Effects of Ending Payments for Ecosystem Services: removal does not crowd prior conservation out

We implemented a decision experiment in the field with rural peasants in Colombia to test the effects of introducing then partially or totally removing Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES). We consider individual and collective payments and different rules for removal. We find that there is clearly...

Full description

Autores:
Moros, Lina
Vélez, María Alejandra
Pfaff, Alexander
Quintero, Daniela
Tipo de recurso:
Work document
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad de los Andes
Repositorio:
Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/48002
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/1992/48002
Palabra clave:
Lab in the field experiment
Pro-environmental behavior
Payment for ecosystem Services
Incentives
Colombia
Q01, Q52, Q57, Q58
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id UNIANDES2_5b5d1f757ef0e0906153bbef87cda953
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/48002
network_acronym_str UNIANDES2
network_name_str Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
repository_id_str
spelling Al consultar y hacer uso de este recurso, está aceptando las condiciones de uso establecidas por los autores.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Moros, Lina65815a58-6e7b-4ff6-bb9d-b036dde6f29a500Vélez, María Alejandrab6416404-dc29-444b-900b-db5aadb982bd400Pfaff, Alexander62e1667f-1b3e-4623-8024-21bd51f71a51500Quintero, Danielaea4d8978-6079-4654-885e-8f89cff201225002020-12-22T20:20:45Z2020-12-22T20:20:45Z2020http://hdl.handle.net/1992/480021657-719110.57784/1992/48002instname:Universidad de los Andesreponame:Repositorio Institucional Sénecarepourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/We implemented a decision experiment in the field with rural peasants in Colombia to test the effects of introducing then partially or totally removing Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES). We consider individual and collective payments and different rules for removal. We find that there is clearly no behavioral 'crowding-out' when a PES is created then ended. Even a simple pre-versus-post-PES comparison finds 'crowding in', if anything, with contributions higher after PES was removed than before PES was introduced. Comparing to a control, without PES, strengthens that conclusion. We discuss four possible mechanisms explaining these findings: recognition or gratitude; lack of negative emotions; pre-existing and persistent intrinsic motivations, and evocation of pro-environmental behavior.38 páginasengUniversidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDEDocumentos CEDE No. 47 Diciembre de 2020https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/018590.htmlEffects of Ending Payments for Ecosystem Services: removal does not crowd prior conservation outDocumento de trabajoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WPLab in the field experimentPro-environmental behaviorPayment for ecosystem ServicesIncentivesColombiaQ01, Q52, Q57, Q58Facultad de EconomíaPublicationORIGINALdcede2020-47.pdfdcede2020-47.pdfapplication/pdf9784226https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/edcfdcaf-7be9-4d85-b464-89ee2c4a808a/download324444a8e53dadbb8645c1161ce4e349MD51THUMBNAILdcede2020-47.pdf.jpgdcede2020-47.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg19119https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/61000b4f-9a8e-423a-8a80-f3317b972e76/downloadcbb8c1a0d5e92b4f65c80ecd0a2cdb8bMD55TEXTdcede2020-47.pdf.txtdcede2020-47.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain69786https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/15986314-aae1-4df4-a075-aa74c89a667e/downloadc26c2a21f23e011c331dfedf4a8fab95MD541992/48002oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/480022024-06-04 15:41:47.233http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/open.accesshttps://repositorio.uniandes.edu.coRepositorio institucional Sénecaadminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of Ending Payments for Ecosystem Services: removal does not crowd prior conservation out
title Effects of Ending Payments for Ecosystem Services: removal does not crowd prior conservation out
spellingShingle Effects of Ending Payments for Ecosystem Services: removal does not crowd prior conservation out
Lab in the field experiment
Pro-environmental behavior
Payment for ecosystem Services
Incentives
Colombia
Q01, Q52, Q57, Q58
title_short Effects of Ending Payments for Ecosystem Services: removal does not crowd prior conservation out
title_full Effects of Ending Payments for Ecosystem Services: removal does not crowd prior conservation out
title_fullStr Effects of Ending Payments for Ecosystem Services: removal does not crowd prior conservation out
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Ending Payments for Ecosystem Services: removal does not crowd prior conservation out
title_sort Effects of Ending Payments for Ecosystem Services: removal does not crowd prior conservation out
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Moros, Lina
Vélez, María Alejandra
Pfaff, Alexander
Quintero, Daniela
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Moros, Lina
Vélez, María Alejandra
Pfaff, Alexander
Quintero, Daniela
dc.subject.keyword.none.fl_str_mv Lab in the field experiment
Pro-environmental behavior
Payment for ecosystem Services
Incentives
Colombia
topic Lab in the field experiment
Pro-environmental behavior
Payment for ecosystem Services
Incentives
Colombia
Q01, Q52, Q57, Q58
dc.subject.jel.none.fl_str_mv Q01, Q52, Q57, Q58
description We implemented a decision experiment in the field with rural peasants in Colombia to test the effects of introducing then partially or totally removing Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES). We consider individual and collective payments and different rules for removal. We find that there is clearly no behavioral 'crowding-out' when a PES is created then ended. Even a simple pre-versus-post-PES comparison finds 'crowding in', if anything, with contributions higher after PES was removed than before PES was introduced. Comparing to a control, without PES, strengthens that conclusion. We discuss four possible mechanisms explaining these findings: recognition or gratitude; lack of negative emotions; pre-existing and persistent intrinsic motivations, and evocation of pro-environmental behavior.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-22T20:20:45Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-22T20:20:45Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Documento de trabajo
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WP
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1992/48002
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 1657-7191
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.57784/1992/48002
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad de los Andes
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/
url http://hdl.handle.net/1992/48002
identifier_str_mv 1657-7191
10.57784/1992/48002
instname:Universidad de los Andes
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca
repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.none.fl_str_mv Documentos CEDE No. 47 Diciembre de 2020
dc.relation.repec.spa.fl_str_mv https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/018590.html
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv 38 páginas
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE
institution Universidad de los Andes
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/edcfdcaf-7be9-4d85-b464-89ee2c4a808a/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/61000b4f-9a8e-423a-8a80-f3317b972e76/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/15986314-aae1-4df4-a075-aa74c89a667e/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 324444a8e53dadbb8645c1161ce4e349
cbb8c1a0d5e92b4f65c80ecd0a2cdb8b
c26c2a21f23e011c331dfedf4a8fab95
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional Séneca
repository.mail.fl_str_mv adminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co
_version_ 1812134001353162752

Publicaciones similares