Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study
We use an experimental field approach to understand better the pro-social preferences and behavior of both individuals involved in the provision of social services (public servants) and the behavior of those potential beneficiaries, the poor. We conducted field experiments using the Dictator, Ultima...
- Autores:
-
Cárdenas Campo, Juan Camilo
Candelo Londoño, Natalia
Gaviria Uribe, Alejandro
Polanía Reyes, Sandra Viviana
Sethi, Rajiv
- Tipo de recurso:
- Work document
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2007
- Institución:
- Universidad de los Andes
- Repositorio:
- Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/8087
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8087
- Palabra clave:
- Distributive dictator game
Dictator Game
Ultimatum game
Trust Game
Third Party Punishment game
Pro-social behavior
Public officials
Field experiments
Pobreza - Investigaciones - Bogotá (Colombia)
Seguridad social - Bogotá (Colombia) - Estudio de casos
Seguridad social - Bogotá (Colombia) - Métodos de simulación
Juegos diferenciales - Investigaciones
H3, H83, I3, D6, C93
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id |
UNIANDES2_d754de4d844518b396b4d0e3881c59ff |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/8087 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIANDES2 |
network_name_str |
Séneca: repositorio Uniandes |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study |
dc.title.alternative.none.fl_str_mv |
Discriminación en la provisión de servicios sociales a los más pobres: un estudio experimental en campo |
title |
Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study |
spellingShingle |
Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study Distributive dictator game Dictator Game Ultimatum game Trust Game Third Party Punishment game Pro-social behavior Public officials Field experiments Pobreza - Investigaciones - Bogotá (Colombia) Seguridad social - Bogotá (Colombia) - Estudio de casos Seguridad social - Bogotá (Colombia) - Métodos de simulación Juegos diferenciales - Investigaciones H3, H83, I3, D6, C93 |
title_short |
Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study |
title_full |
Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study |
title_fullStr |
Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study |
title_sort |
Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Cárdenas Campo, Juan Camilo Candelo Londoño, Natalia Gaviria Uribe, Alejandro Polanía Reyes, Sandra Viviana Sethi, Rajiv |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Cárdenas Campo, Juan Camilo Candelo Londoño, Natalia Gaviria Uribe, Alejandro Polanía Reyes, Sandra Viviana Sethi, Rajiv |
dc.subject.keyword.none.fl_str_mv |
Distributive dictator game Dictator Game Ultimatum game Trust Game Third Party Punishment game Pro-social behavior Public officials Field experiments |
topic |
Distributive dictator game Dictator Game Ultimatum game Trust Game Third Party Punishment game Pro-social behavior Public officials Field experiments Pobreza - Investigaciones - Bogotá (Colombia) Seguridad social - Bogotá (Colombia) - Estudio de casos Seguridad social - Bogotá (Colombia) - Métodos de simulación Juegos diferenciales - Investigaciones H3, H83, I3, D6, C93 |
dc.subject.armarc.none.fl_str_mv |
Pobreza - Investigaciones - Bogotá (Colombia) Seguridad social - Bogotá (Colombia) - Estudio de casos Seguridad social - Bogotá (Colombia) - Métodos de simulación Juegos diferenciales - Investigaciones |
dc.subject.jel.none.fl_str_mv |
H3, H83, I3, D6, C93 |
description |
We use an experimental field approach to understand better the pro-social preferences and behavior of both individuals involved in the provision of social services (public servants) and the behavior of those potential beneficiaries, the poor. We conducted field experiments using the Dictator, Ultimatum, Trust and Third Party Punishment games, and a newly designed Distributive Dictator Game. With these, we want to understand the traits and mechanisms that guide pro-sociality including altruism, reciprocal altruism, reciprocity, trust, fairness, inequity aversion, and altruistic (social) punishment. We recruited in Bogotá, Colombia more than 500 public servants and beneficiaries from welfare programs associated with health, education, childcare and nutrition. The overall results replicate the patterns of previous studies with these experimental designs, that is, individuals showed a preference for fair outcomes, positive levels of trust and reciprocity, and willingness to punish -at a personal cost, unfair outcomes if against themselves or if against third parties. By using more information about our participants we were able however to explain the observed variations in these behaviors. The results provide evidence that the poor trigger more pro-social behavior from all citizens including public servants, but the latter show more strategic generosity by graduating their pro-social behavior towards the poor depending on attributes of the beneficiaries or recipients of offers in these games. We observed a bias in favor of women and households with more number of dependents, but discriminatory behavior against particularly stigmatized groups in society such as ex-combatants from the political conflict, or street recyclers. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2007 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-27T16:50:28Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-27T16:50:28Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Documento de trabajo |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042 |
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WP |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-5334 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8087 |
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-7191 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.57784/1992/8087 |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad de los Andes |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca |
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/ |
identifier_str_mv |
1657-5334 1657-7191 10.57784/1992/8087 instname:Universidad de los Andes reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/ |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8087 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartofseries.none.fl_str_mv |
Documentos CEDE No. 12 Julio de 2007 |
dc.relation.repec.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/003885.html |
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv |
45 páginas |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE |
institution |
Universidad de los Andes |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/addfe18d-f97e-4d44-aa01-34091c8471f0/download https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/dcaefb3e-350b-4118-a7a8-e25b830d60f8/download https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/e46d79f9-3ea2-493e-b836-f5e4e923e36b/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
3157071a96e18ab3ae71a545855b89db 50a790fa46b5f3905c4936ffa52c790f 54fc0a63326e19a407990da8c82e9a92 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional Séneca |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
adminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co |
_version_ |
1812133827236069376 |
spelling |
Al consultar y hacer uso de este recurso, está aceptando las condiciones de uso establecidas por los autores.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Cárdenas Campo, Juan Camilo7633600Candelo Londoño, Natalia85424733-2d91-45d1-8436-85908e66d10f600Gaviria Uribe, Alejandroca823a2f-d6c4-4368-a26a-ba76f5c87187600Polanía Reyes, Sandra Viviana34f43c89-5113-489b-800d-49105520094e600Sethi, Rajiv4227d12d-cadf-4d3e-91af-f9d8dd6629276002018-09-27T16:50:28Z2018-09-27T16:50:28Z20071657-5334http://hdl.handle.net/1992/80871657-719110.57784/1992/8087instname:Universidad de los Andesreponame:Repositorio Institucional Sénecarepourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/We use an experimental field approach to understand better the pro-social preferences and behavior of both individuals involved in the provision of social services (public servants) and the behavior of those potential beneficiaries, the poor. We conducted field experiments using the Dictator, Ultimatum, Trust and Third Party Punishment games, and a newly designed Distributive Dictator Game. With these, we want to understand the traits and mechanisms that guide pro-sociality including altruism, reciprocal altruism, reciprocity, trust, fairness, inequity aversion, and altruistic (social) punishment. We recruited in Bogotá, Colombia more than 500 public servants and beneficiaries from welfare programs associated with health, education, childcare and nutrition. The overall results replicate the patterns of previous studies with these experimental designs, that is, individuals showed a preference for fair outcomes, positive levels of trust and reciprocity, and willingness to punish -at a personal cost, unfair outcomes if against themselves or if against third parties. By using more information about our participants we were able however to explain the observed variations in these behaviors. The results provide evidence that the poor trigger more pro-social behavior from all citizens including public servants, but the latter show more strategic generosity by graduating their pro-social behavior towards the poor depending on attributes of the beneficiaries or recipients of offers in these games. We observed a bias in favor of women and households with more number of dependents, but discriminatory behavior against particularly stigmatized groups in society such as ex-combatants from the political conflict, or street recyclers.En este estudio utilizamos un enfoque experimental en campo para estudiar las preferencias sociales y el comportamiento de los individuos involucrados en la provisión de servicios sociales hacia los más pobres, incluyendo servidores o funcionarios públicos y los beneficiarios de estos servicios. Realizamos experimentos en campo usando los juegos de Dictador, Ultimatum, Confianza y Castigo de Terceros, así como un Nuevo juego diseñado para el proyecto denominado el Dictador Distributivo. Con estos juegos queremos comprender los elementos y mecanismos que guían el comportamiento pro-social incluyendo altruismo, altruismo recíproco, reciprocidad, confianza, justicia y equidad, aversión a la desigualdad y la sanción social (altruista) de terceros. Convocamos en Bogotá, Colombia más de 500 servidores públicos y beneficiarios de las poblaciones más pobres en programas de bienestar social asociados con la salud, educación, cuidado de niños y nutrición. Los resultados generales replican los patrones observados en estudios previos con estos diseños experimentales tales como las preferencias por resultados justos, niveles positivos de reciprocidad y confianza, y la disponibilidad a sancionar -a un costo personal, resultados injustos hacia sí mismos y hacia terceros. Al utilizar más información personal acerca de los participantes pudimos sin embargo explicar una fracción superior de la variación en el comportamiento. Los resultados sugieren que la pobreza genera un comportamiento más pro-social que en los controles, pero los servidores públicos muestran un comportamiento más estratégico hacia los más pobres al graduar su generosidad en función de los atributos de los beneficiarios de las ofertas en estos juegos. Observamos un sesgo a favor de las mujeres y de hogares con más número de personas dependientes, a favor de los desplazados, pero también observamos comportamientos discriminatorios contra de grupos particularmente estigmatizados en la sociedad como los excombatientes del conflicto armado, o los recicladores de las calles.45 páginasapplication/pdfengUniversidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDEDocumentos CEDE No. 12 Julio de 2007https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/003885.htmlDiscrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental studyDiscriminación en la provisión de servicios sociales a los más pobres: un estudio experimental en campoDocumento de trabajoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WPDistributive dictator gameDictator GameUltimatum gameTrust GameThird Party Punishment gamePro-social behaviorPublic officialsField experimentsPobreza - Investigaciones - Bogotá (Colombia)Seguridad social - Bogotá (Colombia) - Estudio de casosSeguridad social - Bogotá (Colombia) - Métodos de simulaciónJuegos diferenciales - InvestigacionesH3, H83, I3, D6, C93Facultad de EconomíaPublicationORIGINALdcede2007-12.pdfdcede2007-12.pdfapplication/pdf683302https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/addfe18d-f97e-4d44-aa01-34091c8471f0/download3157071a96e18ab3ae71a545855b89dbMD51TEXTdcede2007-12.pdf.txtdcede2007-12.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain126535https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/dcaefb3e-350b-4118-a7a8-e25b830d60f8/download50a790fa46b5f3905c4936ffa52c790fMD54THUMBNAILdcede2007-12.pdf.jpgdcede2007-12.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg22947https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/e46d79f9-3ea2-493e-b836-f5e4e923e36b/download54fc0a63326e19a407990da8c82e9a92MD551992/8087oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/80872024-06-04 15:25:24.87http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/open.accesshttps://repositorio.uniandes.edu.coRepositorio institucional Sénecaadminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co |