Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane ethanol

The key objective of this study was to evaluate and compare, within the concept of integrated biorefining, the potential environmental gains of the life cycle, economic feasibility and energy balance of the production of bioenergetics from palm and sugarcane. In this context, the research model deve...

Full description

Autores:
Ocampo Batlle, Eric Alberto
Escobar Palacio, José Carlos
Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo
Da Costa Bortoni, Edson
Horta Nogueira, Luiz Augusto
Carrillo Caballero, Gaylord Enrique
Aparecido Vitoriano Julio, Alisson
Cárdenas Escorcia, Yulineth
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional UTB
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/10353
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/10353
Palabra clave:
Integrated biofuel production
Biorefinery
Energy performance
Sustainability
Environmental impacts
LEMB
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id UTB2_c848fceda1e20a8bfed66434e2d4069c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/10353
network_acronym_str UTB2
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional UTB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane ethanol
title Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane ethanol
spellingShingle Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane ethanol
Integrated biofuel production
Biorefinery
Energy performance
Sustainability
Environmental impacts
LEMB
title_short Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane ethanol
title_full Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane ethanol
title_fullStr Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane ethanol
title_full_unstemmed Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane ethanol
title_sort Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane ethanol
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Ocampo Batlle, Eric Alberto
Escobar Palacio, José Carlos
Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo
Da Costa Bortoni, Edson
Horta Nogueira, Luiz Augusto
Carrillo Caballero, Gaylord Enrique
Aparecido Vitoriano Julio, Alisson
Cárdenas Escorcia, Yulineth
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Ocampo Batlle, Eric Alberto
Escobar Palacio, José Carlos
Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo
Da Costa Bortoni, Edson
Horta Nogueira, Luiz Augusto
Carrillo Caballero, Gaylord Enrique
Aparecido Vitoriano Julio, Alisson
Cárdenas Escorcia, Yulineth
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv Integrated biofuel production
Biorefinery
Energy performance
Sustainability
Environmental impacts
topic Integrated biofuel production
Biorefinery
Energy performance
Sustainability
Environmental impacts
LEMB
dc.subject.armarc.none.fl_str_mv LEMB
description The key objective of this study was to evaluate and compare, within the concept of integrated biorefining, the potential environmental gains of the life cycle, economic feasibility and energy balance of the production of bioenergetics from palm and sugarcane. In this context, the research model developed in this work involved several assessment techniques; in terms of environmental assessment, the tool used was the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) from the Well-To-Tank perspective, which is based on the LCA “cradle-to-gate” assignment method. The environmental assessment was performed using SimaPro v.8.0.3 software and the impacts were quantified using the IMPACT 2002+ method. On the other hand, energy performance evaluation was based on the 1st law indicators. Likewise, economic feasibility was based on the evaluation of the fixed capital investment index and the estimate of investment costs for the entire integrated system. Two different scenarios were proposed in order to compare and evaluate traditional systems with the integrated biorefinery. The first conversion scenario (baseline scenario) consisted of a traditional palm oil extraction plant in addition to an ethanol and sugar plant, concerning the use of fossil fuels in all stages of production. The second conversion scenario (improved scenario) explored the substitution of fossil energy sources as well as the energy recovery of residual biomass in more efficient energy conversion systems. The results indicated significant reductions of 29.5% and 29.1% in the global warming impact category when the baseline scenario was compared to the improved scenario. Additionally, the improved scenario achieved a reduction of 2.1 g CO2eq MJ− 1 (ethanol) and 2.61 g CO2eq MJ− 1 (biodiesel). On the other hand, the improved scenario presented better energy rates since it showed an increase of 3.82% in the global efficiency of the system and produced 106.32 kWh more per ton of processed raw material. Finally, when considering the Life Cycle Energy Efficiency, an increase of 83% was observed and in the case of the Renewability Factor showed an increase of 7.12 energy units. Integration is also economically feasible; however, it could be significantly improved through fiscal incentives founded on the reduction of fossil energy use, enhanced conversion yielding, and improvements in conversion technologies.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-06T12:26:30Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-06T12:26:30Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-26
dc.date.submitted.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-05
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasVersion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Eric Alberto Ocampo Batlle, Jose Carlos Escobar Palacio , Electo Eduardo Silva Lora , Edson Da Costa Bortoni , Luiz Augusto Horta Nogueira , Gaylord Enrique Carrillo Caballero , Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano Julio , Yulineth Cardenas Escorcia. Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane etanol. Journal of Cleaner Production. Volume 311, 15 August 2021, 127638. j.jclepro.2021.127638
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/10353
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv j.jclepro.2021.127638
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
identifier_str_mv Eric Alberto Ocampo Batlle, Jose Carlos Escobar Palacio , Electo Eduardo Silva Lora , Edson Da Costa Bortoni , Luiz Augusto Horta Nogueira , Gaylord Enrique Carrillo Caballero , Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano Julio , Yulineth Cardenas Escorcia. Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane etanol. Journal of Cleaner Production. Volume 311, 15 August 2021, 127638. j.jclepro.2021.127638
j.jclepro.2021.127638
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
Repositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/10353
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessRights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.cc.*.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.format.size.none.fl_str_mv 18 páginas
dc.coverage.spatial.none.fl_str_mv Colombia
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Cartagena de Indias
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Cleaner Production. Volume 311, 2021.
institution Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10353/3/license.txt
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10353/1/Energy%2c%20economic%2c%20and%20environmental%20assessmen_Gaylord%20Enrique%20Carr.pdf
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10353/2/license_rdf
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10353/4/Energy%2c%20economic%2c%20and%20environmental%20assessmen_Gaylord%20Enrique%20Carr.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10353/5/Energy%2c%20economic%2c%20and%20environmental%20assessmen_Gaylord%20Enrique%20Carr.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e20ad307a1c5f3f25af9304a7a7c86b6
625d643d5abc18c7ca2645f39046ca1d
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
2718f143899e17fac8a030202493cbd6
bb53e2d9473b81cde01fa3a4ca22de24
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UTB
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorioutb@utb.edu.co
_version_ 1814021676428427264
spelling Ocampo Batlle, Eric Alberto32758030-fa9d-4b53-b31e-a5bb7cbb99caEscobar Palacio, José Carlos299918fe-ddc3-49f5-9836-6a80b61a3cefSilva Lora, Electo Eduardo34fe2c38-b9bc-47a8-82e4-cddcda6e755eDa Costa Bortoni, Edson9de19f36-c2f3-444f-bcf2-c538a4d148deHorta Nogueira, Luiz Augusto5a1bb99c-91b6-42a4-8cc0-3b3f671807abCarrillo Caballero, Gaylord Enrique095c857b-71a5-4ca2-bb54-94ecb72d2f6dAparecido Vitoriano Julio, Alisson46a5733a-a00f-4a99-9026-dcb4368f745eCárdenas Escorcia, Yulinethb04eb89c-114e-4f4a-9e73-ba312050dd39Colombia2021-08-06T12:26:30Z2021-08-06T12:26:30Z2021-05-262021-08-05Eric Alberto Ocampo Batlle, Jose Carlos Escobar Palacio , Electo Eduardo Silva Lora , Edson Da Costa Bortoni , Luiz Augusto Horta Nogueira , Gaylord Enrique Carrillo Caballero , Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano Julio , Yulineth Cardenas Escorcia. Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane etanol. Journal of Cleaner Production. Volume 311, 15 August 2021, 127638. j.jclepro.2021.127638https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/10353j.jclepro.2021.127638Universidad Tecnológica de BolívarRepositorio Universidad Tecnológica de BolívarThe key objective of this study was to evaluate and compare, within the concept of integrated biorefining, the potential environmental gains of the life cycle, economic feasibility and energy balance of the production of bioenergetics from palm and sugarcane. In this context, the research model developed in this work involved several assessment techniques; in terms of environmental assessment, the tool used was the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) from the Well-To-Tank perspective, which is based on the LCA “cradle-to-gate” assignment method. The environmental assessment was performed using SimaPro v.8.0.3 software and the impacts were quantified using the IMPACT 2002+ method. On the other hand, energy performance evaluation was based on the 1st law indicators. Likewise, economic feasibility was based on the evaluation of the fixed capital investment index and the estimate of investment costs for the entire integrated system. Two different scenarios were proposed in order to compare and evaluate traditional systems with the integrated biorefinery. The first conversion scenario (baseline scenario) consisted of a traditional palm oil extraction plant in addition to an ethanol and sugar plant, concerning the use of fossil fuels in all stages of production. The second conversion scenario (improved scenario) explored the substitution of fossil energy sources as well as the energy recovery of residual biomass in more efficient energy conversion systems. The results indicated significant reductions of 29.5% and 29.1% in the global warming impact category when the baseline scenario was compared to the improved scenario. Additionally, the improved scenario achieved a reduction of 2.1 g CO2eq MJ− 1 (ethanol) and 2.61 g CO2eq MJ− 1 (biodiesel). On the other hand, the improved scenario presented better energy rates since it showed an increase of 3.82% in the global efficiency of the system and produced 106.32 kWh more per ton of processed raw material. Finally, when considering the Life Cycle Energy Efficiency, an increase of 83% was observed and in the case of the Renewability Factor showed an increase of 7.12 energy units. Integration is also economically feasible; however, it could be significantly improved through fiscal incentives founded on the reduction of fossil energy use, enhanced conversion yielding, and improvements in conversion technologies.application/pdf18 páginasenghttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Journal of Cleaner Production. Volume 311, 2021.Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integrated production of palm oil biodiesel and sugarcane ethanolinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Integrated biofuel productionBiorefineryEnergy performanceSustainabilityEnvironmental impactsLEMBCartagena de IndiasInvestigadoresAditiya, H.B., Mahlia, T.M.I., Chong, W.T., Nur, H., Sebayang, A.H., 2016. Second generation bioethanol production: a critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 66, 631–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.015.Ahmad, F.B., Zhang, Z., Doherty, W.O.S., O’Hara, I.M., 2019. The outlook of the production of advanced fuels and chemicals from integrated oil palm biomass biorefinery. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 109, 386–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rser.2019.04.009.Alejos Altamirano, C.A., Yokoyama, L., de Medeiros, J.L., de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo, O., 2016. Ethylic or methylic route to soybean biodiesel? Tracking environmental answers through life cycle assessment. Appl. Energy 184, 1246–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.017.Ambat, I., Srivastava, V., Sillanp¨ a¨ a, M., 2018. Recent advancement in biodiesel production methodologies using various feedstock: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 90, 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.069.ANP, 2021. 77o Leil˜ ao de Biodiesel da ANP [WWW Document]. Agˆencia Nac. Petroleo, ´ Gas ´ Nat. e Biocombustíveis. URL. https://www.gov.br/anp/pt-br/assuntos/distribui cao-e-revenda/leiloes-biodiesel/leiloes-entregas-2021. (Accessed 3 March 2021).Archer, S.A., Murphy, R.J., Steinberger-Wilckens, R., 2018. Methodological analysis of palm oil biodiesel life cycle studies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 94, 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.066.Aristizabal-Marulanda, ´ V., Solarte-Toro, J.C., Cardona Alzate, C.A., 2020. Economic and social assessment of biorefineries: the case of Coffee Cut-Stems (CCS) in Colombia. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 9, 100397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100397.Aziz, N.I.H.A., Hanafiah, M.M., Gheewala, S.H., 2019. A review on life cycle assessment of biogas production: challenges and future perspectives in Malaysia. Biomass Bioenergy 122, 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.047. Fig. 15. Damage categories comparison of Bioelectricity BSc and IBSc scenarios. Table 10 Comparisons of the NER and RF index obtained in this study with others reported in the literature. Index This study Other studies BSc IBSc Ocampo Batlle et al. (2020) Palacio et al. (2018) Reno ´ et al. (2014) Souza et al. (2012) NER [MJout MJin − 1 ] 7.34 13.44 8.50 8.80 8.10 9.00 RF [MJout MJin − 1 ] 8.50 15.70 9.93 9.85 9.40 10.1 E.A. Ocampo Batlle et al. Journal of Cleaner Production 311 (2021) 127638 17Beaudry, G., Macklin, C., Roknich, E., Sears, L., Wiener, M., Gheewala, S.H., 2018. Greenhouse gas assessment of palm oil mill biorefinery in Thailand from a life cycle perspective. Biomass Convers. Bioref. 8, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399- 016-0233-7.Bezergianni, S., Chrysikou, L.P., 2020. Application of Life-Cycle Assessment in Biorefineries, Waste Biorefinery. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12- 818228-4.00017-4Booneimsri, P., Kubaha, K., Chullabodhi, C., 2018. Increasing power generation with enhanced cogeneration using waste energy in palm oil mills. Energy Sci. Eng. 6, 154–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.196.Brand˜ ao, F., Schoneveld, G., 2015. The State of Oil Palm Development in the Brazilian Amazon: Trends, Value Chain Dynamics, and Business Models (No. 198). https://doi. org/10.17528/cifor/005861. Bogor.Bressanin, J.M., Klein, B.C., Chagas, M.F., Watanabe, M.D.B., Sampaio, I.L. de M., Bonomi, A., Morais, E.R. de, Cavalett, O., 2020. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of biomass Gasification and fischer–tropsch synthesis integrated to sugarcane biorefineries. Energies 13, 4576. https://doi.org/10.3390/ en13174576.Buˇsi´c, A., Mardetko, N., Kundas, S., Morzak, G., Belskaya, H., Santek, ˇ M.I., Komes, D., Novak, S., Santek, ˇ B., 2018. Bioethanol production from renewable raw materials and its separation and purification: a review. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 56, 289–311. https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.56.03.18.5546.CCEE, 2021. Informaçao ˜ Do Leil˜ ao Dinˆ animo [WWW Document]. Camara ˆ Comer. Energ. El´etrica. URL. https://www.ccee.org.br/. (Accessed 3 March 2021).CEPEA, 2021. Indicador mensal ethanol hidratado CEPEA/ESALQ combustível - estado de S˜ ao paulo [WWW Document]. Cent. Estud. Avançados em Econ. Apl. URL. http ://cepea.esalq.usp.br/etanol/. (Accessed 3 March 2021).Chemical Engineering Magazine, 2019. Current Economic Trends CEPCI [WWW Document]. URL. https://www.chemengonline.com/2019-chemical-engineering -plant-cost-index-annual-average/. (Accessed 3 March 2021). Chen, H., 2015. Lignocellulose Biorefinery Engineering, first ed.Chen, J., Bian, X., Rapp, G., Lang, J., Montoya, A., Trethowan, R., Bouyssiere, B., Portha, J.-F., Jaubert, J.-N., Pratt, P., Coniglio, L., 2019. From ethyl biodiesel to biolubricants: options for an Indian mustard integrated biorefinery toward a green and circular economy. Ind. Crop. Prod. 137, 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. indcrop.2019.04.041.Chrysikou, L.P., Bezergianni, S., Kiparissides, C., 2018. Environmental analysis of a lignocellulosic-based biorefinery producing bioethanol and high-added value chemicals. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 28, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. seta.2018.06.010.Conab, 2018. Acompanhamento da Safra Brasileira da Cana-de-açúcar. https://www. conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/cana.Corona, A., Parajuli, R., Ambye-Jensen, M., Hauschild, M.Z., Birkved, M., 2018. Environmental screening of potential biomass for green biorefinery conversion. J. Clean. Prod. 189, 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.316.Cortez, L.A.B., Nigro, F.E.B., Nogueira, L.A.H., Nassar, A.M., Cantarella, H., Moraes, M.A. F.D., Leal, R.L.V., Franco, T.T., Schuchardt, U.F., Baldassin Junior, R., 2015. Perspectives for sustainable aviation biofuels in Brazil. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 1–12 https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/264898.Debnath, D., Babu, S.C., 2019. Biofuels, Bioenergy and Food Security, first ed. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-00851-6.Demichelis, F., Laghezza, M., Chiappero, M., Fiore, S., 2020. Technical, economic and environmental assessement of bioethanol biorefinery from waste biomass. J. Clean. Prod. 277, 124111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124111.Dias, M.O. de S., Maciel Filho, R., Mantelatto, P.E., Cavalett, O., Rossell, C.E.V., Bonomi, A., Leal, M.R.L.V., 2015. Sugarcane processing for ethanol and sugar in Brazil. Environ. Dev. 15, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.004.EPE, 2019. Analise ´ de conjuntura dos biocombustíveis: ano 2019 [WWW Document]. Empres. Pesqui. Energ´etica. URL. https://www.epe.gov.br/pt/publicacoes-dados -abertos/publicacoes/analise-de-conjuntura-dos-biocombustiveis-2019. (Accessed 3 March 2021).Farzad, S., Mandegari, M.A., Guo, M., Haigh, K.F., Shah, N., Gorgens, ¨ J.F., 2017. Multiproduct biorefineries from lignocelluloses: a pathway to revitalisation of the sugar industry? Biotechnol. Biofuels 10, 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0761-9.Fritsche, U.R., Diaz-Chavez, R., de la Rúa, C., Gabriel, B., Perrin, A., 2018. Sustainability of bioenergy. In: The Role of Bioenergy in the Emerging Bioeconomy: Resources, Technologies, Sustainability and Policy, pp. 225–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-12-813056-8.00006-6.Furtado Júnior, J.C., Palacio, J.C.E., Leme, R.C., Lora, E.E.S., da Costa, J.E.L., Reyes, A. M.M., del Olmo, O.A., 2020. Biorefineries productive alternatives optimization in the brazilian sugar and alcohol industry. Appl. Energy 259, 113092. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.088.Garcia-Nunez, J.A., Rodriguez, D.T., Fontanilla, C.A., Ramirez, N.E., Silva Lora, E.E., Frear, C.S., Stockle, C., Amonette, J., Garcia-Perez, M., 2016. Evaluation of alternatives for the evolution of palm oil mills into biorefineries. Biomass Bioenergy 95, 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.05.020.Gebremariam, S.N., Marchetti, J.M., 2018. Economics of biodiesel production: Review. Energy Convers. Manag. 168, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enconman.2018.05.002.Gikonyo, B., 2015. Efficiency and Sustainability in Biofuel Production, first ed. Apple Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18466. Hadidi, L.A., Altamimi, Q.M., 2019. 3E (energy, economic, and environmental) analysis of waste management strategies. In: Advances in Waste-To-Energy Technologies. CRC Press, p. 13.Harris, Z.M., Milner, S., Taylor, G., 2018. Biogenic carbon—capture and sequestration. In: Greenhouse Gases Balances of Bioenergy Systems. Elsevier, pp. 55–76. https:// doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101036-5.00005-7.Hingsamer, M., Jungmeier, G., 2018. Biorefineries, the Role of Bioenergy in the Emerging Bioeconomy: Resources, Technologies, Sustainability and Policy. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813056-8.00005-4.Hosseini-Fashami, F., Motevali, A., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Hashemi, S.J., Chau, K. wing, 2019. Energy-Life cycle assessment on applying solar technologies for greenhouse strawberry production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 116, 109411. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109411. IEA Bioenergy, 2019. Task 42. Bioref. Fut. BioEcon. 1–23. ISO 14040, 2006, 2006. Environmental management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework.Jolliet, O., Margni, M., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., Rebitzer, G., Rosenbaum, R., 2003. Impact 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 8, 324–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978505.Julio, A.A.V., Batlle, E.A.O., Rodriguez, C.J.C., Palacio, J.C.E., 2021. Exergoeconomic and Environmental Analysis of a Palm Oil Biorefinery for the Production of Bio-Jet Fuel, vol. 27. Waste and Biomass Valorization Pag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649- 021-01404-2.Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Chau, K. wing, 2019a. Use of optimization techniques for energy use efficiency and environmental life cycle assessment modification in sugarcane production. Energy 181, 1298–1320. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.002.Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Chau, K. wing, 2019b. Combined life cycle assessment and artificial intelligence for prediction of output energy and environmental impacts of sugarcane production. Sci. Total Environ. 664, 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.004.Kaushik, L.K., Muthukumar, P., 2018. Life cycle Assessment (LCA) and Techno-economic Assessment (TEA) of medium scale (5–10 kW) LPG cooking stove with two-layer porous radiant burner. Appl. Therm. Eng. 133, 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. applthermaleng.2018.01.050Khanali, M., Akram, A., Behzadi, J., Mostashari-Rad, F., Saber, Z., Chau, K. wing, NabaviPelesaraei, A., 2021. Multi-objective optimization of energy use and environmental emissions for walnut production using imperialist competitive algorithm. Appl. Energy 284, 116342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116342Khoshnevisan, B., Tabatabaei, M., Tsapekos, P., Rafiee, S., Aghbashlo, M., Lindeneg, S., Angelidaki, I., 2020. Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorizing municipal solid waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, lactic and succinic acid. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 117, 109493. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109493.Klein, B.C., Chagas, M.F., Junqueira, T.L., Rezende, M.C.A.F., Cardoso, T. de F., Cavalett, O., Bonomi, A., 2018. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of renewable jet fuel production in integrated Brazilian sugarcane biorefineries. Appl. Energy 209, 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.079. Lai, O.-M., Tan, C.-P., Akoh, C.C., 2012. Palm Oil: Production, Processing, Characterization, and Uses, first ed. Elsevier, New York.LAPIG, 2020. Atlas das Pastagens Brasileiras [WWW Document]. Laboratorio ´ Process. Imgens e Geoprocessamento. URL. https://pastagem.org/atlas/map. (Accessed 28 July 2020).Leal, M.R.L.V., Galdos, M.V., Scarpare, F.V., Seabra, J.E.A., Walter, A., Oliveira, C.O.F., 2013. Sugarcane straw availability, quality, recovery and energy use: a literature review. Biomass Bioenergy 53, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biombioe.2013.03.007.Lee, K.T., Ofori-Boateng, C., 2013. Sustainability of Biofuel Production from Oil Palm Biomass, first ed. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-70-3 Malaysia.Maham, S.G., Rahimi, A., Smith, D.L., 2018. Environmental assessment of the essential oils produced from dragonhead (Dracocephalum moldavica L.) in conventional and organic farms with different irrigation rates. J. Clean. Prod. 204, 1070–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.348.Mahath, C.S., Mophin Kani, K., Dubey, B., 2019. Gate-to-gate environmental impacts of dairy processing products in Thiruvananthapuram, India. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 141, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.023.Manochio, C., Andrade, B., Rodriguez, R., Moraes, B., 2017. Ethanol from biomass: a comparative overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 80, 743–755. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.063Mat Yasin, M.H., Mamat, R., Najafi, G., Ali, O.M., Yusop, A.F., Ali, M.H., 2017. Potentials of palm oil as new feedstock oil for a global alternative fuel: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 79, 1034–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.186.Mata, T.M., Martins, A.A., Sikdar, S.K., Costa, C.A.V., 2011. Sustainability considerations of biodiesel based on supply chain analysis. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 13, 655–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-010-0346-9.Mohammadi, F., Roedl, A., Abdoli, M.A., Amidpour, M., Vahidi, H., 2020. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of the energetic use of bagasse in Iranian sugar industry. Renew. Energy 145, 1870–1882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.023.Monteiro, H., Moura, B., Iten, M., Mata, T.M., Martins, A.A., 2020. Life cycle energy and carbon emissions of ergosterol from mushroom residues. Energy Rep. 6, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.157.Mostashari-Rad, F., Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Taki, M., Ghahderijani, M., Kaab, A., Chau, K. wing, Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., 2021. Exergoenvironmental damages assessment of horticultural crops using ReCiPe2016 and cumulative exergy demand frameworks. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2020.123788Munasinghe, M., Jayasinghe, P., Deraniyagala, Y., Matlaba, V.J., Santos, J.F. dos, Maneschy, M.C., Mota, J.A., 2019. Value–Supply Chain Analysis (VSCA) of crude palm oil production in Brazil, focusing on economic, environmental and social E.A. Ocampo Batlle et al. Journal of Cleaner Production 311 (2021) 127638 18 sustainability. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 17, 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. spc.2018.10.001.Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Bayat, R., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Afrasyabi, H., Chau, K. wing, 2017. Modeling of energy consumption and environmental life cycle assessment for incineration and landfill systems of municipal solid waste management - a case study in Tehran Metropolis of Iran. J. Clean. Prod. 148, 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.172.Nieder-Heitmann, M., Haigh, K.F., Gorgens, ¨ J.F., 2019. Life cycle assessment and multicriteria analysis of sugarcane biorefinery scenarios: finding a sustainable solution for the South African sugar industry. J. Clean. Prod. 239 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.118039.Nogueira, L.A.H., Souza, G.M., Cortez, L.A.B., de Brito Cruz, C.H., 2020. Biofuels for transport. In: Future Energy: Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for Our Planet. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102886- 5.00009-8.O’Hara, I.M., Mundree, S.G., 2016. Sugarcane-based biofuels and bioproducts. In: Sugarcane-based Biofuels and Bioproducts, first ed. https://doi.org/10.1002/ 9781118719862 New Jersey.Ocampo Batlle, E.A., Castillo Santiago, Y., Venturini, O.J., Escobar Palacio, J.C., Silva Lora, E.E., Yepes Maya, D.M., Albis Arrieta, A.R., 2020. Thermodynamic and environmental assessment of different scenarios for the insertion of pyrolysis technology in palm oil biorefineries. J. Clean. Prod. 250, 119544. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119544.Ohimain, E.I., Izah, S.C., 2017. A review of biogas production from palm oil mill effluents using different configurations of bioreactors. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 70, 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.221. Palacio, J.C.E., Ocampo, E.A., Reno, ´ M.L.G., Reyes, A.M.M., Souza, G.F. de, Olmo, O.A.A. del, Lora, E.E.S., 2018. Exergy and environmental analysis of a polygeneration system of alcohol industry. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12649-018-0509-1.Pereira, L.G., Cavalett, O., Bonomi, A., Zhang, Y., Warner, E., Chum, H.L., 2019. Comparison of biofuel life-cycle GHG emissions assessment tools: the case studies of ethanol produced from sugarcane, corn, and wheat. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 110, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.043.Pereira, L.G., Chagas, M.F., Dias, M.O.S., Cavalett, O., Bonomi, A., 2015. Life cycle assessment of butanol production in sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil. J. Clean. Prod. 96, 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.059. Pereira, S. de S., Seabra, J.E.A., Nogueira, L.A.H., 2018. Feedstocks for biodiesel production: Brazilian and global perspectives. Biofuels 9, 455–478. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/17597269.2017.1278931Queiroz, A.G., França, L., Ponte, M.X., 2012. The life cycle assessment of biodiesel from palm oil (“ dendˆe”) in the Amazon. Biomass Bioenergy 36, 50–59. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.007.Ramirez-Contreras, N.E., Munar-Florez, D.A., Garcia-Nunez, ˜ J.A., MosqueraMontoya, M., Faaij, A.P.C., 2020. The GHG emissions and economic performance of the Colombian palm oil sector; current status and long-term perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 258, 120757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120757.REN21, 2018. Renewables 2018: global status report, 978-3-9818107-0-7. Reno, ´ M.L.G., Olmo, O.A. del, Palacio, J.C.E., Lora, E.E.S., Venturini, O.J., 2014. Sugarcane biorefineries: case studies applied to the Brazilian sugar–alcohol industry. Energy Convers. Manag. 86, 981–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enconman.2014.06.031.Rocha, M.H., Capaz, R.S., Lora, E.E.S., Nogueira, L.A.H., Leme, M.M.V., Reno, ´ M.L.G., Olmo, O.A. Del, 2014. Life cycle assessment (LCA) for biofuels in Brazilian conditions: a meta-analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 37, 435–459. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.036.Saber, Z., Esmaeili, M., Pirdashti, H., Motevali, A., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., 2020. Exergoenvironmental-Life cycle cost analysis for conventional, low external input and organic systems of rice paddy production. J. Clean. Prod. 263, 121529. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121529.Salina, F.H., de Almeida, I.A., Bittencourt, F.R., 2020. RenovaBio opportunities and biofuels outlook in Brazil. In: Renewable Energy and Sustainable Buildings. Springer, Cham, pp. 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18488-9_30.Santos, F., Bor´em, A., Caldas, C., 2015. Sugarcane: Agricultural Production, Bioenergy and Ethanol, first ed. Elsevier. Academic Press, Brasilia.Saravanan, A.P., Pugazhendhi, A., Mathimani, T., 2020. A comprehensive assessment of biofuel policies in the BRICS nations: implementation, blending target and gaps. Fuel 272, 117635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117635.Sharvini, S.R., Noor, Z.Z., Chong, C.S., Stringer, L.C., Glew, D., 2020. Energy generation from palm oil mill effluent: a life cycle assessment of two biogas technologies. Energy 191, 116513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116513.Silva, W.L.G. da, Souza, P.T. de, Shimamoto, G.G., Tubino, M., 2015. Separation of the Glycerol-biodiesel phases in an ethyl transesterification synthetic route using water. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-5053.20150147.Singh, A., Pant, D., Olsen, S.I., 2013. Life Cycle Assessment of Renewable Energy Sources. Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5364-1Sitepu, E.K., Heimann, K., Raston, C.L., Zhang, W., 2020. Critical evaluation of process parameters for direct biodiesel production from diverse feedstock. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 123, 109762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109762.Souza, C.C. De, Leandro, J.P., Francisco, J., Frainer, D.M., Castel˜ ao, R.A., 2018. Cogeneration of electricity in sugar-alcohol plant : perspectives and viability. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 91, 832–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.047.Souza, S.P., de Avila, ´ M.T., Pacca, S., 2012. Life cycle assessment of sugarcane ethanol and palm oil biodiesel joint production. Biomass Bioenergy 44, 70–79. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.018.Speight, J.G., 2020. A Biorefinery, the Refinery of the Future. https://doi.org/10.1016/ b978-0-12-816994-0.00014-2.Suwanmanee, U., Bangjang, T., Kaewchada, A., Jaree, A., 2020. Greenhouse gas emissions and energy assessment of modified diesohol using cashew nut shell liquid and biodiesel as additives. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 24, 232–253. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.spc.2020.06.009Tan, Y.D., Lim, J.S., Wan Alwi, S.R., 2020. Multi-objective optimal design for integrated palm oil mill complex with consideration of effluent elimination. Energy 202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117767.Tsiropoulos, I., Faaij, A.P.C., Seabra, J.E.A., 2014. In: Life Cycle Assessment of Sugarcane Ethanol Production in India in Comparison to Brazil. Springer, pp. 1049–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0714-5.U.S. EIA, 2016. Capital Cost Estimates for Utility Scale Electricity Generating Plants. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2018. International Energy Outlook 2018, Energy Information Administration - EIA. Washintong, DC. https://www.eia. gov/outlooks/archive/ieo18/.Vaskan, P., Pachon, ´ E.R., Gnansounou, E., 2018. Techno-economic and life-cycle assessments of biorefineries based on palm empty fruit bunches in Brazil. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 3655–3668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.218.Venturini, O.J., Júnior, J.C.F., Palacio, J.C.E., Batlle, E.A.O., Carvalho, M., Lora, E.E.S., 2020. Indicators for sustainability assessment of biofuels: economic, environmental, social, and technological dimensions. In: Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future. Elsevier, pp. 73–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815581-3.00004-X.Verma, P., Sharma, M.P., Dwivedi, G., 2016. Impact of alcohol on biodiesel production and properties. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 56, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.rser.2015.11.048.Verma, S., Kuila, A., 2020. Principles of sustainable biorefinery. In: Biorefinery Production Technologies for Chemicals and Energy. Wiley, pp. 1–13. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781119593065.ch1Vieira da Silva, M.A., Lagnier Gil Ferreira, B., da Costa Marques, L.G., Lamare Soares Murta, A., Vasconcelos de Freitas, M.A., 2017. Comparative study of NOx emissions of biodiesel-diesel blends from soybean, palm and waste frying oils using methyl and ethyl transesterification routes. Fuel 194, 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. fuel.2016.12.084.Wertz, J.-L., B´edu´e, O., 2013. Lignocellulosic Biorefineries, first ed. CRC Press. EFPL Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15443-4.Yusoff, M.F.M., Xu, X., Guo, Z., 2014. Comparison of fatty acid methyl and ethyl Esters as biodiesel base stock: a review on processing and production requirements. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 91, 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-014-2443-0.Zivkovi ˇ ´c, S.B., Veljkovi, M.V., Bankovi, I.B., Krsti, I.M., Konstantinovi, S., Ili, S.B., Avramovi, J.M., Stamenkovi, O.S., 2017. Technological, technical, economic, environmental, social, human health risk, toxicological and policy considerations of biodiesel production and use. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 79, 222–247http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83182https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10353/3/license.txte20ad307a1c5f3f25af9304a7a7c86b6MD53ORIGINALEnergy, economic, and environmental assessmen_Gaylord Enrique Carr.pdfEnergy, economic, and environmental assessmen_Gaylord Enrique Carr.pdfapplication/pdf11209084https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10353/1/Energy%2c%20economic%2c%20and%20environmental%20assessmen_Gaylord%20Enrique%20Carr.pdf625d643d5abc18c7ca2645f39046ca1dMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10353/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52TEXTEnergy, economic, and environmental assessmen_Gaylord Enrique Carr.pdf.txtEnergy, economic, and environmental assessmen_Gaylord Enrique Carr.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain92784https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10353/4/Energy%2c%20economic%2c%20and%20environmental%20assessmen_Gaylord%20Enrique%20Carr.pdf.txt2718f143899e17fac8a030202493cbd6MD54THUMBNAILEnergy, economic, and environmental assessmen_Gaylord Enrique Carr.pdf.jpgEnergy, economic, and environmental assessmen_Gaylord Enrique Carr.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg96517https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10353/5/Energy%2c%20economic%2c%20and%20environmental%20assessmen_Gaylord%20Enrique%20Carr.pdf.jpgbb53e2d9473b81cde01fa3a4ca22de24MD5520.500.12585/10353oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/103532021-08-07 02:10:35.868Repositorio Institucional UTBrepositorioutb@utb.edu.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

Publicaciones similares