Kant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of Memory

This paper analyses the features of Kant’s view of memory, which Kant himself described explicitly in his lectures on anthropology and implicitly in the A edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. I shall offer a review of literature on Kant’s view of memory up to this day. I suggest that memory is a...

Full description

Autores:: Pacheco Acosta, Héctor Luis

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2020

Institución:: Universidad Simón Bolívar

Repositorio:: Repositorio Digital USB

Idioma:: eng

id	USIMONBOL2_c97f05672ddb3350f8b1e1da95e46ace
oai_identifier_str	oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/6939
network_acronym_str	USIMONBOL2
network_name_str	Repositorio Digital USB
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv	Kant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of Memory
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv	Las funciones empíricas y transcendentales de la memoria en Kant
title	Kant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of Memory
spellingShingle	Kant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of Memory Kant Memory Cognition Imagination Experience Memoria Conocimiento Imaginación Experiencia
title_short	Kant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of Memory
title_full	Kant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of Memory
title_fullStr	Kant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of Memory
title_full_unstemmed	Kant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of Memory
title_sort	Kant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of Memory
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Pacheco Acosta, Héctor Luis
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Pacheco Acosta, Héctor Luis
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Kant Memory Cognition Imagination Experience
topic	Kant Memory Cognition Imagination Experience Memoria Conocimiento Imaginación Experiencia
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Memoria Conocimiento Imaginación Experiencia
description	This paper analyses the features of Kant’s view of memory, which Kant himself described explicitly in his lectures on anthropology and implicitly in the A edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. I shall offer a review of literature on Kant’s view of memory up to this day. I suggest that memory is a cognitive faculty that has the power to store and reproduce representations. Kant distinguishes among three different kinds of memorization which are relevant for human cognition. I offer reasons to hold that imagination and memory must be differentiated by their functioning, although the first one grounds the second one. Finally, I hold that certain functions of memory need to be presupposed at a transcendental level, in which memory would play a fundamental function with regard to the possibility of experience
publishDate	2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2020-12-18T16:10:14Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2020-12-18T16:10:14Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2020
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo científico
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	20117477
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/6939
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	http://dx.doi.org/10.14482/eidos.32.193
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/11704
identifier_str_mv	20117477
url	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/6939 http://dx.doi.org/10.14482/eidos.32.193 http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/11704
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	pdf
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv	Universidad del Norte. Department of Humanities and Philosophy
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	Eidos Nº 32 (2020)
institution	Universidad Simón Bolívar
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/9a0b9963-4448-4450-ac74-7406e6f7d996/download https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/32155a39-1c7b-4141-8533-7b935ab220d6/download https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/96130880-2319-45be-a3ea-a321c1a3ab11/download https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/9101b942-f684-4469-84d7-93cf87584985/download https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/4f201cbf-1552-46d1-bcb1-f80761078f8f/download https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/721888d7-480a-42df-a2f1-55c5b4d7f72b/download https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/892c2145-300b-4a09-bbc2-ba3b837de775/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	1bb07afd15c0502e31bb21c258fef3db 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 733bec43a0bf5ade4d97db708e29b185 e267e766c8d5191b29ea81554cdd80c9 430536448a1a1d7d46be56c1c83889d1 f63b1235d9a937a4d0e26bf9d9145eb5 5e4274389e281f89d28e64092cc588df
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Digital Universidad Simón Bolívar
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio.digital@unisimon.edu.co
_version_	1812100518370082816
spelling	Pacheco Acosta, Héctor Luisb3c18a8a-b73c-4f02-aa12-ea40c732302c2020-12-18T16:10:14Z2020-12-18T16:10:14Z202020117477https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/6939http://dx.doi.org/10.14482/eidos.32.193http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/11704This paper analyses the features of Kant’s view of memory, which Kant himself described explicitly in his lectures on anthropology and implicitly in the A edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. I shall offer a review of literature on Kant’s view of memory up to this day. I suggest that memory is a cognitive faculty that has the power to store and reproduce representations. Kant distinguishes among three different kinds of memorization which are relevant for human cognition. I offer reasons to hold that imagination and memory must be differentiated by their functioning, although the first one grounds the second one. Finally, I hold that certain functions of memory need to be presupposed at a transcendental level, in which memory would play a fundamental function with regard to the possibility of experienceEste artículo analiza los rasgos de la concepción de la memoria de Kant, los cuales él describió explícitamente en sus lecciones sobre antropología e implícitamente en la edición A de la Crítica de la Razón Pura. Proporcionaré una revisión de la literatura sobre la concepción de Kant acerca de la memoria hasta el presente. Sugiero que la memoria es una facultad cognitiva que tiene el poder de almacenar y reproducir representaciones. Kant distingue tres tipos diferentes de memorización, los cuales son relevantes para el conocimiento humano. Asimismo, proporciono razones para sostener que la imaginación y la memoria deben ser diferenciadas por su funcionamiento, aunque la primera es el fundamento de la segunda. Finalmente, sostengo que ciertas funciones de la memoria necesitan ser presupuestas a un nivel trascendental, en el cual la memoria cumpliría una función fundamental con respecto a la posibilidad de la experiencia.pdfengUniversidad del Norte. Department of Humanities and PhilosophyAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2EidosNº 32 (2020)KantMemoryCognitionImaginationExperienceMemoriaConocimientoImaginaciónExperienciaKant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of MemoryLas funciones empíricas y transcendentales de la memoria en Kantinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo científicohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Bader, R. M. (2017). Inner Sense and Time. In A. Gomes and A. Stephenson (Eds.), Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason, and the Self (pp. 124-137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Baumgarten, A. G. (2013). Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes and Related Materials. C. D. Fugate and J. Hymers (ed. and trans.). London: New York. Bloomsbury. (First published 1739/41757/71779).Bennet, J. (1966). Kant’s Analytic. New York: Cambridge University Press.Brandt, R. (1999). Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants “Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht” (1798), Kant-Forschungen 10. Berlin: F. Meiner Verlag.Brandt, R. (1999). Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants “Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht” (1798), Kant-Forschungen 10. Berlin: F. Meiner Verlag.Brook, A. (1994). Kant and the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Caygill, H. (1995). A Kant Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Cicero. (1967). De oratore. Books I, II (2 vols.). E. W. Sutton (trans.). London: William Heinemann LTD. Descartes, R. (1991). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. III, The correspondence. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch and A. Kenny (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Dietrich, H. (1991). Die Erfindung des Gedächtnisses. Frankfurt am Main: Keip.Ewing, A. C. (1967). A Short Commentary on Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Förster, E. (1993). Factual Notes. In E. Förster (Ed.), Immanuel Kant: Opus Postumum (pp. 257-288). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Gibbons, S. (1994). Kant’s Theory of Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Hanna, R. (2005). Kant and Nonconceptual Content. European Journal of Philosophy, 13, 247-290. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0966-8373.2005.00229.xHeidegger, M. (1990). Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. R. Taft (trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Joyce, R. (1997). Cartesian Memory. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 35(3), 375-393. Doi:10.1353/hph.1997.0046Kant, I. (2007a). Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (1798). In R. B. Louden (Ed. and trans.), Anthropology History and Education (pp. 227-429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I. (2007b). Lectures on Pedagogy (1803). In R. B. Louden (ed. and trans.), Anthropology History and Education (pp. 434-485). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I. (1998 [1781/1787]). Critique of Pure Reason. In P. Guyer, and A. W. Wood (eds. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I. (1996). Critique of practical reason (1788). In M. J. Gregor (ed. and trans.). Practical Philosophy (pp. 133-272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I. (1900ff.). Kant‘s gesammelte Schriften, Akademie Ausgabe (Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Ed.) (29 vols. to date). Berlin: G. Reimer [later W. de Gruyter].Kitcher, P. (1990). Kant’s Transcendental Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Krüger, J. G. (1756). Versuch einer Experimental-Seelenlehre. Halle & Helmstädt: C. H. Hemmerde.Llewelyn, J. (2000). The Hypocritical Imagination: between Kant and Levinas. London and New York. Routledge.Locke, J. (1959). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. A. Campbell Fraser (Ed.), Vol 1. New York: Dover.Makkreel, R. (2014). Self-Cognition and Self-Assessment in Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology. In A. Cohen (Ed.), Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology (pp. 18-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Matherne, S. (2015). Images and Kant’s Theory of Perception. Ergo, 2(29), 737-777. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0002.029McLear, C. (2017). Intuition and Presence. In A. Gomes and A. Stephenson (Eds.), Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason, and the Self (pp. 86-103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Mei, M. (2011). Notio intellectus divini quomodo prodeat. Eine Untersuchung über die gnoseologische Bedeutung unserer Gotteserkenntnis. In L. Kreimendahl, M. Muslow and & F. Vollhardt (Eds.), Aufklärung, Band 23: Die natürliche Theologie bei Christian Wolff (pp. 97-122). Hamburg:Felix Meiner Verlag.Nagel, G. (1983). The Structure of Experience: Kant’s System of Principles. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Nuzzo, A. (2015). Forms of Memory in Classical German Philosophy. In D. Nikulin (Ed.), Memory: A History (pp. 184-219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Paton, H. J. (1936). Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience: A Commentary on the first half of the Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Vol I. United Kingdom: Allen & Unwin.Paton, H. J. (1929). Self-Identity. Mind, 38(151), 312-329. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XXXVIII.151.312Powell, C. T. (1990). Kant’s Theory of Self-Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Prichard, H. A. (1909). Kant’s Theory of Knowledge. London: Oxford University Press. Rockmore, T. (2012). Kant on Unconscious Mental Activity. In P. Giordanetti, R. Pozzo and M. Sgarbi (Eds.), Kant’s Philosophy of the Unconscious (pp. 305-326). Berlin: De Gruyter.Rousseau, J. J. (1979). Emile or On Education. A. Bloom (Ed.), New York: Basic Books.Stephenson, A. (2017). Imagination and Inner Intuition. In A. Gomes and A. Stephenson (Eds.), Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason, and the Self (pp. 104-123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Strawson, P. (1966). The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.Svare, H. (2006). Body and Practice in Kant. Dordrecht: Springer.Waxman, W. (1991). Kant’s Model of the Mind: A New Interpretation of Transcendental Idealism. New York: Oxford University.Wilson, H. L. (2011). The Pragmatic Use of Kant’s Physical Geography. In S. Elden and E. Mendieta (Eds.), Reading Kant’s Geography (pp. 161-172). Albany: State University of New York Press.Wolff, C. (1972). Psychologia Rationalis. In J. École (Ed.), Christian Wolff: Gesammelte Werke, II, 6 (pp. 50-572). Hildesheim: Georg Olms. (First published 1740).Wolff, C. (1968) Psychologia Empirica. In J. École (Ed.), Christian Wolff: Gesammelte Werke, II, 5 (pp. 22-611). Hildesheim: Georg Olms. (First published 1738).ORIGINALPDF.pdfPDF.pdfPDFapplication/pdf969746https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/9a0b9963-4448-4450-ac74-7406e6f7d996/download1bb07afd15c0502e31bb21c258fef3dbMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/32155a39-1c7b-4141-8533-7b935ab220d6/download4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8381https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/96130880-2319-45be-a3ea-a321c1a3ab11/download733bec43a0bf5ade4d97db708e29b185MD53TEXTKant_on_Empirical_and_Transcendental.pdf.txtKant_on_Empirical_and_Transcendental.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain69675https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/9101b942-f684-4469-84d7-93cf87584985/downloade267e766c8d5191b29ea81554cdd80c9MD54PDF.pdf.txtPDF.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain69988https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/4f201cbf-1552-46d1-bcb1-f80761078f8f/download430536448a1a1d7d46be56c1c83889d1MD56THUMBNAILKant_on_Empirical_and_Transcendental.pdf.jpgKant_on_Empirical_and_Transcendental.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1366https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/721888d7-480a-42df-a2f1-55c5b4d7f72b/downloadf63b1235d9a937a4d0e26bf9d9145eb5MD55PDF.pdf.jpgPDF.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3765https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/892c2145-300b-4a09-bbc2-ba3b837de775/download5e4274389e281f89d28e64092cc588dfMD5720.500.12442/6939oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/69392024-08-14 21:54:12.609http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalopen.accesshttps://bonga.unisimon.edu.coRepositorio Digital Universidad Simón Bolívarrepositorio.digital@unisimon.edu.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

Kant on Empirical and Transcendental Functions of Memory

Publicaciones similares