Fiscal impacts and cross-border effects of a change in state liquor policy

This paper analyzes the economic effects of the 2012 change in liquor policy (Initiative 1183) in Washington State in the United States. This policy increased the availability of liquor but also increased taxes on liquor in Washington. This research provides some evidence that the quantity of liquor...

Full description

Autores:
Toro González, Daniel
Watson, Philip
Winfree, Jason
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional UTB
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/9981
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/9981
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/305480
Palabra clave:
Fiscal impacts
Liquor policy
Regulation
Spatial spillovers
Vertical restraints
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id UTB2_45c3fcd959a3ecbabac93f08339d83ea
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/9981
network_acronym_str UTB2
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional UTB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Fiscal impacts and cross-border effects of a change in state liquor policy
title Fiscal impacts and cross-border effects of a change in state liquor policy
spellingShingle Fiscal impacts and cross-border effects of a change in state liquor policy
Fiscal impacts
Liquor policy
Regulation
Spatial spillovers
Vertical restraints
title_short Fiscal impacts and cross-border effects of a change in state liquor policy
title_full Fiscal impacts and cross-border effects of a change in state liquor policy
title_fullStr Fiscal impacts and cross-border effects of a change in state liquor policy
title_full_unstemmed Fiscal impacts and cross-border effects of a change in state liquor policy
title_sort Fiscal impacts and cross-border effects of a change in state liquor policy
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Toro González, Daniel
Watson, Philip
Winfree, Jason
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Toro González, Daniel
Watson, Philip
Winfree, Jason
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv Fiscal impacts
Liquor policy
Regulation
Spatial spillovers
Vertical restraints
topic Fiscal impacts
Liquor policy
Regulation
Spatial spillovers
Vertical restraints
description This paper analyzes the economic effects of the 2012 change in liquor policy (Initiative 1183) in Washington State in the United States. This policy increased the availability of liquor but also increased taxes on liquor in Washington. This research provides some evidence that the quantity of liquor sold in both Washington and Idaho increased, suggesting that availability/convenience effects can outweigh tax/price effects. Furthermore, the cross-border spillover effects are isolated to the nearest store to the border.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-10T20:25:39Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-10T20:25:39Z
dc.date.submitted.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-08
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Philip Watson, Jason Winfree,b and Daniel Toro-González (2020) “Fiscal Impacts and Cross-Border Effects of a Change in State Liquor Policy,” Journal of Food Distribution Research, July, pp. 1–18.
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/9981
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/305480
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.22004/ag.econ.305480
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
identifier_str_mv Philip Watson, Jason Winfree,b and Daniel Toro-González (2020) “Fiscal Impacts and Cross-Border Effects of a Change in State Liquor Policy,” Journal of Food Distribution Research, July, pp. 1–18.
10.22004/ag.econ.305480
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
Repositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/9981
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/305480
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.cc.*.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv 18 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Cartagena de Indias
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Food Distribution Research Volume 51, Issue 2, pp. 1–18.
institution Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/9981/2/license_rdf
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/9981/3/license.txt
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/9981/1/139.pdf
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/9981/4/139.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/9981/5/139.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
e20ad307a1c5f3f25af9304a7a7c86b6
2fb09b18b3d22c61d0ad9ce4ae1fedda
88383b6ff5ca7a32f7d7f3cf36cd4c0d
08bd030e873ba9d80ab85028c59a4175
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UTB
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorioutb@utb.edu.co
_version_ 1814021797679464448
spelling Toro González, Daniel180623f6-abb7-485b-864a-94bebfd6988aWatson, Philip70345cb6-e31a-4d93-b837-6c52b949f502Winfree, Jasonaf16d200-76ef-4c9b-8813-c77f0a3417dd2021-02-10T20:25:39Z2021-02-10T20:25:39Z2020-072021-02-08Philip Watson, Jason Winfree,b and Daniel Toro-González (2020) “Fiscal Impacts and Cross-Border Effects of a Change in State Liquor Policy,” Journal of Food Distribution Research, July, pp. 1–18.https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/9981https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30548010.22004/ag.econ.305480Universidad Tecnológica de BolívarRepositorio Universidad Tecnológica de BolívarThis paper analyzes the economic effects of the 2012 change in liquor policy (Initiative 1183) in Washington State in the United States. This policy increased the availability of liquor but also increased taxes on liquor in Washington. This research provides some evidence that the quantity of liquor sold in both Washington and Idaho increased, suggesting that availability/convenience effects can outweigh tax/price effects. Furthermore, the cross-border spillover effects are isolated to the nearest store to the border.18 páginasapplication/pdfenghttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Journal of Food Distribution Research Volume 51, Issue 2, pp. 1–18.Fiscal impacts and cross-border effects of a change in state liquor policyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Fiscal impactsLiquor policyRegulationSpatial spilloversVertical restraintsCartagena de IndiasPúblico generalAnselin, L., A. Varga, and Z. Acs. 1997. “Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations.” Journal of Urban Economics 42(3): 422–448.Arcidiacono, P., H. Sieg, and F. Sloan. 2007. “Living Rationally under the Volcano? an Empirical Analysis of Heavy Drinking and Smoking.” International Economic Review 48(1): 37–65.Asplund, M., F. Richard, and F. Wilander. 2007. “Demand and Distance: Evidence on Crossborder Shopping.” Journal of Public Economics 91: 141–157.Baltagi, B.H. and J.M. Griffin. 1995. “A Dynamic Demand Model for Liquor: The Case for Pooling.” Review of Economics and Statistics 77(3): 545–554.Beatty, T.K., E.R. Larsen, and D.E. Sommervoll. 2009. “Driven to Drink: Sin Taxes Near a Border.” Journal of Health Economics 28(6): 1175–1184.Burge, G., and C. Rogers. 2011. “Local Option Sales Taxes and Consumer Spending Patterns: Fiscal Interdependence under Multi-Tiered Local Taxation.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 41(1): 46–58.Chiou, L. and E. Muehlegger. 2008. “Crossing the Line: Direct Estimation of Cross-Border Cigarette Sales and the Effect on Tax Revenue.” BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 8(1): 1–41.Cotti, C., R. A. Dunn, and N. Tefft. 2015. “The Great Recession and Consumer Demand for Alcohol: A Dynamic Panel-Data Analysis of US Households.” American Journal of Health Economics 1(3): 297–325.Evans, W.N., and T.J. Moore. 2012. “Liquidity, Economic Activity, and Mortality.” Review of Economics & Statistics 94(2): 400–418.Feng, S., and M. Patton. 2017. “Empirical Analysis of Differential Spillover Effects Within a Growth Equilibrium Framework: Urban–Rural versus Rural–Rural Linkages.” Papers in Regional Science 96(4): 743–758.Ferraro, A.P. 2014. “Serving the People: Evaluating Initiative 1183 & Liquor Privatization in Washington State.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 76: 427.Fogarty, J. 2010. “The Demand for Beer, Wine and Spirits: A Survey of the Literature.” Journal of Economic Surveys 24(3): 428–478.Gallet, C.A. 2007. “The Demand for Alcohol: A Meta-Analysis of Elasticities.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 51(2): 121–135.Geys, B. 2006. “Looking across Borders: A Test of Spatial Policy Interdependence Using Local Government Efficiency Ratings.” Journal of Urban Economics 60(3): 443–462.High, J., and C.A. Coppin. 1988. “Wiley and the Whiskey Industry: Strategic Behavior in the Passage of the Pure Food Act.” Business History Review 62(2): 286–309.Hogeland, W. 2010. The Whiskey Rebellion: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and the Frontier Rebels Who Challenged America's Newfound Sovereignty. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Mulia, N., S.E. Zemore, R. Murphy,H. Liu, and R. Catalano. 2014. “Economic Loss and Alcohol Consumption and Problems during the 2008 to 2009 US Recession.” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 38(4): 1026–1034.Public Health Institute. 2016, June 28. “Years after Liquor Privatization, Washington State Residents Regret Vote to End State Monopoly.” Public Health Institute. Available online: https://www.phi.org/press/years-after-liquor-privatization-washington-state-residents-regretvote- to-end-state-monopoly/.Rogers, C.L. 2004. “Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) Policy on the Urban Fringe.” Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy 34(1): 27–50.Rorabaugh, W.J. 1991. “Alcohol in America.” OAH Magazine of History 6(2): 17–19.Ruhm, C. 2007. “A Healthy Economy Can Break Your Heart.” Demography 44(4): 829–848.Ruhm, C.J., A.S. Jones, K.A. McGeary, W.C. Kerr, J.V. Terza, T.K. Greenfield, and R.S. Pandian. 2012. “What US Data Should Be Used to Measure the Price Elasticity of Demand for Alcohol?” Journal of Health Economics 31(6): 851–862.Selvanathan, S., amd S. Selvanathan. 2005. The Demand for Alcohol, Tobacco and Marijuana: International Evidence. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Siegel, M., W. DeJong, A.B. Albers, T.S. Naimi, and D.H. Jernigan. 2013. “Differences in Liquor Prices between Control State‐Operated and License‐State Retail Outlets in the United States.” Addiction 108(2): 339–347.Stehr, M. 2007. “The Effect of Sunday Sales Bans and Excise Taxes on Drinking and Cross— Border Shopping for Alcoholic Beverages.” National Tax Journal 60(1): 85–105.Subbaraman, M.S., and W.C. Kerr. 2016. “Opinions on the Privatization of Distilled-Spirits Sales in Washington State: Did Voters Change Their Minds?” Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 77(4): 568–576.Toro-González, D. J.J. McCluskey, and R.C. Mittelhammer. 2014. “Beer Snobs Do Exist: Estimation of Beer Demand by Type.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 39(2): 1–14.Williams, F.J., Chaloupka, and H. Wechsler. 2005. “Are There Differential Effects of Price and Policy on College Students ‘Drinking Intensity’?” Contemporary Economic Policy 23(1): 78–90.Winfree, J.A., and P. Watson. 2015. “Substitution of Liquor Sales across States.” Applied Economics Letters 22(11): 891–894.Ye, Y., and W.C. Kerr. 2016. “Estimated Increase in Cross‐Border Purchases by Washington Residents Following Liquor Privatization and Implications for Alcohol Consumption Trends.” Addiction 111(11): 1948–1953.Ying, L.G. 2000. “Measuring the Spillover Effects: Some Chinese Evidence.” Papers in Regional Science 79(1): 75–89.Young, D.J., and A. Bielinska-Kwapisz. 2003. “Alcohol Consumption, Beverage Prices and Measurement Error.” Journal of Studies on Alcohol 64(2): 235–238.http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/9981/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83182https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/9981/3/license.txte20ad307a1c5f3f25af9304a7a7c86b6MD53ORIGINAL139.pdf139.pdfArtículo principalapplication/pdf956413https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/9981/1/139.pdf2fb09b18b3d22c61d0ad9ce4ae1feddaMD51TEXT139.pdf.txt139.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain46648https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/9981/4/139.pdf.txt88383b6ff5ca7a32f7d7f3cf36cd4c0dMD54THUMBNAIL139.pdf.jpg139.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg46214https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/9981/5/139.pdf.jpg08bd030e873ba9d80ab85028c59a4175MD5520.500.12585/9981oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/99812023-04-24 08:29:55.032Repositorio Institucional UTBrepositorioutb@utb.edu.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