Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to the AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion case
This article highlights a new discussion in Colombia, that is, the role that arbitration could play in consumer law. The paper also analyses a signature case in U.S. arbitration consumer law (AT&T Mobility v Concepcion), which offers the basis to open the debate of small claims contested during...
- Autores:
-
Salgado Figueroa, Eduardo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional UTB
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/12260
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/12260
- Palabra clave:
- Arbitration
Consumer
Contract law
Inefficacy
Contract relativity
Arbitraje
Consumidor
Derecho de los contratos
Ineficacia
Relatividad contractual.
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id |
UTB2_21e9ad9d68ae1e5c24909354871895dd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/12260 |
network_acronym_str |
UTB2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional UTB |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to the AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion case |
dc.title.alternative.spa.fl_str_mv |
Hacia el arbitraje colectivo en el Derecho del Consumidor en Colombia. Una Referencia al caso AT&T mobility llC v. Concepción |
title |
Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to the AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion case |
spellingShingle |
Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to the AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion case Arbitration Consumer Contract law Inefficacy Contract relativity Arbitraje Consumidor Derecho de los contratos Ineficacia Relatividad contractual. |
title_short |
Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to the AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion case |
title_full |
Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to the AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion case |
title_fullStr |
Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to the AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion case |
title_full_unstemmed |
Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to the AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion case |
title_sort |
Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to the AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion case |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Salgado Figueroa, Eduardo |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Salgado Figueroa, Eduardo |
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv |
Arbitration Consumer Contract law Inefficacy Contract relativity Arbitraje Consumidor Derecho de los contratos Ineficacia Relatividad contractual. |
topic |
Arbitration Consumer Contract law Inefficacy Contract relativity Arbitraje Consumidor Derecho de los contratos Ineficacia Relatividad contractual. |
description |
This article highlights a new discussion in Colombia, that is, the role that arbitration could play in consumer law. The paper also analyses a signature case in U.S. arbitration consumer law (AT&T Mobility v Concepcion), which offers the basis to open the debate of small claims contested during a Class Arbitral proceeding. It also weighs on the legal nature of Class Waiver Clause. It furthers on the possible sanctions that could be imposed on that clause, to conclude that Consumer Law in Colombia deserves a better and effective procedure favoring consumers by voiding with inefficacy a possible Class Waiver in an arbitration agreement |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-15 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-21T15:32:56Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-21T15:32:56Z |
dc.date.submitted.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07 |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bcce |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/draft |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
status_str |
draft |
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Salgado Figueroa, E. (2021). Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion case. Jurídicas, 18(2), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2021.18.2.6 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/12260 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.17151/jurid.2021.18.2.6 |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar |
identifier_str_mv |
Salgado Figueroa, E. (2021). Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion case. Jurídicas, 18(2), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2021.18.2.6 10.17151/jurid.2021.18.2.6 Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar Repositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/12260 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.cc.*.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv |
14 páginas |
dc.format.medium.none.fl_str_mv |
Pdf |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cartagena de Indias |
dc.publisher.sede.spa.fl_str_mv |
Campus Tecnológico |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
Jurídicas - Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) |
institution |
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12260/1/admin%2c%2bJuridicas18%282%29_6.pdf https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12260/2/license_rdf https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12260/3/license.txt https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12260/4/admin%2c%2bJuridicas18%282%29_6.pdf.txt https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12260/5/admin%2c%2bJuridicas18%282%29_6.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
651472c1300a5b9cbf0383c78575db03 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 e20ad307a1c5f3f25af9304a7a7c86b6 7f414ded7319a74ab250c05f5118f03a b935127a66151d50ee790efc25273d76 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional UTB |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorioutb@utb.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814021797700435968 |
spelling |
Salgado Figueroa, Eduardo5eed2773-5217-49ee-bc14-e83f25ae95062023-07-21T15:32:56Z2023-07-21T15:32:56Z2021-03-152023-07Salgado Figueroa, E. (2021). Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion case. Jurídicas, 18(2), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2021.18.2.6https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/1226010.17151/jurid.2021.18.2.6Universidad Tecnológica de BolívarRepositorio Universidad Tecnológica de BolívarThis article highlights a new discussion in Colombia, that is, the role that arbitration could play in consumer law. The paper also analyses a signature case in U.S. arbitration consumer law (AT&T Mobility v Concepcion), which offers the basis to open the debate of small claims contested during a Class Arbitral proceeding. It also weighs on the legal nature of Class Waiver Clause. It furthers on the possible sanctions that could be imposed on that clause, to conclude that Consumer Law in Colombia deserves a better and effective procedure favoring consumers by voiding with inefficacy a possible Class Waiver in an arbitration agreementEste artículo hace hincapié en una nueva discusión en Colombia sobre el rol que puede jugar el arbitraje en el Derecho del Consumidor. El estudio profundiza en el análisis de un precedente en los Estados Unidos sobre el Arbitraje en el derecho de los consumidores, esto es AT&T Mobility vs. Concepcion, el cual ofrece las bases para abrir el debate de las reclamaciones de baja cuantía a través de arbitraje y como no pueden los consumidores en esa jurisdicción demandar colectivamente. Esto hace necesario que se comience a observar en Colombia las demandas colectivas así como el estudio legal de las posibles sanciones a la cláusula de renuncia colectiva en el arbitraje del consumidor en Colombia. Lo anterior lleva a la conclusión que se necesita un proceso efectivo que favorezca a los consumidores sancionando con ineficacia de pleno derecho las renuncias a los arbitrajes colectivos14 páginasPdfapplication/pdfspahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Jurídicas - Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021)Towards class arbitration in the consumer law in Colombia. A reference to the AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcion caseHacia el arbitraje colectivo en el Derecho del Consumidor en Colombia. Una Referencia al caso AT&T mobility llC v. Concepcióninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/drafthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bccehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1ArbitrationConsumerContract lawInefficacyContract relativityArbitrajeConsumidorDerecho de los contratosIneficaciaRelatividad contractual.Cartagena de IndiasCampus TecnológicoCole, S. R. (2011). On Babies and Bathwater: The Arbitration Fairness Act and the Supreme Court’s Recent ArbitrationJurisprudence. Hous. L. Rev., 48(3), 712-738.Colombia. Supreme Court of Justice (1998, march, 27). Civil Cassation Court File 4798. [Reporting Judge Ramírez Gómez, José Fernando]Colombia. Supreme Court of Justice (1994, oct, 19). Civil Cassation Court, File N° 3972. [Reporting Judge Carlos Esteban Jaramillo Schloss]Colombia. Supreme Court of Justice. (2001, feb. 2). Civil Cassation Court File No. 5670 [Reporting Judge. Carlos Ignacio Jaramillo Jaramillo].Colombia. Supreme Court of Justice. (2002, sept. 11). Civil Cassation Court File No: 6430. [Reporting Judge José Fernando Ramírez Gómez].Colombia. Constitutional Court. (2007 march, 14). Sentence SU-174 [Reporting Judge Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa]. http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2007/SU174-07.htmColombia. Supreme Court of Justice. (2011, aug. 30). Civil Cassation Court, Ref: 11001- 3103-012- 1999-01957-01 [Reporting Judge William Namén Vargas].Colombia. Presidencia de la República. (16 de junio de 1971). Decreto 410. Por el cual se expide el Código de Comercio. Diario Oficial n.º 33.339. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/ gestornormativo/norma.php?i=41102Colombia. Presidencia de la República. (27 de agosto de 2013) Decreto 1829. Por el cual se reglamentan algunas disposiciones de las Leyes 23 de 1991, 446 de 1998, 640 de 2001 y 1563 de 2012. Diario Oficial n.º 48.895.https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=54362Colombia. Presidencia de la República. (12 de octubre de 2011) Ley 1480. Por medio de la cual se expide el Estatuto del Consumidor y se dictan otras disposiciones. Diario Oficial n.º 48.22. https:// www.sic.gov.co/sites/default/files/normatividad/042017/Ley_1480_Estatuto_Consumidor_2.pdfColombia. Presidencia de la República. (12 de julio de 2012) Ley 1563. Por medio de la cual se expide el Estatuto de Arbitraje Nacional e Internacional y se dictan otras disposiciones. Diario Oficial n.º 48.489. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=48366Echeverri Salazar, V. M. (2011). El control a las cláusulas abusivas en los contratos de adhesión con consumidores. Opinión Jurídica, 10(20),125-144. https://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/opinion/article/view/548Fernández Allende, M. (1994). Contratos por adhesión y cláusulas abusivas, ilegales o inequitativas. En A. Gabriel, A. Stiglitz y A. Alterini (eds.), Defensa de los consumidores de productos y servicios: daños, contratos. Ediciones La RoccaGual Acosta, J. M. (2016). Las cláusulas abusivas - Evolución hacia una noción. Revista Verba Iuris, 11(36), 113-134. https://doi.org/10.18041/0121-3474/verbaiuris.36.1017Lampley, R. L. (2008). Is Arbitration under Attack: Exploring the Recent Judicial Skepticism of the Class Arbitration Waiver and Innovative Solutions to the Unsettled Legal Landscape. Cornell JL & Pub. Pol’y, 18, 477. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228920316.pdfMonsalve-Caballero, V. & Rodado-Barreto, D.P. (2011). La integración de la buena fe objetiva en la etapa de formación de los contratos de consumo. Vniversitas, 60(122), 483-518. https://doi. org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj60-122.ibfoPosada Torres, C. (2015) Las cláusulas abusivas en los contratos de adhesión en el derecho colombiano, Revista de Derecho Privado, 29, 141-182. https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.n29.07Raymond, A. H. (2012). It Is Time the Law Begins to Protect Consumers from Significantly One-Sided Arbitration Clauses Within Contracts of Adhesion. Neb. L. Rev., 91, 666. https://digitalcommons. unl.edu/nlr/vol91/iss3/4/Soto, C. A. (2000). La transformación del contrato: del contrato negociado al contrato predispuesto. En A.A. Alterini, J.L de los Mozos & C.A. Soto (dir.), Contratación contemporánea, Teoría general y principios. Palestra y TemisUnited States of America. Supreme Court. (2011). AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion.United States of America. Supreme Court. (1989).Volt Information Sciences, Inc. V. Board of trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University.United States of America. Supreme Court. (2013). American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Rest.United States of America. Court of California. (2005). Discover Bank V. Superior Court.United States. Court of Appeals. Eleventh Circuit (2007) Dale v. Comcast Corp. Georgia.Villalba Cuellar, J. C. (2011). Los contratos de consumo en el derecho colombiano y el derecho comparado, Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas: Investigación y Reflexión, 19(2), 171-195. https://doi.org/10.18359/rfce.2255USA. Federal Arbitration Act of 1925, 9 U.S.C. § 1-16 et seq (1925).http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1ORIGINALadmin,+Juridicas18(2)_6.pdfadmin,+Juridicas18(2)_6.pdfapplication/pdf155966https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12260/1/admin%2c%2bJuridicas18%282%29_6.pdf651472c1300a5b9cbf0383c78575db03MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12260/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83182https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12260/3/license.txte20ad307a1c5f3f25af9304a7a7c86b6MD53TEXTadmin,+Juridicas18(2)_6.pdf.txtadmin,+Juridicas18(2)_6.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain38035https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12260/4/admin%2c%2bJuridicas18%282%29_6.pdf.txt7f414ded7319a74ab250c05f5118f03aMD54THUMBNAILadmin,+Juridicas18(2)_6.pdf.jpgadmin,+Juridicas18(2)_6.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4905https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/12260/5/admin%2c%2bJuridicas18%282%29_6.pdf.jpgb935127a66151d50ee790efc25273d76MD5520.500.12585/12260oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/122602023-07-22 00:17:36.967Repositorio Institucional UTBrepositorioutb@utb.edu.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 |