The imaginary geography of Hollywood : cinema 1960–2000

Where do we mean when we say ‘Hollywood cinema’? Do we mean contemporary suburban Los Angeles, 1970s New York, a mid-century Midwestern small town, a Gilded Age Wild West town, a Civil War plantation, somewhere in space, all of the above, or none of the above? Has Hollywood cinema been associated wi...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Book
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano
Repositorio:
Expeditio: repositorio UTadeo
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:expeditiorepositorio.utadeo.edu.co:20.500.12010/16089
Acceso en línea:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv9hj8kf
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/16089
Palabra clave:
Imaginary Geography
Hollywood
Cinema 1960–2000
Industria cinematográfica
Cine
Geografía en el cine
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Description
Summary:Where do we mean when we say ‘Hollywood cinema’? Do we mean contemporary suburban Los Angeles, 1970s New York, a mid-century Midwestern small town, a Gilded Age Wild West town, a Civil War plantation, somewhere in space, all of the above, or none of the above? Has Hollywood cinema been associated with the same places throughout its history? What are the privileged – and invisible – places in Hollywood cinema? Film has from its beginnings been a major part of urban – and, increasingly, suburban – life, in theatres, nickelodeons, picture palaces, and multiplexes. As film exhibition has migrated, have film settings migrated as well? Do box office blockbusters, minor hits, and year-end awards lists describe the same country? Because cinema, by virtue of its cinematographic apparatus, is always literally set somewhere, the public spaces that it affords for placing and locating stories act as home bases for a putative national identity, whether that space is ‘real’ like The French Connection’s (Friedkin, 1971) New York or fantastic like Star Wars’ (Lucas, 1977) Tatooine.