Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review

The aim of this study was to critically appraise the performance of detection methods for non-cavitated carious lesions (NCCLs). A detailed search of Medline (via OVID), the Cochrane Collaboration, Scielo and EMBASE identified 2054 publications. After title and abstract review by three investigators...

Full description

Autores:
Gomez, Juliana
Tellez, M.
Pretty, I. A.
Ellwood, R. P.
Ismail, A. I.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2013
Institución:
Universidad El Bosque
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. El Bosque
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/4649
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4649
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12021
Palabra clave:
Accuracy
Caries
Detection
Noncavitated carious lesions
Sensitivity
Specificity
Rights
openAccess
License
Acceso abierto
id UNBOSQUE2_b5491bd16f36f9803f6c81b7275b4ee8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/4649
network_acronym_str UNBOSQUE2
network_name_str Repositorio U. El Bosque
repository_id_str
spelling Gomez, JulianaTellez, M.Pretty, I. A.Ellwood, R. P.Ismail, A. I.2020-11-05T20:55:21Z2020-11-05T20:55:21Z20131600-0528http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4649https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12021instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coapplication/pdfengWileyCommunity Dentistry and Oral EpidemiologyCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 1600-0528, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2013, p. 55-66https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cdoe.12021Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic reviewNon-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic reviewArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85AccuracyCariesDetectionNoncavitated carious lesionsSensitivitySpecificityThe aim of this study was to critically appraise the performance of detection methods for non-cavitated carious lesions (NCCLs). A detailed search of Medline (via OVID), the Cochrane Collaboration, Scielo and EMBASE identified 2054 publications. After title and abstract review by three investigators (JG, MT, AI), 124 publications were selected for further review. The final publications evaluated the following methods: Visual (V), Caries Lesion Activity Assessment (CLAA), Laser Fluorescence (LF), Radiographic (R), Fibre-optic Transillumination (FOTI), Electrical Conductance (EC) and Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence (QLF). All included studies used histological assessment as a gold standard for in vitro studies or clinical/visual validation for the in vivo designs. They reported outcomes measures such as sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and reliability. Data were extracted from the selected studies independently by two reviewers and checked for errors. The quality of the studies was evaluated as described by Bader et al. (2002). Of the 124 articles, 42 were included that described 85 clinical assessments. Overall, the quality of evidence on detection methods was rated ‘poor’, except for EC that was rated ‘fair’. The SE rates were as follows: V (0.17–0.96), LF or DIAGNOdent (DD) (0.16–0.96), R (0.12–0.84), FOTI (0.21–0.96), EC (0.61–0.92) and QLF (0.82). The SP rates were as follows: V (0.46–1.0), LF (0.25–1.00), R (0.55–0.99), FOTI (0.74-0.88), EC (0.73–1.0) and QLF (0.92). There is a large variation in SE and SP values for methods and a lack of consistency in definition of disease and analytical methods. EC and QLF seem to be promising for detection of early lesions. For both cost and practicality considerations, visual methods should remain the standard for clinical assessment in dental practice.Acceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abierto2013-02-01ORIGINALGomez_Juliana_2013.pdfGomez_Juliana_2013.pdfapplication/pdf189187https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/a7c65fd8-08ec-4ff6-a0ec-2ee2b475d646/download7be2539d6ca70429eb39f0b350597f72MD51THUMBNAILGomez_Juliana_2013.pdf.jpgGomez_Juliana_2013.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5775https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/e06bed6f-7f0c-4162-b9d1-eb6e7831d26d/download7210a811635d1799e7c05fee5d259be7MD53TEXTGomez_Juliana_2013.pdf.txtGomez_Juliana_2013.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain71269https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/6a46694e-2f74-44b4-afd8-581179d68bff/downloadb933a1f9cbedf3399db500f0007cf4c5MD5420.500.12495/4649oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/46492024-02-07 04:20:03.691restrictedhttps://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.com
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review
title Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review
spellingShingle Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review
Accuracy
Caries
Detection
Noncavitated carious lesions
Sensitivity
Specificity
title_short Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review
title_full Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review
title_fullStr Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review
title_sort Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Gomez, Juliana
Tellez, M.
Pretty, I. A.
Ellwood, R. P.
Ismail, A. I.
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Gomez, Juliana
Tellez, M.
Pretty, I. A.
Ellwood, R. P.
Ismail, A. I.
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv Accuracy
Caries
Detection
Noncavitated carious lesions
Sensitivity
Specificity
topic Accuracy
Caries
Detection
Noncavitated carious lesions
Sensitivity
Specificity
description The aim of this study was to critically appraise the performance of detection methods for non-cavitated carious lesions (NCCLs). A detailed search of Medline (via OVID), the Cochrane Collaboration, Scielo and EMBASE identified 2054 publications. After title and abstract review by three investigators (JG, MT, AI), 124 publications were selected for further review. The final publications evaluated the following methods: Visual (V), Caries Lesion Activity Assessment (CLAA), Laser Fluorescence (LF), Radiographic (R), Fibre-optic Transillumination (FOTI), Electrical Conductance (EC) and Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence (QLF). All included studies used histological assessment as a gold standard for in vitro studies or clinical/visual validation for the in vivo designs. They reported outcomes measures such as sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and reliability. Data were extracted from the selected studies independently by two reviewers and checked for errors. The quality of the studies was evaluated as described by Bader et al. (2002). Of the 124 articles, 42 were included that described 85 clinical assessments. Overall, the quality of evidence on detection methods was rated ‘poor’, except for EC that was rated ‘fair’. The SE rates were as follows: V (0.17–0.96), LF or DIAGNOdent (DD) (0.16–0.96), R (0.12–0.84), FOTI (0.21–0.96), EC (0.61–0.92) and QLF (0.82). The SP rates were as follows: V (0.46–1.0), LF (0.25–1.00), R (0.55–0.99), FOTI (0.74-0.88), EC (0.73–1.0) and QLF (0.92). There is a large variation in SE and SP values for methods and a lack of consistency in definition of disease and analytical methods. EC and QLF seem to be promising for detection of early lesions. For both cost and practicality considerations, visual methods should remain the standard for clinical assessment in dental practice.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2013
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-05T20:55:21Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-05T20:55:21Z
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.local.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1600-0528
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4649
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12021
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
identifier_str_mv 1600-0528
instname:Universidad El Bosque
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4649
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12021
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 1600-0528, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2013, p. 55-66
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cdoe.12021
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Acceso abierto
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv 2013-02-01
rights_invalid_str_mv Acceso abierto
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
2013-02-01
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
institution Universidad El Bosque
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/a7c65fd8-08ec-4ff6-a0ec-2ee2b475d646/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/e06bed6f-7f0c-4162-b9d1-eb6e7831d26d/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/6a46694e-2f74-44b4-afd8-581179d68bff/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 7be2539d6ca70429eb39f0b350597f72
7210a811635d1799e7c05fee5d259be7
b933a1f9cbedf3399db500f0007cf4c5
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliotecas@biteca.com
_version_ 1814100769963507712