Why don't poor countries do R&D?

Using a global panel on research and development (R&D) expenditures, this paper documents that on average poor countries do far less R&D than rich as a share of GDP. This is arguably counter intuitive since the gains from doing the R&D required for technological catch up are thought to be very high and Griffith et al. (2004) have documented that in the OECD returns increase dramatically with distance from the frontier. Exploiting recent advances in instrumental variables in a varying coefficient context we find than the rates of return follow an inverted U: they rise with distance to the frontier and then fall thereafter, potentially turning negative for the poorest countries. The findings are consistent with the importance of factors complementary to R&D, such as education, the quality of scientific infrastructure and the overall functioning of the national innovation system, and the quality of the private sector, which become increasingly weak with distance from the frontier and the absence of which can offset the catch up effect. China's and India's explosive growth in R&D investment trajectories in spite of expected low returns may be justified by their importing the complementary factors in the form of multinational corporations who do most of the patentable research.

• Autores: Goñi, Edwin; Maloney, William Francis
• Tipo de recurso: Work document
• Fecha de publicación: 2014
• Institución: Universidad de los Andes
• Repositorio: Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
• Idioma: eng
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/8497
• Acceso en línea: http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8497
• Palabra clave: Complementarities; Development; Instrumental variable varying coefficient models; R&D; Technology adoption; Pobreza - Aspectos económicos; Asistencia económica; Innovaciones tecnológicas; Inversiones extranjeras; O1, O32, O33, O4
• Rights: openAccess
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/