Unilateral forgiveness : forgiveness in the absence of apology

According to conditional theories, forgiveness is unreasonable unless the wrongdoer complies with conditions that make them worthy of it (Griswold, 2007; Murphy, 1988; Swinburne, 1989). These conditions are meant to ensure respect for the victim and proper condemnation of the offense. The wrongdoer,...

Full description

Autores:
Castro Maldonado, María Camila
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad de los Andes
Repositorio:
Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/35090
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/1992/35090
Palabra clave:
Perdón
Filosofía del perdón
Filosofía
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description
Summary:According to conditional theories, forgiveness is unreasonable unless the wrongdoer complies with conditions that make them worthy of it (Griswold, 2007; Murphy, 1988; Swinburne, 1989). These conditions are meant to ensure respect for the victim and proper condemnation of the offense. The wrongdoer, we are told, ought to repent, apologize, atone, repair, and so forth. There are, however, cases that do not fit this paradigm. Sometimes victims have good reasons to unilaterally forgive someone who has not complied with conditions that would otherwise make them deserving of forgiveness. In this paper, I argue that unilateral forgiveness need not be, as conditional theories would have it, a moral mistake. In fact, in some cases unilateral forgiveness constitutes a reasonable response to a wrongdoing. These are scenarios in which the standard considerations to resent others, to feel indignation for what they did, and to sever our relationships with them hold.