La relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de Hund

En el presente trabajo abordamos el problema de la relación entre química y física focalizándonos en la cuestión del isomerismo óptico y la llamada ‘paradoja de Hund’, que apunta a la dificultad de dar cuenta de la quiralidad mediante la mecánica cuántica. En particular, presentamos la solución a la...

Full description

Autores:: Fortín, Sebastían
Martínez González, Juan Camilo

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2013

Institución:: Universidad El Bosque

Repositorio:: Repositorio U. El Bosque

Idioma:: spa

id	UNBOSQUE2_74f688c4b7bcf919447cebdc05dff3b7
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/6275
network_acronym_str	UNBOSQUE2
network_name_str	Repositorio U. El Bosque
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	La relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de Hund
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv	The relationship between Chemistry and physics: optical isomerismand Hund’s paradox
title	La relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de Hund
spellingShingle	La relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de Hund Isomerismo Quiralidad Paradoja de Hund Decoherencia Interpretación de la mecánica cuántica Isomerism Quirality Hund’s paradox Decoherence Interpretation of quantum mechanics
title_short	La relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de Hund
title_full	La relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de Hund
title_fullStr	La relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de Hund
title_full_unstemmed	La relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de Hund
title_sort	La relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de Hund
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Fortín, Sebastían Martínez González, Juan Camilo
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Fortín, Sebastían Martínez González, Juan Camilo
dc.contributor.orcid.none.fl_str_mv	0000-0002-4531-7461 0000-0002-7239-1763
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Isomerismo Quiralidad Paradoja de Hund Decoherencia Interpretación de la mecánica cuántica
topic	Isomerismo Quiralidad Paradoja de Hund Decoherencia Interpretación de la mecánica cuántica Isomerism Quirality Hund’s paradox Decoherence Interpretation of quantum mechanics
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv	Isomerism Quirality Hund’s paradox Decoherence Interpretation of quantum mechanics
description	En el presente trabajo abordamos el problema de la relación entre química y física focalizándonos en la cuestión del isomerismo óptico y la llamada ‘paradoja de Hund’, que apunta a la dificultad de dar cuenta de la quiralidad mediante la mecánica cuántica. En particular, presentamos la solución a la paradoja propuesta desde la teoría de la decoherencia. El objetivo del trabajo consiste en cuestionar esta solución a la luz de una interpretación precisa del concepto de decoherencia. Sobre esta base argumentamos que una respuesta satisfactoria a la paradoja de Hund sólo puede brindarse desde una adecuada interpretación de la mecánica cuántica, que logre sortear los desafíos conceptuales de la teoría.
publishDate	2013
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2013-01-01
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-11-03T16:03:49Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-11-03T16:03:49Z
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.hasversion.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0124-4620
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6275
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v13i26.1649
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv	repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
identifier_str_mv	0124-4620 instname:Universidad El Bosque reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
url	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6275 https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v13i26.1649
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 13 Núm 26, 2013, 199-224.
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1649
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Adler, S. “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: A response to P. W. Anderson”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2003): 135-142. Ardenghi, J. S., Fortin, S. & Lombardi, O. “The conceptual meaning of reduced states: decoherence and interpretation”. 14th Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Nancy, 2011 Bacciagaluppi, G. “The role of decoherence in quantum mechanics”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. E. N. Zalta. 2008. <http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/fall2008/entries/qm-decoherence/>. Bacciagaluppi, G. & Hemmo, M. “Making sense of approximate decohe-rence”. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1 (1994): 345-354.—.. “Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (1996): 239-277. Bader, R. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994 Ballentine, L. Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development. Singapore: World S cient i fic , 1998 Berlin, Y. A., Burin, A. L. & Goldanskii, V. V. “The Hund paradox and stabilization of molecular chiral states”. Zeitschrift für Physik D 37 (1996): 333-339. Bub, J. Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. D’Espagnat, B. “An elementary note about mixtures”. Preludes in Theore-tical Physics. Eds. A. De-Shalit, H. Feshbach & L. van Hove. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1966. D’Espagnat, B. Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Reading, MA: Benjamin, 1976. Dirac, P. A. M. “Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 123 (1929): 714-33 Elby, A. “The ‘decoherence’ approach to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics”. Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philo-sophy of Science Association 1 (1994): 355-365. Harris, R. A. & Stodolsky, L. “Time dependence of optical activity”. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 74 (1981): 2145-2155. Healey, R. A. “Dissipating the quantum measurement problem”. Topoi 14 (1995): 55-65. Heisenberg, W. “The physical content of quantum kinematics and mecha-n i c s”. Quantum Theory and Measurement. Eds. J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983. Trad. de “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischer Kinematic und Mechanik”. Zeitschrift für Physik 43 (1927 ): 172 -198. Hendry, R. F. “The physicists, the chemists, and the pragmatics of explana-t i on”. Philosophy of Science 71 (2004): 1048-59.—. “Two conceptions of the chemical bond”. Philosophy of Science 75 (2008): 909-920.—. “Ontological reduction and molecular structure”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010): 183-191. Hettema, H. “Explanation and theory foundation in quantum chemistry”. Foundatios of Chemistry 11 (2009): 145-174.—.Reducing Chemistry to Physics. Limits, Models, Consecuences. Groningen: University of Groningen, 2012. Hund. F. “Zur Deutung der Molekelspektren. III”. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43, (1927) 805-826. Joos, E. “Elements of environmental decoherence”. Decoherence: Theoretical, Experimental, and Conceptual Problems, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 538. Eds. P. Blanchard, D. Giulini, E. Joos, C. Kiefer & I. O. Stamatescu. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, (2000). Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Mecánica Cuántica No-Relativista. Barce-lona: Reverté, 1972 Leggett, A. J. “Reflections on the quantum measurement paradox”. Quantum Implications. Eds. B. J. Hiley & F. D. Peat. Londres: Routledge and Kegan P a u l , 19 8 7 Lombardi, O & Castagnino, M. “A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics39 (2008a): 380-443.—. “The role of the Hamiltonian in the interpretation of quantum mecha-n i c s”. Journal of Physics. Conferences Series. 2008b, # 012014. Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 28.—. “Matters are not so clear on the physical side”. Foundations of Chemistry 12 (2010): 159-166 Lombardi, O., Fortin, S., Castagnino M. & Ardenghi, J. S. “Compatibility between environment-induced decoherence and the modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics”. Philosophy of Science 78 (2011): 1024-1036 ombardi, O. & Labarca, M. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical w or ld ”. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2005): 125-148.—. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical world: A response to Ne e d h a m”. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2006): 81-92. Nagel, E. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961. Paz, J. P. & Zurek, W. H. “Environment-induced decoherence and the tran-sition from quantum to classical”. Fundamentals of Quantum Information. Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 587. Ed. D. Heiss. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, 2002. (los números de página está tomados de arXiv:quant-ph/0010011). Primas, H. Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism. Berlin: Springer, 1983 Scerri, E. R. “Realism, reduction and the ‘intermediate position”. Of Minds and Molecules. New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry. Eds. N. Bhushan & S. Rosenfeld. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.—. “Just how ab initio is ab initio quantum chemistry?”. Foundations of Chemistry 6 (2004): 93-116.—. “Normative and descriptive philosophy of science and the role of chemistry”. Philosophy of Chemistry: Synthesis of a New Discipline. Eds. D. Baird, E. Scerri & L. McIntyre. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. 119-128. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 242.—. “Editorial 37”. Foundations of Chemistry 13 (2011): 1-7. Scerri, E. R. & McIntyre, L. “The case for the philosophy of chemistry”. Synthese 111 (19 9 7 ): 213 -232 Schlosshauer, M. Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Berlin: Springer, 2007. Sutcliffe, B. T. & Wolley, R. G. “A comment on Editorial 37”. Foundations of Chemistry, 13 (2011): 93-95.—.. “Atoms and molecules in classical chemistry and quantum mechanics”. Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Vol. 6, Philosophy of Chemistry. Eds. R. F. Hendry & A Woody. Oxford: Elsevier, 2012. Szabo, A & Ostlund, N. S. Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 1996 Van Brakel, J. Philosophy of Chemistry. Between the Manifest and the Scientific Image. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2000. Vemulapalli, G. K. & Byerly, H. “Remnants of reductionism”. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1999): 17-41. Wolley, R. G. “Quantum theory and molecular structure”. Advances in Physics25 (1976): 27-52.—. “Must a molecule have a shape?”. Journal of the American Chemical Society100 (1978): 1073-1078.—. “Is there a quantum definition of a molecule?”. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 23 (1998): 3-12. Zurek, W. H. “Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?”. Physical Review D 24 (1981): 1516-1525.—. “Environment-induced superselection rules”. Physical Review D 26 (1982): 1862-1880.—. “Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical”. Physics Today44 (1991): 36-44.—. “Preferred states, predictability, classicality and the environment-induced decoherence”. Progress of Theoretical Physics 89 (1993): 281-312.—. “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical”. Reviews of Modern Physics 75 (2003): 715-776.
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv	Acceso abierto
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Acceso abierto http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia
institution	Universidad El Bosque
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	http://18.204.144.38/bitstreams/ef4a1520-5339-47b4-9a8e-95ce81342a93/download http://18.204.144.38/bitstreams/459ed498-2256-430e-b7b0-cb2d7daf8095/download http://18.204.144.38/bitstreams/3513afee-853a-4422-a39c-c9db15affa3f/download http://18.204.144.38/bitstreams/2c341308-332a-46d5-a214-745a0791a018/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	4e0300059376247dd2ecdbfdfeceacc7 934f4ca17e109e0a05eaeaba504d7ce4 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 0550b0e02f178397f0ed7e90c611d1b9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	DSpace Pre-instalado Biteca S.A.S
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bibliotecas@biteca.com
_version_	1814100679914946560
spelling	Fortín, SebastíanMartínez González, Juan Camilo0000-0002-4531-74610000-0002-7239-17632021-11-03T16:03:49Z2021-11-03T16:03:49Z2013-01-010124-4620http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6275https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v13i26.1649instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coEn el presente trabajo abordamos el problema de la relación entre química y física focalizándonos en la cuestión del isomerismo óptico y la llamada ‘paradoja de Hund’, que apunta a la dificultad de dar cuenta de la quiralidad mediante la mecánica cuántica. En particular, presentamos la solución a la paradoja propuesta desde la teoría de la decoherencia. El objetivo del trabajo consiste en cuestionar esta solución a la luz de una interpretación precisa del concepto de decoherencia. Sobre esta base argumentamos que una respuesta satisfactoria a la paradoja de Hund sólo puede brindarse desde una adecuada interpretación de la mecánica cuántica, que logre sortear los desafíos conceptuales de la teoría.In this article we address the problem of the relationship between chemistry and physics by focusing on the issue of optical isomerism and the so-called ‘Hund’s paradox’, which points to the difficulty of giving an account of quirality by means of quantum mecha-nics. In particular, we introduce the solution to the paradox as proposed by the theory of decoherence. The main goal of this work consists in disputing that solution in the light of a precise interpretation of the concept of decoherence. On this basis, we argue that a satisfactory answer to Hund’s paradox can only be supplied from an adequate interpretation of quantum mechanics, which can overcome the conceptual challenges of the theory.application/pdfspaRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 13 Núm 26, 2013, 199-224.https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1649Adler, S. “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: A response to P. W. Anderson”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2003): 135-142.Ardenghi, J. S., Fortin, S. & Lombardi, O. “The conceptual meaning of reduced states: decoherence and interpretation”. 14th Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Nancy, 2011Bacciagaluppi, G. “The role of decoherence in quantum mechanics”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. E. N. Zalta. 2008. <http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/fall2008/entries/qm-decoherence/>.Bacciagaluppi, G. & Hemmo, M. “Making sense of approximate decohe-rence”. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1 (1994): 345-354.—.. “Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (1996): 239-277.Bader, R. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994Ballentine, L. Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development. Singapore: World S cient i fic , 1998Berlin, Y. A., Burin, A. L. & Goldanskii, V. V. “The Hund paradox and stabilization of molecular chiral states”. Zeitschrift für Physik D 37 (1996): 333-339.Bub, J. Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.D’Espagnat, B. “An elementary note about mixtures”. Preludes in Theore-tical Physics. Eds. A. De-Shalit, H. Feshbach & L. van Hove. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1966.D’Espagnat, B. Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Reading, MA: Benjamin, 1976.Dirac, P. A. M. “Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 123 (1929): 714-33Elby, A. “The ‘decoherence’ approach to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics”. Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philo-sophy of Science Association 1 (1994): 355-365.Harris, R. A. & Stodolsky, L. “Time dependence of optical activity”. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 74 (1981): 2145-2155.Healey, R. A. “Dissipating the quantum measurement problem”. Topoi 14 (1995): 55-65.Heisenberg, W. “The physical content of quantum kinematics and mecha-n i c s”. Quantum Theory and Measurement. Eds. J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983. Trad. de “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischer Kinematic und Mechanik”. Zeitschrift für Physik 43 (1927 ): 172 -198.Hendry, R. F. “The physicists, the chemists, and the pragmatics of explana-t i on”. Philosophy of Science 71 (2004): 1048-59.—. “Two conceptions of the chemical bond”. Philosophy of Science 75 (2008): 909-920.—. “Ontological reduction and molecular structure”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010): 183-191.Hettema, H. “Explanation and theory foundation in quantum chemistry”. Foundatios of Chemistry 11 (2009): 145-174.—.Reducing Chemistry to Physics. Limits, Models, Consecuences. Groningen: University of Groningen, 2012.Hund. F. “Zur Deutung der Molekelspektren. III”. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43, (1927) 805-826.Joos, E. “Elements of environmental decoherence”. Decoherence: Theoretical, Experimental, and Conceptual Problems, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 538. Eds. P. Blanchard, D. Giulini, E. Joos, C. Kiefer & I. O. Stamatescu. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, (2000).Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Mecánica Cuántica No-Relativista. Barce-lona: Reverté, 1972Leggett, A. J. “Reflections on the quantum measurement paradox”. Quantum Implications. Eds. B. J. Hiley & F. D. Peat. Londres: Routledge and Kegan P a u l , 19 8 7Lombardi, O & Castagnino, M. “A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics39 (2008a): 380-443.—. “The role of the Hamiltonian in the interpretation of quantum mecha-n i c s”. Journal of Physics. Conferences Series. 2008b, # 012014. Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 28.—. “Matters are not so clear on the physical side”. Foundations of Chemistry 12 (2010): 159-166Lombardi, O., Fortin, S., Castagnino M. & Ardenghi, J. S. “Compatibility between environment-induced decoherence and the modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics”. Philosophy of Science 78 (2011): 1024-1036ombardi, O. & Labarca, M. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical w or ld ”. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2005): 125-148.—. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical world: A response to Ne e d h a m”. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2006): 81-92.Nagel, E. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961.Paz, J. P. & Zurek, W. H. “Environment-induced decoherence and the tran-sition from quantum to classical”. Fundamentals of Quantum Information. Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 587. Ed. D. Heiss. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, 2002. (los números de página está tomados de arXiv:quant-ph/0010011).Primas, H. Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism. Berlin: Springer, 1983Scerri, E. R. “Realism, reduction and the ‘intermediate position”. Of Minds and Molecules. New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry. Eds. N. Bhushan & S. Rosenfeld. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.—. “Just how ab initio is ab initio quantum chemistry?”. Foundations of Chemistry 6 (2004): 93-116.—. “Normative and descriptive philosophy of science and the role of chemistry”. Philosophy of Chemistry: Synthesis of a New Discipline. Eds. D. Baird, E. Scerri & L. McIntyre. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. 119-128. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 242.—. “Editorial 37”. Foundations of Chemistry 13 (2011): 1-7.Scerri, E. R. & McIntyre, L. “The case for the philosophy of chemistry”. Synthese 111 (19 9 7 ): 213 -232Schlosshauer, M. Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Berlin: Springer, 2007.Sutcliffe, B. T. & Wolley, R. G. “A comment on Editorial 37”. Foundations of Chemistry, 13 (2011): 93-95.—.. “Atoms and molecules in classical chemistry and quantum mechanics”. Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Vol. 6, Philosophy of Chemistry. Eds. R. F. Hendry & A Woody. Oxford: Elsevier, 2012.Szabo, A & Ostlund, N. S. Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 1996Van Brakel, J. Philosophy of Chemistry. Between the Manifest and the Scientific Image. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2000.Vemulapalli, G. K. & Byerly, H. “Remnants of reductionism”. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1999): 17-41.Wolley, R. G. “Quantum theory and molecular structure”. Advances in Physics25 (1976): 27-52.—. “Must a molecule have a shape?”. Journal of the American Chemical Society100 (1978): 1073-1078.—. “Is there a quantum definition of a molecule?”. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 23 (1998): 3-12.Zurek, W. H. “Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?”. Physical Review D 24 (1981): 1516-1525.—. “Environment-induced superselection rules”. Physical Review D 26 (1982): 1862-1880.—. “Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical”. Physics Today44 (1991): 36-44.—. “Preferred states, predictability, classicality and the environment-induced decoherence”. Progress of Theoretical Physics 89 (1993): 281-312.—. “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical”. Reviews of Modern Physics 75 (2003): 715-776.Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Acceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIsomerismoQuiralidadParadoja de HundDecoherenciaInterpretación de la mecánica cuánticaIsomerismQuiralityHund’s paradoxDecoherenceInterpretation of quantum mechanicsLa relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de HundThe relationship between Chemistry and physics: optical isomerismand Hund’s paradoxArtículo de revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la CienciaORIGINALRCFC2013.jpgRCFC2013.jpgimage/jpeg127136http://18.204.144.38/bitstreams/ef4a1520-5339-47b4-9a8e-95ce81342a93/download4e0300059376247dd2ecdbfdfeceacc7MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-81031http://18.204.144.38/bitstreams/459ed498-2256-430e-b7b0-cb2d7daf8095/download934f4ca17e109e0a05eaeaba504d7ce4MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://18.204.144.38/bitstreams/3513afee-853a-4422-a39c-c9db15affa3f/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53THUMBNAILRCFC2013.jpg.jpgRCFC2013.jpg.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4948http://18.204.144.38/bitstreams/2c341308-332a-46d5-a214-745a0791a018/download0550b0e02f178397f0ed7e90c611d1b9MD5420.500.12495/6275oai:18.204.144.38:20.500.12495/62752021-11-03 22:02:47.193http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalopen.accesshttp://18.204.144.38DSpace Pre-instalado Biteca S.A.Sbibliotecas@biteca.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

La relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de Hund

Publicaciones similares