Assessment of the Technological and Environmental Factors Influencing the Ultra-High-Pressure Water Jetting Treatment of the Surface of Naval Construction Steel Against Corrosion

This research defines the best combination of factors (wáter pressure, the use or non-use of washing with fresh water after process, environmental factors (i.e., temperature, humidity, etc.) and type of epoxy Paint) for the high pressure water jetting treatment of naval steels to guarantee the best...

Full description

Autores:
Castellanos-Gonzalez, Luis Marcos
Castilla Jimenez, Javier A.
Cabello Eras, Juan Jose
Hurtado Marquez, Julio S.
Martinez-Diaz, Leonel
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad Simón Bolívar
Repositorio:
Repositorio Digital USB
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/2117
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/2117
Palabra clave:
Water-jetting
Cleaning
Surface preparation
Coatings
Flash rust
Corrosion
Results
Freslwater
Rights
License
Licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
id USIMONBOL2_531b2f9f253513143f796412205ed9e7
oai_identifier_str oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/2117
network_acronym_str USIMONBOL2
network_name_str Repositorio Digital USB
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Assessment of the Technological and Environmental Factors Influencing the Ultra-High-Pressure Water Jetting Treatment of the Surface of Naval Construction Steel Against Corrosion
title Assessment of the Technological and Environmental Factors Influencing the Ultra-High-Pressure Water Jetting Treatment of the Surface of Naval Construction Steel Against Corrosion
spellingShingle Assessment of the Technological and Environmental Factors Influencing the Ultra-High-Pressure Water Jetting Treatment of the Surface of Naval Construction Steel Against Corrosion
Water-jetting
Cleaning
Surface preparation
Coatings
Flash rust
Corrosion
Results
Freslwater
title_short Assessment of the Technological and Environmental Factors Influencing the Ultra-High-Pressure Water Jetting Treatment of the Surface of Naval Construction Steel Against Corrosion
title_full Assessment of the Technological and Environmental Factors Influencing the Ultra-High-Pressure Water Jetting Treatment of the Surface of Naval Construction Steel Against Corrosion
title_fullStr Assessment of the Technological and Environmental Factors Influencing the Ultra-High-Pressure Water Jetting Treatment of the Surface of Naval Construction Steel Against Corrosion
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Technological and Environmental Factors Influencing the Ultra-High-Pressure Water Jetting Treatment of the Surface of Naval Construction Steel Against Corrosion
title_sort Assessment of the Technological and Environmental Factors Influencing the Ultra-High-Pressure Water Jetting Treatment of the Surface of Naval Construction Steel Against Corrosion
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Castellanos-Gonzalez, Luis Marcos
Castilla Jimenez, Javier A.
Cabello Eras, Juan Jose
Hurtado Marquez, Julio S.
Martinez-Diaz, Leonel
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Castellanos-Gonzalez, Luis Marcos
Castilla Jimenez, Javier A.
Cabello Eras, Juan Jose
Hurtado Marquez, Julio S.
Martinez-Diaz, Leonel
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Water-jetting
Cleaning
Surface preparation
Coatings
Flash rust
Corrosion
Results
Freslwater
topic Water-jetting
Cleaning
Surface preparation
Coatings
Flash rust
Corrosion
Results
Freslwater
description This research defines the best combination of factors (wáter pressure, the use or non-use of washing with fresh water after process, environmental factors (i.e., temperature, humidity, etc.) and type of epoxy Paint) for the high pressure water jetting treatment of naval steels to guarantee the best performance against corrosión. Results show that the epoxy/iron oxide Paint had the best performance when: a water-jetting pressure of 275.8 MP a is used, followed by a low pressure freshwater cleaning. Results also show the best results when the process is developed at the highest environmental temperatures and lowest humidity.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-01T14:53:01Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-01T14:53:01Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1815932X
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/2117
identifier_str_mv 1815932X
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/2117
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv Licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
rights_invalid_str_mv Licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv Medwell Journal
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv Research journal of applied sciences
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Vol. 13, No.5 (2018)
institution Universidad Simón Bolívar
dc.source.uri.eng.fl_str_mv http://docsdrive.com/pdfs/medwelljournals/rjasci/2018/294-298.pdf
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/3d6beeca-b800-4b27-964f-88b24a2b0a7d/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 3fdc7b41651299350522650338f5754d
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv DSpace UniSimon
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliotecas@biteca.com
_version_ 1814076116962377728
spelling Licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Castellanos-Gonzalez, Luis Marcosd8923681-e484-46e8-b88d-069b60c96e80-1Castilla Jimenez, Javier A.af68f71c-41c5-4eb2-abe0-09bbebcf08d0-1Cabello Eras, Juan Jose6549dccc-1d69-43ae-be93-ca26dea2a477-1Hurtado Marquez, Julio S.7fa351fd-4aa5-431e-aea4-7903df35d5a3-1Martinez-Diaz, Leonel12788453-0823-44c2-8ef3-f29d3a35a2fc-12018-06-01T14:53:01Z2018-06-01T14:53:01Z2018-051815932Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/2117This research defines the best combination of factors (wáter pressure, the use or non-use of washing with fresh water after process, environmental factors (i.e., temperature, humidity, etc.) and type of epoxy Paint) for the high pressure water jetting treatment of naval steels to guarantee the best performance against corrosión. Results show that the epoxy/iron oxide Paint had the best performance when: a water-jetting pressure of 275.8 MP a is used, followed by a low pressure freshwater cleaning. Results also show the best results when the process is developed at the highest environmental temperatures and lowest humidity.engMedwell JournalResearch journal of applied sciencesVol. 13, No.5 (2018)http://docsdrive.com/pdfs/medwelljournals/rjasci/2018/294-298.pdfWater-jettingCleaningSurface preparationCoatingsFlash rustCorrosionResultsFreslwaterAssessment of the Technological and Environmental Factors Influencing the Ultra-High-Pressure Water Jetting Treatment of the Surface of Naval Construction Steel Against Corrosionarticlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Ault, J., 2010. Inspection techniques for flash rust formed after waterjetting. Elzly Technology Corporation, Reston, Virginia.Ault, J., 2014. Performance of coatings over waterjetted surfaces, paint and coatings industry webinars. Paintsquare Mag., 18: 36-45.Bierwagen, G., D. Tallman, J. Li, L. He and C. Jeffcoate, 2003. EIS studies of coated metals in accelerated exposure. Prog. Org. Coat., 46: 149-158.Calve, P.L., J.P. Pautasso and N.L. Bozec, 2011. Characterizing surfaces after UHP waterjetting in new ship construction. J. Protective Coat. Linings, 28: 36-42.Frenzel, L.M., 2010. How does waterjet cleaning affect the surface and surface preparation?. J. Protective Coat. Linings, 27: 44-56.Kim, G.R., T.S. Kang, Y.H. Cho and J.M. Han, 2008. Effect of flash rust on protective properties of organic coatings. Proceedings of the Conference and Expo on CORROSION, March 16-20, 2008, NACE International, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp: 1-13.Knapp, J.K. and T.A. Taylor, 1996. Waterjet roughened surface analysis and bond strength. Surf. Coat. Technol., 86: 22-27.Rosenberg, B., L. Yuan and S. Fulmer, 2006. Ergonomics of abrasive blasting: A comparison of high pressure water and steel shot. Appl. Ergon., 37: 659-667.Schmid, R., 2005. Evolution of UHP waterjetting equipment: Surface preparation process found to yield higherproductivity than gritblasting. Met. Finish., 103: 41-60.Teimourian, H., M.R. Shabgard and A.W. Momber, 2010. De-painting with high-speed water jets: Paint removal process and substrate surface roughness. Prog. Org. Coat., 69: 455-462.Yuin, W. and W. Alan, 1997. Robust design using taguchi methods. Librería Díaz de Santos, Madrid, Spain.LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8368https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/3d6beeca-b800-4b27-964f-88b24a2b0a7d/download3fdc7b41651299350522650338f5754dMD5220.500.12442/2117oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/21172019-04-11 21:51:32.839metadata.onlyhttps://bonga.unisimon.edu.coDSpace UniSimonbibliotecas@biteca.comPGEgcmVsPSJsaWNlbnNlIiBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vY3JlYXRpdmVjb21tb25zLm9yZy9saWNlbnNlcy9ieS1uYy80LjAvIj48aW1nIGFsdD0iTGljZW5jaWEgQ3JlYXRpdmUgQ29tbW9ucyIgc3R5bGU9ImJvcmRlci13aWR0aDowIiBzcmM9Imh0dHBzOi8vaS5jcmVhdGl2ZWNvbW1vbnMub3JnL2wvYnktbmMvNC4wLzg4eDMxLnBuZyIgLz48L2E+PGJyLz5Fc3RhIG9icmEgZXN0w6EgYmFqbyB1bmEgPGEgcmVsPSJsaWNlbnNlIiBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vY3JlYXRpdmVjb21tb25zLm9yZy9saWNlbnNlcy9ieS1uYy80LjAvIj5MaWNlbmNpYSBDcmVhdGl2ZSBDb21tb25zIEF0cmlidWNpw7NuLU5vQ29tZXJjaWFsIDQuMCBJbnRlcm5hY2lvbmFsPC9hPi4=

Publicaciones similares