Sealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: efficacy after 2.5 years

The prevalence of proximal caries in primary molar teeth is high in many countries. Aims: (1) To study by means of a split-mouth design the 1- and 2.5-year efficacy of sealing proximal lesions vs. flossing instructions (control) on primary molar teeth. (2) To assess children’s behaviour and pain per...

Full description

Autores:
Martignon, Stefania
Tellez, M.
Santamaría, R.M.
Gomez, J.
Ekstrand, K.R.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2011
Institución:
Universidad El Bosque
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. El Bosque
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/5144
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5144
https://doi.org/10.1159/000321986
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
Palabra clave:
Preschoolers
Radiographic progression
Primary molars
Rights
openAccess
License
Acceso abierto
id UNBOSQUE2_db7ea84aa0acd14c4a798747208ba31a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/5144
network_acronym_str UNBOSQUE2
network_name_str Repositorio U. El Bosque
repository_id_str
spelling Martignon, StefaniaTellez, M.Santamaría, R.M.Gomez, J.Ekstrand, K.R.Martignon, Stefania [0000-0002-6505-8356]2020-11-27T19:47:50Z2020-11-27T19:47:50Z20111421-976Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5144https://doi.org/10.1159/000321986instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquehttps://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coapplication/pdfengKargerCaries ResearchCaries Research, 1421-976X, Vol. 44, 2011 p. 562-570https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/321986Sealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: efficacy after 2.5 yearsSealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: efficacy after 2.5 yearsArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85PreschoolersRadiographic progressionPrimary molarsThe prevalence of proximal caries in primary molar teeth is high in many countries. Aims: (1) To study by means of a split-mouth design the 1- and 2.5-year efficacy of sealing proximal lesions vs. flossing instructions (control) on primary molar teeth. (2) To assess children’s behaviour and pain perception during the procedure. Methods: Ninety-one 4- to 6-year-old children from Bogotá, Colombia participated. Participants had to have at least two proximal lesions scored according to the following radiographic classification system: radiolucency (1) in enamel outer half, (2) restricted to enamel-dentine junction, or (3) restricted to dentine outer third. Baseline, 1- and 2.5-year follow-up bitewing radiographs were taken. Test and control lesions were randomly selected. After temporary separation test lesions were sealed (adhesive). Parents/caregivers received a flossing leaflet for their children. Progression of the lesions was assessed by means of independent reading of conventional bitewing radiographs. Results: One-year (n = 73) test vs. control lesion progression was 27.4 vs. 50.7%, respectively (p < 0.01, McNemar’s test), and 2.5-year (n = 56) test vs. control lesion progression was 46.4 vs. 71.4%, respectively (p < 0.01). The dropouts did not differ from those who remained in the study regarding relevant caries baseline data. More than 88% of the participants presented positive to definitively positive behaviour and very low or low pain intensity at both first and second appointments. Conclusion: The sealing technique was superior to flossing instructions both after 1 and 2.5 years of follow-up and the majority of the participants had no anxiety or pain during the treatment.Acceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2011ORIGINALMartignon_S._2011.pdfMartignon_S._2011.pdfapplication/pdf374473https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/e191353a-a1db-4204-b5d9-a3ef6621f509/download3db1e705695adcfaba0a370dc0f1b3baMD51THUMBNAILMartignon_S._2011.pdf.jpgMartignon_S._2011.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5775https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/bea6b51d-4fca-40b2-a756-1811a4bba747/download7210a811635d1799e7c05fee5d259be7MD52TEXTMartignon_S._2011.pdf.txtMartignon_S._2011.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain45921https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/e8b8edbd-aef1-4190-9c87-cc13057bc80d/download81f0bd29691e3b053ede7d82ba4eda08MD5320.500.12495/5144oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/51442024-02-06 23:26:33.545restrictedhttps://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.com
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Sealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: efficacy after 2.5 years
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Sealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: efficacy after 2.5 years
title Sealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: efficacy after 2.5 years
spellingShingle Sealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: efficacy after 2.5 years
Preschoolers
Radiographic progression
Primary molars
title_short Sealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: efficacy after 2.5 years
title_full Sealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: efficacy after 2.5 years
title_fullStr Sealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: efficacy after 2.5 years
title_full_unstemmed Sealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: efficacy after 2.5 years
title_sort Sealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: efficacy after 2.5 years
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Martignon, Stefania
Tellez, M.
Santamaría, R.M.
Gomez, J.
Ekstrand, K.R.
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Martignon, Stefania
Tellez, M.
Santamaría, R.M.
Gomez, J.
Ekstrand, K.R.
dc.contributor.orcid.none.fl_str_mv Martignon, Stefania [0000-0002-6505-8356]
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv Preschoolers
Radiographic progression
Primary molars
topic Preschoolers
Radiographic progression
Primary molars
description The prevalence of proximal caries in primary molar teeth is high in many countries. Aims: (1) To study by means of a split-mouth design the 1- and 2.5-year efficacy of sealing proximal lesions vs. flossing instructions (control) on primary molar teeth. (2) To assess children’s behaviour and pain perception during the procedure. Methods: Ninety-one 4- to 6-year-old children from Bogotá, Colombia participated. Participants had to have at least two proximal lesions scored according to the following radiographic classification system: radiolucency (1) in enamel outer half, (2) restricted to enamel-dentine junction, or (3) restricted to dentine outer third. Baseline, 1- and 2.5-year follow-up bitewing radiographs were taken. Test and control lesions were randomly selected. After temporary separation test lesions were sealed (adhesive). Parents/caregivers received a flossing leaflet for their children. Progression of the lesions was assessed by means of independent reading of conventional bitewing radiographs. Results: One-year (n = 73) test vs. control lesion progression was 27.4 vs. 50.7%, respectively (p < 0.01, McNemar’s test), and 2.5-year (n = 56) test vs. control lesion progression was 46.4 vs. 71.4%, respectively (p < 0.01). The dropouts did not differ from those who remained in the study regarding relevant caries baseline data. More than 88% of the participants presented positive to definitively positive behaviour and very low or low pain intensity at both first and second appointments. Conclusion: The sealing technique was superior to flossing instructions both after 1 and 2.5 years of follow-up and the majority of the participants had no anxiety or pain during the treatment.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2011
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-27T19:47:50Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-27T19:47:50Z
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.local.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1421-976X
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5144
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1159/000321986
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
identifier_str_mv 1421-976X
instname:Universidad El Bosque
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5144
https://doi.org/10.1159/000321986
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv Caries Research, 1421-976X, Vol. 44, 2011 p. 562-570
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/321986
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv 2011
rights_invalid_str_mv Acceso abierto
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
2011
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Karger
dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv Caries Research
institution Universidad El Bosque
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/e191353a-a1db-4204-b5d9-a3ef6621f509/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/bea6b51d-4fca-40b2-a756-1811a4bba747/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/e8b8edbd-aef1-4190-9c87-cc13057bc80d/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 3db1e705695adcfaba0a370dc0f1b3ba
7210a811635d1799e7c05fee5d259be7
81f0bd29691e3b053ede7d82ba4eda08
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliotecas@biteca.com
_version_ 1814100710725255168