Media markets, special interests, and voters

This paper examines the role of mass media in countering special interest group influence. I use the concentration of campaign contributions from Political Action Committees to proxy special interests' capture US Senate candidates from 1980 to 2002, and compare the reaction of voters to increas...

Full description

Autores:
Fergusson Talero, Leopoldo
Tipo de recurso:
Work document
Fecha de publicación:
2012
Institución:
Universidad de los Andes
Repositorio:
Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/8315
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8315
Palabra clave:
Campaign finance
Elections
Media
Special interests
Fondos para campañas electorales
Elecciones
Medios de comunicación de masas - Aspectos políticos
D72, L82
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id UNIANDES2_88dd618d1380a583b55d62be40b1074b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/8315
network_acronym_str UNIANDES2
network_name_str Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Media markets, special interests, and voters
dc.title.alternative.none.fl_str_mv Mercados de medios, grupos de interés, y electores
title Media markets, special interests, and voters
spellingShingle Media markets, special interests, and voters
Campaign finance
Elections
Media
Special interests
Fondos para campañas electorales
Elecciones
Medios de comunicación de masas - Aspectos políticos
D72, L82
title_short Media markets, special interests, and voters
title_full Media markets, special interests, and voters
title_fullStr Media markets, special interests, and voters
title_full_unstemmed Media markets, special interests, and voters
title_sort Media markets, special interests, and voters
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Fergusson Talero, Leopoldo
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Fergusson Talero, Leopoldo
dc.subject.keyword.none.fl_str_mv Campaign finance
Elections
Media
Special interests
topic Campaign finance
Elections
Media
Special interests
Fondos para campañas electorales
Elecciones
Medios de comunicación de masas - Aspectos políticos
D72, L82
dc.subject.armarc.none.fl_str_mv Fondos para campañas electorales
Elecciones
Medios de comunicación de masas - Aspectos políticos
dc.subject.jel.none.fl_str_mv D72, L82
description This paper examines the role of mass media in countering special interest group influence. I use the concentration of campaign contributions from Political Action Committees to proxy special interests' capture US Senate candidates from 1980 to 2002, and compare the reaction of voters to increases in concentration in two different types of media markets - in-state media markets and out-of-state media markets. Unlike in-state media markets, out-of-state markets focus on neighboring states' politics and elections. Thus, if citizens punish political capture, increases in concentration of special interest contributions to a particular candidate should reduce his vote share in in-state counties relative to the out-of-state counties, where the candidate receives less coverage. I find that a one standard deviation increase in concentration of special interest contributions to incumbents reduces their vote share by about 0.5 to 1.5 percentage points in in-state counties relative to the out-of-state counties. Results are similar in specifications that rely solely on variation in concentration across time within the same county, and when the sample is limited to in-state counties that are contiguous to out-of-state counties and have similar demographic structures. A placebo test where in-state counties bordering out-of-state ones are compared to other in-state counties shows no effect, confirming the identification hypothesis that the results are not driven by geographic characteristics or distance from the media center of the state.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2012
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-27T16:52:06Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-27T16:52:06Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Documento de trabajo
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WP
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1657-5334
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8315
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 1657-7191
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.57784/1992/8315
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad de los Andes
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv 1657-5334
1657-7191
10.57784/1992/8315
instname:Universidad de los Andes
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca
repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/
url http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8315
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.none.fl_str_mv Documentos CEDE No. 08 Junio de 2012
dc.relation.repec.SPA.fl_str_mv https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/009796.html
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv 58 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE
institution Universidad de los Andes
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/4670d4c9-e74c-4a42-983f-a540400f03a0/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/0c55975b-fb46-41a6-9c62-02d8ec128592/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/cf6e79a6-8256-46d7-af17-35e30193617b/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 2c985b0d4cb36e143794d808189ae58d
8cc46308831d83cb39605e5991cc32ac
59258c0a17cdcf7f8ed955f470133455
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional Séneca
repository.mail.fl_str_mv adminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co
_version_ 1812134051611410432
spelling Al consultar y hacer uso de este recurso, está aceptando las condiciones de uso establecidas por los autores.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Fergusson Talero, Leopoldo82075002018-09-27T16:52:06Z2018-09-27T16:52:06Z20121657-5334http://hdl.handle.net/1992/83151657-719110.57784/1992/8315instname:Universidad de los Andesreponame:Repositorio Institucional Sénecarepourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/This paper examines the role of mass media in countering special interest group influence. I use the concentration of campaign contributions from Political Action Committees to proxy special interests' capture US Senate candidates from 1980 to 2002, and compare the reaction of voters to increases in concentration in two different types of media markets - in-state media markets and out-of-state media markets. Unlike in-state media markets, out-of-state markets focus on neighboring states' politics and elections. Thus, if citizens punish political capture, increases in concentration of special interest contributions to a particular candidate should reduce his vote share in in-state counties relative to the out-of-state counties, where the candidate receives less coverage. I find that a one standard deviation increase in concentration of special interest contributions to incumbents reduces their vote share by about 0.5 to 1.5 percentage points in in-state counties relative to the out-of-state counties. Results are similar in specifications that rely solely on variation in concentration across time within the same county, and when the sample is limited to in-state counties that are contiguous to out-of-state counties and have similar demographic structures. A placebo test where in-state counties bordering out-of-state ones are compared to other in-state counties shows no effect, confirming the identification hypothesis that the results are not driven by geographic characteristics or distance from the media center of the state.En este documento estudio la capacidad de los medios masivos de comunicación para contrarrestar la influencia de los grupos de interés. Para ello, calculo el grado de concentración de las contribuciones a las campañas electorales para el Senado de los Estados Unidos entre 1980 y 2002, y comparo la reacción de los electores frente a incrementos en la concentración en dos tipos de mercados de medios ¿los mercados -en-el-estado y mercados fuera-del-estado. Contrario a los mercados de medios en-el-estado, los mercados fuera-del-estado se enfocan en la política y elecciones de estados vecinos. Así, si los ciudadanos castigan la captura política, incrementos en la concentración de las contribuciones por parte de grupos de interés a un candidato en particular deben reducir su votación en los condados con mercados en-el-estado en comparación con aquellos fuera-del- estado, donde se da menos cubrimiento al candidato. Los resultados indican que un incremento de una desviación estándar en el índice de concentración reduce la votación por el senador de turno en aproximadamente 0,5a1,5 puntos porcentuales en los condados en-el-estado relativo a los condados fuera-del-estado...58 páginasapplication/pdfengUniversidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDEDocumentos CEDE No. 08 Junio de 2012https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/009796.htmlMedia markets, special interests, and votersMercados de medios, grupos de interés, y electoresDocumento de trabajoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WPCampaign financeElectionsMediaSpecial interestsFondos para campañas electoralesEleccionesMedios de comunicación de masas - Aspectos políticosD72, L82Facultad de EconomíaPublicationORIGINALdcede2012-08.pdfdcede2012-08.pdfapplication/pdf2102334https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/4670d4c9-e74c-4a42-983f-a540400f03a0/download2c985b0d4cb36e143794d808189ae58dMD51THUMBNAILdcede2012-08.pdf.jpgdcede2012-08.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg7893https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/0c55975b-fb46-41a6-9c62-02d8ec128592/download8cc46308831d83cb39605e5991cc32acMD55TEXTdcede2012-08.pdf.txtdcede2012-08.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain470753https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/cf6e79a6-8256-46d7-af17-35e30193617b/download59258c0a17cdcf7f8ed955f470133455MD541992/8315oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/83152024-06-04 15:46:40.666http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/open.accesshttps://repositorio.uniandes.edu.coRepositorio institucional Sénecaadminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co