Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation

The study presents a complete one-dimensional model to evaluate the parameters that describe the operation of a Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) electrolyzer and PEM fuel cell. The mathematical modeling is implemented in Matlab/Simulink® software to evaluate the influence of parameters such as tempera...

Full description

Autores:
Escobar-Yonoff, Rony
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad del Atlántico
Repositorio:
Repositorio Uniatlantico
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uniatlantico.edu.co:20.500.12834/1135
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12834/1135
Palabra clave:
ElectrolyzerFuel cellEconomic assessmentProton exchange membraneElectric power generation
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
id UNIATLANT2_6ea4a1f2dc24ad9ee8503fc6c211c5fd
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uniatlantico.edu.co:20.500.12834/1135
network_acronym_str UNIATLANT2
network_name_str Repositorio Uniatlantico
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation
dc.title.alternative.spa.fl_str_mv Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation
title Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation
spellingShingle Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation
ElectrolyzerFuel cellEconomic assessmentProton exchange membraneElectric power generation
title_short Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation
title_full Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation
title_fullStr Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation
title_full_unstemmed Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation
title_sort Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Escobar-Yonoff, Rony
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Escobar-Yonoff, Rony
dc.contributor.other.none.fl_str_mv Maestre-Cambronel, Daniel
Charry, Sebastían
Rincon-Montenegro, Adriana
Portnoy, Ivan
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv ElectrolyzerFuel cellEconomic assessmentProton exchange membraneElectric power generation
topic ElectrolyzerFuel cellEconomic assessmentProton exchange membraneElectric power generation
description The study presents a complete one-dimensional model to evaluate the parameters that describe the operation of a Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) electrolyzer and PEM fuel cell. The mathematical modeling is implemented in Matlab/Simulink® software to evaluate the influence of parameters such as temperature, pressure, and overpotentials on the overall performance. The models are further merged into an integrated electrolyzer-fuel cell system for electrical power generation. The operational description of the integrated system focuses on estimating the overall efficiency as a novel indicator. Additionally, the study presents an economic assessment to evaluate the cost-effectiveness based on different economic metrics such as capital cost, electricity cost, and payback period. The parametric analysis showed that as the temperature rises from 30 to 70 C in both devices, the efficiency is improved between 5-20%. In contrast, pressure differences feature less relevance on the overall performance. Ohmic and activation overpotentials are highlighted for the highest impact on the generated and required voltage. Overall, the current density exhibited an inverse relation with the efficiency of both devices. The economic evaluation revealed that the integrated system can operate at variable load conditions while maintaining an electricity cost between 0.3-0.45 $/kWh. Also, the capital cost can be reduced up to 25% while operating at a low current density and maximum temperature. The payback period varies between 6-10 years for an operational temperature of 70 C, which reinforces the viability of the system. Overall, hydrogen-powered systems stand as a promising technology to overcome energy transition as they provide robust operation from both energetic and economic viewpoints.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-07
dc.date.submitted.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-03
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-17T18:40:25Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-17T18:40:25Z
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasVersion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv ny Escobar-Yonoff, Daniel Maestre-Cambronel, Sebastián Charry, Adriana Rincón-Montenegro, Ivan Portnoy, Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation, Heliyon, Volume 7, Issue 3, 2021, e06506, ISSN 2405-8440, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06506. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844021006095) Abstract: The study presents a complete one-dimensional model to evaluate the parameters that describe the operation of a Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) electrolyzer and PEM fuel cell. The mathematical modeling is implemented in Matlab/Simulink® software to evaluate the influence of parameters such as temperature, pressure, and overpotentials on the overall performance. The models are further merged into an integrated electrolyzer-fuel cell system for electrical power generation. The operational description of the integrated system focuses on estimating the overall efficiency as a novel indicator. Additionally, the study presents an economic assessment to evaluate the cost-effectiveness based on different economic metrics such as capital cost, electricity cost, and payback period. The parametric analysis showed that as the temperature rises from 30 to 70 °C in both devices, the efficiency is improved between 5-20%. In contrast, pressure differences feature less relevance on the overall performance. Ohmic and activation overpotentials are highlighted for the highest impact on the generated and required voltage. Overall, the current density exhibited an inverse relation with the efficiency of both devices. The economic evaluation revealed that the integrated system can operate at variable load conditions while maintaining an electricity cost between 0.3-0.45 $/kWh. Also, the capital cost can be reduced up to 25% while operating at a low current density and maximum temperature. The payback period varies between 6-10 years for an operational temperature of 70 °C, which reinforces the viability of the system. Overall, hydrogen-powered systems stand as a promising technology to overcome energy transition as they provide robust operation from both energetic and economic viewpoints. Keywords: Electrolyzer; Fuel cell; Economic assessment; Proton exchange membrane; Electric power generation
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12834/1135
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06506.
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad del Atlántico
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad del Atlántico
identifier_str_mv ny Escobar-Yonoff, Daniel Maestre-Cambronel, Sebastián Charry, Adriana Rincón-Montenegro, Ivan Portnoy, Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation, Heliyon, Volume 7, Issue 3, 2021, e06506, ISSN 2405-8440, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06506. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844021006095) Abstract: The study presents a complete one-dimensional model to evaluate the parameters that describe the operation of a Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) electrolyzer and PEM fuel cell. The mathematical modeling is implemented in Matlab/Simulink® software to evaluate the influence of parameters such as temperature, pressure, and overpotentials on the overall performance. The models are further merged into an integrated electrolyzer-fuel cell system for electrical power generation. The operational description of the integrated system focuses on estimating the overall efficiency as a novel indicator. Additionally, the study presents an economic assessment to evaluate the cost-effectiveness based on different economic metrics such as capital cost, electricity cost, and payback period. The parametric analysis showed that as the temperature rises from 30 to 70 °C in both devices, the efficiency is improved between 5-20%. In contrast, pressure differences feature less relevance on the overall performance. Ohmic and activation overpotentials are highlighted for the highest impact on the generated and required voltage. Overall, the current density exhibited an inverse relation with the efficiency of both devices. The economic evaluation revealed that the integrated system can operate at variable load conditions while maintaining an electricity cost between 0.3-0.45 $/kWh. Also, the capital cost can be reduced up to 25% while operating at a low current density and maximum temperature. The payback period varies between 6-10 years for an operational temperature of 70 °C, which reinforces the viability of the system. Overall, hydrogen-powered systems stand as a promising technology to overcome energy transition as they provide robust operation from both energetic and economic viewpoints. Keywords: Electrolyzer; Fuel cell; Economic assessment; Proton exchange membrane; Electric power generation
10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06506.
Universidad del Atlántico
Repositorio Universidad del Atlántico
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12834/1135
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights.cc.*.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Barranquilla
dc.publisher.discipline.spa.fl_str_mv Ingeniería Mecánica
dc.publisher.sede.spa.fl_str_mv Sede Norte
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Heliyon
institution Universidad del Atlántico
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uniatlantico.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12834/1135/1/1-s2.0-S2405844021006095-main.pdf
https://repositorio.uniatlantico.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12834/1135/2/license_rdf
https://repositorio.uniatlantico.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12834/1135/3/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 468d7dc7e3361afd23e3016171482664
24013099e9e6abb1575dc6ce0855efd5
67e239713705720ef0b79c50b2ececca
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv DSpace de la Universidad de Atlántico
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sysadmin@mail.uniatlantico.edu.co
_version_ 1808413934930100224
spelling Escobar-Yonoff, Rony2de83376-e65e-4277-b50a-e6c124905baeMaestre-Cambronel, DanielCharry, SebastíanRincon-Montenegro, AdrianaPortnoy, Ivan2022-12-17T18:40:25Z2022-12-17T18:40:25Z2020-12-072021-03-03ny Escobar-Yonoff, Daniel Maestre-Cambronel, Sebastián Charry, Adriana Rincón-Montenegro, Ivan Portnoy, Performance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generation, Heliyon, Volume 7, Issue 3, 2021, e06506, ISSN 2405-8440, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06506. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844021006095) Abstract: The study presents a complete one-dimensional model to evaluate the parameters that describe the operation of a Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) electrolyzer and PEM fuel cell. The mathematical modeling is implemented in Matlab/Simulink® software to evaluate the influence of parameters such as temperature, pressure, and overpotentials on the overall performance. The models are further merged into an integrated electrolyzer-fuel cell system for electrical power generation. The operational description of the integrated system focuses on estimating the overall efficiency as a novel indicator. Additionally, the study presents an economic assessment to evaluate the cost-effectiveness based on different economic metrics such as capital cost, electricity cost, and payback period. The parametric analysis showed that as the temperature rises from 30 to 70 °C in both devices, the efficiency is improved between 5-20%. In contrast, pressure differences feature less relevance on the overall performance. Ohmic and activation overpotentials are highlighted for the highest impact on the generated and required voltage. Overall, the current density exhibited an inverse relation with the efficiency of both devices. The economic evaluation revealed that the integrated system can operate at variable load conditions while maintaining an electricity cost between 0.3-0.45 $/kWh. Also, the capital cost can be reduced up to 25% while operating at a low current density and maximum temperature. The payback period varies between 6-10 years for an operational temperature of 70 °C, which reinforces the viability of the system. Overall, hydrogen-powered systems stand as a promising technology to overcome energy transition as they provide robust operation from both energetic and economic viewpoints. Keywords: Electrolyzer; Fuel cell; Economic assessment; Proton exchange membrane; Electric power generationhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12834/113510.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06506.Universidad del AtlánticoRepositorio Universidad del AtlánticoThe study presents a complete one-dimensional model to evaluate the parameters that describe the operation of a Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) electrolyzer and PEM fuel cell. The mathematical modeling is implemented in Matlab/Simulink® software to evaluate the influence of parameters such as temperature, pressure, and overpotentials on the overall performance. The models are further merged into an integrated electrolyzer-fuel cell system for electrical power generation. The operational description of the integrated system focuses on estimating the overall efficiency as a novel indicator. Additionally, the study presents an economic assessment to evaluate the cost-effectiveness based on different economic metrics such as capital cost, electricity cost, and payback period. The parametric analysis showed that as the temperature rises from 30 to 70 C in both devices, the efficiency is improved between 5-20%. In contrast, pressure differences feature less relevance on the overall performance. Ohmic and activation overpotentials are highlighted for the highest impact on the generated and required voltage. Overall, the current density exhibited an inverse relation with the efficiency of both devices. The economic evaluation revealed that the integrated system can operate at variable load conditions while maintaining an electricity cost between 0.3-0.45 $/kWh. Also, the capital cost can be reduced up to 25% while operating at a low current density and maximum temperature. The payback period varies between 6-10 years for an operational temperature of 70 C, which reinforces the viability of the system. Overall, hydrogen-powered systems stand as a promising technology to overcome energy transition as they provide robust operation from both energetic and economic viewpoints.application/pdfenghttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2HeliyonPerformance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generationPerformance assessment and economic perspectives of integrated PEM fuel cell and PEM electrolyzer for electric power generationPúblico generalElectrolyzerFuel cellEconomic assessmentProton exchange membraneElectric power generationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1BarranquillaIngeniería MecánicaSede NorteG. Abu-Rumman, A.I. Khdair, S.I. Khdair, Current status and future investment potential in renewable energy in Jordan: an overview, Heliyon 6 (2) (2020), e03346.G.V. Ochoa, C. Isaza-Roldan, J. Duarte Forero, Economic and exergo-advance analysis of a waste heat recovery system based on regenerative organic rankine cycle under organic fluids with low global warming potential, Energies 13 (6) (2020) 1317A. Ursúa, P. Sanchis, Static–dynamic modelling of the electrical behaviour of a commercial advanced alkaline water electrolyser, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 (24) (2012) 18598–18614.K. Zeng, D. Zhang Recent progress in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production and applications Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 36 (3) (2010), pp. 307-326G. Amador, et al. Characteristics of auto-ignition in internal combustion engines operated with gaseous fuels of variable methane number J. Energy Resour. Technol., 139 (2017)J. Duarte Forero, G. Valencia Ochoa, J. Piero Rojas Effect of the geometric profile of top ring on the tribological characteristics of a low-displacement diesel engine Lubricants, 8 (8) (2020), p. 83G. Valencia, C. Peñaloza, J. Forero Thermo-economic assessment of a gas microturbine-absorption chiller trigeneration system under different compressor inlet air temperatures Energies, 12 (2019), p. 4643F. Gutiérrez-Martín, L. Amodio, M. Pagano Hydrogen production by water electrolysis and off-grid solar PV Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, xxxx (2020)M.H.S. Bargal, M.A.A. Abdelkareem, Q. Tao, J. Li, J. Shi, Y. Wang Liquid cooling techniques in proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks: a detailed survey Alexandria Eng. J., 59 (2) (2020), pp. 635-655R.E. Yonoff, G.V. Ochoa, Y. Cardenas-Escorcia, J.I. Silva-Ortega, L. Meriño-Stand Research trends in proton exchange membrane fuel cells during 2008–2018: a bibliometric analysis Heliyon, 5 (5) (2019), Article e01724M. Abdollahzadeh, P. Ribeirinha, M. Boaventura, A. Mendes Three-dimensional modeling of PEMFC with contaminated anode fuel Energy, 152 (2018), pp. 939-959M. Sahraoui, Y. Bichiou, K. Halouani Three-dimensional modeling of water transport in PEMFC Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38 (2012)J.-P. Kone, X. Zhang, Y. Yan, G. Hu, G. Ahmadi Three-dimensional multiphase flow computational fluid dynamics models for proton exchange membrane fuel cell: a theoretical development J. Comput. Multiph. Flows, 9 (2017) 1757482X1769234K. Shekhar An Investigation into the Minimum Dimensionality Required for Accurate Simulation of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells by the Comparison between 1- and 3-dimension Models (2013)Z. Abdin, C.J. Webb, E.M. Gray PEM fuel cell model and simulation in Matlab–Simulink based on physical parameters Energy, 116 (2016), pp. 1131-1144S.L. Chavan, D.B. Talange Modeling and performance evaluation of PEM fuel cell by controlling its input parameters Energy, 138 (2017), pp. 437-445T. Yigit, O.F. Selamet Mathematical modeling and dynamic Simulink simulation of high-pressure PEM electrolyzer system Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 41 (32) (2016), pp. 13901-13914Z. Abdin, C.J. Webb, E.M. Gray Modelling and simulation of an alkaline electrolyser cell Energy, 138 (2017), pp. 316-331B. Han, S.M. Steen, J. Mo, F.-Y. Zhang Electrochemical performance modeling of a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cell for hydrogen energy Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 40 (22) (2015), pp. 7006-7016B. Han, S.M. Steen, J. Mo, F.-Y. Zhang Electrochemical performance modeling of a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cell for hydrogen energy Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 40 (22) (2015), pp. 7006-7016K. Moorthy, N. Patwa, Y. Gupta, et al. Breaking barriers in deployment of renewable energy Heliyon, 5 (1) (2019), Article e01166F. Alshehri, V.G. Suárez, J.L. Rueda Torres, A. Perilla, M.A.M.M. van der Meijden Modelling and evaluation of PEM hydrogen technologies for frequency ancillary services in future multi-energy sustainable power systems Heliyon, 5 (4) (2019), Article e01396C.A. Frangopoulos, L.G. Nakos Development of a model for thermoeconomic design and operation optimization of a PEM fuel cell system Energy, 31 (10–11) (2006), pp. 1501-1519A.A. AlZahrani, I. Dincer Exergoeconomic analysis of hydrogen production using a standalone high-temperature electrolyzer Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, xxxx (2020)T. Taner, S.A.H. Naqvi, M. Ozkaymak Techno-economic analysis of a more efficient hydrogen generation system prototype: a case study of PEM electrolyzer with Cr-C coated SS304 bipolar plates Fuel Cells, 19 (1) (2019), pp. 19-26E.I. Zoulias, N. Lymberopoulos Techno-economic analysis of the integration of hydrogen energy technologies in renewable energy-based stand-alone power systems Renew. Energy, 32 (4) (2007), pp. 680-696M. Thema, F. Bauer, M. Sterner Power-to-Gas: electrolysis and methanation status review Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 112 (Sep-2019), pp. 775-787 Elsevier LtdH. Steeb, W. Seeger, H. Aba Oud Hysolar: an overview on the German-Saudi Arabian programme on solar hydrogen Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 19 (8) (1994), pp. 683-686T. Lepage, M. Kammoun, Q. Schmetz, A. Richel Biomass-to-hydrogen: a review of main routes production, processes evaluation and techno-economical assessment Biomass Bioenergy, 144 (Jan-2021), p. 105920 Elsevier LtdD. Milani, A. Kiani, R. McNaughton Renewable-powered hydrogen economy from Australia’s perspective Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 45 (46) (2020), pp. 24125-24145I. Dincer, C. Acar Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 40 (34) (2014), pp. 11094-11111K.K.T. Thanapalan, J.G. Williams, G.P. Liu, D. Rees Modelling OF a PEM fuel cell system IFAC Proc. Vol., 41 (2) (2008), pp. 4636-4641T. Mennola, et al. Mass transport in the cathode of a free-breathing polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell J. Appl. Electrochem., 33 (11) (2003), pp. 979-987H. Pukrushpan, T. Jay, Anna G. Stefanopoulou, Peng Control of Fuel Cell Power Systems Springer (2004)J.H. Nam, M. Kaviany Effective diffusivity and water-saturation distribution in single- and two-layer PEMFC diffusion medium Int. J. Heat Mass Tran., 46 (24) (2003), pp. 4595-4611R. García-Valverde, N. Espinosa, A. Urbina Simple PEM water electrolyser model and experimental validation Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37 (2) (2012), pp. 1927-1938H. Görgün Dynamic modelling of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 31 (1) (2006), pp. 29-38K.S. V Santhanam, R.J. Press, M.J. Miri, A. V Bailey, G.A. Takacs Introduction to Hydrogen Technology Wiley (2017)C. Vallieres, D. Winkelmann, D. Roizard, E. Favre, P. Scharfer, M. Kind On Schroeder’s paradox J. Membr. Sci., 278 (1) (2006), pp. 357-364L. Onishi, J. Prausnitz Water−Nafion equilibria. Absence of Schroeder’s paradox J. Phys. Chem. B, 111 (2007), pp. 10166-10173T.A. Zawodzinski, M. Neeman, L.O. Sillerud, S. Gottesfeld Determination of water diffusion coefficients in perfluorosulfonate ionomeric membranes J. Phys. Chem., 95 (15) (1991), pp. 6040-6044F. Marangio, M. Santarelli, M. Calì Theoretical model and experimental analysis of a high pressure PEM water electrolyser for hydrogen production Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34 (3) (2009), pp. 1143-1158D.J. Kim, M.J. Jo, S.Y. Nam A review of polymer–nanocomposite electrolyte membranes for fuel cell application J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 21 (2015), pp. 36-52J. Qi, Y. Zhai, J. St-Pierre Effect of contaminant mixtures in air on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance J. Power Sources, 413 (2019), pp. 86-97J. Milewski, G. Guandalini, S. Campanari Modeling an alkaline electrolysis cell through reduced-order and loss-estimate approaches J. Power Sources, 269 (2014), pp. 203-211P.D. Beattie, V.I. Basura, S. Holdcroft Temperature and pressure dependence of O2 reduction at Pt∣Nafion® 117 and Pt∣BAM® 407 interfaces J. Electroanal. Chem., 468 (2) (1999), pp. 180-192N.M. Marković, B.N. Grgur, P.N. Ross Temperature-dependent hydrogen electrochemistry on platinum low-index single-crystal surfaces in acid solutions J. Phys. Chem. B, 101 (27) (1997), pp. 5405-5413M.G. Santarelli, M.F. Torchio, P. Cochis Parameters estimation of a PEM fuel cell polarization curve and analysis of their behavior with temperature J. Power Sources, 159 (2) (2006), pp. 824-835T.E. Springer, T.A. Zawodzinski, S. Gottesfeld Polymer electrolyte fuel cell model J. Electrochem. Soc., 138 (8) (1991), pp. 2334-2342F. Barbir Fuel cell electrochemistry PEM Fuel Cells: Theory and Practice, Academic Press, Burlington (2005), pp. 33-72R.M. Dell, P.T. Moseley, D.A.J. Rand Hydrogen, fuel cells and fuel cell vehicles Towards sustainable road transport, Academic Press, Boston (2014), pp. 260-295F. Barbir, T. Gómez Efficiency and economics of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 22 (10–11) (1997), pp. 1027-1037F. Barbir Fuel cell applications F. Barbir (Ed.), PEM Fuel Cells (second ed.), Academic Press, Boston (2013), pp. 373-434L. Zhou Progress and problems in hydrogen storage methods Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 9 (4) (Aug-2005), pp. 395-408 Elsevier LtdS.K. Kamarudin, W.R.W. Daud, A. Md. Som, M.S. Takriff, A.W. Mohammad Technical design and economic evaluation of a PEM fuel cell system J. Power Sources, 157 (2) (2006), pp. 641-649S. Rahimi, M. Meratizaman, S. Monadizadeh, M. Amidpour Techno-economic analysis of wind turbine-PEM (polymer electrolyte membrane) fuel cell hybrid system in standalone area Energy, 67 (2014), pp. 381-396A. Mayyas, et al. Manufacturing cost analysis for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers manufacturing cost analysis for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers Natl. Renew. Energy Lab. (2019), p. 65 AugustR. Yukesh Kannah, et al. Techno-economic assessment of various hydrogen production methods – A review Bioresour. Technol., 319 (Jan-2021), p. 124175 Elsevier LtdG. Valencia Ochoa, C. Acevedo Peñaloza, J. Duarte Forero Thermoeconomic optimization with PSO algorithm of waste heat recovery systems based on organic rankine cycle system for a natural gas engine Energies, 12 (21) (2019), p. 4165F. Consuegra, A. Bula, W. Guillín, J. Sánchez, J. Duarte Forero Instantaneous in-cylinder volume considering deformation and clearance due to lubricating film in reciprocating internal combustion engines Energies, 12 (8) (2019), p. 1437G. Valencia Ochoa, J. Cárdenas Gutierrez, J. Duarte Forero Exergy, economic, and life-cycle assessment of ORC system for waste heat recovery in a natural gas internal combustion engine Resources, 9 (1) (2020), p. 2Z. Zhang, X. Wang, X. Zhang, L. Jia Optimizing the performance of a single PEM fuel cell J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 5 (3) (2008)A. Fontalvo, J. Solano, C. Pedraza, A. Bula, A. Gonzalez Quiroga, R. Vasquez Padilla Energy, exergy and economic evaluation comparison of small-scale single and dual pressure organic rankine cycles integrated with low-grade heat sources Entropy, 19 (10) (2017), p. 476http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1ORIGINAL1-s2.0-S2405844021006095-main.pdf1-s2.0-S2405844021006095-main.pdfapplication/pdf3834056https://repositorio.uniatlantico.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12834/1135/1/1-s2.0-S2405844021006095-main.pdf468d7dc7e3361afd23e3016171482664MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8914https://repositorio.uniatlantico.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12834/1135/2/license_rdf24013099e9e6abb1575dc6ce0855efd5MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81306https://repositorio.uniatlantico.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12834/1135/3/license.txt67e239713705720ef0b79c50b2ececcaMD5320.500.12834/1135oai:repositorio.uniatlantico.edu.co:20.500.12834/11352022-12-17 13:40:26.278DSpace de la Universidad de Atlánticosysadmin@mail.uniatlantico.edu.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

Publicaciones similares