Comparative Analysis of The Solid Waste Management Plans of Bogotá D.C and Mexico City

Introduction. Mexico City has approximately 8’918,853 inhabitants that generate an average of 12,893 tons / day, while Bogotá, with more than 7’412,516 inhabitants generates an approximate of 7,200 tons / day. Objective. Carry out a comparative analysis between the solid waste management plans of Me...

Full description

Autores:
Rodríguez-Díaz, Andrés
Díaz-Mendoza, Claudia
Pasqualino, Jorgelina
Bahamón-Restrepo, Andrés
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2022
Institución:
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional UTB
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/12350
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/12350
Palabra clave:
Developing Countries;
Waste Collection;
Separation at Source
LEMB
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id UTB2_61c8574159ebf9b09cc4962ea2c1d436
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/12350
network_acronym_str UTB2
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional UTB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Comparative Analysis of The Solid Waste Management Plans of Bogotá D.C and Mexico City
dc.title.alternative.spa.fl_str_mv Análise Comparativa Dos Planos De Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos de Bogotá D.C E Cidade do México
Análisis comparativo de los planes de gestión de residuos sólidos de Bogotá D.C y Ciudad de México
title Comparative Analysis of The Solid Waste Management Plans of Bogotá D.C and Mexico City
spellingShingle Comparative Analysis of The Solid Waste Management Plans of Bogotá D.C and Mexico City
Developing Countries;
Waste Collection;
Separation at Source
LEMB
title_short Comparative Analysis of The Solid Waste Management Plans of Bogotá D.C and Mexico City
title_full Comparative Analysis of The Solid Waste Management Plans of Bogotá D.C and Mexico City
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of The Solid Waste Management Plans of Bogotá D.C and Mexico City
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of The Solid Waste Management Plans of Bogotá D.C and Mexico City
title_sort Comparative Analysis of The Solid Waste Management Plans of Bogotá D.C and Mexico City
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Rodríguez-Díaz, Andrés
Díaz-Mendoza, Claudia
Pasqualino, Jorgelina
Bahamón-Restrepo, Andrés
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Rodríguez-Díaz, Andrés
Díaz-Mendoza, Claudia
Pasqualino, Jorgelina
Bahamón-Restrepo, Andrés
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv Developing Countries;
Waste Collection;
Separation at Source
topic Developing Countries;
Waste Collection;
Separation at Source
LEMB
dc.subject.armarc.none.fl_str_mv LEMB
description Introduction. Mexico City has approximately 8’918,853 inhabitants that generate an average of 12,893 tons / day, while Bogotá, with more than 7’412,516 inhabitants generates an approximate of 7,200 tons / day. Objective. Carry out a comparative analysis between the solid waste management plans of Mexico City in relation to Bogotá, highlighting similarities, differences, strengths, and weaknesses. Materials and methods. The method of this research is based on a bibliographic review in databases, and documents corresponding to the legislation of each country, comparing aspects such as population, waste generation, source separation, collection, transfer, and final disposal. Results. Among the main successes found in both cities are the new implementation of zero waste plans, recycling, coverage of the cleaning service companies, all with a view to reducing the amount of waste deposited in sanitary landfills. The increase in the separation at the origin, despite being low, is a plus; the transport of waste is regular, but it was identified that in both cities it covers most of the territorial extension, which contributes to the reduction of urban centers of illegal waste disposal. Conclusions. Both cities have strong points such as the collection and transfer process in Mexico City and recycling in Bogotá. Among the aspects of improvement, separation at the source needs to be promoted, waste transportation needs to be technified and renewed in Mexico City, and better implemented in Bogotá. © 2022 Corporacion Universitaria Lasallista. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-21T16:26:07Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-21T16:26:07Z
dc.date.submitted.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bcce
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/draft
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str draft
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Rodríguez-Díaz, A., Díaz-Mendoza, C., Pasqualino, J., & Bahamón-Restrepo, A. (2022). Análise Comparativa Dos Planos De Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos de Bogotá DC E Cidade do México. Producción+ Limpia, 17(1), 111-135.
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/12350
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.22507/10.22507/PML.V17N1A7
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
identifier_str_mv Rodríguez-Díaz, A., Díaz-Mendoza, C., Pasqualino, J., & Bahamón-Restrepo, A. (2022). Análise Comparativa Dos Planos De Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos de Bogotá DC E Cidade do México. Producción+ Limpia, 17(1), 111-135.
10.22507/10.22507/PML.V17N1A7
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
Repositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/12350
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.cc.*.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv 25 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Cartagena de Indias
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Producción+ Limpia, 17(1)
institution Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12350/1/2955-Texto%20del%20art%c3%adculo-210215712-1-10-20220628.pdf
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12350/2/license_rdf
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12350/3/license.txt
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12350/4/2955-Texto%20del%20art%c3%adculo-210215712-1-10-20220628.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12350/5/2955-Texto%20del%20art%c3%adculo-210215712-1-10-20220628.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv b1693f81bf900c03ffdc3a1642d9c71f
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
e20ad307a1c5f3f25af9304a7a7c86b6
96b6ef5d526aef1ea54276d9d4acf8dc
d9a96832f8a576b99bc9afe64d0331f6
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UTB
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorioutb@utb.edu.co
_version_ 1814021619337658368
spelling Rodríguez-Díaz, Andrésff52a254-e61a-4c9f-bd0d-8570f4b31c40Díaz-Mendoza, Claudia7203402a-e50a-4248-b87c-f8bd3118435ePasqualino, Jorgelina04ae88a5-d5fb-4f38-9bac-00e72494f905Bahamón-Restrepo, Andrés202f90f2-5caf-4d4b-8e97-051f0d75ff0d2023-07-21T16:26:07Z2023-07-21T16:26:07Z20222023Rodríguez-Díaz, A., Díaz-Mendoza, C., Pasqualino, J., & Bahamón-Restrepo, A. (2022). Análise Comparativa Dos Planos De Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos de Bogotá DC E Cidade do México. Producción+ Limpia, 17(1), 111-135.https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/1235010.22507/10.22507/PML.V17N1A7Universidad Tecnológica de BolívarRepositorio Universidad Tecnológica de BolívarIntroduction. Mexico City has approximately 8’918,853 inhabitants that generate an average of 12,893 tons / day, while Bogotá, with more than 7’412,516 inhabitants generates an approximate of 7,200 tons / day. Objective. Carry out a comparative analysis between the solid waste management plans of Mexico City in relation to Bogotá, highlighting similarities, differences, strengths, and weaknesses. Materials and methods. The method of this research is based on a bibliographic review in databases, and documents corresponding to the legislation of each country, comparing aspects such as population, waste generation, source separation, collection, transfer, and final disposal. Results. Among the main successes found in both cities are the new implementation of zero waste plans, recycling, coverage of the cleaning service companies, all with a view to reducing the amount of waste deposited in sanitary landfills. The increase in the separation at the origin, despite being low, is a plus; the transport of waste is regular, but it was identified that in both cities it covers most of the territorial extension, which contributes to the reduction of urban centers of illegal waste disposal. Conclusions. Both cities have strong points such as the collection and transfer process in Mexico City and recycling in Bogotá. Among the aspects of improvement, separation at the source needs to be promoted, waste transportation needs to be technified and renewed in Mexico City, and better implemented in Bogotá. © 2022 Corporacion Universitaria Lasallista. All rights reserved.25 páginasapplication/pdfspahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Producción+ Limpia, 17(1)Comparative Analysis of The Solid Waste Management Plans of Bogotá D.C and Mexico CityAnálise Comparativa Dos Planos De Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos de Bogotá D.C E Cidade do MéxicoAnálisis comparativo de los planes de gestión de residuos sólidos de Bogotá D.C y Ciudad de Méxicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/drafthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bccehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Developing Countries;Waste Collection;Separation at SourceLEMBCartagena de IndiasAltamirano, C. (2016) La Ciudad de México no sabe qué hacer con su basura El paísAnzola, D. (2016) Estudio del manejo de residuos sólidos en el relleno sanitario Doña Juana con el fin de delinear un borrador de propuesta para el manejo integral de residuos sólidos en la ciudad de Bogotá d.c Bogotá D.c: universidad colegio mayor de nuestra señora del rosarioArmijo, C., Ojeda, S. (2018) Waste management system in Mexico: history, state of the art and trends Tijuana, México: UABCBermudez, J., Montoya, A. Assessment of the Current Situation of Informal Recyclers and Recycling: Case Study Bogotá (2019) Sustainability, pp. 1-6.(2018) Barrido y recolección de residuos en la ciudad de Bogotá Bogotá(2018) Proyecciones de Población 2018-2020, total departamental por área Proyecciones de población 2018-2020 República de Colombia: Departamento administrativo nacional de estadísticaDas, S., Kumar, P. Solid waste management:Scopeandthechallenge ofsustainability (2019) CleanerProduction, pp. 1-9.Di Nola, M., Escapa, M. Modelling solid waste management solutions: The case of Campania, Italy (2018) Waste Management, pp. 2-3.Espinoza, M. (2011) Análisis a la gestion integral y al manejo de residuos sólidos, una propuesta que apunta al desarrollo sostenible BogotáOpciones para el aprovechamiento (2017) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, p. 10.Guerrero, L., Hogland, W. Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries (2012) Waste management, p. 222. Cited 5 times.Gutierrez, F., Coria, A. A Study and Factor Identification of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Mexico City (2019) Sustainability, pp. 3-7.Hoornweg, D. Managing municipal solid waste in Latin America an the Caribbean (2012) Grid Lines, 6.(2016) Encuesta intercensal 2015. Cited 230 times. Ciudad de México: Instituto nacional de estadística, geografía e informática(2003) Ley general para la prevención y gestión integral de los residuos. Cited 26 times. (08 de Octubre de). México: Congreso General de los Estados Unidos MexicanosMargallo, M., Ziegler-Rodriguez, K., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Aldaco, R., Irabien, Á., Kahhat, R. Enhancing waste management strategies in Latin America under a holistic environmental assessment perspective: A review for policy support (2019) Science of the Total Environment, 689, pp. 1255-1275. Cited 87 times. www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.393Marin, A. (2017) Al relleno llega un verdadero tesoro el espectadorMedina, E. (2020) Alcaldía de Bogotá Obtenido de https://Bogotá.gov.co/mi-ciudad/turismo/informacion-deBogotá-en-2020Mora, J. (2004) Elproblemadelabasuraenla ciudaddeMéxico. Cited 2 times. CiudaddeMéxico: Fundación de estudios urbanos y metropolitanosPadilla, A., Trujillo, J. Waste disposal and households’ heterogeneity. Identifying factors shaping attitudes towards source-separated recycling in Bogotá, Colombia (2017) Waste management, pp. 1-2.(2015) Plan de gestión integral de residuos sólidos, Bogotá se orienta hacia el aprovechamiento total de sus residuos Bogotá DC: UAESPPires, A. Solid waste management in European countries: A review of systemsanalysis (2010) Wastemanagement, p. 1036.(2017) Los servicios de gestión de residuos sólidos municipales en América Latina. Cited 8 times. Londres, Reino Unido.: Public Services International Research UnitQuintero Torres, D. (2016) The Role of Territorial Management in Landfill Site. Case Study: “Doña Juana” Landfill, Bogotá, Colombia, pp. 1-5. Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia (UPTC) Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi (IGAC)Rodriguez, J., Ibarra, D. Model for the dynamic management assessment of ordinary waste in Bogotá and its influence on the urban environmental quality index (2018) riia- Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 2.Rodriguez, S. (2011) Residuos Sólidos en Colombia: Su manejo es un compromiso de todos Tunja: Universidad Santo TomásRondon, E. (2016) Guia general para la gestión de residuos sólidos domiciliarios. Cited 4 times. Chile: Cepal-Naciones UnidasSeadon, J. Sustainable waste management systems (2010) Waste management, p. 1644.(2015) Inventario de residuos sólidos- CDMX 2014. Cited 3 times. Ciudad de México(2016) Ciudad de México: Programa de gestión integral de residuos sólidos(2019) Secretaria del Medio Ambiente Obtenido de https://sedema.cdmx.gob.mx/programas/programa/residuos-solidos(2017) Bogotá es una de las ciudades que peor maneja su basura (10 de Octubre de). Obtenido de https://sostenibilidad.semana.com/medio-ambiente/articulo/Bogotá-es-la-ciudad-que-peor-maneja-subasura-en-el-pais/38775Solano Meza, J.K., Orjuela Yepes, D., Rodrigo-Ilarri, J., Cassiraga, E. Predictive analysis of urban waste generation for the city of Bogotá, Colombia, through the implementation of decision trees-based machine learning, support vector machines and artificial neural networks (2019) Heliyon, 5 (11), art. no. e02810. Cited 69 times. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/heliyon/ doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02810Sukholthman, P., Sharp, A. A system dynamics model to evaluate effects of source separation of municipal solid waste management: A case of Bangkok, Thailand (2016) Waste management, pp. 2-4.(2017) Informe nacional de aprovechamiento de residuos 2016 Bogotá, Colombia: Departamento nacional de planeaciónTello, P., Terraza, H. (2010) Informe de la evaluacion regional del manejo de residuos sólidos en América latina y el Caribe. Cited 16 times. Organización Panamericana de la Salud(2016) Los residuos urbanos y su problemática Obtenido de la Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia. España https://www2.uned.es/biblioteca/rsu/pagina1.htmUrrego, E., Rodriguez, J. Application of methodologies EPA, Mexican and IPCC for estimating biogas, a case study of the sanitary landfill Doña Juana, Bogotá–Colombia (2016) SCIELO, pp. 1-2.(2018) Diagnóstico del modelo de aseo en Bogotá: el Bogotá D.C: nuevo PGIRSWheeler, S. (2015) Built Landscapes of Metropolitan Regions: An International Typology California: Journal of the American Planning Associationhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501ORIGINAL2955-Texto del artículo-210215712-1-10-20220628.pdf2955-Texto del artículo-210215712-1-10-20220628.pdfapplication/pdf284477https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12350/1/2955-Texto%20del%20art%c3%adculo-210215712-1-10-20220628.pdfb1693f81bf900c03ffdc3a1642d9c71fMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12350/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83182https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12350/3/license.txte20ad307a1c5f3f25af9304a7a7c86b6MD53TEXT2955-Texto del artículo-210215712-1-10-20220628.pdf.txt2955-Texto del artículo-210215712-1-10-20220628.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain73127https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12350/4/2955-Texto%20del%20art%c3%adculo-210215712-1-10-20220628.pdf.txt96b6ef5d526aef1ea54276d9d4acf8dcMD54THUMBNAIL2955-Texto del artículo-210215712-1-10-20220628.pdf.jpg2955-Texto del artículo-210215712-1-10-20220628.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg7671https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12350/5/2955-Texto%20del%20art%c3%adculo-210215712-1-10-20220628.pdf.jpgd9a96832f8a576b99bc9afe64d0331f6MD5520.500.12585/12350oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/123502023-07-22 00:17:41.512Repositorio Institucional UTBrepositorioutb@utb.edu.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