Disinflation costs under inflation targeting in a small open economy

Since 1991, inflation in Colombia was reduced from 25% on average to about 6% more recently. Although this performance is in line with a long run inflation target of some analysts ask whether the Central Bank should continue disinflating. In this paper we present a dynamic stochastic general equilib...

Full description

Autores:
Restrepo Echavarría, Paulina
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2005
Institución:
Universidad de los Andes
Repositorio:
Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/10527
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/1992/10527
Palabra clave:
Inflación - Colombia - Modelos econométricos
Cuestión monetaria - Colombia
Predicciones económicas - Colombia - Modelos matemáticos
Economía
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description
Summary:Since 1991, inflation in Colombia was reduced from 25% on average to about 6% more recently. Although this performance is in line with a long run inflation target of some analysts ask whether the Central Bank should continue disinflating. In this paper we present a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of inflation targeting for a small open economy to answer this question. We calibrate the model to the Colombian economy and compute the welfare costs and benefits of achieving the long run inflation target. We find that the long run welfare gains are about 4.54% in terms of capital. Furthermore, accounting for the transition the welfare gains are about 1.18% in terms of capital. Our results differ from previous findings because transition costs are introduced and our environment considers the presence of real rigidities (monopolistic competition) and nominal rigidities (sticky information) in a small open economy. We also analyze the sensitivity of the results to some key parameters and conclude that higher price flexibility leads to Iower gains from reducing inflation and that a country with markups around 15% receives higher gains than those countries with different levels of markups. The weight given to the inflation gap in the monetary policy rule is important, and finally the transition is more expensive in the case of a closed economy.