Nazi soundscapes : sound, technology and urban space in Germany, 1933-1945
During 2004, I conducted a small-scale survey comprised of oral history inter- views with Germans who were children and young adults during National Social- ism. Among other themes, what emerged in the interviews was their heightened awareness of sound in everyday urban life, particularly during Wor...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Book
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2012
- Institución:
- Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano
- Repositorio:
- Expeditio: repositorio UTadeo
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:expeditiorepositorio.utadeo.edu.co:20.500.12010/16107
- Palabra clave:
- Nazi Soundscapes
Technology and Urban Space
Urbanismo -- Alemania -- 1933 -1945
Sonidos naturales
Paisajismo
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
| Summary: | During 2004, I conducted a small-scale survey comprised of oral history inter- views with Germans who were children and young adults during National Social- ism. Among other themes, what emerged in the interviews was their heightened awareness of sound in everyday urban life, particularly during World War II, and the sense of being earwitnesses to that period.2 These interviews provided a departure point for the current study, inviting further investigation into the im- plications of sound within Nazi-era control, discipline and terror, and the need to specify the role of radio and mediated sound within fascist aesthetics and cultural practices. The figure of the earwitness has been introduced in several post-war accounts. Firstly, in the early 1970s, German-language critic and novelist Elias Canetti produced a collection of twenty-six caricatures of personality types, titled Der Ohrenzeuge (1974)/The Earwitness: Fifty Characters (1979). In Canetti’s ironic rendering, the earwitness figure has more confidence in heard sounds and the spoken voice, than in images or vision. Canetti’s earwitness emerges as an exag- gerated stereotype of a passive listener who “forgets nothing,” sneaks around and stores information for the purpose of incriminating others (1979: 43). Can- etti’s listener could be read as providing an auditory equivalent of the witness as voyeur. This portrayal presents the listening, speaking body in terms of sound recording and transmission technologies, as a “metaphor of memory” (Draaisma 1990; Peters and Rothenbuhler 1997). In this case, Canetti uses his ironic carica- ture to mock the notion that the recollection of the earwitness involves immediate access to the past. |
|---|