Informality and optimal public policy
This article tackles the feature of optimal public policy such as the level of enforcement and the supply of public goods in an economy characterized by a huge informal sector. We consider informality as the group of productive activities which, before hand, do not comply (totally or partially) with...
- Autores:
-
Bardey, David
Mejía Londoño, Daniel
- Tipo de recurso:
- Work document
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Universidad de los Andes
- Repositorio:
- Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/8621
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8621
- Palabra clave:
- Informalidad
Bienes públicos
Enforcement
Economía informal - Política gubernamental
Precios sombra
Bienes públicos
K10, K20, K42, O17
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id |
UNIANDES2_0f117c693e785d6167f044830573b54a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/8621 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIANDES2 |
network_name_str |
Séneca: repositorio Uniandes |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Informality and optimal public policy |
dc.title.alternative.none.fl_str_mv |
Informalidad y política pública óptima |
title |
Informality and optimal public policy |
spellingShingle |
Informality and optimal public policy Informalidad Bienes públicos Enforcement Economía informal - Política gubernamental Precios sombra Bienes públicos K10, K20, K42, O17 |
title_short |
Informality and optimal public policy |
title_full |
Informality and optimal public policy |
title_fullStr |
Informality and optimal public policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Informality and optimal public policy |
title_sort |
Informality and optimal public policy |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Bardey, David Mejía Londoño, Daniel |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Bardey, David Mejía Londoño, Daniel |
dc.subject.keyword.none.fl_str_mv |
Informalidad Bienes públicos Enforcement |
topic |
Informalidad Bienes públicos Enforcement Economía informal - Política gubernamental Precios sombra Bienes públicos K10, K20, K42, O17 |
dc.subject.armarc.none.fl_str_mv |
Economía informal - Política gubernamental Precios sombra Bienes públicos |
dc.subject.jel.none.fl_str_mv |
K10, K20, K42, O17 |
description |
This article tackles the feature of optimal public policy such as the level of enforcement and the supply of public goods in an economy characterized by a huge informal sector. We consider informality as the group of productive activities which, before hand, do not comply (totally or partially) with government regulations. The Government intervenes as a Stackelberg leader and has to decide how to allocate public expenditures, collected through the tax system, between the provision of a public good, which can only be used for formal activities, and enforcement effort, aimed at detecting informal firms that evade taxes. Taking the public policy as given, a representative family, owner of a representative firm, decides how to split a fix amount of labour supply between formal and informal activities. Our results show that the greater are the distortions in the process of tax collection, the larger is the size of the informal sector. Finally we derive the properties of the optimal public policy. In particular, we show that the shadow cost of public fund represent the rationale of enforcement spending. We also point out that the size of the tax distortion (e.g. the shadow cost of public funds) is inversely related to total income, the tax rate and the provision of the public good. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-27T16:55:05Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-27T16:55:05Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Documento de trabajo |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042 |
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WP |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-5334 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8621 |
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-7191 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.57784/1992/8621 |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad de los Andes |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca |
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/ |
identifier_str_mv |
1657-5334 1657-7191 10.57784/1992/8621 instname:Universidad de los Andes reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/ |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8621 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartofseries.none.fl_str_mv |
Documentos CEDE No. 01 Enero de 2016 |
dc.relation.repec.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/014229.html |
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv |
26 páginas |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE |
institution |
Universidad de los Andes |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/2eb3779e-b253-456d-9bd8-0acb25d77156/download https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/ecd33264-8644-4970-bd4a-42317d9ed9ec/download https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/68e7aed1-da52-4a43-aebc-48c7ae471378/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
6e208e503629a9e08cafa5ec1100d04b e34cde5b89057a7cbb8aa88b33301ac3 6a7ebe62541aed734b59cb45c9fd7653 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional Séneca |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
adminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co |
_version_ |
1818111878506741760 |
spelling |
Al consultar y hacer uso de este recurso, está aceptando las condiciones de uso establecidas por los autores.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Bardey, Davideb5d55eb-0c4d-4330-b74c-b4e0ef0037ac500Mejía Londoño, Daniel6b74bcdd-9622-4f4e-90ac-8325f4ed3c0d5002018-09-27T16:55:05Z2018-09-27T16:55:05Z20161657-5334http://hdl.handle.net/1992/86211657-719110.57784/1992/8621instname:Universidad de los Andesreponame:Repositorio Institucional Sénecarepourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/This article tackles the feature of optimal public policy such as the level of enforcement and the supply of public goods in an economy characterized by a huge informal sector. We consider informality as the group of productive activities which, before hand, do not comply (totally or partially) with government regulations. The Government intervenes as a Stackelberg leader and has to decide how to allocate public expenditures, collected through the tax system, between the provision of a public good, which can only be used for formal activities, and enforcement effort, aimed at detecting informal firms that evade taxes. Taking the public policy as given, a representative family, owner of a representative firm, decides how to split a fix amount of labour supply between formal and informal activities. Our results show that the greater are the distortions in the process of tax collection, the larger is the size of the informal sector. Finally we derive the properties of the optimal public policy. In particular, we show that the shadow cost of public fund represent the rationale of enforcement spending. We also point out that the size of the tax distortion (e.g. the shadow cost of public funds) is inversely related to total income, the tax rate and the provision of the public good.Este artículo aborda el diseño de una política pública óptima como las de enforcement y la provisión de bienes públicos en una economía caracterizada por un sector informal importante. Se considera como sector informal el conjunto de actividades productivas que no cumplen parcialmente o totalmente las regulaciones del Estado. El Estado interviene como líder de Stackelberg y tiene que asignar recursos públicos que provienen de los impuestos entre la provisión de un bien público, lo cual puede ser usado solamente para actividades formales, y gastos de enforcement para detectar las actividades informales. Tomando la política pública como dada, un hogar representativo, dueño de una empresa representativa, decide cómo repartir su tiempo entre actividades formales e informales. Nuestros resultados muestran que a medida que aumentan las distorsiones generadas por los impuestos, aumenta el tamaño del sector informal. Se derivan las propiedades de la política pública óptima. En particular, se muestra que es la presencia de un precio sombra de los fundos públicos que justifica los gastos de enforcement. Se revela también que este precio sombra es inversamente relacionado con la tasa óptima de impuestos, el ingreso total y la provisión de bienes públicos.26 páginasapplication/pdfengUniversidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDEDocumentos CEDE No. 01 Enero de 2016https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/014229.htmlInformality and optimal public policyInformalidad y política pública óptimaDocumento de trabajoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WPInformalidadBienes públicosEnforcementEconomía informal - Política gubernamentalPrecios sombraBienes públicosK10, K20, K42, O17Facultad de EconomíaPublicationTHUMBNAILdcede2016-01.pdf.jpgdcede2016-01.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg28132https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/2eb3779e-b253-456d-9bd8-0acb25d77156/download6e208e503629a9e08cafa5ec1100d04bMD55TEXTdcede2016-01.pdf.txtdcede2016-01.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain46956https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/ecd33264-8644-4970-bd4a-42317d9ed9ec/downloade34cde5b89057a7cbb8aa88b33301ac3MD54ORIGINALdcede2016-01.pdfdcede2016-01.pdfapplication/pdf458336https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/68e7aed1-da52-4a43-aebc-48c7ae471378/download6a7ebe62541aed734b59cb45c9fd7653MD511992/8621oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/86212024-06-04 15:37:16.468http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/open.accesshttps://repositorio.uniandes.edu.coRepositorio institucional Sénecaadminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co |