The political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economy
If property rights in land are so beneficial, why are they not adopted more widely? I propose a theory based on the idea that limited property rights over peasants' plots may be supported by elite landowners (who depend on peasants for labour) to achieve two goals. First, like other distortions...
- Autores:
-
Fergusson Talero, Leopoldo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Work document
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2012
- Institución:
- Universidad de los Andes
- Repositorio:
- Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/8316
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8316
- Palabra clave:
- Political economy
Institutions
Economic development
Taxation
Property rights
Land
Dualism
Economía política - Investigaciones
Distribución de tierras - Aspectos económicos
Derecho de propiedad - Investigaciones
H2, N10, O1, O10, P16
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id |
UNIANDES2_af09d22ff8b10e479b345f0069e8cd44 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/8316 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIANDES2 |
network_name_str |
Séneca: repositorio Uniandes |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economy |
dc.title.alternative.none.fl_str_mv |
Economía política de los derechos de propiedad rurales y la persistencia dela economía dual |
title |
The political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economy |
spellingShingle |
The political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economy Political economy Institutions Economic development Taxation Property rights Land Dualism Economía política - Investigaciones Distribución de tierras - Aspectos económicos Derecho de propiedad - Investigaciones H2, N10, O1, O10, P16 |
title_short |
The political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economy |
title_full |
The political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economy |
title_fullStr |
The political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economy |
title_full_unstemmed |
The political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economy |
title_sort |
The political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economy |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Fergusson Talero, Leopoldo |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Fergusson Talero, Leopoldo |
dc.subject.keyword.none.fl_str_mv |
Political economy Institutions Economic development Taxation Property rights Land Dualism |
topic |
Political economy Institutions Economic development Taxation Property rights Land Dualism Economía política - Investigaciones Distribución de tierras - Aspectos económicos Derecho de propiedad - Investigaciones H2, N10, O1, O10, P16 |
dc.subject.armarc.none.fl_str_mv |
Economía política - Investigaciones Distribución de tierras - Aspectos económicos Derecho de propiedad - Investigaciones |
dc.subject.jel.none.fl_str_mv |
H2, N10, O1, O10, P16 |
description |
If property rights in land are so beneficial, why are they not adopted more widely? I propose a theory based on the idea that limited property rights over peasants' plots may be supported by elite landowners (who depend on peasants for labour) to achieve two goals. First, like other distortions such as taxation, limited property rights reduce peasants' income from their own plots, generating a cheap labour force. Second, and unlike taxation, they force peasants to remain in the rural sector to protect their property, even if job opportunities appear in the urban sector. The theory identifies conditions under which weak property rights institutions emerge, providing a specific mechanism for the endogenous persistence of inefficient rural institutions as development unfolds. It also predicts a non-monotonic relationship between the quality of rural property rights and land in the hands of peasants. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2012 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-27T16:52:06Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-27T16:52:06Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Documento de trabajo |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042 |
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WP |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-5334 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8316 |
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-7191 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.57784/1992/8316 |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad de los Andes |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca |
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/ |
identifier_str_mv |
1657-5334 1657-7191 10.57784/1992/8316 instname:Universidad de los Andes reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/ |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8316 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartofseries.none.fl_str_mv |
Documentos CEDE No. 09 Junio de 2012 |
dc.relation.repec.SPA.fl_str_mv |
https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/009797.html |
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv |
42 páginas |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE |
institution |
Universidad de los Andes |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/5588d358-cddc-41b8-8c04-4f56f49c9c00/download https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/00aee4a7-2311-4a07-8f77-ad2a19e8cf56/download https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/c23e7ac2-d64f-4565-b62b-a30bda6f3573/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
687e57de57969edbffc3a9c094e7aafd 52de54de4ddf9c50b0807fae11d103e8 e4dcfb3745bc4a293dab2584750da1d0 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional Séneca |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
adminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co |
_version_ |
1812134035840827392 |
spelling |
Al consultar y hacer uso de este recurso, está aceptando las condiciones de uso establecidas por los autores.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Fergusson Talero, Leopoldo82075002018-09-27T16:52:06Z2018-09-27T16:52:06Z20121657-5334http://hdl.handle.net/1992/83161657-719110.57784/1992/8316instname:Universidad de los Andesreponame:Repositorio Institucional Sénecarepourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/If property rights in land are so beneficial, why are they not adopted more widely? I propose a theory based on the idea that limited property rights over peasants' plots may be supported by elite landowners (who depend on peasants for labour) to achieve two goals. First, like other distortions such as taxation, limited property rights reduce peasants' income from their own plots, generating a cheap labour force. Second, and unlike taxation, they force peasants to remain in the rural sector to protect their property, even if job opportunities appear in the urban sector. The theory identifies conditions under which weak property rights institutions emerge, providing a specific mechanism for the endogenous persistence of inefficient rural institutions as development unfolds. It also predicts a non-monotonic relationship between the quality of rural property rights and land in the hands of peasants.Si los derechos de propiedad sobre la tierra son tan benéficos, ¿Por qué no se establecen con mayor frecuencia? Este documento propone una teoría en la que derechos de propiedad limitados para las parcelas de los campesinos pueden ser defendidos por una elite terrateniente (que depende del trabajo de los campesinos) con dos objetivos en mente. Primero, como otras distorsiones como la tributación, los derechos de propiedad incompletos reducen el ingreso de los campesinos en sus parcelas, generando una mano de obra barata. Segundo, y contrario a la tributación, obligan a los campesinos a quedarse en el sector rural para cuidar su propiedad, inclusive si aparecen oportunidades de trabajo en el sector urbano. La teoría identifica condiciones bajo las cuales surgen instituciones débiles de derechos de propiedad, sugiriendo un mecanismo específico para la persistencia endógena de instituciones rurales ineficientes a medida que se da el desarrollo económico. También predice una relación no monótona entre la calidad de los derechos de propiedad rurales y la cantidad de tierra en manos de los campesinos.42 páginasapplication/pdfengUniversidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDEDocumentos CEDE No. 09 Junio de 2012https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/009797.htmlThe political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economyEconomía política de los derechos de propiedad rurales y la persistencia dela economía dualDocumento de trabajoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WPPolitical economyInstitutionsEconomic developmentTaxationProperty rightsLandDualismEconomía política - InvestigacionesDistribución de tierras - Aspectos económicosDerecho de propiedad - InvestigacionesH2, N10, O1, O10, P16Facultad de EconomíaPublicationORIGINALdcede2012-09.pdfdcede2012-09.pdfapplication/pdf1430230https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/5588d358-cddc-41b8-8c04-4f56f49c9c00/download687e57de57969edbffc3a9c094e7aafdMD51THUMBNAILdcede2012-09.pdf.jpgdcede2012-09.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg8665https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/00aee4a7-2311-4a07-8f77-ad2a19e8cf56/download52de54de4ddf9c50b0807fae11d103e8MD55TEXTdcede2012-09.pdf.txtdcede2012-09.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain411956https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/c23e7ac2-d64f-4565-b62b-a30bda6f3573/downloade4dcfb3745bc4a293dab2584750da1d0MD541992/8316oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/83162024-06-04 15:44:38.932http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/open.accesshttps://repositorio.uniandes.edu.coRepositorio institucional Sénecaadminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co |