Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults

Background Self-efficacy alludes to personal competence in an individual’s effectiveness when facing stressful situations. This construct has been related to different domains of the health field, finding that high levels of self-efficacy benefit human functioning and enhance well-being. Methods The...

Full description

Autores:
Cudris-Torres, Lorena
Vinaccia, Stefano
BARRIOS NUÑEZ, ALVARO
Gaviria Arrieta, Natali
GOMEZ, MARTHA LUZ
Olivella López, Giselle
Hernández-Lalinde, Juan
Bermudez, Valmore
lobato perez, olaiza esther
Niño Vega, Jorge Armando
Navarro Obeid, Jorge Eduardo
Ortega Fernández, Román José
JAVELA, JULIAN
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad Simón Bolívar
Repositorio:
Repositorio Digital USB
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/16115
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16115
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01347-4
Palabra clave:
Self-efficacy
Chronic diseases
Psychometric properties
Older adults
Colombia
Rights
openAccess
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
id USIMONBOL2_408b2c35454df3a32f1440abc2893dab
oai_identifier_str oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/16115
network_acronym_str USIMONBOL2
network_name_str Repositorio Digital USB
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults
title Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults
spellingShingle Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults
Self-efficacy
Chronic diseases
Psychometric properties
Older adults
Colombia
title_short Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults
title_full Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults
title_fullStr Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults
title_sort Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Cudris-Torres, Lorena
Vinaccia, Stefano
BARRIOS NUÑEZ, ALVARO
Gaviria Arrieta, Natali
GOMEZ, MARTHA LUZ
Olivella López, Giselle
Hernández-Lalinde, Juan
Bermudez, Valmore
lobato perez, olaiza esther
Niño Vega, Jorge Armando
Navarro Obeid, Jorge Eduardo
Ortega Fernández, Román José
JAVELA, JULIAN
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Cudris-Torres, Lorena
Vinaccia, Stefano
BARRIOS NUÑEZ, ALVARO
Gaviria Arrieta, Natali
GOMEZ, MARTHA LUZ
Olivella López, Giselle
Hernández-Lalinde, Juan
Bermudez, Valmore
lobato perez, olaiza esther
Niño Vega, Jorge Armando
Navarro Obeid, Jorge Eduardo
Ortega Fernández, Román José
JAVELA, JULIAN
dc.subject.keywords.eng.fl_str_mv Self-efficacy
Chronic diseases
Psychometric properties
Older adults
Colombia
topic Self-efficacy
Chronic diseases
Psychometric properties
Older adults
Colombia
description Background Self-efficacy alludes to personal competence in an individual’s effectiveness when facing stressful situations. This construct has been related to different domains of the health field, finding that high levels of self-efficacy benefit human functioning and enhance well-being. Methods The present study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for managing chronic diseases (SEMCD-S) by assessing factorial, convergent and divergent validity, reliability, and measurement invariance. Likewise, the comparison of self-efficacy according to socio-demographic characteristics was proposed by contrasting latent factors. An instrumental, transactional, descriptive, and non-experimental design study was carried out with the participation of 325 Colombian senior citizens. Results The findings suggest that the scale has appropriate psychometric properties. The one-factor structure exhibited a satisfactory fit, the mean-variance extracted reported acceptable figures and the correlation analysis with other constructs supported this instrument’s convergent and discriminant validity. Likewise, it was invariant to the different socio-demographic aspects examined, while the internal consistency figures were high. Differences in the means of the latent factors were only detected in the academic grade. In this case, older adults with a primary school level attained higher self-efficacy values than those who had completed high school or university studies. Conclusions It is concluded that the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in the Colombian context to measure and compare this construct.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-01-17T21:17:08Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-01-17T21:17:08Z
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.spa.none.fl_str_mv Artículo científico
dc.identifier.citation.none.fl_str_mv Cudris-Torres, L., Alpi, S.V., Barrios-Núñez, Á. et al. Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults. BMC Psychol 11, 301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01347-4
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 20507283 (Electrónico)
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16115
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01347-4
identifier_str_mv Cudris-Torres, L., Alpi, S.V., Barrios-Núñez, Á. et al. Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults. BMC Psychol 11, 301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01347-4
20507283 (Electrónico)
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16115
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01347-4
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv BMC Psychology
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Vol. 11 (2023)
institution Universidad Simón Bolívar
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/793cebc7-8350-4a52-a469-4ed29d8dea1f/download
https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/1e80d226-01ff-49b5-ad06-e5f2a512e598/download
https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/2c018ff3-c18e-4b03-8fac-b470fdaf0a6d/download
https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/65169ab5-099b-42da-8e30-20ce76fd16b6/download
https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/359ac118-f0fa-40fc-bd1a-b0aea1e051ef/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv b35d820fa2904146f337c033ec53f948
2f656a26de8af8c32aaacd5e2a33538c
733bec43a0bf5ade4d97db708e29b185
50007e72499684af2b89e37638d51f50
90f55a6094d179acbaf5748bce3fb4b7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Digital Universidad Simón Bolívar
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.digital@unisimon.edu.co
_version_ 1834107420269346816
spelling Cudris-Torres, Lorenacffc92dd-21bb-48f8-83ae-d2b27ef56b6e600Vinaccia, Stefanodd82d902-8763-448c-9f99-3a0e7db714b2600BARRIOS NUÑEZ, ALVAROaf90b11e-8167-49b3-a51a-159e2d20fd8e600Gaviria Arrieta, Natali4ab592d1-f464-418d-93dd-0af79fd4a603600GOMEZ, MARTHA LUZ811190e5-38ec-4f49-abd3-a3a25c5f9e09600Olivella López, Giselle19b0b133-4a33-4a9d-8568-55e6280462fb600Hernández-Lalinde, Juan269b3460-20ba-4af8-8879-d274d24bbf9c600Bermudez, Valmore5f222e11-cf45-43f6-acab-8f359844c515600lobato perez, olaiza esther386e53d8-7630-474d-9b57-f390181a2c56600Niño Vega, Jorge Armando 86de8788-cf17-42eb-a7aa-63ade638f6f5600Navarro Obeid, Jorge Eduardo5b93caa2-03bf-4f21-9646-0ba99ff72ffb600Ortega Fernández, Román José6d242204-c8d0-4342-88ec-c13e29964ea7600JAVELA, JULIANf25e29d4-765a-424b-b6d7-17de639da7796002025-01-17T21:17:08Z2025-01-17T21:17:08Z2023Cudris-Torres, L., Alpi, S.V., Barrios-Núñez, Á. et al. Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults. BMC Psychol 11, 301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01347-420507283 (Electrónico)https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/16115https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01347-4Background Self-efficacy alludes to personal competence in an individual’s effectiveness when facing stressful situations. This construct has been related to different domains of the health field, finding that high levels of self-efficacy benefit human functioning and enhance well-being. Methods The present study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for managing chronic diseases (SEMCD-S) by assessing factorial, convergent and divergent validity, reliability, and measurement invariance. Likewise, the comparison of self-efficacy according to socio-demographic characteristics was proposed by contrasting latent factors. An instrumental, transactional, descriptive, and non-experimental design study was carried out with the participation of 325 Colombian senior citizens. Results The findings suggest that the scale has appropriate psychometric properties. The one-factor structure exhibited a satisfactory fit, the mean-variance extracted reported acceptable figures and the correlation analysis with other constructs supported this instrument’s convergent and discriminant validity. Likewise, it was invariant to the different socio-demographic aspects examined, while the internal consistency figures were high. Differences in the means of the latent factors were only detected in the academic grade. In this case, older adults with a primary school level attained higher self-efficacy values than those who had completed high school or university studies. Conclusions It is concluded that the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in the Colombian context to measure and compare this construct.pdfengSpringer NatureAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Stateshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2BMC PsychologyVol. 11 (2023)Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adultsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo científicohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Self-efficacyChronic diseasesPsychometric propertiesOlder adultsColombiaBandura A. The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. J Behav Therapy Experimental Psychiatry. 1982;13(3):195–99. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(82)90004-0Bandura A. On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. J Manag. 2012;38(1):9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606García Álvarez D, Cobo Rendón R, Hernández Lalinde JD. Validity, reliability and factorial invariance of the general self-efficacy and academic self-efficacy scales in university students. Retos. 2022;46:1093–104. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v46.94281Cudris-Torres L, Alpi SV, Barrios-Núñez Á, Gaviria Arrieta N, Mejía Gutiérrez J, Alvis Barranco L, Rios-Carlys G, Cuenca-Calderón SE, Bermúdez V, Hernández-Lalinde J, Riveira Zuleta CA, Bahamón MJ and Álvarez, Herrera JS. (2023) Quality of life in the older adults: The protective role of self-efficacy in adequate coping in patients with chronic diseases. Front. Psychol. 14:1106563. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1106563Ritter PL, Lorig K. The English and Spanish Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale measures were validated using multiple studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(11):1265–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.009Freund T, Gensichen J, Goetz K, Szecsenyi J, Mahler C. Evaluating self-efficacy for managing chronic disease: psychometric properties of the six-item self-efficacy scale in Germany. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(1):39–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011. 01764.x.Eslami A, Daniali SS, Mohammadi K, Reisi-Dehkordi N, Mostafavi-Darani F. Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Self-Efficacy in Chronic Disease Patients. Iran J Nursering Midwifery Res. 2017;22(1):57–61. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.202065Kim SN, Lee HJ, Kim SY, Lee N. Validity and reliability of Korean Version of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021;51(5):617–29. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.21069Marconcin P, Tomé G, Carnide F, Yázigi F, Campos P, et al. Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the self-efficacy to manage chronic disease 6-item scale for european portuguese. Acta Reumatologica Portuguesa. 2021;46(1):15–22.Incirkus K, Nahcivan N. Validity and reliability study of the turkish version of the self-efficacy for managing chronic disease 6-item scale. Turk J Med Sci. 2020;2650(5):1254–61. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1910-13Mattsson M, Sandqvist G, Hesselstrand R, Olsson D, Kwakkenbos L, et al. Validity and reliability of the swedish version of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease scale for individuals with systemic sclerosis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2022;51(2):110–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2021.1917142Hudon C, Chouinard MC, Bélanger A, Fortin M, Freund T, et al. The self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease scale – french version: a validation study in primary care. Eur J Person Centered Healthc. 2014;2:533–38.Sarhan SA, Kamal DE, Hamed MS, Mostafa DI. Validity and reliability of the arabic version of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease scale in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2022;41(10):2967–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06183Riehm KE, Kwakkenbos L, Carrier ME, Bartlett SJ, Malcarne VL, et al. Scleroderma patient-centered intervention network investigators. Validation of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease Scale: a Scleroderma patient-centered intervention network Cohort Study. Arthritis Care Research. 2016;68(8):1195–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22807Lorig K, Stewart A, Ritter P, Gonzalez V, Lynch J, Laurent D. Outcome measures for Health Education and Other Health Care Interventions. SAGE Publication; 1996.Kim CJ, Chae S, Yoo H. Psychometric testing of the chronic disease self-efficacy scale–korean version (CDSES-K). J Transcult Nurs. 2012;23(2):173–80.Bloomfield J, Fisher MJ. Quantitative research design. J Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association. 2019;22(2):27–30. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.738299924514584Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill; 1967.Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:309–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309Comrey AL. Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;56(5):754–61. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.56.5.754Comrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis. Psychol Press. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315827506. 2nd ed.Guadagnoli E, Velicer WF. Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(2):265–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265Broadbent E, Petrie K, Weinman J. The brief illness perception Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006;631–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg D. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol. 1988;46(10):1121–23. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022Kleinman L, Zodet M, Hakim Z, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the fatigue severity scale for use in chronic hepatitis C. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:499–508. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10089607104Mattsson B, Möller IE, Lundberg G, Boström C. Reliability and validity of the fatigue severity scale in swedish for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Rheumatol. 2008;37(4):269–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009740801914868Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ. 2002;324(7351):1417–23.Kenny DA, Kaniskan B, McCoach DB. The performance of RMSEA in Models with Small degrees of Freedom. Sociol Methods Res. 2015;44(3):486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236Hu L, Bentler PM. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary J. 199;6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118Steiger JH. Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelling. Pers Indiv Differ. 2007;42(5):893–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017Hamid MR, Sami W, Sidek MH. Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2017;890. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163Hernández-Lalinde J, Espinosa-Castro JF, Penaloza-Tarazona ME, Díaz-Camargo É, Bautista-Sandoval M, Riaño-Garzón ME, et al. Arch Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica. 2018;37(5):552–61. https://doi.org/10.17632/x9tghxpdc3.1. Sobre el uso adecuado del coeficiente de correlación de Pearson: verificación de supuestos mediante un ejemplo aplicado a las ciencias de la salud.Satorra A, Bentler PM. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika. 2001;66(4):507–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Struct Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary J. 2002;9(2):233–55. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5Hancock GR. Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured mean modelling and mimic approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika. 2001;66(3):373–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294440Fröhner J, Beckerle P, Endo S, Hirche S. An embodiment paradigm in evaluation of human-in-the-loop control. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2019;51(34):104–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.01.036Yang J, Ambrose Lo WL, Zheng F, Cheng X, Yu Q, Wang C. Evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy on improving Pain, Fear Avoidance, and self-efficacy in patients with chronic low back Pain: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Pain Res Manage. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4276175La Touche R, Salud CS, La Salle EU, Of Fisioterapia CS, de Madrid A, de La EU. Madrid. How does self-efficacy influence pain perception, postural stability and range of motion in individuals with chronic low back pain. Pain Physician. 2019;22:E1-13.Bonilla-Cruz NJ, Moncada HO, Latorre Yáñez JD, Gómez Torres HD, Niño-Vega JA. Psychological well-being and suicide orientation in teachers in Norte de Santander during COVID – 19 confinement. Gaceta Médica De Caracas. 2022;130(Suplemento 3):727–33. https://doi.org/10.47307/GMC.2022.130.s3.26Wang DF, Zhou YN, Liu YH, et al. Social support and depressive symptoms: exploring stigma and self-efficacy in a moderated mediation model. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03740-6Riehm KE, Kwakkenbos L, Carrier ME, Bartlett SJ, Malcarne VL, Mouthon L, et al. Validation of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease Scale: a Scleroderma patient-centered intervention network Cohort Study. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68(8):1195–200.Mena-Díaz FC, Nazar G, Mendoza-Parra S. Hacia la Promoción de la Salud. 2018;23(2):67–78. https://doi.org/10.17151/hpsal.2018.23.2.5. Antecedentes de adherencia a tratamiento en pacientes hipertensos de un centro de salud chileno.Martín Alfonso L, Grau Ábalo JA, Espinosa Brito AD. Marco conceptual para la evaluación y mejora de la adherencia a los tratamientos médicos en enfermedades crónicas. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública. 2014;40(2):222–35.Iglesias Álvarez N. Efectividad de una intervención educativa basada en la autoeficacia para mejorar la adherencia terapéutica en pacientes con hipertensión arterial del CAP de la Barceloneta. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra; 2018.Hirschberg S, Donatti S, Rijana I, Selan V. La relación entre adherencia terapéutica y calidad de vida en la hipertensión arterial. PSIENCIA Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Psicológica. 2014;6(2):64–70.Mena Díaz FC, Nazar G, Mendoza Parra S. Antecedentes de adherencia a tratamiento en pacientes hipertensos de un centro de salud chileno. Hacia Promoc. Salud [Internet]. 25 de mayo de 2018 [citado 26 de julio de 2023];23(2):67–78. Disponible en: https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/hacialapromociondelasalud/article/view/3603García A, Moreno J, Suárez P. Escala de autoeficacia general: datos psicométricos de la adaptación para población española. Psicothema. 2000;12(2):509–13.Nazar Carter G, Mendoza Parra S, Mena Díaz C. Autoeficacia y estrés como determinantes de adherencia en pacientes hipertensos. Comuna de Retiro, Región del Maule, Chile. Concepción: Universidad de Concepción, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Departamento de Psicología; 2017.Ato M, López-García JJ, Benavent A. Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Annals of Psychology. 2013;29(3):3. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511Alonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Med Clin (Barc). 1995;104:771–6.Hernández Lalinde JD, Espinosa Castro JF, Peñaloza Tarazona ME, Fernández González JE, Chacón Rangel JG, Toloza Sierra CA, et al. Sobre el uso adecuado del coeficiente de correlación de Pearson: definición, propiedades y suposiciones. Arch Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica. 2018;37(5):587–95.Campo-Arias A, Oviedo HC. Propiedades Psicométricas de una Escala: la Consistencia Interna. Revista de Salud Pública [Internet]. 2008;10(5):831–9. Recuperado de:. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42210515Cartagena Beteta M. Relación entre la autoeficacia y el rendimiento escolar y los hábitos de estudio en alumnos de secundaria. REICE Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad Eficacia y Cambio en Educación. 2008;6(3):59–99.Barrera-Mesa CE, Caro-Caro EO, Del Rey-Alamillo R. Víctimas de ciberviolencia: formas, prevalencia y diferencias de género. Revista de Investigación. Desarrollo e Innovación. 2022;12(2):239–50. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v12.n2.2022.15268Alvarez-Pitti J, Casajús Mallén JA, Trabazo RL, Lucía A, López de Lara D, Moreno Aznar LA, et al. Ejercicio físico como «medicina» en enfermedades crónicas durante la infancia y la adolescencia. Anales de Pediatría. 2020;92(3):173–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2020.01.010Grisales-Aguirre AM, Figueroa-Vallejo CJ. Modelado de tópicos aplicado al análisis del papel del aprendizaje automático en revisiones sistemáticas. Revista de Investigación. Desarrollo e Innovación. 2022;12(2):265–78. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v12.n2.2022.15271Kanan LA, Bellinati N, Veronez C, Pereira L. Self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale: avaliação da autoeficácia no gerenciamento da doença crônica. Revista CUIDARTE. 2018;9(3):2435–45. https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.v9i3.561ORIGINALPDF.pdfPDF.pdfapplication/pdf1426567https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/793cebc7-8350-4a52-a469-4ed29d8dea1f/downloadb35d820fa2904146f337c033ec53f948MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8905https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/1e80d226-01ff-49b5-ad06-e5f2a512e598/download2f656a26de8af8c32aaacd5e2a33538cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8381https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/2c018ff3-c18e-4b03-8fac-b470fdaf0a6d/download733bec43a0bf5ade4d97db708e29b185MD53TEXTPDF.pdf.txtPDF.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain67860https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/65169ab5-099b-42da-8e30-20ce76fd16b6/download50007e72499684af2b89e37638d51f50MD54THUMBNAILPDF.pdf.jpgPDF.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5414https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/359ac118-f0fa-40fc-bd1a-b0aea1e051ef/download90f55a6094d179acbaf5748bce3fb4b7MD5520.500.12442/16115oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/161152025-01-18 03:01:06.016http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesopen.accesshttps://bonga.unisimon.edu.coRepositorio Digital Universidad Simón Bolívarrepositorio.digital@unisimon.edu.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

Publicaciones similares