Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review
The aim of this study was to critically appraise the performance of detection methods for non-cavitated carious lesions (NCCLs). A detailed search of Medline (via OVID), the Cochrane Collaboration, Scielo and EMBASE identified 2054 publications. After title and abstract review by three investigators...
- Autores:
-
Gomez, Juliana
Tellez, M.
Pretty, I. A.
Ellwood, R. P.
Ismail, A. I.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Universidad El Bosque
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio U. El Bosque
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/4649
- Palabra clave:
- Accuracy
Caries
Detection
Noncavitated carious lesions
Sensitivity
Specificity
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Acceso abierto
id |
UNBOSQUE2_b5491bd16f36f9803f6c81b7275b4ee8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/4649 |
network_acronym_str |
UNBOSQUE2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio U. El Bosque |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Gomez, JulianaTellez, M.Pretty, I. A.Ellwood, R. P.Ismail, A. I.2020-11-05T20:55:21Z2020-11-05T20:55:21Z20131600-0528http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4649https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12021instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coapplication/pdfengWileyCommunity Dentistry and Oral EpidemiologyCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 1600-0528, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2013, p. 55-66https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cdoe.12021Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic reviewNon-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic reviewArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85AccuracyCariesDetectionNoncavitated carious lesionsSensitivitySpecificityThe aim of this study was to critically appraise the performance of detection methods for non-cavitated carious lesions (NCCLs). A detailed search of Medline (via OVID), the Cochrane Collaboration, Scielo and EMBASE identified 2054 publications. After title and abstract review by three investigators (JG, MT, AI), 124 publications were selected for further review. The final publications evaluated the following methods: Visual (V), Caries Lesion Activity Assessment (CLAA), Laser Fluorescence (LF), Radiographic (R), Fibre-optic Transillumination (FOTI), Electrical Conductance (EC) and Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence (QLF). All included studies used histological assessment as a gold standard for in vitro studies or clinical/visual validation for the in vivo designs. They reported outcomes measures such as sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and reliability. Data were extracted from the selected studies independently by two reviewers and checked for errors. The quality of the studies was evaluated as described by Bader et al. (2002). Of the 124 articles, 42 were included that described 85 clinical assessments. Overall, the quality of evidence on detection methods was rated ‘poor’, except for EC that was rated ‘fair’. The SE rates were as follows: V (0.17–0.96), LF or DIAGNOdent (DD) (0.16–0.96), R (0.12–0.84), FOTI (0.21–0.96), EC (0.61–0.92) and QLF (0.82). The SP rates were as follows: V (0.46–1.0), LF (0.25–1.00), R (0.55–0.99), FOTI (0.74-0.88), EC (0.73–1.0) and QLF (0.92). There is a large variation in SE and SP values for methods and a lack of consistency in definition of disease and analytical methods. EC and QLF seem to be promising for detection of early lesions. For both cost and practicality considerations, visual methods should remain the standard for clinical assessment in dental practice.Acceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abierto2013-02-01ORIGINALGomez_Juliana_2013.pdfGomez_Juliana_2013.pdfapplication/pdf189187https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/a7c65fd8-08ec-4ff6-a0ec-2ee2b475d646/download7be2539d6ca70429eb39f0b350597f72MD51THUMBNAILGomez_Juliana_2013.pdf.jpgGomez_Juliana_2013.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5775https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/e06bed6f-7f0c-4162-b9d1-eb6e7831d26d/download7210a811635d1799e7c05fee5d259be7MD53TEXTGomez_Juliana_2013.pdf.txtGomez_Juliana_2013.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain71269https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/6a46694e-2f74-44b4-afd8-581179d68bff/downloadb933a1f9cbedf3399db500f0007cf4c5MD5420.500.12495/4649oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/46492024-02-07 04:20:03.691restrictedhttps://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.com |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review |
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review |
title |
Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review Accuracy Caries Detection Noncavitated carious lesions Sensitivity Specificity |
title_short |
Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review |
title_full |
Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review |
title_sort |
Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: A systematic review |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Gomez, Juliana Tellez, M. Pretty, I. A. Ellwood, R. P. Ismail, A. I. |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Gomez, Juliana Tellez, M. Pretty, I. A. Ellwood, R. P. Ismail, A. I. |
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv |
Accuracy Caries Detection Noncavitated carious lesions Sensitivity Specificity |
topic |
Accuracy Caries Detection Noncavitated carious lesions Sensitivity Specificity |
description |
The aim of this study was to critically appraise the performance of detection methods for non-cavitated carious lesions (NCCLs). A detailed search of Medline (via OVID), the Cochrane Collaboration, Scielo and EMBASE identified 2054 publications. After title and abstract review by three investigators (JG, MT, AI), 124 publications were selected for further review. The final publications evaluated the following methods: Visual (V), Caries Lesion Activity Assessment (CLAA), Laser Fluorescence (LF), Radiographic (R), Fibre-optic Transillumination (FOTI), Electrical Conductance (EC) and Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence (QLF). All included studies used histological assessment as a gold standard for in vitro studies or clinical/visual validation for the in vivo designs. They reported outcomes measures such as sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and reliability. Data were extracted from the selected studies independently by two reviewers and checked for errors. The quality of the studies was evaluated as described by Bader et al. (2002). Of the 124 articles, 42 were included that described 85 clinical assessments. Overall, the quality of evidence on detection methods was rated ‘poor’, except for EC that was rated ‘fair’. The SE rates were as follows: V (0.17–0.96), LF or DIAGNOdent (DD) (0.16–0.96), R (0.12–0.84), FOTI (0.21–0.96), EC (0.61–0.92) and QLF (0.82). The SP rates were as follows: V (0.46–1.0), LF (0.25–1.00), R (0.55–0.99), FOTI (0.74-0.88), EC (0.73–1.0) and QLF (0.92). There is a large variation in SE and SP values for methods and a lack of consistency in definition of disease and analytical methods. EC and QLF seem to be promising for detection of early lesions. For both cost and practicality considerations, visual methods should remain the standard for clinical assessment in dental practice. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2013 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-05T20:55:21Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-05T20:55:21Z |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.local.none.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1600-0528 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4649 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12021 |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad El Bosque |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque |
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co |
identifier_str_mv |
1600-0528 instname:Universidad El Bosque reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4649 https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12021 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv |
Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 1600-0528, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2013, p. 55-66 |
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cdoe.12021 |
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acceso abierto |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Acceso abierto |
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-02-01 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Acceso abierto http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 2013-02-01 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology |
institution |
Universidad El Bosque |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/a7c65fd8-08ec-4ff6-a0ec-2ee2b475d646/download https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/e06bed6f-7f0c-4162-b9d1-eb6e7831d26d/download https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/6a46694e-2f74-44b4-afd8-581179d68bff/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7be2539d6ca70429eb39f0b350597f72 7210a811635d1799e7c05fee5d259be7 b933a1f9cbedf3399db500f0007cf4c5 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibliotecas@biteca.com |
_version_ |
1814100769963507712 |