A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC)
Abstract Background: Management algorithms for adult severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) were omitted in later editions of the Brain Trauma Foundation’s sTBI Management Guidelines, as they were not evidence-based. Methods: We used a Delphi-method-based consensus approach to address management of sT...
- Autores:
-
Hawryluk, Gregory W.J.
Aguilera, Sergio
Buki, Andras
Bulger, Eileen
Citerio, Giuseppe
Cooper, D. Jamie
Diaz, Ramon
Diringer, Michael
Figaji, Anthony
Gao, Guoyi
Geocadin, Romergryko
Ghajar, Jamshid
Harris, Odette
Hofer, Alan
Joseph, Mathew
Kitagawa, Ryan
Manley, Geofrey
Mayer, Stephan
Menon, David K.
Meyfroidt, Geert
Michael, Daniel B.
Oddo, Mauro
Okonkwo, David O.
Patel, Mayur
Robertson, Claudia
Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V.
Rubiano, Andrés M.
Sahuquillo, Juan
Servadei, Franco
Shutter, Lori
Stein, Deborah
Stocchetti, Nino
Taccone, Fabio Silvio
Timmons, Shelly D.
Tsai, Eve
Ullman, Jamie
Vespa, Paul
Videtta, Walter
Wright, David W.
Zammit, Christopher
Chesnut, Randall
Hutchinson, Peter J.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad El Bosque
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio U. El Bosque
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/1985
- Palabra clave:
- Lesiones traumáticas del encéfalo
Traumatismos craneocerebrales
Presión intracraneal
Brain injury
Head trauma
Algorithm
Protocol
Consensus
Intracranial pressure
Tiers
Seattle
- Rights
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Summary: | Abstract Background: Management algorithms for adult severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) were omitted in later editions of the Brain Trauma Foundation’s sTBI Management Guidelines, as they were not evidence-based. Methods: We used a Delphi-method-based consensus approach to address management of sTBI patients undergoing intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. Forty-two experienced, clinically active sTBI specialists from six continents comprised the panel. Eight surveys iterated queries and comments. An in-person meeting included whole- and small-group discussions and blinded voting. Consensus required 80% agreement. We developed heatmaps based on a trafc-light model where panelists’ decision tendencies were the focus of recommendations Results: We provide comprehensive algorithms for ICP-monitor-based adult sTBI management. Consensus established 18 interventions as fundamental and ten treatments not to be used. We provide a three-tier algorithm for treating elevated ICP. Treatments within a tier are considered empirically equivalent. Higher tiers involve higher risk therapies. Tiers 1, 2, and 3 include 10, 4, and 3 interventions, respectively. We include inter-tier considerations, and recommendations for critical neuroworsening to assist the recognition and treatment of declining patients. Novel elements include guidance for autoregulation-based ICP treatment based on MAP Challenge results, and two heatmaps to guide (1) ICP-monitor removal and (2) consideration of sedation holidays for neurological examination Conclusions: Our modern and comprehensive sTBI-management protocol is designed to assist clinicians managing sTBI patients monitored with ICP-monitors alone. Consensus-based (class III evidence), it provides management |
---|