
comportamento
gado bovino
enriquecimento
produção extensa
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Revista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicos - 2024
| id |
Unillanos2_4984c0c0120864bac61ea857545d4d49 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unillanos.edu.co:001/4399 |
| network_acronym_str |
Unillanos2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio Digital Universidad de los LLanos |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Efecto del enriquecimiento ambiental sobre la ganancia de peso y la relación humano-animal en bovinos en pastoreo |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
Effect of environmental enrichment on weight gain and human-animal relationship in grazing cattle |
| title |
Efecto del enriquecimiento ambiental sobre la ganancia de peso y la relación humano-animal en bovinos en pastoreo |
| spellingShingle |
Efecto del enriquecimiento ambiental sobre la ganancia de peso y la relación humano-animal en bovinos en pastoreo behavior cattle enrichment extensive production wellbeing bienestar comportamiento enriquecimiento ganado vacuno producción extensiva bem-estar comportamento gado bovino enriquecimento produção extensa |
| title_short |
Efecto del enriquecimiento ambiental sobre la ganancia de peso y la relación humano-animal en bovinos en pastoreo |
| title_full |
Efecto del enriquecimiento ambiental sobre la ganancia de peso y la relación humano-animal en bovinos en pastoreo |
| title_fullStr |
Efecto del enriquecimiento ambiental sobre la ganancia de peso y la relación humano-animal en bovinos en pastoreo |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Efecto del enriquecimiento ambiental sobre la ganancia de peso y la relación humano-animal en bovinos en pastoreo |
| title_sort |
Efecto del enriquecimiento ambiental sobre la ganancia de peso y la relación humano-animal en bovinos en pastoreo |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Vargas Angel, Gino Odair Jaramillo-Hernández , Dumar Alexander Mainau Brunsó, Eva |
| dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv |
Jaramillo Hernández, Dumar Alexander |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Vargas Angel, Gino Odair Jaramillo-Hernández , Dumar Alexander Mainau Brunsó, Eva |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
behavior cattle enrichment extensive production wellbeing |
| topic |
behavior cattle enrichment extensive production wellbeing bienestar comportamiento enriquecimiento ganado vacuno producción extensiva bem-estar comportamento gado bovino enriquecimento produção extensa |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
bienestar comportamiento enriquecimiento ganado vacuno producción extensiva bem-estar comportamento gado bovino enriquecimento produção extensa |
| description |
Los bovinos en pastoreo extensivo del trópico bajo sobreviven a limitantes nutricionales, de salud y de bienestar, las cuales desafían constantemente la capacidad humana para brindarles planes de mejoramiento capaces de generar adaptabilidad al contexto productivo, disminuyendo las adversidades de un entorno ambiental y social. El objetivo de esta investigación fue analizar los tiempos de interacción y preferencia de los elementos de enriquecimiento ambiental, la relación humano-animal y ganancia de peso de bovinos en pastoreo del trópico bajo. Para ello, se utilizaron 26 bovinos que pastan en sistemas extensivos naturales, divididos al azar y aleatoriamente en dos grupos: el primero denominado G1C control, en el cual fue inexistente el uso de elementos de enriquecimiento ambiental en las áreas de pastoreo. Por otro lado, el grupo dos denominado G2EA, al cual se integraba durante una hora (9:00 am a 10:00 am) un ambiente modificado enriquecido con llantas, cepillos comerciales y cepillos artesanales. Los animales fueron evaluados por veinte horas durante cuatro semanas. En estas observaciones se valoraron los tiempos de contacto físico e interacción con los elementos enriquecidos, la relación humano-animal a través de 5 test Welfare Quality de miedo aproximación-evasión y la ganancia de peso durante el ensayo. Los datos fueron analizados con el programa estadístico SAS® versión 9.4. Se identificó que el enriquecimiento ambiental tuvo efectos comportamentales significativos en algunas de las variables analizadas como la relación humano-animal, siendo el grupo G2EA el que presentó mayores porcentajes de animales que permitieron un afianzamiento positivo. La interacción con los elementos de enriquecimiento que captó mayor porcentaje de uso fue el cepillo comercial estático. El enriquecimiento ambiental otorga a los bovinos de este experimento efectos beneficiosos de la relación humano-animal y efectos positivos para la ganancia de peso. Es necesario llevar a cabo más estudios, con un mayor número de animales de diferentes grupos etarios y técnicas productivas, probando diferentes ambientes modificados. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-09-13T00:00:00Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-09-13T00:00:00Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-09-13 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF |
| dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.22579/22484817.1142 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2248-4817 |
| dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.22579/22484817.1142 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.22579/22484817.1142 2248-4817 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.22579/22484817.1142 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
• Agricultura de las Américas. (2020). El enorme aporte de la ganadería a la economía de Colombia. Agricultura de las Américas. https://agriculturadelasamericas.com/pecuaria/productores-ganaderos-yseguridadalimentaria-mundial/ • Alonso, M.E., González-Montaña, J.R., Lomillos, J. M. (2020). Consumers’ concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animals, 10(3), 385. • Barnett, J., Hemsworth, P., Hand, A. (1983). Effects of chronic stress on some blood parameters in the pig. Appl. Anim. Ethol, 9, 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0304-3762(83)90007-X. • Boivin, X., Lensink, J., Tallet, C., Veissier, I. (2003). Stockmanship and farm animal welfare. Animal welfare, 12(4), 479-492. • Boivin, X. (2018). Animal experience of domestication. In Animal welfare in a changing world (pp. 154-161). Wallingford UK: CAB International. • Bolt, S. & George, A. (2019). The use of environmental enrichment on farms benefits animal welfare and productivity. Livestock, 24. 183-188. 10.12968/live.2019.24.4.183. • Broom, D.M. & Fraser, A.F. (2007) Welfare Assessment in Direct Measures of Good Welfare. In Domestic animal behaviour and welfare, 4th edition, Broom, D.M. and A.F. Fraser (Eds.), p.65, Cambridge University Press, London. • Cafe, L.M., Robinson, D.L., Ferguson, D.M., McIntyre, B.L., Geesink, G.H., Greenwood, P.L. (2011). Cattle temperament: Persistence of assessments and associations with productivity, efficiency, carcass and meat quality traits. Journal of animal science, 89(5), 1452-1465. • Claxton, A.M. (2011). The potential of the human-animal relationship as an environmental enrichment for the welfare of zoo-housed animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 133(1–2):1–10. • Coria-Avila, G.A., Pfaus, J.G., Orihuela, A., Domínguez-Oliva, A., José-Pérez, N., Hernández, L.A., Mota-Rojas, D. (2022). The Neurobiology of Behavior and Its Applicability for Animal Welfare: A Review. Animals 12, 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070928. • Crast, J., Bloomsmith M.A., Jonesteller, T.J. (2016). Effects of enhanced enrichment in sooty mangabeys. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 55(6). • Curley, Jr O. (2004). Influence of temperament on bovine hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function. Master of Science. Texas A&M University, de Oliveira Roça, R. Modificações post-mortem (F.C.A. - UNESP - Campus de Botucatu). • da Silva, P.M., Ferreira, I.C., da Fonseca Neto, Á.M., Malaquias, J.V., de Pinho, A.S., de Oliveira, A.S., Martins, C.F. (2021). Does environmental enrichment consisting of brushing prepartum zebu heifers improve first-lactation behavior? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 234, 105206. • Demba, S. & Rose, S. (2023) Changes in amount and length of periods of stereotypic behavior in Jersey cows with and without access to pasture. Front. Anim. Sci. 4:1148523. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2023.1148523 • Destrez, A., Haslin, E., Boivin, X. (2018). What stockperson behavior during weighing reveals about the relationship between humans and suckling beef cattle: A preliminary study. Applied animal behaviour science, 209, 8-13. • Dickson, E.J., Campbell, D.L., Lee, C., Lea, J.M., McDonald, P.G., Monk, J.E. (2022). Beef Cattle Preference and Usage of Environmental Enrichments Provided Simultaneously in a Pasture-Based Environment. Animals, 12(24), 3544. • Dickson, E.J., Monk, J.E., Lee, C., Campbell, D.L. (2024). Environmental enrichment during yard weaning alters the performance of calves in an attention bias and a novel object recognition test. Frontiers in Animal Science, 5, 1364259. • Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC). (1992). The Five freedoms. Veterinary Record 131, 357. • Federación Colombiana de Ganaderos -Fedegán. (2020). El enorme aporte de la ganadería a la economía de Colombia. Agricultura de las Américas. • Ferguson, D.M. & Warner, R.D. (2008). Have we underestimated the impact of preslaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat science, 80(1), 12-19. • Fraser, D., Fraser, A. F., Ritchie, J.S.D. (1975). The term “stress” in a veterinary context. British Veterinary Journal, 131(6), 653-662. • Fordyce, G. & Goddard, M.E. (1984). Maternal influence on the temperament of Bos indicus cross cows. In Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production (Vol. 15, pp. 345-348). • Fordyce, G., Goddard, M.E., Tyler, R., Williams, G., Toleman, M.A. (1985). Temperament and bruising of Bos indicus cross cattle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 25(2), 283-288. • Fraser, D. & Duncan, I.J. (1998). ‘Pleasures’,'pains’ and animal welfare: toward a natural history of affect. Animal welfare, 7(4), 383-396. • Georg, H. & Totschek, K. (2001). Investigation of an automatic brush for dairy cows. Landtechnik, 56, 260-261. • Godyn, D, Nowicki, J, Herbut, P. (2019). Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Pig Welfare. Animals:1–17. • Grunert, K.G., Sonntag, W.I., Glanz-Chanos, V., Forum, S. (2018). Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment. Meat science, 137, 123-129. • Guy, J. H.; Meads, Z. A.; Shiel, R. S. and Edwards, S. A. (2013). The effect of combining different environmental enrichmentmaterials on enrichment use by growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 144:102-10. 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.01.006. • Hemsworth, P.H., & Coleman, G.J. (2010). Human-livestock interactions: The stockperson and the productivity of intensively farmed animals. CABI. • Hemsworth, P.H., Sherwen, S.L., Coleman, G.J. (2018). Human contact. Animal welfare, (Ed. 3), 294-314. • Herron, M.E, Buffington, C.A.T. (2010). Environmental enrichment for indoor cats. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 32(12). • Horvath, K.C., Allen, A.N., Miller-Cushon E.K. (2020). Effects of access to stationary brushes and chopped hay on behavior and performance of individually housed dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 103(9):8421-8432. PMID: 32564951. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-18042. • Horvath, K.C., Miller-Cushon, E.K. (2019). Characterizing grooming behavior patterns and the influence of brush access on the behavior of group-housed dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 102(4):3421-3430. PMID: 30738669. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15460. • Huber, R., Baumung, R., Wurzinger, M., Semambo, D., Okeyo, A., Winckler, C. (2008). Grazing, social and comfort behaviour of Ankole and crossbred (Ankole × Holstein) heifers on pasture in south western Uganda. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 112. 223-234. 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.08.006. • Hultgren, J., Arvidsson Segerkvist, K., Berg, C., Karlsson, A.H., Algers, B. (2020). Animal handling and stress-related behaviour at mobile slaughter of cattle. Prev Vet Med, 177:104959. PMID: 32240886. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104959. • Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario-ICA. (2020). Resolución No 067449 (08/05/2020). Requisitos para obtener la certificación en Buenas Prácticas Ganaderas-BPG en la producción de leche https:/ www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/Areas/Pecuaria/S ervicios/Inocuidad-en-las-CadenasAgroalimentarias/LISTADO-DE-PREDIOS-CERTIFICADOSEN-BPG/Resolucion-067449-del-08-de-mayo-2020- 1.pdf.aspx?lang=es-CO • Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario-ICA. (2020). Resolución N°068167 (20/05/2020). Requisitos para obtener la certificación en Buenas Prácticas Ganaderas-BPG en la producción de carne de bovinos y/o bufalinos. https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/db5b53ff-0752-4884- 90b8- a7ce15ce1ead/2020R68167.aspx#:~:text=BUENAS%20PRÁCTICAS %20GANADERAS%20(BPG)%3A,la%20protección%20del%20medio%20ambiente. • Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario-ICA. (2015). Resolución Nº 003714 (20/10/2015). Por la cual se establecen las enfermedades de declaración obligatoria en Colombia. https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/3188abb6-2297-44e2-89e6- 3a5dbd4db210/2015R3714.aspx#:~:text=4%20(20%20OCT.,de%20declaración%20oblig atoria%20en%20Colombia".&text=2015)%20003714- ,"Por%20la%20cual%20se%20establecen%20las,de%20declaración%20obligatoria%20e n%20Colombia". • Ishiwata, T., Uetake, K., Abe, N., Eguchi, Y., Tanaka, T. (2006). Effects of an environmental enrichment using a drum can on behavioral, physiological and productive characteristics in fattening beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 77, 352–362. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1740-0929.2006.00359.x • Johnson, R.A., Johnson, P.J., Megarani, D.V., Patel S.D., Yaglom H.D., Osterlind, S., Grindler, K., Vogelweid, C.M., Parker, T.M., Pascua, C.K. (2017). Horses Working in Therapeutic Riding Programs: Cortisol, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Glucose, and Behavior Stress Indicators. J Equine Vet Sci. 57:77–85. • Kendrick, K.M., da Costa, A.P., Leigh, A.E., Hinton, M.R., Peirce, J.W. (2001). Sheep don't forget a face. Nature, 414(6860), 165-166. • León-Llanos, L. M. & Flórez-Díaz, H. (2016). La importancia del temperamento en la producción de ganado de carne bovina. Orinoquia, 20(2), 55-63. • Leruste, H., Bokkers, E.A.M., Heutinck, L.F.M., Wolthuis-Fillerup, M., Van Der Werf, J.T.N., Brscic, M., Lensink, B.J. (2012). Evaluation of on-farm veal calves’ responses to unfamiliar humans and potential influencing factors. Animal, 6(12), 2003-2010. • Maciel, A.B. (2006). Proposta de avaliação da condição corporal em vacas Holandesa e Nelore. Botucatu. Dissertação (Mestrado). UNESP Botucatu. Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Programa de Pos-graduação em Zootecnia. • MADR, M. Resolución 126. (2022). Lineamientos de Política de Ganadería Bovina Sostenible 2022-2050, Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (MADR), Ministerio de Ambiento y Desarrollo Sostenible (MADS), Bogotá, DC, Colombia. • Mandel, R., Whay, H.R., Klement, E., Nicol, C.J. (2016). Invited review: Environmental enrichment of dairy cows and calves in indoor housing. Journal of dairy science, 99(3), 1695-1715. • McConnachie, E., Smid, A.M.C., Thompson, A.J., Weary, D.M., Gaworski, M.A., Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2018). Cows are highly motivated to access a grooming substrate. Biol. Lett.1420180303. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0303. • Moreno, P.S., Salamanca, P.N., Pérez, Z.D., Arango, S.J., Cobos, S.O. (2021). Cartilla ilustrativa: elementos bióticos (Mycota, Plantae, Animalia) del área natural “reserva” del Centro Agroindustrial del Meta, CAM sede Hachón. https://repositorio.sena.edu.co/handle/11404/7193 • Morgan, K.N., & Tromborg, C.T. (2007). Sources of stress in captivity. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 102, 262–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032. • Müller, R., & von Keyserlingk, M.A. (2006). Consistency of flight speed and its correlation to productivity and to personality in Bos taurus beef cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 99(3-4), 193-204. • Munilla, M.E., Lado, M., Vittone, J.S., Romera, S.A. (2019). Bienestar animal durante el período de engorde de bovinos. Revista veterinaria, 30(2), 82-89. • Ninomiya, S. & Sato, S. (2009). Effects of ‘Five freedoms’ environmental enrichment on the welfare of calves reared indoors. Animal science journal, 80(3), 347-351. • Owen, M.A., Swaisgood, R.R., Czekala, N.M., Donald, G., Lindburg, D.G. (2005). Enclosure choice and well-being in giant pandas: is it all about control? Zoo Biol. 24:475–81. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20064. • Paranhos da Costa, M.J.R., San’Anna, A.C., Silva, L.C.M. (2015). Temperamento de bovinos Gir e Girolando: efeitos geneticos e de manejo. Informe Agropecuario 36 (286), 100–107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289533842_Tempe ramento_de_bovinos_Gir_e_Girolando_efeitos_geneticos_e_de_manejo. • Park, R.M., Schubach, K.M., Cooke, R.F., Herring, A.D., Jennings, J.S., Daigle, C.L. (2020). Impact of a cattle brush on feedlot steer behavior, productivity and stress physiology. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 228, 104995. • Pempek, J., Eastridge, M., Proudfoot, K. (2017). The effect of a furnished individual hutch pre-weaning on calf behavior, response to novelty, and growth. Journal of Dairy Science, 100. 10.3168/jds.2016-12180. • Pinillos, R.G., Appleby, M.C., Manteca, X., Scott‐Park, F., Smith, C., Velarde, A. (2016). One Welfare–a platform for improving human and animal welfare. Veterinary Record, 179(16), 412-413. • Rault, J.L., Sandøe, P., Sonntag, Q., Stuardo, L. (2022). Positive animal welfare: bridging the gap or raising inequalities worldwide? Frontiers in Animal Science, 3, 825379. • Rault, J.L., Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X., Hemsworth, P. (2020). The power of a positive human–animal relationship for animal welfare. Frontiers in veterinary science, 7, 590867. • Reyes, F.S., Gimenez, A.R., Anderson, K.M., Miller-Cushon, E.K., Dorea, J.R., Van Os, J.M.C. (2022). Impact of Stationary Brush Quantity on Brush Use in Group-Housed Dairy Heifers. Animals 12, 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12080972. • Ross, S.R. (2006). Issues of choice and control in the behaviour of a pair of captive polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Behav Proc. 73:117–20. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.04.003. • Schütz, A., Busch, G., Sonntag, W.I. (2020). Environmental enrichment in pig husbandry–Citizens’ ratings of pictures showing housing elements using an online-survey. Livestock Science, 240, 104218. • Sinclair, M., Lee, N.Y., Hötzel, M.J., de Luna, M.C., Sharma, A., Idris, M., Derkley, T., Li, C., Islam, M.A., Iyasere, O.S., Navarro, G., Ahmed, A.A., Khruapradab, C., Curry, M., Burns, G.L., Marchant, J.N. (2022). International perceptions of animals and the importance of their welfare. Front Anim Sci, 3:960379. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2022.960379. • Strappini, A.C., Monti, G., Sepúlveda-Varas, P., de Freslon, I., Peralta, J. M. (2021). Measuring Calves' Usage of Multiple Environmental Enrichment Objects Provided Simultaneously. Front Vet Sci, 8:698681. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.698681. • Taylor, P.S., Schrobback, P., Verdon, M., Lee, C. (2023). An effective environmental enrichment framework for the continual improvement of production animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 32:e14. doi:10.1017/awf.2023.5. • Van de Weerd, H.A. & Day, J.E. (2009). A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116(1), 1-20. • Van Reenen, C.G., Van der Werf, J.T., Bruckmaier, R.M., Hopster, H., Engel, B., Noordhuizen, J.P., Blokhuis, H.J. (2002). Individual differences in behavioral and physiological responsiveness of primiparous dairy cows to machine milking. J Dairy Sci, 85, 2551–2561. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74338-5. • Van Os, J.M., Goldstein, S.A., Weary, D.M., von Keyserlingk, M.A. (2021). Stationary brush use in naive dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci, 104(11):12019-12029. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20467. Epub 2021 Aug 5. PMID: 34364642. • Vargas, Á.G., & Jaramillo H.D. (2013). Identificación y efectos de los diferentes métodos del amamantamiento restringido sobre la funcionalidad ovárica posparto en hembras bovinas mestizas doble propósito. Revista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicos, 4(1), 78-107. https://doi.org/10.22579/22484817.612. • Vigors, B., Ewing, D.A., Lawrence A.B. (2021). The Importance of Farm Animal Health and Natural Behaviors to Livestock Farmers: Findings From a Factorial Survey Using Vignettes. Front Anim Sci, 2:638782. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2021.638782. • Villalba, J.J & Manteca, X. (2019). A Case for Eustress in Grazing Animals. Front Vet Sci, 6:303. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00303. • Voisinet, B.D., Grandin, T., Tatum, J.D., O'Connor, S.F., Struthers, J.J. (1997). Feedlot cattle with calm temperaments have higher average daily gains than cattle with excitable temperaments. J Anim Sci, 75(4):892-6. doi: 10.2527/1997.754892x. PMID: 9110198. • Welfare Quality. (2009). Assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Leystad, Netherlands. • Wilson, S.C., Mitlöhner, F.M., Morrow-Tesch, J., Dailey, J.W., McGlone, J.J. (2002). An assessment of several potential enrichment devices for feedlot cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 76(4), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00019-9 • Zhang, C., Juniper, D., Meagher, R.K. (2021). Effects of physical enrichment items and social housing on calves’ growth, behaviour and response to novelty. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 237. 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105295. • Zobel, G., Neave, H.W., Henderson, H.V., Webster, J. (2017). Calves Use an Automated Brush and a Hanging Rope When Pair-Housed. Animals, 7, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7110084 |
| dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/sistemasagroecologicos/article/download/1142/1138 |
| dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv |
Núm. 2 , Año 2024 : Julio-Diciembre |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
1142 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
2 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
15 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicos |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicos - 2024 |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Revista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicos - 2024 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de los Llanos |
| dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/sistemasagroecologicos/article/view/1142 |
| institution |
Universidad de los Llanos |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/bitstreams/7b17f80d-135b-4505-8152-78e5d94ab7a2/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
56d4ac6300ba4a2e2b6f746d40bea7b4 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad de Los Llanos |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@unillanos.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1812104643286663168 |
| spelling |
Jaramillo Hernández, Dumar Alexandervirtual::163-1Vargas Angel, Gino OdairJaramillo-Hernández , Dumar AlexanderMainau Brunsó, Eva2024-09-13T00:00:00Z2024-09-13T00:00:00Z2024-09-13Los bovinos en pastoreo extensivo del trópico bajo sobreviven a limitantes nutricionales, de salud y de bienestar, las cuales desafían constantemente la capacidad humana para brindarles planes de mejoramiento capaces de generar adaptabilidad al contexto productivo, disminuyendo las adversidades de un entorno ambiental y social. El objetivo de esta investigación fue analizar los tiempos de interacción y preferencia de los elementos de enriquecimiento ambiental, la relación humano-animal y ganancia de peso de bovinos en pastoreo del trópico bajo. Para ello, se utilizaron 26 bovinos que pastan en sistemas extensivos naturales, divididos al azar y aleatoriamente en dos grupos: el primero denominado G1C control, en el cual fue inexistente el uso de elementos de enriquecimiento ambiental en las áreas de pastoreo. Por otro lado, el grupo dos denominado G2EA, al cual se integraba durante una hora (9:00 am a 10:00 am) un ambiente modificado enriquecido con llantas, cepillos comerciales y cepillos artesanales. Los animales fueron evaluados por veinte horas durante cuatro semanas. En estas observaciones se valoraron los tiempos de contacto físico e interacción con los elementos enriquecidos, la relación humano-animal a través de 5 test Welfare Quality de miedo aproximación-evasión y la ganancia de peso durante el ensayo. Los datos fueron analizados con el programa estadístico SAS® versión 9.4. Se identificó que el enriquecimiento ambiental tuvo efectos comportamentales significativos en algunas de las variables analizadas como la relación humano-animal, siendo el grupo G2EA el que presentó mayores porcentajes de animales que permitieron un afianzamiento positivo. La interacción con los elementos de enriquecimiento que captó mayor porcentaje de uso fue el cepillo comercial estático. El enriquecimiento ambiental otorga a los bovinos de este experimento efectos beneficiosos de la relación humano-animal y efectos positivos para la ganancia de peso. Es necesario llevar a cabo más estudios, con un mayor número de animales de diferentes grupos etarios y técnicas productivas, probando diferentes ambientes modificados.Cattle in extensive grazing in the low tropics survive different nutritional, health and well-being limitations, which constantly challenge human capacity to provide them with improvement plans capable of generating adaptability to the productive context, reducing the adversities of an environmental and social environment. The objective of this research was to analyze the interaction times and preference of environmental enrichment elements, the human-animal relationship and weight gain of grazing cattle in the low tropics. For this, 26 cattle were used, which graze in natural extensive systems, randomly divided into two groups, the first called G1C control, in which elements of environmental enrichment were non-existent in the grazing areas. On the other hand, group two called G2EA, which was integrated for one hour (9:00 am to 10:00 am) in a modified environment enriched with tires, commercial brushes and handmade brushes. The animals were evaluated for 20 hours for 4 weeks. In these observations, the times of physical contact and interaction with the enriched elements, the human-animal relationship were assessed through 5 Welfare Quality tests of approach-avoidance fear and weight gain during the test. The data were analyzed with the statistical program SAS® Software, version 9.4. It was identified that environmental enrichment had significant behavioral effects on some of the variables analyzed such as the human-animal relationship, with the G2EA group being the one that presented the highest percentages of animals that allowed positive consolidation. The interaction with the enrichment elements that captured the highest percentage of use was the static commercial brush. Environmental enrichment gives the cattle in this experiment beneficial effects of the human-animal relationship, positive effects for weight gain. It is necessary to carry out more studies, with a greater number of animals of different age groups and production techniques, testing different modified environments.application/pdfspaUniversidad de los LlanosRevista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicos - 2024https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistas.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/sistemasagroecologicos/article/view/1142behaviorcattleenrichmentextensive productionwellbeingbienestarcomportamientoenriquecimientoganado vacunoproducción extensivabem-estarcomportamentogado bovinoenriquecimentoprodução extensaEfecto del enriquecimiento ambiental sobre la ganancia de peso y la relación humano-animal en bovinos en pastoreoEffect of environmental enrichment on weight gain and human-animal relationship in grazing cattleArtículo de revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Texthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a8510.22579/22484817.11422248-4817https://doi.org/10.22579/22484817.1142• Agricultura de las Américas. (2020). El enorme aporte de la ganadería a la economía de Colombia. Agricultura de las Américas. https://agriculturadelasamericas.com/pecuaria/productores-ganaderos-yseguridadalimentaria-mundial/• Alonso, M.E., González-Montaña, J.R., Lomillos, J. M. (2020). Consumers’ concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animals, 10(3), 385.• Barnett, J., Hemsworth, P., Hand, A. (1983). Effects of chronic stress on some blood parameters in the pig. Appl. Anim. Ethol, 9, 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0304-3762(83)90007-X.• Boivin, X., Lensink, J., Tallet, C., Veissier, I. (2003). Stockmanship and farm animal welfare. Animal welfare, 12(4), 479-492.• Boivin, X. (2018). Animal experience of domestication. In Animal welfare in a changing world (pp. 154-161). Wallingford UK: CAB International.• Bolt, S. & George, A. (2019). The use of environmental enrichment on farms benefits animal welfare and productivity. Livestock, 24. 183-188. 10.12968/live.2019.24.4.183.• Broom, D.M. & Fraser, A.F. (2007) Welfare Assessment in Direct Measures of Good Welfare. In Domestic animal behaviour and welfare, 4th edition, Broom, D.M. and A.F. Fraser (Eds.), p.65, Cambridge University Press, London.• Cafe, L.M., Robinson, D.L., Ferguson, D.M., McIntyre, B.L., Geesink, G.H., Greenwood, P.L. (2011). Cattle temperament: Persistence of assessments and associations with productivity, efficiency, carcass and meat quality traits. Journal of animal science, 89(5), 1452-1465.• Claxton, A.M. (2011). The potential of the human-animal relationship as an environmental enrichment for the welfare of zoo-housed animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 133(1–2):1–10.• Coria-Avila, G.A., Pfaus, J.G., Orihuela, A., Domínguez-Oliva, A., José-Pérez, N., Hernández, L.A., Mota-Rojas, D. (2022). The Neurobiology of Behavior and Its Applicability for Animal Welfare: A Review. Animals 12, 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070928.• Crast, J., Bloomsmith M.A., Jonesteller, T.J. (2016). Effects of enhanced enrichment in sooty mangabeys. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 55(6).• Curley, Jr O. (2004). Influence of temperament on bovine hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function. Master of Science. Texas A&M University, de Oliveira Roça, R. Modificações post-mortem (F.C.A. - UNESP - Campus de Botucatu).• da Silva, P.M., Ferreira, I.C., da Fonseca Neto, Á.M., Malaquias, J.V., de Pinho, A.S., de Oliveira, A.S., Martins, C.F. (2021). Does environmental enrichment consisting of brushing prepartum zebu heifers improve first-lactation behavior? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 234, 105206.• Demba, S. & Rose, S. (2023) Changes in amount and length of periods of stereotypic behavior in Jersey cows with and without access to pasture. Front. Anim. Sci. 4:1148523. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2023.1148523• Destrez, A., Haslin, E., Boivin, X. (2018). What stockperson behavior during weighing reveals about the relationship between humans and suckling beef cattle: A preliminary study. Applied animal behaviour science, 209, 8-13.• Dickson, E.J., Campbell, D.L., Lee, C., Lea, J.M., McDonald, P.G., Monk, J.E. (2022). Beef Cattle Preference and Usage of Environmental Enrichments Provided Simultaneously in a Pasture-Based Environment. Animals, 12(24), 3544.• Dickson, E.J., Monk, J.E., Lee, C., Campbell, D.L. (2024). Environmental enrichment during yard weaning alters the performance of calves in an attention bias and a novel object recognition test. Frontiers in Animal Science, 5, 1364259.• Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC). (1992). The Five freedoms. Veterinary Record 131, 357.• Federación Colombiana de Ganaderos -Fedegán. (2020). El enorme aporte de la ganadería a la economía de Colombia. Agricultura de las Américas.• Ferguson, D.M. & Warner, R.D. (2008). Have we underestimated the impact of preslaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat science, 80(1), 12-19.• Fraser, D., Fraser, A. F., Ritchie, J.S.D. (1975). The term “stress” in a veterinary context. British Veterinary Journal, 131(6), 653-662.• Fordyce, G. & Goddard, M.E. (1984). Maternal influence on the temperament of Bos indicus cross cows. In Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production (Vol. 15, pp. 345-348).• Fordyce, G., Goddard, M.E., Tyler, R., Williams, G., Toleman, M.A. (1985). Temperament and bruising of Bos indicus cross cattle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 25(2), 283-288.• Fraser, D. & Duncan, I.J. (1998). ‘Pleasures’,'pains’ and animal welfare: toward a natural history of affect. Animal welfare, 7(4), 383-396.• Georg, H. & Totschek, K. (2001). Investigation of an automatic brush for dairy cows. Landtechnik, 56, 260-261.• Godyn, D, Nowicki, J, Herbut, P. (2019). Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Pig Welfare. Animals:1–17.• Grunert, K.G., Sonntag, W.I., Glanz-Chanos, V., Forum, S. (2018). Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment. Meat science, 137, 123-129.• Guy, J. H.; Meads, Z. A.; Shiel, R. S. and Edwards, S. A. (2013). The effect of combining different environmental enrichmentmaterials on enrichment use by growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 144:102-10. 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.01.006.• Hemsworth, P.H., & Coleman, G.J. (2010). Human-livestock interactions: The stockperson and the productivity of intensively farmed animals. CABI.• Hemsworth, P.H., Sherwen, S.L., Coleman, G.J. (2018). Human contact. Animal welfare, (Ed. 3), 294-314.• Herron, M.E, Buffington, C.A.T. (2010). Environmental enrichment for indoor cats. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 32(12).• Horvath, K.C., Allen, A.N., Miller-Cushon E.K. (2020). Effects of access to stationary brushes and chopped hay on behavior and performance of individually housed dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 103(9):8421-8432. PMID: 32564951. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-18042.• Horvath, K.C., Miller-Cushon, E.K. (2019). Characterizing grooming behavior patterns and the influence of brush access on the behavior of group-housed dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 102(4):3421-3430. PMID: 30738669. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15460.• Huber, R., Baumung, R., Wurzinger, M., Semambo, D., Okeyo, A., Winckler, C. (2008). Grazing, social and comfort behaviour of Ankole and crossbred (Ankole × Holstein) heifers on pasture in south western Uganda. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 112. 223-234. 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.08.006.• Hultgren, J., Arvidsson Segerkvist, K., Berg, C., Karlsson, A.H., Algers, B. (2020). Animal handling and stress-related behaviour at mobile slaughter of cattle. Prev Vet Med, 177:104959. PMID: 32240886. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104959.• Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario-ICA. (2020). Resolución No 067449 (08/05/2020). Requisitos para obtener la certificación en Buenas Prácticas Ganaderas-BPG en la producción de leche https:/ www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/Areas/Pecuaria/S ervicios/Inocuidad-en-las-CadenasAgroalimentarias/LISTADO-DE-PREDIOS-CERTIFICADOSEN-BPG/Resolucion-067449-del-08-de-mayo-2020- 1.pdf.aspx?lang=es-CO• Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario-ICA. (2020). Resolución N°068167 (20/05/2020). Requisitos para obtener la certificación en Buenas Prácticas Ganaderas-BPG en la producción de carne de bovinos y/o bufalinos. https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/db5b53ff-0752-4884- 90b8- a7ce15ce1ead/2020R68167.aspx#:~:text=BUENAS%20PRÁCTICAS %20GANADERAS%20(BPG)%3A,la%20protección%20del%20medio%20ambiente.• Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario-ICA. (2015). Resolución Nº 003714 (20/10/2015). Por la cual se establecen las enfermedades de declaración obligatoria en Colombia. https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/3188abb6-2297-44e2-89e6- 3a5dbd4db210/2015R3714.aspx#:~:text=4%20(20%20OCT.,de%20declaración%20oblig atoria%20en%20Colombia".&text=2015)%20003714- ,"Por%20la%20cual%20se%20establecen%20las,de%20declaración%20obligatoria%20e n%20Colombia".• Ishiwata, T., Uetake, K., Abe, N., Eguchi, Y., Tanaka, T. (2006). Effects of an environmental enrichment using a drum can on behavioral, physiological and productive characteristics in fattening beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 77, 352–362. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1740-0929.2006.00359.x• Johnson, R.A., Johnson, P.J., Megarani, D.V., Patel S.D., Yaglom H.D., Osterlind, S., Grindler, K., Vogelweid, C.M., Parker, T.M., Pascua, C.K. (2017). Horses Working in Therapeutic Riding Programs: Cortisol, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Glucose, and Behavior Stress Indicators. J Equine Vet Sci. 57:77–85.• Kendrick, K.M., da Costa, A.P., Leigh, A.E., Hinton, M.R., Peirce, J.W. (2001). Sheep don't forget a face. Nature, 414(6860), 165-166.• León-Llanos, L. M. & Flórez-Díaz, H. (2016). La importancia del temperamento en la producción de ganado de carne bovina. Orinoquia, 20(2), 55-63.• Leruste, H., Bokkers, E.A.M., Heutinck, L.F.M., Wolthuis-Fillerup, M., Van Der Werf, J.T.N., Brscic, M., Lensink, B.J. (2012). Evaluation of on-farm veal calves’ responses to unfamiliar humans and potential influencing factors. Animal, 6(12), 2003-2010.• Maciel, A.B. (2006). Proposta de avaliação da condição corporal em vacas Holandesa e Nelore. Botucatu. Dissertação (Mestrado). UNESP Botucatu. Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Programa de Pos-graduação em Zootecnia.• MADR, M. Resolución 126. (2022). Lineamientos de Política de Ganadería Bovina Sostenible 2022-2050, Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (MADR), Ministerio de Ambiento y Desarrollo Sostenible (MADS), Bogotá, DC, Colombia.• Mandel, R., Whay, H.R., Klement, E., Nicol, C.J. (2016). Invited review: Environmental enrichment of dairy cows and calves in indoor housing. Journal of dairy science, 99(3), 1695-1715.• McConnachie, E., Smid, A.M.C., Thompson, A.J., Weary, D.M., Gaworski, M.A., Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2018). Cows are highly motivated to access a grooming substrate. Biol. Lett.1420180303. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0303.• Moreno, P.S., Salamanca, P.N., Pérez, Z.D., Arango, S.J., Cobos, S.O. (2021). Cartilla ilustrativa: elementos bióticos (Mycota, Plantae, Animalia) del área natural “reserva” del Centro Agroindustrial del Meta, CAM sede Hachón. https://repositorio.sena.edu.co/handle/11404/7193• Morgan, K.N., & Tromborg, C.T. (2007). Sources of stress in captivity. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 102, 262–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032.• Müller, R., & von Keyserlingk, M.A. (2006). Consistency of flight speed and its correlation to productivity and to personality in Bos taurus beef cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 99(3-4), 193-204.• Munilla, M.E., Lado, M., Vittone, J.S., Romera, S.A. (2019). Bienestar animal durante el período de engorde de bovinos. Revista veterinaria, 30(2), 82-89.• Ninomiya, S. & Sato, S. (2009). Effects of ‘Five freedoms’ environmental enrichment on the welfare of calves reared indoors. Animal science journal, 80(3), 347-351.• Owen, M.A., Swaisgood, R.R., Czekala, N.M., Donald, G., Lindburg, D.G. (2005). Enclosure choice and well-being in giant pandas: is it all about control? Zoo Biol. 24:475–81. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20064.• Paranhos da Costa, M.J.R., San’Anna, A.C., Silva, L.C.M. (2015). Temperamento de bovinos Gir e Girolando: efeitos geneticos e de manejo. Informe Agropecuario 36 (286), 100–107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289533842_Tempe ramento_de_bovinos_Gir_e_Girolando_efeitos_geneticos_e_de_manejo.• Park, R.M., Schubach, K.M., Cooke, R.F., Herring, A.D., Jennings, J.S., Daigle, C.L. (2020). Impact of a cattle brush on feedlot steer behavior, productivity and stress physiology. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 228, 104995.• Pempek, J., Eastridge, M., Proudfoot, K. (2017). The effect of a furnished individual hutch pre-weaning on calf behavior, response to novelty, and growth. Journal of Dairy Science, 100. 10.3168/jds.2016-12180.• Pinillos, R.G., Appleby, M.C., Manteca, X., Scott‐Park, F., Smith, C., Velarde, A. (2016). One Welfare–a platform for improving human and animal welfare. Veterinary Record, 179(16), 412-413.• Rault, J.L., Sandøe, P., Sonntag, Q., Stuardo, L. (2022). Positive animal welfare: bridging the gap or raising inequalities worldwide? Frontiers in Animal Science, 3, 825379.• Rault, J.L., Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X., Hemsworth, P. (2020). The power of a positive human–animal relationship for animal welfare. Frontiers in veterinary science, 7, 590867.• Reyes, F.S., Gimenez, A.R., Anderson, K.M., Miller-Cushon, E.K., Dorea, J.R., Van Os, J.M.C. (2022). Impact of Stationary Brush Quantity on Brush Use in Group-Housed Dairy Heifers. Animals 12, 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12080972.• Ross, S.R. (2006). Issues of choice and control in the behaviour of a pair of captive polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Behav Proc. 73:117–20. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.04.003.• Schütz, A., Busch, G., Sonntag, W.I. (2020). Environmental enrichment in pig husbandry–Citizens’ ratings of pictures showing housing elements using an online-survey. Livestock Science, 240, 104218.• Sinclair, M., Lee, N.Y., Hötzel, M.J., de Luna, M.C., Sharma, A., Idris, M., Derkley, T., Li, C., Islam, M.A., Iyasere, O.S., Navarro, G., Ahmed, A.A., Khruapradab, C., Curry, M., Burns, G.L., Marchant, J.N. (2022). International perceptions of animals and the importance of their welfare. Front Anim Sci, 3:960379. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2022.960379.• Strappini, A.C., Monti, G., Sepúlveda-Varas, P., de Freslon, I., Peralta, J. M. (2021). Measuring Calves' Usage of Multiple Environmental Enrichment Objects Provided Simultaneously. Front Vet Sci, 8:698681. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.698681.• Taylor, P.S., Schrobback, P., Verdon, M., Lee, C. (2023). An effective environmental enrichment framework for the continual improvement of production animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 32:e14. doi:10.1017/awf.2023.5.• Van de Weerd, H.A. & Day, J.E. (2009). A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116(1), 1-20.• Van Reenen, C.G., Van der Werf, J.T., Bruckmaier, R.M., Hopster, H., Engel, B., Noordhuizen, J.P., Blokhuis, H.J. (2002). Individual differences in behavioral and physiological responsiveness of primiparous dairy cows to machine milking. J Dairy Sci, 85, 2551–2561. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74338-5.• Van Os, J.M., Goldstein, S.A., Weary, D.M., von Keyserlingk, M.A. (2021). Stationary brush use in naive dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci, 104(11):12019-12029. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20467. Epub 2021 Aug 5. PMID: 34364642.• Vargas, Á.G., & Jaramillo H.D. (2013). Identificación y efectos de los diferentes métodos del amamantamiento restringido sobre la funcionalidad ovárica posparto en hembras bovinas mestizas doble propósito. Revista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicos, 4(1), 78-107. https://doi.org/10.22579/22484817.612.• Vigors, B., Ewing, D.A., Lawrence A.B. (2021). The Importance of Farm Animal Health and Natural Behaviors to Livestock Farmers: Findings From a Factorial Survey Using Vignettes. Front Anim Sci, 2:638782. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2021.638782.• Villalba, J.J & Manteca, X. (2019). A Case for Eustress in Grazing Animals. Front Vet Sci, 6:303. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00303.• Voisinet, B.D., Grandin, T., Tatum, J.D., O'Connor, S.F., Struthers, J.J. (1997). Feedlot cattle with calm temperaments have higher average daily gains than cattle with excitable temperaments. J Anim Sci, 75(4):892-6. doi: 10.2527/1997.754892x. PMID: 9110198.• Welfare Quality. (2009). Assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Leystad, Netherlands.• Wilson, S.C., Mitlöhner, F.M., Morrow-Tesch, J., Dailey, J.W., McGlone, J.J. (2002). An assessment of several potential enrichment devices for feedlot cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 76(4), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00019-9• Zhang, C., Juniper, D., Meagher, R.K. (2021). Effects of physical enrichment items and social housing on calves’ growth, behaviour and response to novelty. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 237. 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105295.• Zobel, G., Neave, H.W., Henderson, H.V., Webster, J. (2017). Calves Use an Automated Brush and a Hanging Rope When Pair-Housed. Animals, 7, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7110084https://revistas.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/sistemasagroecologicos/article/download/1142/1138Núm. 2 , Año 2024 : Julio-Diciembre1142215Revista Sistemas de Producción AgroecológicosPublicationhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ugMx8ecAAAAJ&hl=esvirtual::163-10000-0003-1377-1747virtual::163-1https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000633925virtual::163-13e90075e-e6d7-4a60-9623-0d169fda1eaevirtual::163-13e90075e-e6d7-4a60-9623-0d169fda1eaevirtual::163-1OREORE.xmltext/xml2755https://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/bitstreams/7b17f80d-135b-4505-8152-78e5d94ab7a2/download56d4ac6300ba4a2e2b6f746d40bea7b4MD51001/4399oai:repositorio.unillanos.edu.co:001/43992024-10-04 18:06:15.148https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Revista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicos - 2024metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.unillanos.edu.coRepositorio Universidad de Los Llanosrepositorio@unillanos.edu.co |