Building a culture of accountability in service delivery: an overview of results of the GDN project on Varieties of Governance in Service Delivery
This paper summarizes the results of a Global Development Network study, carried on by sixteen multidisciplinary research teams and covering thirty developing countries, under the authors general direction, on the effects of different governance structures on the quality and equity of access in thre...
- Autores:
-
Perry Rubio, Guillermo Eduardo
Angelescu, Ramona
- Tipo de recurso:
- Work document
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Universidad de los Andes
- Repositorio:
- Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/8456
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8456
- Palabra clave:
- Governance
Institutions
Service delivery
Accountability
Rendición de cuentas del gobierno - Países en desarrollo
Administración pública - Países en desarrollo
Servicios públicos - Países en desarrollo
D02, D78, H7
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id |
UNIANDES2_9a92c7801223ef3963181da65aaf55d7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/8456 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIANDES2 |
network_name_str |
Séneca: repositorio Uniandes |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Building a culture of accountability in service delivery: an overview of results of the GDN project on Varieties of Governance in Service Delivery |
title |
Building a culture of accountability in service delivery: an overview of results of the GDN project on Varieties of Governance in Service Delivery |
spellingShingle |
Building a culture of accountability in service delivery: an overview of results of the GDN project on Varieties of Governance in Service Delivery Governance Institutions Service delivery Accountability Rendición de cuentas del gobierno - Países en desarrollo Administración pública - Países en desarrollo Servicios públicos - Países en desarrollo D02, D78, H7 |
title_short |
Building a culture of accountability in service delivery: an overview of results of the GDN project on Varieties of Governance in Service Delivery |
title_full |
Building a culture of accountability in service delivery: an overview of results of the GDN project on Varieties of Governance in Service Delivery |
title_fullStr |
Building a culture of accountability in service delivery: an overview of results of the GDN project on Varieties of Governance in Service Delivery |
title_full_unstemmed |
Building a culture of accountability in service delivery: an overview of results of the GDN project on Varieties of Governance in Service Delivery |
title_sort |
Building a culture of accountability in service delivery: an overview of results of the GDN project on Varieties of Governance in Service Delivery |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Perry Rubio, Guillermo Eduardo Angelescu, Ramona |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Perry Rubio, Guillermo Eduardo Angelescu, Ramona |
dc.subject.keyword.none.fl_str_mv |
Governance Institutions Service delivery Accountability |
topic |
Governance Institutions Service delivery Accountability Rendición de cuentas del gobierno - Países en desarrollo Administración pública - Países en desarrollo Servicios públicos - Países en desarrollo D02, D78, H7 |
dc.subject.armarc.none.fl_str_mv |
Rendición de cuentas del gobierno - Países en desarrollo Administración pública - Países en desarrollo Servicios públicos - Países en desarrollo |
dc.subject.jel.none.fl_str_mv |
D02, D78, H7 |
description |
This paper summarizes the results of a Global Development Network study, carried on by sixteen multidisciplinary research teams and covering thirty developing countries, under the authors general direction, on the effects of different governance structures on the quality and equity of access in three public services: basic education, drinking water supply and roads. Governance reforms analyzed referred mostly to decentralization, formal processes of citizen's participation and alternative modes of delivery and, within each of them, emphasis was placed on the effects of accountability systems, informational flows and incentive structures. Case studies used both econometric techniques and qualitative analysis based on surveys and structured interviews of policy makers, service providers and users. The impact of governance reforms and alternatives was found to vary significantly with country context, but three major conclusions emerged: 1) Political culture and legacy are the deeper determinants of effective accountability and results. Thus, countries with a history of highly centralized and authoritarian regimes find it harder to make decentralization, participation and competitive modes of delivery work effectively. However, a culture of accountability can be built overtime when adequate institutions and incentives are introduced and maintained overtime; 2) Adequate information flows are not only a necessary condition, but they often promote effective accountability and better results, as they lead citizens and clients to demand accountability and agents to be more responsive to user needs; 3) Self-financing schemes also promote more accountability and better results, as users demand better services when they pay for them and citizens are more demanding (and local authorities are more responsive to their needs) when local taxes finance local services. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2013 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-27T16:53:22Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-27T16:53:22Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Documento de trabajo |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042 |
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WP |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-5334 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8456 |
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-7191 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.57784/1992/8456 |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad de los Andes |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca |
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/ |
identifier_str_mv |
1657-5334 1657-7191 10.57784/1992/8456 instname:Universidad de los Andes reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/ |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8456 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartofseries.none.fl_str_mv |
Documentos CEDE No. 51 Diciembre de 2013 |
dc.relation.repec.SPA.fl_str_mv |
https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/011930.html |
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv |
58 páginas |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE |
institution |
Universidad de los Andes |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/77642c8d-352f-49ac-acff-89ac127bb332/download https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/72723d9c-676a-4672-9743-3eb9426bd556/download https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/f2941b44-a937-4cda-80e5-05637156696d/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
0742a1f093b0aab2bab4dd63d330ec6f bec1872e8d3cb6d16fd84cb5cfada3ba 8b500fa5815c06e1fe45729459c11e20 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional Séneca |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
adminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co |
_version_ |
1812133931812651008 |
spelling |
Al consultar y hacer uso de este recurso, está aceptando las condiciones de uso establecidas por los autores.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Perry Rubio, Guillermo Eduardo9802600Angelescu, Ramonaeea81226-df0c-4710-9dce-84bc1fd63cd86002018-09-27T16:53:22Z2018-09-27T16:53:22Z20131657-5334http://hdl.handle.net/1992/84561657-719110.57784/1992/8456instname:Universidad de los Andesreponame:Repositorio Institucional Sénecarepourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/This paper summarizes the results of a Global Development Network study, carried on by sixteen multidisciplinary research teams and covering thirty developing countries, under the authors general direction, on the effects of different governance structures on the quality and equity of access in three public services: basic education, drinking water supply and roads. Governance reforms analyzed referred mostly to decentralization, formal processes of citizen's participation and alternative modes of delivery and, within each of them, emphasis was placed on the effects of accountability systems, informational flows and incentive structures. Case studies used both econometric techniques and qualitative analysis based on surveys and structured interviews of policy makers, service providers and users. The impact of governance reforms and alternatives was found to vary significantly with country context, but three major conclusions emerged: 1) Political culture and legacy are the deeper determinants of effective accountability and results. Thus, countries with a history of highly centralized and authoritarian regimes find it harder to make decentralization, participation and competitive modes of delivery work effectively. However, a culture of accountability can be built overtime when adequate institutions and incentives are introduced and maintained overtime; 2) Adequate information flows are not only a necessary condition, but they often promote effective accountability and better results, as they lead citizens and clients to demand accountability and agents to be more responsive to user needs; 3) Self-financing schemes also promote more accountability and better results, as users demand better services when they pay for them and citizens are more demanding (and local authorities are more responsive to their needs) when local taxes finance local services.Este trabajo sintetiza los resultados de un estudio del Global Development Network, realizado por dieciséis equipos multidisciplinarios, cubriendo treinta países en vía de desarrollo, para analizar los efectos que distintas estructuras de gobernanza causan sobre la calidad y la equidad en el acceso a tres servicios públicos: educación básica, agua potable y carreteras. Las reformas de gobernanza analizadas se refieren en particular a procesos de descentralización, procesos formales de participación ciudadana y modelos alternativos de provisión de servicios públicos. Al interior de estas reformas, analizamos con especial atención los efectos de los sistemas de rendición de cuentas, los flujos de información y la estructura de incentivos. Los estudios de caso utilizaron técnicas econométricas y análisis cualitativo basado en encuestas y entrevistas estructuradas a hacedores de política, proveedores y usuarios. Aunque encontramos que el impacto de las reformas de gobernanza varía significativamente entre países, identificamos tres conclusiones generales: 1) La cultura y el legado político de regímenes previos son los determinantes básicos de la existencia y efectividad de los sistemas de rendición de cuentas y de los resultados en la provisión del servicio público. Así, países que históricamente han tenido regímenes centralizados y autoritarios tienen más dificultades en lograr una descentralización efectiva, una participación ciudadana eficaz y modelos verdaderamente competitivos para proveer servicios públicos. A pesar de esto, encontramos que se puede construir una cultura efectiva de rendición de cuentas a largo plazo, cuando se establecen instituciones e incentivos adecuados y se mantienen en el tiempo; 2) El flujo adecuado de información no solo es una condición necesaria para tener un buen sistema de rendición de cuentas, sino que es uno de sus determinantes y está asociado a mejores resultados en la provisión del servicio. En efecto, los flujos de información conducen a que los ciudadanos demanden rendición de cuentas por parte del sistema y a que los proveedores y hacedores de política sientan la necesidad de dar respuestas a las necesidades de la ciudadanía; 3) L os esquemas de auto financiamiento también promueven mayor rendición de cuentas y mejores resultados. Esto se explica por qué usuarios que pagan por la prestación de un servicio público exigen mayor calidad en el suministro. Algo muy similar sucede cuando el servicio se financia con impuestos locales, ya que en ese caso los ciudadanos son más exigentes y las autoridades locales más receptivas a sus requerimientos.58 páginasapplication/pdfengUniversidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDEDocumentos CEDE No. 51 Diciembre de 2013https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/011930.htmlBuilding a culture of accountability in service delivery: an overview of results of the GDN project on Varieties of Governance in Service DeliveryDocumento de trabajoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WPGovernanceInstitutionsService deliveryAccountabilityRendición de cuentas del gobierno - Países en desarrolloAdministración pública - Países en desarrolloServicios públicos - Países en desarrolloD02, D78, H7Facultad de EconomíaPublicationTEXTdcede2013-51.pdf.txtdcede2013-51.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain208081https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/77642c8d-352f-49ac-acff-89ac127bb332/download0742a1f093b0aab2bab4dd63d330ec6fMD54ORIGINALdcede2013-51.pdfdcede2013-51.pdfapplication/pdf782657https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/72723d9c-676a-4672-9743-3eb9426bd556/downloadbec1872e8d3cb6d16fd84cb5cfada3baMD51THUMBNAILdcede2013-51.pdf.jpgdcede2013-51.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg9443https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/f2941b44-a937-4cda-80e5-05637156696d/download8b500fa5815c06e1fe45729459c11e20MD551992/8456oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/84562024-06-04 15:34:45.072http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/open.accesshttps://repositorio.uniandes.edu.coRepositorio institucional Sénecaadminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co |