The notion of Kierkegaardian conscience as an implication of the outside world: A critique of the Cartesian approach
This article aims at showing how the Danish philosopher SØren Kierkegaard, through his concept of conscience, criticizes Cartesian skepticism upon affirming the impossibility of doubting the outside world, since the very possibility of doubt presupposes the existence of a conscience that produces an...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional UTB
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/8768
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/8768
- Palabra clave:
- Conscience
Doubt
Self
Subjectivity
Think
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id |
UTB2_ade3ea10d0386a2800e57f1a54455172 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/8768 |
network_acronym_str |
UTB2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional UTB |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The notion of Kierkegaardian conscience as an implication of the outside world: A critique of the Cartesian approach |
dc.title.alternative.none.fl_str_mv |
La noción de conciencia kierkegaardiana como una implicación del mundo exterior: Una crítica al planteamiento cartesiano |
title |
The notion of Kierkegaardian conscience as an implication of the outside world: A critique of the Cartesian approach |
spellingShingle |
The notion of Kierkegaardian conscience as an implication of the outside world: A critique of the Cartesian approach Conscience Doubt Self Subjectivity Think |
title_short |
The notion of Kierkegaardian conscience as an implication of the outside world: A critique of the Cartesian approach |
title_full |
The notion of Kierkegaardian conscience as an implication of the outside world: A critique of the Cartesian approach |
title_fullStr |
The notion of Kierkegaardian conscience as an implication of the outside world: A critique of the Cartesian approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
The notion of Kierkegaardian conscience as an implication of the outside world: A critique of the Cartesian approach |
title_sort |
The notion of Kierkegaardian conscience as an implication of the outside world: A critique of the Cartesian approach |
dc.subject.keywords.none.fl_str_mv |
Conscience Doubt Self Subjectivity Think |
topic |
Conscience Doubt Self Subjectivity Think |
description |
This article aims at showing how the Danish philosopher SØren Kierkegaard, through his concept of conscience, criticizes Cartesian skepticism upon affirming the impossibility of doubting the outside world, since the very possibility of doubt presupposes the existence of a conscience that produces and is produced by the trichotomic relationship between ideality and reality, or, in other words, mediateness and immediacy. For this, the Cartesian approach will be explained in the first place, namely: the three levels of doubt and the cogito ergo sum. Then the notion of conscience and ideal possibility of the doubt of the Danish author will be explained, and finally, it will be explained how, in the perspective of this notion of conscience, Kierkegaard makes a strong critique to the methodical doubt and to the cartesian cogito like demonstration of existence. © 2019 Universidad del Norte. All rights reserved. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-06T19:05:21Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-06T19:05:21Z |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.hasVersion.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.spa.none.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.none.fl_str_mv |
Eidos; Núm. 30; pp. 211-238 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1692-8857 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/8768 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.14482/eidos.30.199 |
dc.identifier.instname.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar |
dc.identifier.reponame.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio UTB |
identifier_str_mv |
Eidos; Núm. 30; pp. 211-238 1692-8857 10.14482/eidos.30.199 Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar Repositorio UTB |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/8768 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessRights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.cc.none.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.medium.none.fl_str_mv |
Recurso electrónico |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad del Norte |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad del Norte |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www2.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065145614&doi=10.14482%2feidos.30.199&partnerID=40&md5=74dbecc4d520c73cea0d8e32aaad2ef4 Scopus 57208564047 |
institution |
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/8768/1/DOI10_14482eidos_30_199.pdf https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/8768/4/DOI10_14482eidos_30_199.pdf.txt https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/8768/5/DOI10_14482eidos_30_199.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d8826741cb5b5daa64cff02f6f26a271 47b77b308f43343b74fdf4c39bc569c2 0150a08807d440013c589a6d7d7afc85 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional UTB |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorioutb@utb.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814021730235056128 |
spelling |
2019-11-06T19:05:21Z2019-11-06T19:05:21Z2019Eidos; Núm. 30; pp. 211-2381692-8857https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/876810.14482/eidos.30.199Universidad Tecnológica de BolívarRepositorio UTBThis article aims at showing how the Danish philosopher SØren Kierkegaard, through his concept of conscience, criticizes Cartesian skepticism upon affirming the impossibility of doubting the outside world, since the very possibility of doubt presupposes the existence of a conscience that produces and is produced by the trichotomic relationship between ideality and reality, or, in other words, mediateness and immediacy. For this, the Cartesian approach will be explained in the first place, namely: the three levels of doubt and the cogito ergo sum. Then the notion of conscience and ideal possibility of the doubt of the Danish author will be explained, and finally, it will be explained how, in the perspective of this notion of conscience, Kierkegaard makes a strong critique to the methodical doubt and to the cartesian cogito like demonstration of existence. © 2019 Universidad del Norte. All rights reserved.Recurso electrónicoapplication/pdfengUniversidad del Nortehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://www2.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065145614&doi=10.14482%2feidos.30.199&partnerID=40&md5=74dbecc4d520c73cea0d8e32aaad2ef4Scopus 57208564047The notion of Kierkegaardian conscience as an implication of the outside world: A critique of the Cartesian approachLa noción de conciencia kierkegaardiana como una implicación del mundo exterior: Una crítica al planteamiento cartesianoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1ConscienceDoubtSelfSubjectivityThinkGonzález, Y.G.Alcalá, R.R., El escepticismo antiguo: Pirrón de Elis y la indife-rencia como terapia de la filosofía (2005) Daimón, Revista De Filosofía, 36, pp. 35-51. , https://revistas.um.es/daimon/article/view/15811, Recuperado deBinetti, M.J., La posibilidad necesaria de la libertad: Un análisis del pensamiento de SØren Kierkegaard (2005) Cuadernos De Anuario Filosófico Serie Universitaria, 177, pp. 1-117. , https://dadun.unav.edu/bitstream/10171/3884/1/177.pdf, Recuperado deCollins, J., (1958) El Pensamiento De Kierkegaard, , México Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura EconómicaDescartes, R., (2003) Meditaciones Metafísicas Y Otros Textos, , Madrid: Gredos(2009) Biblioteca De Grandes Pensadores: Descartes, , Descartes Madrid: GredosDobre, C.E., SØren Kierkegaard y la reconstrucción de la filosofía mediante la duda subjetiva y la repetición a partir del escrito De Omnibus Dubitandum Est (2014) Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, 47, pp. 25-52. , http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/trf/n47/n47a2.pdf, Recuperado deGrimsley, R., Kierkegaard and Descartes (1966) Journal of the History Oh Philosophy, 4 (1), pp. 31-41. , JanuaryHerrera, C.G., La denuncia de SØren Kierkegaard (2000) La Lámpa-Ra De Diógenes, 1. , http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/844/84410103.pdf, 001). Recuperado deHume, D., (1739) Tratado De La Naturaleza Humana, , Viqueira, trad.) Madrid: DipualbaKant, I., (1788) Crítica De La Razón Pura, , 2003 ed.). México: Biblioteca virtual universalKierkegaard, S., (2007) Johannes Climacus O El Dudar De Todas Las Cosas, , C. Dip, trad.) Buenos Aires: GorlaKierkegaard, S., (2009) La Repetición, , Madrid: AlianzaKierkegaard, S., (2010) Post Scriptum No Científico Y Definitivo A Migajas Filo-Sóficas, , J. Teira y L. Nekane, trads.) Salamanca, España: SíguemeLarrañeta, R., (1990) La Interioridad Apasionada, , Salamanca: San EstebanLarrañeta, R., El verdadero rostro de Kierkegaard (1997) Revista De Filosofía, (18). , https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RESF/article/download/RESF9797220083A/10773, 3a época, X Recuperado deManzano, J.V., (2012) Apuntes De Historia De La Filosofía: 80-Soren Kierkegaard. [Está Bien Así?, , http://hdl.handle.net/11117/1309, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México: Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Occidente. Recuperado deMeabe, J.E., (2012) Kierkegaard, La Duda Y El Origen De La Filosofía, , http://www.academia.edu/5121617/Joaquin_E._Meabe_-_Kierkegaard_la_duda_y_el_origen_de_la_fi-losofia_29-08-2012_REVISADO_-_Para_Academia_edu_-_pdf, Ob-tenido de Academia.edu(1988) Diálogos V: Parménides, Teeteto, Sofista, Político, , Platón Madrid: GredosRasmussen, A.M., René Descartes: Kierkegaard’s understanding of doubt and certainty (2016) Kierkegaard and the Renaissance and Modern Traditions, 5, pp. 11-22. , En S. K. Centre & J. Stewart Ed, New York.: RoutledgeVelaverde, D.M., (2001) Rene Descartes. De Omnibus Dubitan, , Madrid: EdafVenegas, M.E., El Renacimiento: Un contexto para el surgi-miento del concepto pedagógico formación (2004) Educación, 28 (1), pp. 27-37. , http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44028103, Recuperado deVilloro, L., (1965) La Idea Y El Ente En La Filosofía De Descartes, , México Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura EconómicaWittgenstein, L., (1976) Los Cuadernos Azul Y Marrón, , Madrid: Tecnoshttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501ORIGINALDOI10_14482eidos_30_199.pdfapplication/pdf192430https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/8768/1/DOI10_14482eidos_30_199.pdfd8826741cb5b5daa64cff02f6f26a271MD51TEXTDOI10_14482eidos_30_199.pdf.txtDOI10_14482eidos_30_199.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain62203https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/8768/4/DOI10_14482eidos_30_199.pdf.txt47b77b308f43343b74fdf4c39bc569c2MD54THUMBNAILDOI10_14482eidos_30_199.pdf.jpgDOI10_14482eidos_30_199.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg45532https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/8768/5/DOI10_14482eidos_30_199.pdf.jpg0150a08807d440013c589a6d7d7afc85MD5520.500.12585/8768oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/87682020-10-23 04:49:33.745Repositorio Institucional UTBrepositorioutb@utb.edu.co |