Revisión sistemática sobre la metodología implementada en documentos basados en el desarrollo de la toma de decisiones en los jugadores de baloncesto
This research was born from the need to find accurate evidence that allows basketball players and coaches to have a better development of decision-making in the teaching-learning process and in this way, contribute significantly to this sporting aspect, taking into account the importance that is pre...
- Autores:
-
Ramírez Gómez, Jeisson Camilo
García Martínez, Santiago
- Tipo de recurso:
- Trabajo de grado de pregrado
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional - Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uceva.edu.co:20.500.12993/922
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12993/922
- Palabra clave:
- Programas de entrenamiento
Metodología
Baloncesto
Toma de decisiones
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos reservados - Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca
Summary: | This research was born from the need to find accurate evidence that allows basketball players and coaches to have a better development of decision-making in the teaching-learning process and in this way, contribute significantly to this sporting aspect, taking into account the importance that is present today, being a determining factor in the game. The objective was to analyze the methodological trends implemented in documents based on the development of decision-making in basketball players. A qualitative approach with a descriptive observational scope and a critical systematic review design was presented, seeking to create new interpretations from previously selected research. In accordance with the above, when making the selection of studies taking into account the inclusion and exclusion criteria proposed by the authors, a double-entry matrix was used to systematize the data, in this matrix six variables were proposed to characterize each research, the variables were: teaching model, teaching method, role of the player, role of the teacher, didactic task and evaluation. Likewise, supported by different authors, the researchers were based on two teaching models, which are the traditional model and the alternative model, the latter is divided into three, the alternative horizontal structural model, the alternative horizontal comprehensive model, and the alternative vertical model. As significant results, a prevalence was found in the use of alternative models, with 88% compared to the traditional model, which only had 12%. In this way, it was possible to show the importance that these models currently have in the development of decision-making in basketball players, obtaining excellent results at the sporting and personal level of the players and coaches who were participants in each intervention that took place. Into account in this research. The same procedure was carried out with each and every one of the variables raised. |
---|