Urinary metabolomic profling of a cohort of Colombian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune and multisystem disease with a high public health impact. Lupus nephritis (LN), commonly known as renal involvement in SLE, is associated with a poorer prognosis and increased rates of morbidity and mortality in patients with SLE. Identifying new u...

Full description

Autores:
Rojo‑Sánchez, Alejandra
Carmona‑Martes, Ada
Díaz‑Olmos, Yirys
Santamaría‑Torres, Mary
P. Cala, Mónica P.
Orozco‑Acosta, Erick
Aroca‑Martínez, Gustavo
Pacheco‑Londoño, Leonardo
Navarro‑Quiroz, Elkin
Pacheco‑Lugo, Lisandro A.
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2024
Institución:
Universidad Simón Bolívar
Repositorio:
Repositorio Digital USB
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/14561
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/14561
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60217-0
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-60217-0
Palabra clave:
Biochemistry
Bioinformatics
Biomarkers
Computational biology and bioinformatics
Kidney
Mass spectrometry
Metabolomics
Proteomic analysis
Rights
openAccess
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Description
Summary:Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune and multisystem disease with a high public health impact. Lupus nephritis (LN), commonly known as renal involvement in SLE, is associated with a poorer prognosis and increased rates of morbidity and mortality in patients with SLE. Identifying new urinary biomarkers that can be used for LN prognosis or diagnosis is essential and is part of current active research. In this study, we applied an untargeted metabolomics approach involving liquid and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry to urine samples collected from 17 individuals with SLE and no kidney damage, 23 individuals with LN, and 10 clinically healthy controls (HCs) to identify differential metabolic profiles for SLE and LN. The data analysis revealed a differentially abundant metabolite expression profile for each study group, and those metabolites may act as potential differential biomarkers of SLE and LN. The differential metabolic pathways found between the LN and SLE patients with no kidney involvement included primary bile acid biosynthesis, branched-chain amino acid synthesis and degradation, pantothenate and coenzyme A biosynthesis, lysine degradation, and tryptophan metabolism. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that monopalmitin, glycolic acid, and glutamic acid allowed for the differentiation of individuals with SLE and no kidney involvement and individuals with LN considering high confidence levels. While the results offer promise, it is important to recognize the significant influence of medications and other external factors on metabolomics studies. This impact has the potential to obscure differences in metabolic profiles, presenting a considerable challenge in the identification of disease biomarkers. Therefore, experimental validation should be conducted with a larger sample size to explore the diagnostic potential of the metabolites found as well as to examine how treatment and disease activity influence the identified chemical compounds. This will be crucial for refining the accuracy and effectiveness of using urine metabolomics for diagnosing and monitoring lupus and lupus nephritis.