Rise and Evolution of Design Thinking Research for Business Innovation

As organizations are increasingly demanding faster and more successful innovations in the markets, design thinking (DT) has established itself as a generative approach or methodology for solving complex problems and as a driver for the development of products and services that offer superior value t...

Full description

Autores:
Hernández Ramírez, Jose Antonio
Sepúlveda Angarita, Magda Zarela
FONSECA VIGOYA, MARLEN DEL SOCORRO
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2024
Institución:
Universidad Simón Bolívar
Repositorio:
Repositorio Digital USB
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/16214
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16214
https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-162X/CGP/v18i02/81-107
Palabra clave:
Design Thinking
Innovation
Review
Scientometrics
Tree of Science
Rights
openAccess
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
id USIMONBOL2_7223997ca1c6fef65f47df3b0ea79638
oai_identifier_str oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/16214
network_acronym_str USIMONBOL2
network_name_str Repositorio Digital USB
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Rise and Evolution of Design Thinking Research for Business Innovation
title Rise and Evolution of Design Thinking Research for Business Innovation
spellingShingle Rise and Evolution of Design Thinking Research for Business Innovation
Design Thinking
Innovation
Review
Scientometrics
Tree of Science
title_short Rise and Evolution of Design Thinking Research for Business Innovation
title_full Rise and Evolution of Design Thinking Research for Business Innovation
title_fullStr Rise and Evolution of Design Thinking Research for Business Innovation
title_full_unstemmed Rise and Evolution of Design Thinking Research for Business Innovation
title_sort Rise and Evolution of Design Thinking Research for Business Innovation
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Hernández Ramírez, Jose Antonio
Sepúlveda Angarita, Magda Zarela
FONSECA VIGOYA, MARLEN DEL SOCORRO
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Hernández Ramírez, Jose Antonio
Sepúlveda Angarita, Magda Zarela
FONSECA VIGOYA, MARLEN DEL SOCORRO
dc.subject.keywords.eng.fl_str_mv Design Thinking
Innovation
Review
Scientometrics
Tree of Science
topic Design Thinking
Innovation
Review
Scientometrics
Tree of Science
description As organizations are increasingly demanding faster and more successful innovations in the markets, design thinking (DT) has established itself as a generative approach or methodology for solving complex problems and as a driver for the development of products and services that offer superior value to users. To understand this phenomenon, this exhaustive review has been carried out through a scientometric analysis of DT for innovation, examining annual scientific production, country-specific contributions, journal publications, and collaboration networks between authors. The results allow us to identify a growing interdisciplinary interest in the applicability of DT for business innovation. The United States is the country that stands out in academic production, while Germany and Italy concentrate the most important academic networks. Using the Tree of Science (ToS) metaphor, three subtopics were identified as current trends in the field: DT for innovation activities within the business sector, applicability and contributions of DT in other sectors, and DT as a learning and innovation methodology. This study provides a framework for understanding the evolution and current state of design thinking and thus for projecting future research and new applications of design thinking as an approach to innovation in increasingly diverse fields.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-02-05T13:50:44Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-02-05T13:50:44Z
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.spa.none.fl_str_mv Artículo científico
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 23251638
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16214
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-162X/CGP/v18i02/81-107
identifier_str_mv 23251638
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16214
https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-162X/CGP/v18i02/81-107
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Common Ground Research Networks
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Vol. 18, Issue 2 (2024)
institution Universidad Simón Bolívar
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/e04ab5e3-caba-4266-a1f0-a64d255a59bc/download
https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/57c3e4bf-2ebe-4b0e-902e-0ebddb1a2c25/download
https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/8f232312-1bdc-4668-8878-eae294d23e18/download
https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/b8d8005f-c50f-4b94-b345-9082777017b3/download
https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/5e8983f3-d099-4f3f-88aa-e27fdf276665/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ab44063f69a78f9889a982dd67ebc092
733bec43a0bf5ade4d97db708e29b185
2f656a26de8af8c32aaacd5e2a33538c
abdff385f9d4b9fc3607a8ff8857a737
937a456c548a757f4b8b498064e1a043
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Digital Universidad Simón Bolívar
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.digital@unisimon.edu.co
_version_ 1834107461311660032
spelling Hernández Ramírez, Jose Antoniodedabc12-d4bc-4160-ace5-fb87f5ff2a87600Sepúlveda Angarita, Magda Zarelafea2f9a3-4f2b-4290-8f75-9d62505a96bb600FONSECA VIGOYA, MARLEN DEL SOCORRO2fe0aeec-9063-436a-89d3-6eb0a5691cbd6002025-02-05T13:50:44Z2025-02-05T13:50:44Z202423251638https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16214https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-162X/CGP/v18i02/81-107As organizations are increasingly demanding faster and more successful innovations in the markets, design thinking (DT) has established itself as a generative approach or methodology for solving complex problems and as a driver for the development of products and services that offer superior value to users. To understand this phenomenon, this exhaustive review has been carried out through a scientometric analysis of DT for innovation, examining annual scientific production, country-specific contributions, journal publications, and collaboration networks between authors. The results allow us to identify a growing interdisciplinary interest in the applicability of DT for business innovation. The United States is the country that stands out in academic production, while Germany and Italy concentrate the most important academic networks. Using the Tree of Science (ToS) metaphor, three subtopics were identified as current trends in the field: DT for innovation activities within the business sector, applicability and contributions of DT in other sectors, and DT as a learning and innovation methodology. This study provides a framework for understanding the evolution and current state of design thinking and thus for projecting future research and new applications of design thinking as an approach to innovation in increasingly diverse fields.pdfengCommon Ground Research NetworksAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Stateshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2The International Journal of Design Management and Professional PracticeVol. 18, Issue 2 (2024)Rise and Evolution of Design Thinking Research for Business Innovationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo científicohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Design ThinkingInnovationReviewScientometricsTree of ScienceAguirre, Kelly Andrea, and Diego Paredes Cuervo. 2023. “Water Safety and Water Governance: A Scientometric Review.” Sustainability 15 (9): 7164. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097164.Allen, Graeme Joseph. 2022. “ConcepturealizeTM: A New Contribution to Generate RealNeeds-Focussed, User-Centred, Lean Business Models.” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 11 (1): 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00198-4.Aranha, Elzo Alves, Juliana Bárbara Silva Corrêa, and Antoun Charles El Mouallem. 2021. “Entrepreneurship, Business Model, and Design Thinking in Brazilian Small and Medium-Sized Brazilian Enterprises (SMEs).” Revista Dimensión Empresarial 19 (3): 46–64. https://doi.org/10.15665/dem.v19i3.2799.Aria, Massimo, and Corrado Cuccurullo. 2017. “Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis.” Journal of Informetrics 11 (4): 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.Assen, Hanneke, Latifa Benhadda, Erwin Losekoot, and Migchiel van Diggelen. 2023. “Design Thinking in Hospitality Education: Lessons Learned and Future Opportunities.” Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 32:100439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2023.100439Battesini Teixeira, Thomas Germano, Janine Fleith de Medeiros, Camila Kolling, José Luis Duarte Ribeiro, and Donato Morea. 2023. “Redesign in the Textile Industry: Proposal of a Methodology for the Insertion of Circular Thinking in Product Development Processes.” Journal of Cleaner Production 397:136588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136588.Beckman, Sara L., and Michael Barry. 2007. “Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking.” California Management Review 50 (1): 25–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166415.Bender-Salazar, Rahmin. 2023. “Design Thinking as an Effective Method for Problem-Setting and Needfinding for Entrepreneurial Teams Addressing Wicked Problems.” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 12 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023- 00291-2.Bertão, Renato Antonio, Chris Heeseok Jung, Jaeyoung Chung, and Jaewoo Joo. 2023. “Design Thinking: A Customized Blueprint to Train R & D Personnel in Creative Problem-Solving.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 48:101253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101253.Bicen, Pelin, and William H. A. Johnson. 2015. “Radical Innovation with Limited Resources in High-Turbulent Markets: The Role of Lean Innovation Capability.” Creativity and Innovation Management 24 (2): 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12120.Blocker, Christopher P. 2023. “Take a Hike: Promoting Interdisciplinary Learning and Sustainable Value with Design Thinking.” Marketing Education Review 33 (2): 149– 155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2023.2198503.Brown, Tim. 2008. “Design Thinking.” Harvard Business Review 86 (6): 84–92, 141. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18605031.Brown, Tim. 2009. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: Harper Collins.Buchanan, Richard. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637.Buxton, Bill. 2007. Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Carella, Gianluca, Cabirio Cautela, Michele Melazzini, Xue Pei, and Felicitas Schmittinger. 2023. “Design Thinking for Entrepreneurship: An Explorative Inquiry into Its Practical Contributions.” Design Journal 26 (1): 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2022.2144565.Çeviker-Çınar, Gözde, Gökhan Mura, and Melike Demirbağ-Kaplan. 2017. “Design Thinking: A New Road Map in Business Education.” Design Journal 20 (suppl. 1): S977–S987. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353042.Cruz Megchun, Beatriz Itzel. 2022. “Integrating Design Thinking and Anthropology as Enablers in Addressing Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Design, Business & Society 8 (2): 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00038_1.de Paula, Danielly, Carolin Marx, Ella Wolf, Christian Dremel, Kathryn Cormican, and Falk Uebernickel. 2023. “A Managerial Mental Model to Drive Innovation in the Context of Digital Transformation.” Industry and Innovation 30 (1): 42–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2072711.D׳Ippolito, Beatrice. 2014. “The Importance of Design for Firms׳ Competitiveness: A Review of the Literature.” Technovation 34 (11): 716–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.technovation.2014.01.007.Dobni, C. Brooke, Grant Alexander Wilson, and Mark Klassen. 2022. “Business Practices of Highly Innovative Japanese Firms.” Asia Pacific Management Review 27 (3): 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.06.005.Dorst, Kees. 2011. “The Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and Its Application.” Design Studies 32 (6): 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006.Dragičević, Nikolina, Gergana Vladova, and Andre Ullrich. 2023. “Design Thinking Capabilities in the Digital World: A Bibliometric Analysis of Emerging Trends.” Frontiers in Education 7:1012478. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1012478.Dunne, David, and Roger Martin. 2006. “Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An Interview and Discussion.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 5 (4): 512–523. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.23473212.Eggers, Fabian, Hans Risselada, Thomas Niemand, and Sebastian Robledo. 2022. “Referral Campaigns for Software Startups: The Impact of Network Characteristics on Product Adoption.” Journal of Business Research 145:309–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.007.Eisenbart, Boris, S. Bouwman, J. Voorendt, S. McKillagan, B. Kuys, and C. Ranscombe. 2022. “Implementing Design Thinking to Drive Innovation in Technical Design.” International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 10 (3): 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2022.2048698.Fridman, Ilya, Yaron Meron, and Julie Roberts. 2022. “Responsible Design Thinking: Informing Future Models of Cross-Disciplinary Design Education.” Journal of Design, Business & Society 8 (2): 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00037_1.Geissdoerfer, Martin, Nancy M. P. Bocken, and Erik Jan Hultink. 2016. “Design Thinking to Enhance the Sustainable Business Modelling Process—A Workshop Based on a Value Mapping Process.” Journal of Cleaner Production 135:1218–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.020.Giraldo Ospina, Juan Miguel, and Daniel Eduardo Guevara Sánchez. 2022. “Design Thinking Traits and Cognitive Passive Resistance: Mediating Effect of Linear Thinking.” Management Research Review 45 (9): 1155–1184. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-11- 2021-0803.Glen, Roy, Christy Suciu, and Christopher Baughn. 2014. “The Need for Design Thinking in Business Schools.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 13 (4): 653–667. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0308.Grisales Aguirre, Andrés Mauricio, Sebastian Robledo, and Martha Zuluaga. 2023. “Topic Modeling: Perspectives from a Literature Review.” IEEE Access 11:4066–4078. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3232939.Groeger, Lars, and Jochen Schweitzer. 2020. “Developing a Design Thinking Mindset: Encouraging Designerly Ways in Postgraduate Business Education.” In Design Thinking in Higher Education, edited by Gavin Melles, 41–72. Design Science and Innovation. Singapore: Springer.Guaman-Quintanilla, Sharon, Patricia Everaert, Katherine Chiluiza, and Martin Valcke. 2023. “Impact of Design Thinking in Higher Education: A Multi-Actor Perspective on Problem Solving and Creativity.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 33 (1): 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09724-z.Hurtado-Marín, V. Andrea, J. Dario Agudelo-Giraldo, Sebastian Robledo, and Elisabeth Restrepo-Parra. 2021. “Analysis of Dynamic Networks Based on the Ising Model for the Case of Study of Co-Authorship of Scientific Articles.” Scientific Reports 11 (1): 5721. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85041-8.Jaskyte, Kristina, and Jeanne Liedtka. 2022. “Design Thinking for Innovation: Practices and Intermediate Outcomes.” Nonprofit Management & Leadership 32 (4): 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21498.Kurek, Juliana, Luciana Londero Brandli, Marcos Antonio Leite Frandoloso, Amanda Lange Salvia, and Janaina Mazutti. 2023. “Sustainable Business Models Innovation and Design Thinking: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Literature.” Sustainability 15 (2): 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020988.Li, Tingting, and Zehui Zhan. 2022. “A Systematic Review on Design Thinking Integrated Learning in K-12 Education.” Applied Sciences 12 (16): 8077. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168077.Liedtka, Jeanne. 2011. “Learning to Use Design Thinking Tools for Successful Innovation.” Strategy & Leadership 39 (5): 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571111161480.Liedtka, Jeanne. 2015. “Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 32 (6): 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163.Liedtka, Jeanne. 2020. “Putting Technology in Its Place: Design Thinking’s Social Technology at Work.” California Management Review 62 (2): 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619897391.Lugmayr, Artur, Bjoern Stockleben, Yaning Zou, Sonja Anzenhofer, and Mika Jalonen. 2014. “Applying ‘Design Thinking’ in the Context of Media Management Education.” Multimedia Tools and Applications 71 (1): 119–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042- 013-1361-8.Lyu, Qiner, Kentaro Watanabe, Hiroyuki Umemura, and Akihiko Murai. 2023. “DesignThinking Skill Enhancement in Virtual Reality: A Literature Study.” Frontiers in Virtual Reality 4:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1137293.MacDonald, Jason B., and Mohammad Niamat Elahee. 2016. “Design Thinking in Online Communities: Suggestions for Overcoming Crowdsourcing Issues.” International Journal of Innovation and Learning 19 (3): 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2016.075655.Madson, Michael J. 2021. “Making Sense of Design Thinking: A Primer for Medical Teachers.” Medical Teacher 43 (10): 1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1874327.Magistretti, Stefano, Mattia Bianchi, Giulia Calabretta, Marina Candi, Claudio Dell’Era, Ileana Stigliani, and Roberto Verganti. 2022. “Framing the Multifaceted Nature of Design Thinking in Addressing Different Innovation Purposes.” Long Range Planning 55 (5): 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102163.Magistretti, Stefano, Cristina Tu Anh Pham, and Claudio Dell’Era. 2021. “Enlightening the Dynamic Capabilities of Design Thinking in Fostering Digital Transformation.” Industrial Marketing Management 97:59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.indmarman.2021.06.014.Marín-Rodríguez, Nini Johana, Juan David González-Ruiz, and Sergio Botero. 2023. “A Wavelet Analysis of the Dynamic Connectedness among Oil Prices, Green Bonds, and CO2 Emissions.” Risks 11 (1): 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11010015.Martin, Roger L. 2009. The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking Is the Next Competitive Advantage. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Martin, Roger L. 2010. “Design Thinking: Achieving Insights via the ‘Knowledge Funnel.’ ” Strategy & Leadership 38 (2): 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571011029046.Mortati, Marzia, Stefano Magistretti, Cabirio Cautela, and Claudio Dell’Era. 2023. “Data in Design: How Big Data and Thick Data Inform Design Thinking Projects.” Technovation 122:102688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102688.Mount, Matthew, Heather Round, and Tyrone S. Pitsis. 2020. “Design Thinking Inspired Crowdsourcing: Toward a Generative Model of Complex Problem Solving.” California Management Review 62 (3): 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620918626.Nedergaard, Nicky, and Richard Gyrd-Jones. 2013. “Sustainable Brand-Based Innovation: The Role of Corporate Brands in Driving Sustainable Innovation.” Journal of Brand Management 20 (9): 762–778. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2013.16.OECD/Eurostat. 2018. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. 4th ed. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD Publishing; Luxembourg: Eurostat.Osterwalder, Alexander, and Yves Pigneur. 2010. Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Page, Matthew J., Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, et al. 2021. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews.” BMJ 372 (71): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.Pieroni, Marina P. P., Tim C. McAloone, and Daniela C. A. Pigosso. 2019. “Business Model Innovation for Circular Economy and Sustainability: A Review of Approaches.” Journal of Cleaner Production 215:198–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclepro.2019.01.036.Roberts, Jess P., Thomas R. Fisher, Matthew J. Trowbridge, and Christine Bent. 2016. “A Design Thinking Framework for Healthcare Management and Innovation.” Healthcare 4 (1): 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.12.002.Robledo, Sebastian, Pedro Duque, and Andrés Mauricio Grisales Aguirre. 2023. “Word of Mouth Marketing: A Scientometric Analysis.” Journal of Scientific Research 11 (3): 436–446. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.3.47.Robledo, Sebastian, John Eider Vasquez, Néstor Darío Duque-Méndez, and Veronica DuqueUribe. 2022. “Networking as an Entrepreneurial Marketing Tool: The Link between Effectuation and Word of Mouth.” Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship 25 (2): 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-08-2020-0112.Robledo, Sebastian, Martha Zuluaga, Luis-Alexander Valencia-Hernandez, Oscar ArbelaezEcheverri, Pedro Duque, and Juan-David Alzate-Cardona. 2022. “Tree of Science with Scopus: A Shiny Application.” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 100:1–7. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2698.Sameti, Ardalan, Scott Koslow, and Arash Mashhady. 2022. “Are Product Design Researchers and Practitioners on the Same Page? The Way Professional Product Designers View Creative Design.” Journal of Product & Brand Management 31 (6): 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-07-2021-3560.Schwarz, Jan Oliver, Bernhard Wach, and René Rohrbeck. 2023. “How to Anchor Design Thinking in the Future: Empirical Evidence on the Usage of Strategic Foresight in Design Thinking Projects.” Futures 149:103137. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.futures.2023.103137.Seidel, Victor P., Tucker J. Marion, and Sebastian K. Fixson. 2020. “Innovating How to Learn Design Thinking, Making, and Innovation: Incorporating Multiple Modes in Teaching the Innovation Process.” INFORMS Transactions on Education 20 (2): 73– 84. https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2019.0220.Selvalakshmi, M., Vidya Suresh, and Mythili Kolluru. 2021. “Pedagogy Innovation for Management Graduates: Application of Design Thinking.” International Journal of Innovation Science 14 (3/4): 659–674. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2020-0188.Shapira, Hila, Adela Ketchie, and Meret Nehe. 2017. “The Integration of Design Thinking and Strategic Sustainable Development.” Journal of Cleaner Production 140:277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.092.Solodikhina, Аnna, and Мaria Solodikhina. 2022. “Developing an Innovator’s Thinking in Engineering Education.” Education and Information Technologies 27 (2): 2569–2584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10709-7.Verganti, Roberto. 2009. Design-Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Wiesche, Manuel, Falk Uebernickel, Eric Byler, Juan Pablo Garcia-Cifuentes, Kevin Kelly, Trinity College Dublin, Sushi Suzuki, et al. 2018. “Teaching Innovation in Interdisciplinary Environments: Toward a Design Thinking Syllabus.” Presented at the Proceedings of the 2018 AIS SIGED International Conference on Information Systems Education and Research, San Francisco, December 12–14, 2018. https://aisel.aisnet.org/siged2018/13/.Wright, Natalie, and Cara Wrigley. 2019. “Broadening Design-Led Education Horizons: Conceptual Insights and Future Research Directions.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 29 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9429-9.Zuluaga, Martha, Sebastian Robledo, Oscar Arbelaez-Echeverri, German A. Osorio-Zuluaga, and Nestor Duque-Méndez. 2022. “Tree of Science—ToS: A Web-Based Tool for Scientific Literature Recommendation—Search Less, Research More!” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 100:1–10. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2696.Benavides-Sánchez, Edward Andrés, Camilo Andrés Castro-Ruíz, and Miguel Angel Brand Narváez. 2023. “El emprendimiento de base tecnológica y su punto de encuentro con la convergencia tecnocientífica: una revisión a partir del algoritmo Tree of Science” [Technology-Based Entrepreneurship and Its Meeting Point with TechnoScientific Convergence: A Review Based on the Tree of Science Algorithm]. Revista CEA 9 (19): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.2153.Erazo-Muñoz, Pablo Andrés, Angie Lolita Escobar-Ospina, and Santiago Alexis-Pineda. 2022. “Motivación de los empleados: importancia, evolución y enfoques usando análisis cienciométrico” [Employee Motivation: Importance, Evolution and Approaches Using Scientometric Analysis]. Clío América 16 (31): 800–815. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897848.4907.Hoyos, Oscar, Mauricio Castro Duque, Natalia Toro León, Damiand Trejos Salazar, Luz Alexandra Montoya-Restrepo, Ivan Alonso Montoya-Restrepo, and Pedro Duque. 2023. “Gobierno corporativo y desarrollo sostenible: un análisis bibliométrico” [Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis]. Revista CEA 9 (19): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.2190.Rabelo Florez, Roger Alberto. 2023. “Bacterias y hongos utilizados en la biodegradación de hidrocarburos: Una Revisión de literatura y Análisis Bibliométrico [Bacteria and Fungi Used in Hydrocarbon Biodegradation: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis.].” Revista EIA 20 (39): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v20i39.1622.ORIGINALPDF.pdfPDF.pdfapplication/pdf1293265https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/e04ab5e3-caba-4266-a1f0-a64d255a59bc/downloadab44063f69a78f9889a982dd67ebc092MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8381https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/57c3e4bf-2ebe-4b0e-902e-0ebddb1a2c25/download733bec43a0bf5ade4d97db708e29b185MD52CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8905https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/8f232312-1bdc-4668-8878-eae294d23e18/download2f656a26de8af8c32aaacd5e2a33538cMD53TEXTPDF.pdf.txtPDF.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain75472https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/b8d8005f-c50f-4b94-b345-9082777017b3/downloadabdff385f9d4b9fc3607a8ff8857a737MD54THUMBNAILPDF.pdf.jpgPDF.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4678https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/5e8983f3-d099-4f3f-88aa-e27fdf276665/download937a456c548a757f4b8b498064e1a043MD5520.500.12442/16214oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/162142025-02-06 03:05:16.462http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesopen.accesshttps://bonga.unisimon.edu.coRepositorio Digital Universidad Simón Bolívarrepositorio.digital@unisimon.edu.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

Publicaciones similares