Harnessing inter-disciplinary collaboration to improve emergency care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): results of research prioritisation setting exercise

Background More than half of deaths in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) result from conditions that could be treated with emergency care - an integral component of universal health coverage (UHC) - through timely access to lifesaving interventions. Methods The World Health Organization (WHO)...

Full description

Autores:
Lecky, Fiona
Reynolds, Teri A.
OTESILE, OLUBUKOLA
Hollis, Sara M.
Turner, Janette
Fuller, Gordon Ward
Sammy, Ian
Williams-Johnson, Jean
Geduld, Heike
Tenner, Andrea G
French, Simone
Govia, Ishtar
Balen, Julie
Goodacre, Steve
Marahatta, Sujan
de Vries, Shaheem
sawe, hendry
El-Shinawi, Mohamed
Mfinanga, Juma A.
Rubiano, Andrés M.
Chebbi, Henda
Do Shin, Sang
E. Ferrer, Jose Maria E.
Haddadi, Mashyaneh
Firew, Tsion
Taubert, Kathryn
Lee, Andrew
Convocar, Pauline
Jamaluddin, Sabariah Faizah
Kotecha, Shahzmah
Abu Yaqeen, Emad
Wells, Katie
Wallis, Lee
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad El Bosque
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. El Bosque
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/4129
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4129
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00362-7
Palabra clave:
Global health
Research prioritisation
Quality indicators
Emergency care systems
Low resource settings
Rights
openAccess
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Description
Summary:Background More than half of deaths in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) result from conditions that could be treated with emergency care - an integral component of universal health coverage (UHC) - through timely access to lifesaving interventions. Methods The World Health Organization (WHO) aims to extend UHC to a further 1 billion people by 2023, yet evidence supporting improved emergency care coverage is lacking. In this article, we explore four phases of a research prioritisation setting (RPS) exercise conducted by researchers and stakeholders from South Africa, Egypt, Nepal, Jamaica, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Colombia, Ethiopia, Iran, Jordan, Malaysia, South Korea and Phillipines, USA and UK as a key step in gathering evidence required by policy makers and practitioners for the strengthening of emergency care systems in limited-resource settings. Results The RPS proposed seven priority research questions addressing: identification of context-relevant emergency care indicators, barriers to effective emergency care; accuracy and impact of triage tools; potential quality improvement via registries; characteristics of people seeking emergency care; best practices for staff training and retention; and cost effectiveness of critical care – all within LMICs. Conclusions Convened by WHO and facilitated by the University of Sheffield, the Global Emergency Care Research Network project (GEM-CARN) brought together a coalition of 16 countries to identify research priorities for strengthening emergency care in LMICs. Our article further assesses the quality of the RPS exercise and reviews the current evidence supporting the identified priorities.