Analysis and Classification of Evoked Potentials in Response to Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces

Brain activity during perception and recognition of faces have been studied by researchers with the purpose to develop brain-computer interfaces and to study neurological disorders. In this paper, we analyzed evoked potentials as neurophysiological indicators and developed a model based on signal pr...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional UTB
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/9204
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/9204
Palabra clave:
Electroencephalography
Evoked potentials
Face recognition
Machine learning
Wavelet transform
Artificial intelligence
Bioelectric potentials
Biomedical signal processing
Brain
Brain computer interface
Electroencephalography
Electrophysiology
Learning systems
Neurophysiology
Wavelet transforms
Binomial logistic regressions
Classification accuracy
Classification results
Feature extraction stages
Machine learning techniques
Morphological analysis
Morphological characteristic
Perception and recognition
Face recognition
Rights
restrictedAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description
Summary:Brain activity during perception and recognition of faces have been studied by researchers with the purpose to develop brain-computer interfaces and to study neurological disorders. In this paper, we analyzed evoked potentials as neurophysiological indicators and developed a model based on signal processing and machine learning techniques to find descriptive patterns that allow the differentiation of familiar and unfamiliar faces. We considered wave components such as P1, N170, N250, P300, and N400 to describe the events. Morphological analysis and wavelet transform were used for the feature extraction stage, and support vector machines and binomial logistic regression were evaluated for the classification stage. The best classification results were obtained with the morphological characteristics, where the highest classification accuracy was 80% on average. © 2018 IEEE.