Los límites del derecho de corrección y la configuración del error de prohibición

The present text examines the judgment of 29 April 2020, Rad. 50899 of the Supreme Court of Justice in which a father beats his daughter, a minor, after a series of assaults committed by the teenager and the older sister. To this end, the text is divided into: i) an explanation of the most important elements of the judgment, ii) development of the relevant normative elements for the solution of the case, iii) application to the specific case, and iv) conclusions. Firstly, the relevant facts and the explanatory statements of the defender, the Procurator, the Prosecutor and the considerations of the Court are mentioned. Secondly, it sets out the normative and dogmatic elements that make up the ground for justification in the exercise of a subjective right, the right of correction and the prohibition error. Thirdly, the above-mentioned concepts are applied to the specific case, where the exercise of the right of correction is evaluated as a ground for justification, the relationship of the right of correction to the crime of domestic violence and the application of the prohibition error to resolve the case. Finally, it concludes with several observations on how the Court resolves the case compared to the personal proposal and proposes a definition of the right of correction, defining its requirements, normative support and limits.

• Autores: González Barreto, Natalia Andrea
• Tipo de recurso: Trabajo de grado de pregrado
• Fecha de publicación: 2020
• Institución: Universidad de los Andes
• Repositorio: Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
• Idioma: spa
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/51378
• Acceso en línea: http://hdl.handle.net/1992/51378
• Palabra clave: Sentencia 2904 de 2020; Violencia familiar; Problemas sociales; Derecho penal; Violencia infantil; Derecho
• Rights: openAccess
• License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional