Modular architecture principles–MAPs: a key factor in the development of sustainable open architecture products

Modularity is one of the most useful tools employed in the product development process. Regarding functionality, the use of modules is common to generate flexible platforms to manufacture products and product families that require functional variations. In the current globalized market, the mass ind...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional UTB
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/9188
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/9188
Palabra clave:
Design
Modular architecture principles
Modularity
Open architecture
Personalization
Sustainability
Architecture
Commerce
Computer aided manufacturing
Cost effectiveness
Design
Design for manufacturability
Ecodesign
Flexible manufacturing systems
Product design
Product development
Quality function deployment
Reconfigurable architectures
Sustainable development
Design for manufacturing and assemblies
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
Modular architectures
Modularity
Open architecture
Personalizations
Product development process
Reconfigurable manufacturing system
Life cycle
Rights
restrictedAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id UTB2_38508afd7d9fd2848183cad21ce742a1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/9188
network_acronym_str UTB2
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional UTB
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Modular architecture principles–MAPs: a key factor in the development of sustainable open architecture products
title Modular architecture principles–MAPs: a key factor in the development of sustainable open architecture products
spellingShingle Modular architecture principles–MAPs: a key factor in the development of sustainable open architecture products
Design
Modular architecture principles
Modularity
Open architecture
Personalization
Sustainability
Architecture
Commerce
Computer aided manufacturing
Cost effectiveness
Design
Design for manufacturability
Ecodesign
Flexible manufacturing systems
Product design
Product development
Quality function deployment
Reconfigurable architectures
Sustainable development
Design for manufacturing and assemblies
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
Modular architectures
Modularity
Open architecture
Personalizations
Product development process
Reconfigurable manufacturing system
Life cycle
title_short Modular architecture principles–MAPs: a key factor in the development of sustainable open architecture products
title_full Modular architecture principles–MAPs: a key factor in the development of sustainable open architecture products
title_fullStr Modular architecture principles–MAPs: a key factor in the development of sustainable open architecture products
title_full_unstemmed Modular architecture principles–MAPs: a key factor in the development of sustainable open architecture products
title_sort Modular architecture principles–MAPs: a key factor in the development of sustainable open architecture products
dc.subject.keywords.none.fl_str_mv Design
Modular architecture principles
Modularity
Open architecture
Personalization
Sustainability
Architecture
Commerce
Computer aided manufacturing
Cost effectiveness
Design
Design for manufacturability
Ecodesign
Flexible manufacturing systems
Product design
Product development
Quality function deployment
Reconfigurable architectures
Sustainable development
Design for manufacturing and assemblies
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
Modular architectures
Modularity
Open architecture
Personalizations
Product development process
Reconfigurable manufacturing system
Life cycle
topic Design
Modular architecture principles
Modularity
Open architecture
Personalization
Sustainability
Architecture
Commerce
Computer aided manufacturing
Cost effectiveness
Design
Design for manufacturability
Ecodesign
Flexible manufacturing systems
Product design
Product development
Quality function deployment
Reconfigurable architectures
Sustainable development
Design for manufacturing and assemblies
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
Modular architectures
Modularity
Open architecture
Personalizations
Product development process
Reconfigurable manufacturing system
Life cycle
description Modularity is one of the most useful tools employed in the product development process. Regarding functionality, the use of modules is common to generate flexible platforms to manufacture products and product families that require functional variations. In the current globalized market, the mass individualization or personalization is the preferred production model that delivers cost-effectiveness and satisfaction at the level of the market of one. In this model, the modularity is employed as a powerful concept applied not only for the manufacture but also for the use and final disposal stages, in which the design of modules provides functionalities and features that satisfy a variety of specifications for different market segments. Despite the existence of approaches in modularity and its usefulness in product development, it is possible to identify a lack of analysis of modular and open architecture to enhance the sustainability performance of products regarding strategies to diminish adverse impacts during their lifecycle. This paper provides an analysis of the influence and potential of Modular Architecture Principles–MAPs in the sustainable design of open architecture products. Additionally, lifecycle considerations are analysed to identify and propose strategies that enforce the sustainability performance of products concerning personalization from early design stages Abbreviations: MAPs: Modular Architecture Principles; FMS: Flexible Manufacturing System; RMS: Reconfigurable Manufacturing System; EOL: End Of Life; LCA: Life Cycle Assessment; QFD: Quality Function Deployment; DFMA: Design For Manufacturing And Assembly. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-26T16:33:10Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-26T16:33:10Z
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.spa.none.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.citation.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Sustainable Engineering
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 19397038
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/9188
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1080/19397038.2019.1634157
dc.identifier.instname.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
dc.identifier.reponame.none.fl_str_mv Repositorio UTB
dc.identifier.orcid.none.fl_str_mv 56079249600
6506807401
55281389200
identifier_str_mv International Journal of Sustainable Engineering
19397038
10.1080/19397038.2019.1634157
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
Repositorio UTB
56079249600
6506807401
55281389200
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/9188
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessRights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.cc.none.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.medium.none.fl_str_mv Recurso electrónico
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis Ltd.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis Ltd.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85068372656&doi=10.1080%2f19397038.2019.1634157&partnerID=40&md5=19afd6509737f81e9188cb508bf6e039
institution Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/9188/1/MiniProdInv.png
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 0cb0f101a8d16897fb46fc914d3d7043
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UTB
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorioutb@utb.edu.co
_version_ 1814021728403193856
spelling 2020-03-26T16:33:10Z2020-03-26T16:33:10Z2019International Journal of Sustainable Engineering19397038https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/918810.1080/19397038.2019.1634157Universidad Tecnológica de BolívarRepositorio UTB56079249600650680740155281389200Modularity is one of the most useful tools employed in the product development process. Regarding functionality, the use of modules is common to generate flexible platforms to manufacture products and product families that require functional variations. In the current globalized market, the mass individualization or personalization is the preferred production model that delivers cost-effectiveness and satisfaction at the level of the market of one. In this model, the modularity is employed as a powerful concept applied not only for the manufacture but also for the use and final disposal stages, in which the design of modules provides functionalities and features that satisfy a variety of specifications for different market segments. Despite the existence of approaches in modularity and its usefulness in product development, it is possible to identify a lack of analysis of modular and open architecture to enhance the sustainability performance of products regarding strategies to diminish adverse impacts during their lifecycle. This paper provides an analysis of the influence and potential of Modular Architecture Principles–MAPs in the sustainable design of open architecture products. Additionally, lifecycle considerations are analysed to identify and propose strategies that enforce the sustainability performance of products concerning personalization from early design stages Abbreviations: MAPs: Modular Architecture Principles; FMS: Flexible Manufacturing System; RMS: Reconfigurable Manufacturing System; EOL: End Of Life; LCA: Life Cycle Assessment; QFD: Quality Function Deployment; DFMA: Design For Manufacturing And Assembly. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Recurso electrónicoapplication/pdfengTaylor and Francis Ltd.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16echttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85068372656&doi=10.1080%2f19397038.2019.1634157&partnerID=40&md5=19afd6509737f81e9188cb508bf6e039Modular architecture principles–MAPs: a key factor in the development of sustainable open architecture productsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1DesignModular architecture principlesModularityOpen architecturePersonalizationSustainabilityArchitectureCommerceComputer aided manufacturingCost effectivenessDesignDesign for manufacturabilityEcodesignFlexible manufacturing systemsProduct designProduct developmentQuality function deploymentReconfigurable architecturesSustainable developmentDesign for manufacturing and assembliesLife Cycle Assessment (LCA)Modular architecturesModularityOpen architecturePersonalizationsProduct development processReconfigurable manufacturing systemLife cycleMesa J.A.Esparragoza I.Maury H.Ameli, M., Mansour, S., Ahmadi-Javid, A., A Multi-Objective Model for Selecting Design Alternatives and End-Of-Life Options under Uncertainty: A Sustainable Approach (2016) Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, pp. 123-136Bhamu, J., Sangwan, K., Lean Manufacturing: Literature Review and Research Issues (2014) International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34 (7), pp. 876-940Byggeth, S., Broman, G., Robert, K.-H., A Method for Sustainable Product Development Based on A Modular System of Guiding Questions (2007) Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, pp. 1-11Chang, T.-R., Wang, C.-S., Wang, C.-C., A Systematic Approach for Green Design in Modular Product Development (2013) International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68, pp. 2729-2741Chung-Shing, W., Web-Based Modular Interface Geometries with Constraints in Assembly Models (2009) Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56 (4), pp. 1675-1686Cor, E., Zwolinski, P., A Procedure to Define the Best Design Intervention Strategy on A Product for A Sustainable Behavior of the User (2014) Procedia CIRP, 15, pp. 425-430Dahmus, J., Gonzalez-Zugasti, J., Otto, K., Modular Product Architecture (2001) Design Studies, 22 (1), pp. 409-424Devanathan, S., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W.Z., Zhao, F., Ramani, K., Integration of Sustainability into Early Design through the Function Impact Matrix (2010) Journal of Mechanial Design, 132Eddy, D., Krishnamurty, S., Grosse, I., Wileden, J., Lewis, K., A Predictive Modelling-Based Material Selection Method for Sustainable Product Design (2015) Jorunal of Engineering Design, 26 (10-12), pp. 365-390Erixon, G., von Yxkull, A., Arnström, A., Modularity - the Basis for Product and Factory Reengineering (1996) CIRP Annals, 45, pp. 1-6Fiorineschi, L., Fricilli, F., Rissone, P., Cascini, G., Product Architecture Definition: Evaluating the Potentiality of TRIZ Tools (2015) Procedia Engineering, 131, pp. 359-371Fujita, K., Product Variety Optimization under Modular Architecture (2002) Computer-Aided Design, 34 (12), pp. 953-965Gifford, R., Nilsson, A., Personal and Social Factors that Influence Pro-Environmental Concern and Behaviour: A Review (2014) International Journal of Psychology, 49 (3), pp. 141-157Giudice, F., Balisteri, F., Risitano, G., A Concurrent Design Method Based on DFMA-FEA Integrated Approach (2009) Concurrent Engineering, 17 (3), pp. 183-202Gu, P., Hashemian, M., Nee, A., Adaptable Design (2004) CIRP Annals, 53 (2), pp. 539-557He, B., Tang, W., Wang, J., Huang, S., Deng, Z., Wang, Y., Low-Carbon Conceptual Design Based on Product Lifecycle Assessment (2015) International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81, pp. 863-874Hu, S., Ko, J., Weyland, L., ElMaraghy, H., Lien, T., Koren, Y., Shpitalni, M., Assembly System Design and Operations for Product Variety (2011) CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 60 (2), pp. 715-733. , …Jian, P., Leng, J., Ding, K., Gu, P., Koren, Y., Social Manufacturing as a Sustainable Paradigm for Mass Individualization (2016) Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering ManufactureKimura, F., Kato, S., Hata, T., Masuda, T., Product Modularization for Parts Reuse in Inverse Manufacturing (2001) CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 50 (1), pp. 89-92Kissling, R., Fitzpatrick, C., Boeni, H., Luepschen, C., Andrew, S., Dickenson, J., Definition of Generic Re-Use Operating Models for Electrical and Electronic Equipment (2012) Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 65, pp. 85-99Koga, T., Aoyama, K., Modular Design Method for Sustainable Life-Cycle of Product Family considering Future Market Changes (2008) Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, , Brooklyn, New YorkKollmuss, A., Agyeman, J., Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior? (2010) Environmental Education Research, 8 (3), pp. 239-260Koren, Y., Hu, S., Gu, P., Shpitalni, M., Open-Architecture Products (2013) CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 62, pp. 719-729Koren, Y., Shpitalni, M., Gu, P., Hu, S., Product Design for Mass-Individualization (2015) Procedia CIRP - 25th Design Conference Innovative Product Creation, 36, pp. 64-71Kovács, G., Corporate Environmental Responsibility in the Supply Chain (2008) Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (15), pp. 1571-1578Kriwet, A., Zussman, E., Seliger, G., Systematic Integration of Design-For-Recycling into Product Design (1995) International Journal of Production Economics, 38 (1), pp. 15-22Kyoung-Yun, K., Manley, D., Yang, H., Ontology-Based Assembly Design and Information Sharing for Collaborative Product Development (2006) Computer-Aided Design, 38 (12), pp. 1233-1250Lu, B., Li, B., Wang, L., Yang, J., Liu, J., Wang, X., Reusability Based on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Case Study on WEEE (2014) Procedia CIRP, 15, pp. 473-478Ma, J., Kremer, G., A Sustainable Modular Product Design Approach with Key Components and Uncertain End-Of-Life Strategy Consideration (2016) The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 85 (1), pp. 741-763Mesa, J., Maury, H., Arrieta, R., Bula, A., Riba, C., Characterization of Modular Architecture Principles Towards Reconfiguration: A Firts Approach in Its Selection Process (2015) International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 80 (1), pp. 221-232Mutha, A., Pokharel, S., Strategic Network Design for Reverse Logistics and Remanufacturing Using New and Old Product Modules (2009) Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56 (1), pp. 334-346Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D., Waldman, D., Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sus (2011) Business & Society, 50 (1), pp. 6-27Ramani, K., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W.Z., Zhao, F., Sutherland, J., Handwerker, C., Thurson, D., Integrated Sustainable Lifecycle Design: A Review (2010) Journal of Mechanical Design, 136. , …Remery, M., Mascle, C., Agard, B., A New Method for Evaluating the Best Product End-Of-Life Strategy during the Early Design Phase (2012) Journal of Engineering Design, 23 (6), pp. 419-441Rizzi, F., Bartolozzi, I., Borghini, A., Frey, M., Environmental Management of End-Of-Life Products: Nine Factors of Sustainability in Collaborative Networks (2012) Business Strategy and the Environment, 22 (8), pp. 561-572Romli, A., Prickett, P., Setchi, R., Soe, S., Integrated Eco-Design Decision-Making for Sustainable Product Development (2015) International Journal of Production Research, 53 (2), pp. 549-571Rusinko, C., Green Manufacturing: An Evaluation of Environmentally Sustainable Manufacturing Practices and Their Impact on Competitive Outcomes (2007) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54 (3), pp. 445-454Seliger, G., Weinert, N., Zettl, M., Module Configurator for the Development of Products for Ease of Remanufacturing (2007) Advances in Life Cycle Engineering for Sustainable Manufacturing Businesses, , Takata S., Umeda Y., London, SpringerShrivastava, P., Berger, S., Sustainability Principles: A Review and Directions (2010) Organization Management Journal, 7 (4), pp. 246-261Simpson, T., Product Platform Design and Customization: Status and Promise (2004) Artificial Inteligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 18, pp. 3-20Smith, S., Yen, C.-C., Green Product Design through Product Modularization Using Atomic Theory (2010) Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 26 (6), pp. 790-798Stevels, A., (1997) Optimization of the End-Of-Life System, , Ecodesign: A promising Approach. UNEP Working Group on sustainable Product DevelopmentSubramaniyam, P., Srinivassan, K., Prabaharan, M., Approach for Green Product Design (2011) International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 2 (3), pp. 244-248Tian, J., Chen, M., Sustainable Design for Automotive Products: Dismantling and Recycling of End-Of-Life Vehicles (2014) Waste Management, 34, pp. 458-467Tseng, K., Lin, B., Han, C.-M., An Intelligent System for Sustainable Product Design at the Concept Development Stage (2012) Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 9 (3), pp. 397-408Umeda, Y., Fukushige, S., Tonoike, K., Kondoh, S., Product Modularity for Life Cycle Design (2008) CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 57 (1), pp. 13-16News from the Entrepreneurship Community in Singapore (2016) START-UPS:Singaporean engineer builds the world’s first multi-configuration bicycle with help from ACE Start-up Grant(3), , http://www.upstartnews.sg/archive/03/05.html, 05, Retrieved 10May 2017Vinodh, S., Rathod, G., Integration of ECQFD and LCA for Sustainable Product Design (2010) Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, pp. 833-842Yan, J., Feng, C., Sustainable Design-Oriented Product Modularity Combined with 6R Concept: A Case Study of Rotor Laboratory Bench (2014) Clean Technologies and Environmental Policiy, 16, pp. 95-109Yung, W., Chan, H., Wong, D., So, J., Choi, A., Eco-Redesign of a Personal Electronic Product Subject to the Energy-Using Product Directive (2012) International Journal of Production Research, 50 (5), pp. 1411-1423http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501THUMBNAILMiniProdInv.pngMiniProdInv.pngimage/png23941https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/9188/1/MiniProdInv.png0cb0f101a8d16897fb46fc914d3d7043MD5120.500.12585/9188oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/91882021-02-02 15:20:54.049Repositorio Institucional UTBrepositorioutb@utb.edu.co